• 의료법학
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.309-334
• /
• 2012

Although the number of foreign patients visiting Korea for medical treatments or plastic surgery is rapidly increasing, countermeasures against unforeseen medical disputes involving foreign patients are adequate. To date, the record shows that most foreign patients have visited doctors at the departments of family medicine, internal medicine, dermatology (incl. plastic surgery), and healthcare centers, which, fortunately, indicates that there are not many severe, high risk patients. However, if the current growth rate continues to rise and the number of foreign patients visiting each department continues to grow, more diverse medical practices will be likely to take place in the future, and consequently, it is expected that the possibilities of medical malpractice and the costs of dispute resolution will also rise dramatically. When a medical dispute occurs, in general, a lawsuit is ultimately settled by the court. However, since this can damage the creditworthiness of medical institutions and also incur significant litigation costs, which is a typical characteristic of a medical lawsuit, medical professionals or institutions will be heavily burdened. Furthermore, an adequate policy or countermeasure against a medical dispute with a foreign patient has not yet been established, and it would be difficult to resolve a dispute by finding the middle ground, due to relative standards and policies between countries. Now, we need to improve the existing policies and prepare for countermeasures that will allow us to precisely predict the nature of such disputes, which have been increasing, and resolve them peacefully. Based on such knowledge, this study aims to establish countermeasures against medical disputes with foreign patients, and examine ways to promptly and reasonably resolve them at an early stage.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.239-262
• /
• 2014

The conventional medical appraisal which was done in the process of medical lawsuit was requested from the court to the designated hospital and was delivered as a pattern of one question and one answer in each. However, the comprehensiveness of medical appraisal which was pursued, for example, in Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency, could be guaranteed in terms of in-depth medical analysis as well as the broader capacity of the causality estimation besides. The comprehensiveness of appraisal would also include how well organized hospital system of medical care is and how well correlated job system among medical staffs, when medical dispute was happened at the hospital. This comprehensiveness will exert a big contribution on making a demonstrative medical care to prevent from the medical dispute and it could achieve the national plan of building the patient safety net which is effective in restoring the worsened quality of contemporary medical service. Therefore, the comprehensiveness of medical appraisal has to be designed to go forward interdisciplinary fused speciality rather than one division of medicine, which is also aiming at the reliable and consistent appraisal with the supreme dignity from one window. In addition to that, the objective and concrete frame of comprehensive appraisal under the computed connection has to be deliberated to make itself possible in collaboration with positive participation of medical community. The comprehensiveness of medical appraisal would serve to expand not only the capacity of speciality but also the ability of influence on a restorative justice, so that it give effect to an increased number of mediation and arbitration rather than medical lawsuit as well as a decreased number of the social cost and social conflict.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.57-81
• /
• 2016

환자가 의사를 상대로 의료사고에 대한 민사책임을 추궁하기 위하여 소송을 제기하게 될 때, 의사의 의료과실과 환자에게 발생한 손해 사이에 인과관계가 존재하는지 여부는 소송의 승패를 좌우한다. 의료과실소송에서는 의료가 지니는 특수성으로 인하여 다른 민사사건과 달리 인과관계의 존부의 판단이 쉽지 않다. 또한 의료과실소송에서는 진료기록을 비롯한 정보가 의사에게 집중되어 있고, 환자의 의료지식은 의사에 비하여 상대적으로 부족하다. 따라서 원고인 환자가 부담하는 인과관계에 관한 증명책임의 완화가 판례를 통하여 인정되고 있다. 이에 본고에서는 우리나라에서 의료민사책임에서 인과관계를 어떻게 인정하는지에 관한 법리를 살펴보고자 한다. 그리고 우리나라 판례의 태도를 인과관계가 문제되는 유형별 - 일반적 의료행위의 경우, 설명의무의 경우, 의료과실과의 인과관계가 없는 경우 - 로 나누어 고찰하기로 한다.

• 한국병원경영학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.1-30
• /
• 2006

According to the available data, in these days, the number of medical accidents and disputes have significantly increased since 1990 in Korea. From this aspect, a variety of approaches and efforts to solve these problems is needed before it is too late. This study intended to identify the thoughts of patients who are directly connected with medical accidents and disputes and then to consider reasonable settlement methods of the increasing disputes. For achieving the purpose of this study, the self-administerd questionnaire was conducted with 450 out-patients who visited three university hospitals, five small and medium-sized hospitals, and ten clinics in Seoul from June 13 to 17, 2005. Incomplete questionnaires were omitted and 410 respondents(91%) were included for the analysis of this study. Each section of the survey was composed of six categories such as the recognition of malpractice, a compensation system about no-fault medical accidents, the recognition of the judgement of medical accidents in court, reasonable settlement of medical accidents, reasons of lawsuit, and the need of the medical dispute settlement organization. The major results of this study were as follows. First, more than half of the respondents, 51.9 percent, worry about malpractice. And many respondents think malpractice causes their symptoms to persist or become worse, and also some respondents think that the doctor's prescription changed too frequently. Second, as for a compensation system about no-fault medical accident, 55.7 percent of the respondents insist that a proper compensation for suffering patients or their families should be provided. And also as for the responsibility of compensation, respondents think joint compensation of both the medical institution and the government is needed foremost, followed by the medical insurance company and finally by the medical institution. The government as well as the related institutions should take responsibility for malpractice accidents for which the doctor is not responsible. Third, as for the acknowledgment of medical accident judgements by the court, 32.8 percent of respondents think that it is best to compromise with a medical institution, followed by lawsuit(26.2%), the assistance of civil organization(23.2%), and a powerful physical protest(7.6%). Fourth, as for the lawsuit of medical accidents, 62.9 percent of respondents think that patients and their families would be in a disadvantageous position in relation to medical institutions and doctors mentioning the lack of professional medical and lawful knowledge, experience and know-how as the reason. So many people have given up appeals owing to the difficulties involved in defending themselves through evidence. Fifth, about a half share of the respondents indicated that the medical institution's neglect of the responsibility of medical accidents is one of the most important reasons of lawsuit. And next respondents mentioned the lack of the medical dispute settlement organization and a general distrust of medical institutions and doctors. Sixth, a majority of respondents consented to the introduction of the need of the medical dispute settlement organization, And about a half of the respondents mentioned a readiness to accept the mediation of the organization, but the rest did not express a clear opinion. It seems that conflict among the parties concerned have existed in relation to the medical dispute settlement organization and related legislation for many years. But as this study has shown, the needs of the medical dispute settlement organization is in desperate demand. Therefore, more negotiation efforts from all interest groups should be considered for the birth of the medical dispute settlement organization and related legislation.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.39-48
• /
• 2010

정보화 사회에 있어서 피해자는 범죄원인의 제공자로서 특성과 보호대상으로서의 특성이 공존하고 있다. 이러한 상반된 특성이 피해자학의 변천과 그 피해자학의 발전을 가져왔다. 그 결과 피해자화에 따른 피해의 분류가 일반화되었다. 즉 범죄로 인한 직접피해를 제1차 피해라고 하며, 그리고 제 1차 피해로 인하여 수적으로 발생되는 피해를 제2차 및 제3차 피해로 구분할 수 있었다. 본 논문은 이와 같은 피해분류의 원인에 따라 각국의 범죄피해자 대책을 살펴보고 한국의 문제점올 고찰하였다.

• 한국정보처리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정보처리학회 2006년도 춘계학술발표대회
• /
• pp.457-460
• /
• 2006

법원의 사건수 증가와 인력확충의 한계로 인한 업무 부담이 증가함에 따라 사법서비스의 질이 저하되고 있고, 이러한 문제의 해결 방안으로 전자법원의 실현 방안이 대두되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 민사 소송절차에 있어서 전자파일링 기술을 도입, 활용하는 해외 법원의 적용실태를 연구하였으며 소송과정 중에서 가장 많은 인력과 비용, 시간이 소요되는 송달단계를 전자화 한 사법부의 소송문서전자시스템의 설계 및 구현을 통하여 송달 과정에서 비용을 절감하고 처리시간을 향상하였다.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제41권10호
• /
• pp.15-30
• /
• 2003

This case study analyses the process to redress consumer damages caused by advertising solution error of Samsung mall from July 30th, 2002. We could discover the typical characteristics of small damages for many people and propose efficient consumer redress system. It was very difficult for consumers to recognize and verify their damages. Damages were very diverse and had traits of electronic transactions. We also examined the evaluations of individual consumer and consumer organization, YMCA on the process and result of consumer redress. Class action should be introduced as soon as possible to overcome financial problem and gathering plaintiffs for lawsuit. Consumer organizations need more professional negotiation ability.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제54권11호
• /
• pp.917-922
• /
• 2016

Attitudes of parents toward behavior guidance techniques used in pediatric dentistry have changed for decades. Some techniques were regarded acceptable with authority of dentists' assistance, but now face the objection of caregivers. For the way of breeding is changing, dentist should understand the situation and try to communicate with caregiver for eliminating misunderstanding of the procedures that could induce lawsuit for abusive techniques. Most of all, dentist should try to find the best method for the patient and help to overcome the fear and anxiety. The meaningful knowledge driven from clinical experience should be shared with other dentists to build up sound theoretical foundation.

• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제7권2호통권24호
• /
• pp.67-76
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study is to propose the efficient improvement in the lawsuit to request the guarantee against defect. This study points out several problems about related act and subordinate statue and judgement by analyzing the character of contract in apartment house, related laws and regulations, appraisals and judicial decisions. This study deduces the necessity of the establishment of the specification and the breakdown cost for repair and maintenance work to provide the standard for the detached judgement.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.140-145
• /
• 2005

The PL(Product Liability) Law has been going into effect in Korea since July 2002. Accordingly, a company's responsibility for customers who are damaged by the defect in the product safety has been gradually strict and imposed burden on management. Not only general consumers but also labors who work with machine in the field of production are included in the concept of victim of the PL Law. That is to say, when a worker is damaged by the defect of machine he can institute a PL lawsuit more aggressively, not just get the industrial accident compensation as usual, only if not his own fault but the defect of machine used in the course of production can be demonstrated. This paper intends to present suggestions to PL prevention of manufacturing companies of industrial machine through the case research of PL accidents in the area of industrial safety.