• International Journal of Human Ecology
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.115-124
• /
• 2011

This study investigates the efficacy and coping strategies of Home Economics teachers in secondary schools. Data were collected from 75 Home Economics teachers via a mailed survey and from 282 Home Economics teachers via an online survey. Descriptive statistics including frequency, percentage, average, and standard deviation; in addition, the ANOVA, t-test, multiple linear regression, and correlation results were reported using SPSS statistics 17.0. The results were as follows: First, the average Home Economics teachers efficacy level was 3.82 out of 5-point Likert scale. The efficacy level of learning assistance was the highest. The composite efficacy of Home Economics teachers showed a significant difference depending on the major. Second, the averages of the positive and negative coping strategy level of Home Economics teachers were 3.54 and 2.03, respectively. Third, the efficacy of instructional strategy out of the five components of efficacy was the most influential to the positive coping strategy. There was no significant relationship between teacher efficacy and the negative strategy.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.67-78
• /
• 1998

The purposes of this study is to find middle school student's needs for Home Economics Curriculum and the family life participation. The samples are 323 middle school students in Kangneung. The results of this study are summarized follows; 1. It is shown that the family life participation of boys was higher than that of girls. 2. Variables that affect middle school student's needs for Home Economics curriculum are needs for Home Economics, number of brothers and sisters and the age for mother. 3. Variables that affect middle school student's the family life participation are human development and family relationship, the clothing, participation in class of Home Economics, perception of life status and sex. 4. The relative contributions of independent variables of the family life participation of middle school students are as follows. The degree of explanation of middle school student's family environmental variable is 12.2%. Adding the variable of Home Economics course, the degree of explanation is increased to 21.8%(deviation 9.6%). Adding the variable of needs for Home Economics curriculum, the degree of explanation is increased to 33.1% (deviation 11.3%).

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.83-94
• /
• 1997

The purpose of this study was to provide fundamental information for the determination on secondary Home Economics educations contents on food/nutrition. For this purpose, the Home Economics teachers’needs assessment was performed in view of three(technical, interpretive, emancipatory) systems of action. Questionnaire survey was performed. Among 564 questionnaires sent to Home Economics teachers of 396 secondary school selected by systemic random sampling 362 questionnaires were received and 335 questionnaires were analyzed for this study. As a statistical tool, SPSS/PC(sup)+ was used to analyze frequency, mean, standard deviation, T-test and ANOVA. The major findings in this study were as followings： 1. The most important system of action Home Economics teachers recognized on the contents of food/nutrition was interpretive action, followed by emancipatory action. Technical action was turned out to be the least important system of action. 2. Home Economics teachers recognized that the content of interpretive action was the most achieved action in the text book. The least achieved action was emancipatory action, and the middle was technical action. 3. The needs related to contents of emancipatory action was the highest, followed by interpretive action. The lowest needs was the contents related to technical action. 4. Home Economics teacher’s personal background and situation variables make no difference in the importance, achievement in the text book, and the needs of food/nutrition contents.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.91-99
• /
• 1990

By the comparative analysis of middle school Home Economics curricula in the U.S, Sweden, japan, Taiwan, and Korea, this study attempts to understand the current Home Economics education and to access its trends for each country. Based on the findings of the analysis, this study also seeks to get the major implications of the analysis for the betterment of the Korean Home Economics Education. The main sources of information and data analyzed here are :1)curricula for 10 School Districts in Pennsylvania state as representives of the U.S ; 2)Home Economics curriculum for middle school in Sweden ; 3) Home Economics Teaching Guidelines in Japan ;4)Home Economics curriculum in Taiwan ; and 5) Home Economics curriculum in Korea. Content Analysis technique is applied in this study. The major elements of contents include :1)structure of the curriculum ;2)subject name ; 3)time allotment; 4)goals and objectives ; 5)subject areas and content composition ; 6) other related characteristics for the implemention of the curriculum Summarized results of the study outline as follows; 1)Home Economics is offered as independently required subject without sex discrimination in all five countries. 2)Time allotment for Home Economics in Sweden is double that in the other countries. 3)The common goals of Home Economics courses is practical learning experiences closely related to reality. 4) In terms of subjects areas, Food and Nutrition, Clothing & Textiles, Housing Human Development, and Child care are offered in three of four countries, which is also similar to those of Korea. In addition Consumer Education is also covered in the U.S., Sweden and Korea. 5)Curriculum can be utilized as instructional planning materials due to the clear specification of instructional method, materials, and evaluation method on the curriculum, especially in the U,S, and Taiwan.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.87-103
• /
• 2003

This study aimed to research the cognition of Technologyㆍ Home Economics curriculum by the middle and high school students in Kyungnam area. Data were collected from 646 middle school students and 589 high school students by the self-questionnaire. The results were following; 1. The overall cognition of TechnologyㆍHome Economics were evaluated lower middle school students than high school students, especially the variety of lessons the lowest. The variety of lessons and satisfaction was correlated highly. 2. The practices of lessons were more frequently Home Economics than Technology. The most complains were the insufficiency of interests and practice lessons. 3. The overall evaluation of subject´s matters and subject´s goals were highly positive levels, but the item of the interrelatedness of Technology and Home Economics was a little low level. 4. The utility and the importance of subject´s matters were evaluated higher the Home Economics and Computer than Technology revealed sex differences obviously.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.173-187
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 고교학점제 도입 및 차기 가정과 교육과정 개발에 발맞추어 고등학생들의 가정계열 선택과목에 대한 요구를 조사하는데 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 전국 1,689명의 고등학생을 대상으로 가정계열 선택과목에 대한 요구와 성별, 학년, 가정과학 이수여부에 따른 가정계열 선택과목(각 과목별, 분야별)에 대한 차이를 분석하였다. 그 결과 가정 계열 중 식생활 분야에 대한 선호가 가장 높았으며, 선호하는 수업 방식에 있어서도 식생활 분야에서는 다른 분야에 비해 실험과 실습 수업에 대한 요구가 월등히 높았다. 성별 선호도의 차이에서는 가정계열 전체 분야에 걸쳐 여학생이 남학생에 비해 높은 선호를 보였으며, 학년별로는 식생활 분야에서만 3학년이 1학년보다 과목에 대한 선호가 유의하게 높게 나타났다. 또한 가정과학을 배우고 있거나 배운 학생들이 가정과학을 배우지 않은 학생들에 비해 모든 분야에서 선호가 높게 나타났다. 본 연구 결과를 기초로, 차기 교육과정에서 가정계열 진로 선택과목 개발을 위한 심화 연구가 활발히 진행되기를 희망한다.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.105-125
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 중등학교 가정과 교사에게 교사로서 필요한 자격을 실증적 자료 수집에 의한 통계적 검증 과정(주성분분석)을 통해 확인하여 제시하고, 교사와 학생이 가정과 교사의 자격기준 중 어떤 요인(자격기준)을 보다 중요하다고 인식하는지를 조사하여, 중등학교 가정과 교사에게 필요한 교사로서의 자격을 확인하는데 연구의 목적을 두었다. 주성분 분석 과정을 통하여 확인된 가정과 교사 자격기준은 '평가와 연계된 수업의 전문가', '다양한 학습자원의 효과적인 관리자', '교직 사명감과 건전한 인성을 가진 학생의 지원자', '전문적 지식을 갖춘 교과 전문가', '공정하며 민주적인 교실 환경 조성자', '학생의 특성과 환경을 이해하는 진로 및 상담전문가'의 6가지로, 이러한 6개의 총 요인은 전체분산의 60.41%의 설명력을 나타냈다. 6가지 자격기준 모두를 가정과 교사가 학생보다 가정과교사에게 필요한 자격으로 보다 중요한 자격기준이라고 응답하였으나, 각 자격기준의 중요도의 순위는 동일하여서 교사나 학생집단 모두 '교직 사명감과 건전한 인성을 가진 학생의 지원자'영역을 가정교사의 가장 중요한 자격기준으로 인식하고 있었으며, 두 번째로 중요하다고 생각하는 자격기준은 '평가와 연계된 수업 전문가'영역으로 나타났다. 한편, 가정과 교사들은 남자교사보다는 여자교사가, 복수 부전공을 이수한 교사일수록, 또 교사연수에 참여한 횟수가 많은 교사일수록, 가정과 교사 자격기준의 6개 요인을 보다 중요하다고 인식하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또 학생들은 가정 실습의 횟수가 많은 학생일수록, 또 가정 담당 교사를 좋아하는 학생일수록, 그리고 기술 가정 교과 성적이 높으며, 가정 영역에 대한 흥미도가 높은 학생일수록 가정과 교사자격기준의 6개 각 요인이 가정과 교사에게 중요하다고 인식하고 있는 것으로 나타나서, 학생의 교사 인식에는 가정과 수업에서의 실습, 교사 선호도, 교과에 대한 흥미도와 성취도 여부가 중요한 변인으로 규명되었다.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.179-197
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 언어 네트워크 분석방법을 활용하여 2000년부터 2019년까지 최근 20년간 KCI 등재 학술지에 게재된 가정과교육 논문의 연구 동향을 분석하였다. 총 501편의 가정과교육 논문을 대상으로, NetMiner 4.4를 활용하여 워드클라우드, 중심성 분석, 토픽모델링을 실시한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, KCI 등재지에 게재된 가정과교육 논문의 수는 2000년대에 186편, 2010년대에 315편으로 점차 증가하는 추세이고, 가정과교육 논문이 게재된 학술지는 2000년대에 16종, 2010년대에 22종으로 더욱 다양해졌다. 전체 논문 수의 60%가 '한국가정과교육학회지'에 게재되었고, 2018년 이후 '학습자중심교과교육연구'에 게재된 논문이 급증한 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 2000년대와 2010년대에 KCI 등재지에 게재된 가정과교육 연구의 주제는 교과 내용 분석, 수업 개발 및 적용, 교육과정 분석, 인식 조사 및 방향 탐색으로 범주화되었다. 2000년대에는 '가정과교사'가 주요 키워드로 등장하고, 인식 조사 및 방향 탐색 연구가 상대적으로 많이 이루어졌다. 2010년대에는 '개발' 키워드의 영향력이 커지고, 교과 내용 분석 및 수업을 개발하고 적용하는 연구가 상대적으로 많이 이루어진 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 분석 대상과 기간을 확대하여 가정과교육 연구 동향을 분석한 것에 의의가 있다.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.109-131
• /
• 1994

This study developed and proposed a lesson plan for the area of “Human development and family relationship”in secondary home economics curriculum. In current educational practice in secondary home economics curriculum, the employed goal and the nature of home economics are neither stated specifically nor closely interrelated. This problem has led us not being able to achieve pursuing goal of home economics education and to employ appropriate teaching methods. In view of this situation, the purpose of this study was to propose a lesson plan reflecting the contents and teaching methods to overcome difficulties and inefficiency in the current practice of secondary home economics education. The theoretical background of the lesson plan was based on the Marjorie M. Brown’s philosophy of home economics which can be summerized as follows: 1. The goal of home economics is to help individuals and families to become autonomous in their own family life and to be more capable of interacting with others in behalf of well-being of the family and of social evolution toward a free society. 2. The characteristics of home economics is conceptualized as practical science and personal service profession. 3. the nature of problems which home economics should deal with is perennial and practial. 4. Practial reasoning composed of historical understanding, critical action, and reflective thinking is appropriate for the previously mentioned goal and characteristics of home economics and for dealing with perennial practial problems. The lesson plan was proposed for one of perennial problem, “How should we understand, create, and maintain our family culture\ulcorner”by employing practial reasoning and teaching models such as “role play”and “classroom meeting.”

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.115-130
• /
• 1997

The purposes of this study are：(1) to analyze the learning content & subjects on the area of clothing and textiles in Home Economics for Young Men： A Teaching Guide, (2) to compare it with the learning content & subjects on the area of clothing and textiles in Home Economics teaching guides in the middle school in Korea, (3) to provide preliminary data for developing the learning content & learning method on clothing and textiles education for middle school students. To implement these proposals, Home Economics for young Men： A Teaching Guide in U.S.A and 6 Home Economics teaching guides for the middle school in Korea are reviewed and analyzed. The research findings were as follows： 1. Home Economics for Young Men is characterized as including： (1) interesting learning contents for girls and boys in the middle school, (2) learning contents for helping students to work on their own initiative (3) learning contents related to actual life, (4) practical consumer education content related to clothing and textiles area, (5) learning contents for developing originality, (6) learning contents related to vocational education. 2. The subjects in Home Economics for Young Men give careful considerations especially on how to learn. They are based on the idea that middle school students have to learn and to solve the subject by themselves. 3. Learning contents on Home Economics teaching guides for middle school in Korea are different from learning contents in Home Economics for Young Men in the subject & the form of description, the subject matter of practice in clothing area, the standpoint of description on clothing matters. The subjects in Home Economics teaching guides for middle school in Korea don’s give careful consideration on how to learn. There are little idea that middle school students have to learn and to solve the subject by themselves.