• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제45권1호
• /
• pp.51-73
• /
• 2011

이 연구는 학교도서관 평가체제의 개선방안을 제시하기 위한 목적으로 수행되었다. 이를 위해 학교도서관의 경영개선이라는 평가의 본질적 측면과 도서관정보정책위원회의 학교도서관 평가체제 분석과정에서 제기된 문제를 바탕으로 평가체제 개선을 위한 주요 쟁점을 도출하였다. 도출된 쟁점은 평가주관기관, 평가목적, 평가대상 선정, 평가주기, 평가시스템, 평가결과의 활용방안이다. 이 쟁점들에 대해서 설문조사와 전문가 자문을 통해 효과적인 대안을 선정하였고, 그 결과를 종합하여 '시 도교육청 자체평가 모형'을 학교도서관 평가체제 개선안으로 제시하였다. 제안된 평가체제는 학교도서관 평가에 대한 시 도교육청의 자율성과 책무성을 강화하도록 하였으며, 평가결과가 학교도서관에 대한 구체적인 행 재정적 조치와 연계되도록 활용방안을 제시하였다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제19권5호
• /
• pp.3-12
• /
• 2016

This paper aims to apply two ways of student evaluation, i.e. peer- and self-evaluation to TBL(team based learning) class and to explore the difference between two evaluations by gender and grade as well as their relationships, and finally to provide an explanation for the improvement of evaluation ways in TBL class. There has been much research about TBL and its related factors. However, according to the examination of both domestic and overseas researches concerning the application of peer- and self-evaluation to TBL class, few studies have focused on them in terms of the engineering curriculum. This study was conducted with 251 engineering students at P University, and peer- and self-evaluation in TBL class have been measured. Our findings show that firstly, there were significant grade differences in self-evaluation of engineering students. Second, there were no significant gender and grade differences in peer-evaluation. Third, we found a significant correlation between the two factors, self- and peer-evaluation. Also there was a significant correlation among variables of subcategories. Based on these findings, it is expected to provide an explanation for the application of peer- and self-evaluation in TBL class and will be useful for the improvement plans of the related courses in engineering school.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.151-166
• /
• 2006

One of The standard issue in riding on the wave of the information system(IS) is records of performance, grow unprecedently fast, and has highly uncertain future. Within the framework of IS Evaluation, The main purpose of this study is to suggest performance quality evaluation system as follows, The Integrated Quality Evaluation Model Design(IQEMD) of Information System helps corporations to improve productivity, customer service and corporate competitive power. To respond flexibly this trend, we have to realize that the information system has to keep the most effective optimal information network at the proper time. The existing evaluation method has been concentrated on the evaluation of a degree of the information system maturity focused on static viewpoints. The evaluation of potential factors to affect the future-oriented performance, that can analyze both unit business being able to apply an information system base was used efficiently well and what performance evaluation item was obtained actually, was insufficient relatively. In this paper, An integrated quality evaluation method will analyze a degree of information system maturity in dynamic evaluation viewpoints rather than in static evaluation viewpoints. finally we estimated the relative degree of importance of each determinant using the AHP methodology The validity of the proposed model was also partially proved using two different methods, holistic and historical approach.

• 한국지능시스템학회논문지
• /
• 제16권6호
• /
• pp.742-746
• /
• 2006

학습자에 대한 학습능력의 평가는 진단평가, 형성평가와 총괄평가 단계로 구분할 수 있다. 이러한 단계적 평가는 학습자의 사전 학습 준비상태부터 학습 과정의 충실성 및 학습 결과까지를 종합적으로 판단할 수 있는 기준이 된다. 본 논문에서는 퍼지추론을 이용하여 각 단계의 평가를 모두 고려한 종합학습평가 방법을 제안하였다. 학습 수행능력에 대한 객관적인 평가를 위하여 각 평가 단계별로 가중치를 부여하였고, 진단, 형성 및 총괄 평가에 대한 퍼지추론에서 획득한 비퍼지화 값을 최종평가의 소속함수 구간으로 적용하였다. 그 결과 객관성을 보장할 수 있는 명확한 추론을 수행할 수 있었으며, 종합적인 학습평가 방법의 타당성을 보였다.

• International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.65-89
• /
• 2019

This study has the aim of developing an evaluation index that can help evaluate the reliability of the information resources of institutions retaining humanities assets for the purposes of laying out the foundation for providing one-stop portal service for humanities assets. To this end, the evaluation index was derived through the analysis of previous research, case studies, and interviews with experts, the derived evaluation index was then applied to the humanities assets retaining institutions to verify the utility. The institutional information resources' reliability evaluation index consisted of the two dimensions of the institutions' own reliability evaluation index. The institution provided a service and system evaluation index. The institutions' own reliability evaluation index consisted of 25 points for institutional authority, 25 points for data collection and construction, 30 points for data provision, and 20 points for appropriateness of data, for a total of 100 points, respectively. The institution provided service and system evaluation indexes consisting of 25 points for information quality, 15 points for appropriateness (decency), 15 points for accessibility, 20 points for tangibility, 15 points for form, and 10 points for cooperation, for the total of 100 points, respectively. The derived evaluation index was used to evaluate the utility of 6 institutions representing humanities assets through application. Consequently, the reliability of the information resources retained by the Research Information Service System (RISS) of the Korea Education & Research Information Service (KERIS) turned out to be the highest.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.25-34
• /
• 2004

CC(=ISO/IEC 15408)는 정보보호시스템의 국제표준이며 CC평가 및 인증체계에서는 평가기관 운영하며 평가기관에서는 적정한 평가비 산정을 위한 근거가 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 특정한 평가기관의 환경이 아니라, CC기준과 기존의 PP 및 ST만을 바탕으로 하여, 제품유형별 및 보증수준별 평가업무량 모델을 제시하였으며, 평가실무자득의 경험, 보안기능의 사용율 개념 및 기능점수방법 등을 이용하였다. 본 결과는 CC평가환경에서 정보보호제품의 평가비 및 기간의 산정을 위한 기본자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국항만학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.9-17
• /
• 1998

The evaluation structure of complex problems is composed of multi-attributes and hierarchy. A many studies were existed on this problems, but that based on the assumption that the evaluation elements were independent. The actual evaluation problems have the complexity, ambiguity and interlinkage among the elements. In this situation, the fuzzy evaluation process is very effective in settling the complex problems. For evaluation of large scale hierarchical MADM problem, the fuzzy evaluation algorithm is developed in this paper, and that is centering on the identification of fuzzy measures. In this study, we newly identified the weight and interaction among the evaluation attributes. The results of this study are as follows: we can identified the hierarchical structure of the evaluation problem which is composed of the evaluation structure, function and hierarchy; we improved the existed weighting method which could be accomplished by normalizing process, considering the uncertainty and new weight integrating method which come from Dempster-Shafer theory. And we take into account the interaction properties among more than 3 evaluation attributes, which can be compared with the existed studies in which only 2 evaluation attributes taked into account.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2016

An accurate evaluation of educational process is a promise for the progress of education, because evaluation provides a meticulous idea of what has actually been achieved as a result of education. However, for all its significance in the educational fields, there are not many discussions about evaluation in South Korea. We believe that in order to overcome this discrepancy, diverse evaluation theories along with a discussion about the merits or demerits or each theory should be introduced in South Korea. We propose that Eisner's educational evaluation model may suggest alternative ways of perceiving evaluation. Eisner's educational evaluation model, named educational connoisseurship and criticism, emerged as an approach to educational evaluation from the methods used in art and literary criticism.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제46권1호
• /
• pp.81-92
• /
• 2014

This study suggests 5 evaluation criteria (safety and technology, environmental impact, economic feasibility, social factors, and institutional factors) and 24 evaluation indicators for a NFC (nuclear fuel cycle) derived using factor analysis. To do so, a survey using 1 on 1 interview was given to nuclear energy experts and local residents who live near nuclear power plants. In addition, by conducting a factor analysis, homogeneous evaluation indicators were grouped with the same evaluation criteria, and unnecessary evaluation criteria and evaluation indicators were dropped out. As a result of analyzing the weight of evaluation criteria with the sample of nuclear power experts and the general public, both sides recognized safety as the most important evaluation criterion, and the social factors such as public acceptance appeared to be ranked as more important evaluation criteria by the nuclear energy experts than the general public.

• 한국항만학회지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.79-86
• /
• 1999

This paper deals with the evaluation problem of complex systems by introducing a fuzzy approach. The authors are functionally supposing a hierarchical structure model of a complex system and give light on the following problems. First for the purpose of clarifying the characteristics of measures the property and differences between two method such as linear and fuzzy viewpoint are discussed through two level-down evaluation process. Second the integrated evaluation process which keeps reversibility between hierarchical levels is discussed and obtained some necessary conditions for reversibility of fuzzy evaluation. From these results it is expected that the fuzzy approach overcomes partly the limitation of reductionism at the hierarchical evaluation of complex systems.