• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.319-325
• /
• 2005

Planning for the construction of ports and harbors usually takes place without the consideration of tsunamis because of their rare occurrence, approximately once every 100 years. However, recent warnings indicate that massive earthquakes could occur in Japan within the next 30 years. Earthquakes may generate large-scale tsunamis. Therefore, any tsunamis in the vicinity of Japan would also be expected to affect eastern Korea. Therefore, with the looming concerns of tsunamis and earthquakes, immediate attention must be given to the planning of ports and harbors. The warnings deserve an immediate response. The threatened regions cover a very large territory, and the degree of severity of the tsunamis is forecasted to be varied. Therefore, any modeling of the potential scenarios will require a broad array of possibilities. The objective of this paper is to consider the potential damage from tsunamis to ports and moored ships in Japan and Korea. In addition, consideration will be given to how the construction plans of ports and harbors should be changed to cope with the threats from earthquakes and tsunamis.

• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 2006년도 Asia Navigation Conference
• /
• pp.203-212
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this research is to suggest the activation plan of Busan port. In the past years, Busan port enjoyed the golden days because of the China's rapid economic growth. But China's continuous development of ports, the trend of increasing container ship size and increasing direct call to China are coming threats to Busan port. So Korea needs to revise the 'Northeast Logistics Hub' strategy because it is considered that Korea ports continuously will handle China's transshipment cargoes. But now China's transshipment cargo share has decreased by direct call to China ports. It means that China has a lot of its local cargoes, so many ship companies change liner service route to handle China cargoes except Bussan ports although Busan port is included in the main trunk route. In the future, Bussan port will not be able to compete again about throughput with China ports if Busan port's transshipment cargo share decreases. So we must find out and develop Busan port's strength which is the competitive edge. By good luck, Busan port has a few opportunities such as the developed feeder network service and geographical advantages. Busan port has many feeder network service like spider's web in any northeast countries so we can suggest that if Japanese shippers use Busan port to distribute their cargoes to Japanese local areas, its transport costs are cheaper than when they use Japan's main ports. In this paper analyzed side of cost when they use Bussan port like hub to distribute their cargo to their local areas. Because most companies tried to reduce the total cost about logistics. Finally, this paper suggests when northeast shippers(China, Japan) use Bussan port which is more economical than their local main ports.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.433-444
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to examine the task of the policy on the collecting cargoes of the Japanese container ports. Although the ports of Asia countries such as China, South Korea have increased the amount of cargoes dramatically since the latter half of 1990s, the amount of cargoes Japanese container ports deal with have increased within narrow limits. As a result of this trend, the position of Japanese ports as hub-ports has been falling down. The times of main liners linked with North America and Europe stopping at Japanese ports have continued to decrease. So Japan container ports need the policy to increase the amount of cargoes in order to avoid becoming feeder ports. This policy is to collect domestic cargoes which are transshipped in Asia ports such as Busan port from Japanese regional ports to core ports. By collecting domestic cargoes to Japanese core ports intensively, the times of international main liners stopping at Japanese core ports will increase. It's important to support the domestic liners linking between Japanese regional ports and core ports in order to collecting domestic cargoes to Japanese core ports effectively. In addition the role of Japanese government to achieve the coordination between Japanese regional ports and core ports is indispensable.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제30권9호
• /
• pp.749-754
• /
• 2006

The maritime logistics environment including seaborne trade, shipping and ports is changing rapidly and continuously. Large containerships, mega carriers and global terminal operators try to achieve economies of scale and economies of scope. As a result of the changing environment, the competition between ports to achieve competitiveness is intensive. Port competition among China, Japan and Korea is becoming fiercer, both directly and indirectly, resulting from the increased trade in northeast Asia. Port development projects within each country stimulate more intensive port competition. As a result, overcapacity, fierce price competition and overlapping hinterland problems will be caused in the future. Co-operation for survival is considered as a strategy in order to solve anticipated problems caused by port competition Busan port, for instance, could co-operate with China and Japan as well as with other ports in Korea Terminal operators' expansion through investments including joint-ventures will make connections between ports smoother. At the port authority level, continuous cooperative interchange between countries is indispensable.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.73-82
• /
• 2017

우리나라는 세계 5위의 자동차 생산국이고 전체 제조업 가운데 자동차 산업이 차지하는 비중이 높다. 그리고 우리나라 10대 수출품목 중 2위를 차지할 만큼 중요한 산업이다. 우리나라는 국내외에서 생산된 자동차 중 약 300만대를 수출하고 있다. 우리나라와 함께 일본도 자동차 산업 비중이 높고 전 세계에 약 400만대 이상의 자동차를 수출하고 있다. 우리나라와 일본 모두 국내에서 생산된 완성차와 중고차를 선박을 통해 수출하고 있다. 따라서 자동차 생산공장 인근에 자동차 부두가 개발되어 이용되고 있다. 그러나 자동차 수출항만에 있어서 열악한 부두시설, 수출입 자동차 선적 또는 하역을 위한 야드 공간의 부족, 자동차 하역에 비전문화 된 하역업체의 숙련도 부족 등으로 하역이 지연되거나 자동차전용선이 대기하는 등의 비효성의 문제가 발생하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 우리나라와 일본의 자동차 수출항만의 효율성을 측정하여 비교 분석하는데 목적이 있다. 자동차 수출항만의 효율성 측정을 위하여 자료포락분석(DEA) 중 불변규모수익(CRS)와 변동규모수익(VRS)모델을 이용하였다. 투입 및 산출변수로는 안벽길이, 야드면적, 자동차처리대수로 설정하였고 평가대상은 총 25개 항만으로 구성하였다. 효율성 측정 결과 두 모델에서 모두 효율성이 높게 나타난 항만은 우리나라가 2개 항만(광양항, 울산항), 일본이 3개 항만(Kanda항, Omaezaki항, Kanmon-Shimonoseki항)으로 나타났다. 이 결과는 우리나라와 일본의 자동차 수출항만의 효율성 향상과 경쟁력 확보를 위한 전략을 수립하는데 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.19-39
• /
• 2010

우리나라의 환적화물은 '00년 초반에만 하더라도 북중국 항만의 물동량 증가로 높은 증가세를 유지하였으나 최근 북중국 항만들의 대규모 시설개발에 따라 그 증가율이 급격히 낮아지고 있는 상황이다. 이러한 상황에서도 우리나라와 일본 항만간의 환적화물 증가율은 8~9%의 비교적 높은 증가율을 보이고 있는데, 이는 본 연구에서 분석된 부산항과 일본서안 항만간의 컨테이너 물동량 증가율에 기인한다고 판단된다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 일본 서안 23개 주요 항만들을 대상으로 부산항과의 교역특성, 물동량 증가율, 점유율, 변동율 등을 다양하게 분석하여 마케팅 타겟 항만을 선정하고자 하였다. 마케팅 타겟 항만 선정결과 핵심 마케팅 대상항만은 Moji항, Niigata항, Naha항, Shimonoseki항, Kanazawa항, 지속적인 마케팅 대상항만은 Hakata항, Akita항, Tokuyama항, Imari항, Ishikari항, Sakata항을 선정하였다. 부산항의 마케팅 타겟 항만으로 선정된 항만들의 공통된 특징은 물동량 규모와 성장률이 비교적 높으며, 변동성이 낮아 안정적인 교역특성을 가진 항만들이 포함되었다. 선정된 11개 항만들을 대상으로 공격적인 마케팅 전략이 필요하며, 이를 위해서는 부산항과의 전략적 협력을 통한 공동발전 모색이 중요한 전략이 될 것이다.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.19-33
• /
• 2004

Recognizing that the main container ports' status is gradually inclining, the Japanese government is driving forward the super hub port project. This project has three goals, unifying Japanese ports separating nationally, diminishing the port costs by 30 percents less than the current port costs of their competitors, and cutting down the lead time of processing import-export freight into 24 hours, Singaporean level. The project will work to some extent, if succeeding, but the effect is doubtful if it will be the fundamental solution of Japanese ports' crisis. I wrote this paper since I thought that this Japanese policy would serve as a good reference of Korea, which had two container ports system and its prospect was not good through the fact that the Busan ports' rank of dealing with containers fell down to the fifth in 2003.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.113-134
• /
• 2011

2000년대 이후 아시아지역의 항만경쟁은 더욱 심화되었고 컨테이너 선박의 대형화 추세에 따라 이 지역 주요국은 대형항만의 개발을 적극 추진하고 있다. 각국은 대대적인 항만시설 투자를 확충하는 한편 자국항만간의 소모적 경쟁을 회피하고 효율성을 높이기 위해 항만통합전략에 박차를 가하고 있다. 그러나 우리나라는 부산항, 광양항을 양대 축으로 하는 '투 포트' 정책을 추진하고 있는데 이는 자칫 자국 항만간의 과다경쟁으로 경쟁항만에 비해 그 경쟁력을 상실할 우려가 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 중국, 일본의 항만통합전략을 고찰하고 부산항과 광양항의 통합운영효과에 대해 검토해보았다. 또한 객관적이고 실증적인 근거를 위해 부산항과 광양항이 통합된 통합항만을 설정하고 이를 아시아 주요 25개 항만을 선정하여 통합이전과 이후의 효율성을 DEA모형을 통해 측정하여 비교해 보았다. 분석결과 통합이후 효율성 점수가 소폭 개선되는 것으로 나타났으나 통합이후에도 여전히 경쟁항만에 비해 상대적으로 비효율적이며 개선의 여지가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.301-319
• /
• 2008

The development of Korea in the Northeast through trade is not a matter of choice as far as national strategy is concerned, but is an important national policy that is a matter of life or death which will determine the future fate of Korea. This thesis will attempt to arrive at a general, tangible plan for the development of Korea in the Northeast centered around trade by examining the change in naval environment at home and abroad, the given economic situation in the Northeast, and the present state of essential port development in Korea-China-Japan. Its objective will be to provide strategies for the development of Busan port confrontation. For the last ten years, China has been growing at a rapid rate. Since a lot of the volume of naval trade is being transferred from Korea to China, we must do everything we can to improve the service and reduce cost. In addition, Japan also is losing international position. Japan's government and the private industry are trying to make Super Core Ports a prominent feature of their port system. If the Busan port system is to remain competitive, these aspects of the Japanese port system must be kept in mind to prevent trade from going to other ports with more competitive systems.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.315-320
• /
• 2003

Since the beginning of open-door policy, China has been making rapid annual growth with an average 10% economic development. And due to this rapid growth, cargo volumes via ports have been also rapidly increased, and accordingly, current China government has intensively invested in port development. Further, this development project is significantly big scale, compared with those project which Korea and Japan have. Thus, China is beginning to threaten Korean ports, especially Busan port which try to be a hub port in Northeast Asia. For this reason, it has been very important issue for Korea and Busan port to investigate or analyze Chinese ports based on empirical data. Especially, although various studies related to Shanghai and Hong Kong have been conducted, the competitiveness of overall Chinese major ports has been little studied. In this paper, we analyzed competitiveness level of eight Chinese ports with capabilities as container terminal, based on reliable sources. From data analysis, eight Chinese ports were classified into four groups according to competitiveness level. Rankings among four clusters based on competitiveness level are cluster(Hone Kong), cluster C(Shanghai), cluster A(Qingdao, Tianjin, and Yantian) and cluster D(Dalian, Shekou, and Xiamen).