참고문헌
- Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 1995;197:743-747 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480749
- Gavenonis SC, Roth SO. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the extent of disease. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2010;18:199-206, vii-viii https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2010.02.002
- Mann RM. The effectiveness of MR imaging in the assessment of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2010;18:259-276, ix https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2010.02.005
- Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH. Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 2008;246:116-124 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2461061298
- Kuhl C, Weigel S, Schrading S, Arand B, Bieling H, Konig R, et al. Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1450-1457 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0839
- Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, Jong RA, Pisano ED, Barr RG, et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 2012;307:1394-1404 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.388
- Othman E, Wang J, Sprague BL, Rounds T, Ji Y, Herschorn SD, et al. Comparison of false positive rates for screening breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in high risk women performed on stacked versus alternating schedules. Springerplus 2015;4:77
- Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:75-89 https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75
- American College of Radiology. ACR practice parameter for the performance of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast 2018. Available at. https://www.acr.org/-/media/acr/files/practice-parameters/mr-contrast-breast.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2022
- American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS atlas: breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology 2013
- McGrath AL, Price ER, Eby PR, Rahbar H. MRI-guided breast interventions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017;46:631-645 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25738
- Han BK, Schnall MD, Orel SG, Rosen M. Outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1798-1804 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2827
- Cha SY, Ko EY, Han BK, Ko ES, Choi JS, Park KW, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided breast biopsy in Korea: a 10-year follow-up experience. J Breast Cancer 2021;24:377-388 https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2021.24.e35
- Arazi-Kleinman T, Skair-Levy M, Slonimsky E, Maly B, Uziely B, Libson E, et al. Journal club: is screening MRI indicated for women with a personal history of breast cancer? Analysis based on biopsy results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:919-927 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.8450
- Kang BJ, Kim SH, Choi JJ, Lee JH, Cha ES, Kim HS, et al. The clinical and imaging characteristics of breast cancers in patients with interstitial mammoplasty. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010;281:1029-1035 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1276-9
- An Y, Kim S, Kang B, Lee J. Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in Korean women: a pilot study. World J Surg Oncol 2013;11:200
- Spick C, Baltzer PA. Diagnostic utility of second-look US for breast lesions identified at MR imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2014;273:401-409 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14140474
- Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Sinnatamby R, Lebeau A, Lebrecht A, Britton PD, Schreer I; Consensus Group. Interdisciplinary consensus on the uses and technique of MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB): results of a European consensus meeting. Eur J Radiol 2009;72:289-294 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.010
- Noroozian M, Gombos EC, Chikarmane S, Georgian-Smith D, Raza S, Denison CM, et al. Factors that impact the duration of MRI-guided core needle biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:W150-W157 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.2366
- Yun BL, Kim SM, Jang M, Cho N, Moon WK, Kim HH. Breast magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy. J Korean Soc Radiol 2016;74:351-360 https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2016.74.6.351
- Preibsch H, Baur A, Wietek BM, Kramer B, Staebler A, Claussen CD, et al. Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with 7-gauge, 8-gauge, 9-gauge, 10-gauge, and 11-gauge needles: how many specimens are necessary? Acta Radiol 2015;56:1078-1084 https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185114549224
- Price ER. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy of the breast: fundamentals and finer points. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2013;21:571-581 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2013.03.002
- Funaro K, Prather A, Niell B, Jared Weinfurtner R. Tissue marker migration after MRI-guided breast biopsy: migration frequency and associated factors. Breast J 2020;26:440-445 https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13486
- Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Thornton CM, Rosen PP. Clip placement after stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 1997;205:417-422 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356622
- Lee SG, Piccoli CW, Hughes JS. Displacement of microcalcifications during stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy with marking clip placement: case report. Radiology 2001;219:495-497 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma04495
- Rosen EL, Vo TT. Metallic clip deployment during stereotactic breast biopsy: retrospective analysis. Radiology 2001;218:510-516 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.218.2.r01fe39510
- Le-Petross HT, Hess KR, Knudtson JD, Lane DL, Moseley TW, Geiser WR, et al. Effect of mammography on marker clip migration after stereotactic-guided core needle breast biopsy. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2017;46: 410-414 https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.02.001
- Esserman LE, Cura MA, DaCosta D. Recognizing pitfalls in early and late migration of clip markers after imaging-guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiographics 2004;24:147-156 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.241035052
- Jain A, Khalid M, Qureshi MM, Georgian-Smith D, Kaplan JA, Buch K, et al. Stereotactic core needle breast biopsy marker migration: an analysis of factors contributing to immediate marker migration. Eur Radiol 2017;27:4797-4803 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4851-7
- Niell BL, Lee JM, Johansen C, Halpern EF, Rafferty EA. Patient outcomes in canceled MRI-guided breast biopsies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:223-228 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.10228
- Johnson KS, Baker JA, Lee SS, Soo MS. Cancelation of MRI guided breast biopsies for suspicious breast lesions identified at 3.0 T MRI: reasons, rates, and outcomes. Acad Radiol 2013;20:569-575 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2013.01.005
- Hefler L, Casselman J, Amaya B, Heinig A, Alberich T, Koelbl H, et al. Follow-up of breast lesions detected by MRI not biopsied due to absent enhancement of contrast medium. Eur Radiol 2003;13:344-346 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-002-1713-7
- Heller SL, Elias K, Gupta A, Greenwood HI, Mercado CL, Moy L. Outcome of high-risk lesions at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum- assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:237-245 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.10600
- Rauch GM, Dogan BE, Smith TB, Liu P, Yang WT. Outcome analysis of 9-gauge MRI-guided vacuum-assisted core needle breast biopsies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:292-299 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7594
- Lee JM, Kaplan JB, Murray MP, Bartella L, Morris EA, Joo S, et al. Imaging histologic discordance at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:852-859 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2531
- Malhaire C, El Khoury C, Thibault F, Athanasiou A, Petrow P, Ollivier L, et al. Vacuum-assisted biopsies under MR guidance: results of 72 procedures. Eur Radiol 2010;20:1554-1562 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1707-9
- Eby PR, Ochsner JE, DeMartini WB, Allison KH, Peacock S, Lehman CD. Frequency and upgrade rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: 9-versus 11-gauge. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:229-234 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1342
- Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, Evans WP 3rd, Lechner MC, Richardson TR, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 2001;218:497-502 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.218.2.r01fe35497
- Lee SH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Moon HJ, Yoon JH. Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy under ultrasonographic guidance: analysis of a 10-year experience. Ultrasonography 2014;33:259-266 https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.14020
- Orel SG, Rosen M, Mies C, Schnall MD. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience. Radiology 2006;238:54-61 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2381050050
- Gao Y, Bagadiya NR, Jardon ML, Heller SL, Melsaether AN, Toth HB, et al. Outcomes of preoperative MRI-guided needle localization of nonpalpable mammographically occult breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016;207:676-684 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.15913
- Raj SD, Agrons MM, Woodtichartpreecha P, Kalambo MJ, Dogan BE, Le-Petross H, et al. MRI-guided needle localization: indications, tips, tricks, and review of the literature. Breast J 2019;25:479-483 https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13246