• 한국보육지원학회지
• /
• 제19권6호
• /
• pp.39-54
• /
• 2023

Objective: This study aimed to develop a parent play interaction observation scale (PPIOS-Toddler) and analyze it in terms of item discrimination, reliability, and validity. Methods: The subjects of the study were 97 toddlers and mothers. This scale consisted of three categories, six domains and 22 items on a 5-point scale. For the item discrimination of the observation scale, an independent standard t-test was conducted to analyze the significant difference in average between the upper and lower groups for each item. The reliability of the observation scale was calculated by Cronbach's α, the intra-item agreement, and the validity was examined through content validity, the correlation between subdomains and total scores, and official validity using PICCOLO. Results: In item discrimination analysis, all items exhibited differences between upper and lower groups. The overall internal agreement for the observation scale was 0.95, with factor-specific internal agreement ranging from 0.83 to 0.95. The observation scale demonstrated notable correlations between total scores and sub-factors (0.45 to 0.93) and significant correlations with PICCOLO total scores (0.66 to 0.86). Conclusion/Implications: The study successfully verified the item discrimination, reliability, and validity of the Parent Play Interaction Observation Scale (PPIOS-Toddler).

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제26권6호
• /
• pp.511-523
• /
• 2005

본 연구에서는 한국 지구과학 올림피아드 문항의 질 향상 방안을 모색하고자 1회와 2회 예선 및 본선 문항을 다양한 측면에서 분석하였다. 문항 분석을 위해 내적 및 외적 문항 분류틀을 구안하여 적용하였다. 고전 검사이론을 적용하여 문항의 난이도와 변별도, 상관계수, 그리고 신뢰도를, 일반화가능도 이론을 적용하여 일반화가능 도를 각각 추정하였다. 문항 분류틀 적용 결과는 다음과 같다: (1) 내용 차원에서는 지질 영역과 천문 영역에, 지식 및 탐구과정 차원에서는 자료 분석 및 해석에 집중되는 경향을 보였다. 또한 맥락 차원에서는 거의 대부분의 문항이 교과서적인 상황을 토대로 한 것이었다. (2) 요구 사고 수준에서 예선과 본선간의 차이를 발견할 수 없었다. (3) 문항 표현 범주에서는 그림의 사용 비율이 가장 높았고, 문항 유형 범주에서는 예선은 선다형과 단답형의 비율이, 본선은 서술형의 비율이 높았다. 또한 문항 형식 범주에서는 중학부와 예선은 단독형의 비율이 높고, 고교부와 본선은 복합형의 비율이 높았다. 문항을 분석한 결과는 다음과 같다: (1) 중학부는 대체로 난이도가 낮고, 변별도는 적절하였다. 그러나 고교부는 일반고와 과학고간에 상당한 차이가 있었다. (2) 중학부는 대기 영역과 총점과의 상관이, 고교부는 천문 영역과 총점과의 상관이 가장 높았다. (3) 양호한 문항이 가장 많은 일반고부의 문항 내적 일관성신뢰도와 일반화가능도가 가장 높았다. (4) 일반 고는 출제된 문항 수로 적정 수준의 일반화가능 도에 도달되나, 중학부나 과학고는 출제된 문항보다 2배 이상 많은 문항수가 필요한 것으로 나타났다.

• 시큐리티연구
• /
• 제42호
• /
• pp.37-57
• /
• 2015

본 연구의 목적은 무도수련만족 척도를 경호무도 수련자에게 적용할 수 있도록 Many-Facets Rasch 모형에 의한 문항적합성을 검증하는데 있다. 이를 위해 경호무도를 수련하고 있는 255명의 자료를 분석에 사용하였다. 또한 단일차원성 검증을 위해 AMOS 20.0 프로그램을 사용하였으며, 문항적합도 검증을 위해 Facets 3.61 프로그램을 활용하였다. 이에 따른 구체적인 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 단일차원성 검증결과 모형적합도, 신뢰도 및 표준화 ${\beta}$값 모두 적합한 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 문항적합도를 분석한 결과 문항 1,2,3은 부적합, 문항 4,8,11,13,14번은 과적합문항인 것으로 나타났다. 또한 문항곤란도 분석결과 문항 1번이 가장 높은 곤란도를 보유한 것으로 나타났으며, 문항 7번이 가장 낮은 곤란도를 보유한 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 국면에 따른 문항곤란도 및 반응차이검증 결과 여성 집단이 남성 집단에 비해 높은 곤란도를 나타내었으며, 문항적합도는 모두 적합한 것으로 나타났다. 경호무도 수련경력에 따른 문항곤란도 및 반응차이검증결과 수련경력에 따른 반응차이는 없는 것으로 나타났으나 4년이상~5년미만 수련자와 5년이상~6년미만 수련자에서 과적합 특징을 나타내었다. 학년에 따른 문항곤란도 및 반응차이검증 결과 1학년이 문항곤란도를 가장 높게 인식하고 있었으며 4학년은 문항곤란도를 가장 낮게 인식하고 있었다. 넷째, 응답범주분석 결과 6점 응답 범주는 적절하지 않은 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제35권2호
• /
• pp.137-149
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study is to develop a descriptive paper test item which can evaluate elementary school students' HGA (scientific Hypothesis Generating Ability) and to propose a counting formula that can easily assess student's HGA objectively and quantitatively. To make the test item can possibly evaluate all the students from 6th graders to 3rd graders, the 'rabbit's ear' item is developed. Developed test item was distributed to four different elementary schools in Seoul. Total 280 students who were in the 6th grade solved the item. All the students' reponses to the item were analyzed. Based on the analyzed data evaluation factors and evaluation criteria are extracted to design a Hypothesis Generating ability Quotient (HGQ). As the result 'Explican's Degree of Likeness' and 'Hypothesis' Degree of Explanation' are chosen as evaluation factors. Also precedent evaluation criteria were renewed. At first, Explican's Degree of Likeness evaluation criterion was turned four levels into three levels and each content of evaluation criterion is also modified. Secondly, new evaluation factor 'Hypothesis' Degree of Explanation' was developed as combined three different evaluation criteria, 'level of explican', 'number of explican' and 'structure of explican'. This evaluation factor was designed to assess how the suggested hypothesis can elaborately explain the cause of one phenomenon. Newly designed evaluation factors and evaluation criteria can assess HGA more in detail and reduce the scoring discordant through the markers. Lastly, Developed counting formula is much more simple than precedent Kwon's equation for evaluating the Hypothesis Explanation Quotient. So it could help easily distinguish one student's scientific hypothesis generating ability.

• 기본간호학회지
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.331-346
• /
• 1999

Many studies have reported that a lot of nursing colleges do not have good facilities for the nursing practice in hospitals, so many students do not have the good ability which is needed to be a competent nurse. The purpose of this study was to develop a program in which students could improve their ability in fundamental nursing skills before the graduation. This study was primarily designed to identify items of the fundamental nursing practice in which nursing college students have perceived deficiencies. According to previous studies, a total 75 items were presented. In Identifying them, a modified Porter format was used. The questionnaire contained three sections. A. How well do you think you can/could perform the item when you graduate/graduated the college? B. How well do you think you should perform/should be able to perform the item when you graduate/graduated the college? C. How important do you think the item is? For each of the 75 items, the respondents were instructed to answer the above three questions, by circling a number on a rating scale extending from 1 to 5, where low numbers represented a low degree of performance or minimum amount, and high numbers represented a high degree of performance or maximum amount. The perceived degree of deficiency in performance on each questionnaire item was obtained by subtracting the answer to Part A of an item from that to of Part B. The larger difference means a larger perceived degree of deficiency in performance. This method of measuring the perceived degree of deficiency in performance is an indirect measure derived from two direct answers by the respondent for each item. From this result Part C of each item was used to rank the items, and the items were prioritized. The items which had the highest priority were IV injection, simple catheterization, indwelling catheterization, CPR, and nurse recording. By this method, through these results from a nursing college, and the items which will be used first in developing the supplementation program for nursing college students can be identified.

• 대한영양사협회학술지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2010

This study was conducted to characterize well-being menus and to examine the service frequency and profitability of those served in the contract-managed workplace foodservice. In-depth interviews were conducted with six persons who were in charge of menu management in the headquarters of six different foodservice management companies during March, 2007. In addition, 122 set menus consisting of 777 menu items, which were on one month menus served during January to April, 2007, were collected from three workplace operations managed by three different foodservice management companies. As a result of the in-depth interviews, four categories of well-being menu items were extracted: 'medicinal functional menu item', 'environmentally-friendly menu item', 'natural food menu item', and 'harmful components-limiting menu item'. Accordingly, a well-being menu item was defined as 'a menu item with increased nutrition value or decreased health risk by changing food material or cooking method'. When the menu items (n=777) were analyzed by applying the definition and categories, approximately 14% of the items were identified as well-being menu items and most of them were either medicinal functional (65%) or natural food menu items (33%). Approximately 59% of the 122 set menus included at least one well-being menu item, and therefore they were named the well-being set menus. These well-being set menus, however, were not significantly different from the rest set menus in terms of profitability as measured by the contribution margin. The results of this study could be useful for foodservice management companies to develop and plan well-being menus targeting workplace foodservice operations.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.141-155
• /
• 1995

The objective of this study was to develop a scale to measure stress in infertile couples and to test its reliability and validity. Prior to item generation, a basic decision was made to conceptualize stress in infertile couples as including two dimensions and four subdimensions. The dimensions were, intrapersonal stress including cognitive and affective stress, and interpersonal stress including marital and social stress. Initially 95 items were generated from the inter-view data of 31 primary or secondary infertile women and from a literature review. These items were analyzed through the Index of Content Validity(CVI) and 69 items were selected which met 70% or more of the CVI. This preliminary Infertility Stress Scale were analyzed for reliability and construct validity. Item analysis and factor analysis were applied for construct validity. Forty items were selected through item analysis. This procedure was based on the inter-item correlation matrix, a corrected average inter-item correlation coefficient(.30~.70), a corrected item to total correlation coefficient (.03 or more) and information about the alpha estimate if this item was dropped from the scale. The result of the initial factor analysis including varimax rotation produced eight factors. Five items deleted because of factor complexity(indiscriminate factor loadings). The secondary factor analysis including varimax rotation produced seven factors that coincided with the conceptual framework posed for the scale developed. The seven factors were labeled as ‘meaning of children’,‘worthiness’,‘tenacious linking’,‘marital satisfaction’,‘sexual satisfaction’,‘familial adjustment’ and ‘social adjustment’. The alpha coefficient relating to internal consistency was .93 for reliability The results of this study suggest that the measurement derived from the Infertility Stress Scale is useful in assessing the stress of infertile couples.

• 지능정보연구
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.195-209
• /
• 2003

데이터마이닝의 목적은 알려지지 않은 유용한 정보를 얻어 경영에 활용하려는 것이다. 데이터마이닝의 한 기법인 연관규칙도 마찬가지의 목적을 가지고 있다. 하지만 연관규칙 기법으로 생성된 결과는 모두 같기 때문에 타겟 마케팅에 적용 시 그 마케팅 전략은 같을 수밖에 없다. 본 논문에서는 연관규칙을 이용하여 타겟 마케팅에 적용 시에 데이터마이닝의 목적에 부합하는 새로운 규칙을 제안한다. 새로운 규칙이란 연관규칙과 같이 고객이 구매한 항목에 대해 관심을 가져 구매 항목간의 규칙을 생성하는 것뿐만 아니라 구매하지 않은 항목에 대해서도 관심을 가짐으로써 구매하지 않은 항목간의 규칙을 생성하여 타겟 마케팅에 필요한 정보를 생성하는 것을 말한다. 이러한 정보를 이용하면 타겟 항목을 바로 마케팅 하는 전략뿐만 아니라 타겟 항목을 판매하기 위하여 다른 항목을 마케팅 하는 전략도 가능하게 된다. 그 이유는 새로운 규칙 에 의해 생성된 다른 항목의 마케팅이 타겟 항목의 판매를 촉진시키기 때문이다. 본 논문에서는 타겟 마케팅에 적용하기 위한 새로운 규칙과 전략을 설명하고 예제를 통하여 실제 데이터베이스에서 기존 전략 외에 새로운 전략을 생성시키는 과정을 설명한다.

• 한국정보과학회논문지:소프트웨어및응용
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.298-305
• /
• 2009

협력적 여과 시스템은 내용 기반 여과 시스템과는 대조적으로 아이템에 대한 정보를 반영하지 않으며, 또한 사용자가 자신의 흥미에 대한 정보를 제공하지 않았을 경우 추천을 할 수 없다는 단점을 갖는다. 본 논문에서는 협력적 여과 시스템의 단점을 해결하기 위하여 연관 아이템 트리를 이용한 추천 에이전트를 제안한다. 제안된 방법은 벡터 공간 모델과 K-means 알고리즘을 이용하여 사용자를 군집시킨 후 그룹의 대표 평가값을 추출한다. 다음으로, 군집된 그룹별로 아이템간의 상호정보량을 계산하여 아이템간의 연관도를 파악하며, 이를 기반으로 연관 아이템 트리를 생성한다. 이와 같이 생성한 각 그룹의 연관 아이템 트리와 그룹의 대표 평가값을 이용하여 새로운 사용자에게 아이템을 추천한다. 제안된 추천 에이전트는 사용자 정보와 아이템 정보를 병합하여 새로운 사용자에게 아이템을 추천하며, 아이템간의 유사도를 계산하기 위하여 상호정보량을 사용하고 이를 기반으로 연관 아이템 트리를 생성함으로써 초기에 아이템에 대하여 평가한 정보가 부족한 사용자에게 정확도가 높은 아이템을 추천할 수 있다는 장점을 갖는다. 제안된 방법은 MovieLens 추천 시스템의 데이터 집합을 사용하여 기존의 방법과 비교하였다.

• The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2009

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the functional category, the item structure and the model-data fit of the neck disability index (NDI) of neck pain subjects by performing a Rasch rating scale analysis. Methods: The data was obtained from the assessments of 71 college students (males: 27, females: 44) with neck pain. The data of the NDI was applied to the Rasch's rating scale model to estimate the difficulty of items, the goodness-of-fit of each item, the separation reliability and index, and the rating scale. Results: The 'sleep' item showed misfit and nine items were founds to be fits for self-reporting of disability due to neck pain. The most difficult item of the remaining 9 items was 'work' and the easiest item was 'headache'. The transformation formula score=(logit score+7.10)/(7.10+0.11)$\times$100. The 6 response levels of the NDI were validated according to the structure of the rating scale. The item and subject reliability of the separation reliability was 0.97 and 0.85, respectively. Conclusion: We proved that the NDI for self-reporting of disability of daily activities due to mild neck pain was valid and reliable. This study suggests that individuals with mild neck pain may be assessed by using the modified NDI that does not include the 'sleep' item in the 10 items of NDI.