DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

MRI-guided Wire Localization Open Biopsy is Safe and Effective for Suspicious Cancer on Breast MRI

  • Wang, Hai-Yi (Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Cancer Institute of Jiangsu Province) ;
  • Zhao, Yu-Nian (Radiology Department, the Affiliated Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing Medical University) ;
  • Wu, Jian-Zhong (Research Center of Clinical Oncology, the Affiliated Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing Medical University) ;
  • Wang, Zheng (Department of Gland and Vascular Surgery, Tongling People's Hospital) ;
  • Tang, Jing-Hai (Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Cancer Institute of Jiangsu Province)
  • Published : 2015.03.18

Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging of breast, reported to be a high sensitivity of 94% to 100%, is the most sensitive method for detection of breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate our clinical experience in MRI-guided breast lesion wire localization in Chinese women. Materials and Methods: A total of 44 patients with 46 lesions undergoing MRI-guided breast lesion localization were prospectively entered into this study between November 2013 and September 2014. Samples were collected using a 1.5-T magnet with a special MR biopsy positioning frame device. We evaluated clinical lesion characteristics on pre-biopsy MRI, pathologic results, and dynamic curve type baseline analysis. Results: Of the total of 46 wire localization excision biopsied lesions carried out in 44 female patients, pathology revealed fourteen malignancies (14/46, 30.4%) and thirty-two benign lesions (32/46, 69.6%). All lesions were successfully localized followed by excision biopsy and assessed for morphologic features highly suggestive of malignancy according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category of MRI (C4a=18, C4b=17, C4c=8,C5=3). Of 46 lesions, 37 were masses and 9 were non-mass enhancement lesions. Thirty-two lesions showed a continuous kinetics curve, 11 were plateau and 3 were washout. Conclusions: Our study showed success in MRI-guided breast lesion wire localization with a satisfactory cancer diagnosis rate of 30.4%. MRI-guided wire localization breast lesion open biopsy is a safe and effective tool for the workup of suspicious lesions seen on breast MRI alone without major complications. This may contribute to increasing the diagnosis rate of early breast cancer and improve the prognosis in Chinese women.

Keywords

References

  1. Abe H, Schmidt RA, Shah RN, et al (2010). MR-directed ("Second-Look") ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI:MR and sonographicfindings. Am J Roentgenol, 194, 370-7. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.2707
  2. American Collegeof Radiology (2003). BI-RADSbreast imaging and reporting system:breast imaging atlas. reston, VA: American college of radiology.
  3. Beran L, Liang W, Nims T, et al (2005). Correlation of targeted ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities of the breast. Am J Surg, 190, 592-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.019
  4. Deng QQ, Huang XE, Ye LH, et al (2013). Phase II trial of Loubo$^{(R)}$ (Lobaplatin) and pemetrexed for patients with metastatic breast cancer not responding to anthracycline or taxanes. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 413-7. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.1.413
  5. Gebauer B, Bostanjoglo M, Moesta KT, et al (2006). Magnetic resonance-guided biopsy of suspicious breast lesions with a handheld vacuum biopsy device. Acta Radiol, 47, 907-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850600892928
  6. Ghate SV, Rosen EL, Soo MS, et al (2006). MRI-guided vacuumassisted breast biopsy with a handheld portable biopsy system. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 186, 1733-6. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0551
  7. Han BK, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al (2008). Outcome of MRIguided breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 191, 1798-804. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2827
  8. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Schaumloffel U, et al (1999). MR-guided percutaneous excisional and incisional biopsy of breast lesions. Eur Radiol, 9, 1656-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050905
  9. Lee JM, Kaplan JB, Murray MP, et al (2007). Imaging histologic discordance at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum assisted breast biopsy. Am J Roentgenol, 189, 852-9. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2531
  10. Lehman CD, Deperi ER, Peacock S, et al (2005). Clinical experience with MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 184, 1782-7. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.6.01841782
  11. Liberman L, Bracero N, Morris E, et al (2005). MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial clinical experience. AJR Am J Roentgeno, 185, 183-93. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.185.1.01850183
  12. Liberman L, Holland AE, Marjan D, et al (2007). Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Am J Roentgenol, 188, 684-90. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.0809
  13. Liu YC, Zhou SB, Gao F, et al (2013). Phase II study on breast conservative surgery plus chemo- and radiotherapy in treating Chinese patients with early staged breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 3747-50. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.6.3747
  14. Meissnitzer M, Dershaw DD, Lee CH, et al (2009). Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRIfindings for whom biopsy has been recommended. Am J Roentgenol, 193, 1025-9. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.2480
  15. Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, et al (2006). Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer, 106, 982-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21720
  16. Sun MQ, Meng AF, Huang XE, et al (2013). Comparison of psychological influence on breast cancer patients between breast-conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 149-52. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.1.149
  17. Tozaki M, Yamashiro N, Fukuma E (2007). MR-guided vacuumassisted breast biopsy using a non-titanium needle. Magn Reson Med Sci, 6, 259-64. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.6.259
  18. Tozaki M, Yamashiro N, Sakamoto M, et al (2010). Magnetic resonance-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results in 100 Japanese women. Jpn J Radiol, 28, 527-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-010-0464-7
  19. Tozaki M, Yamashiro N, Suzuki T, et al (2009). MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: is it an essential technique? Breast Cancer, 16, 121-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-008-0074-8
  20. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al (2007). American cancer society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mam- mography. CA Cancer J Clin, 57, 75-89. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75