• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제13권10호
• /
• pp.4612-4618
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 지역사회에 거주하는 뇌졸중 클라이언트에서 생산과제의 세 가지 방법을 모두 이용하고 Freedman 등의 양적 채점 방법을 사용하여 인지 손상 선별 검사로서 CDT(Clock Drawing Test)의 신뢰도 및 타당도를 분석하였다. 2010년 11월 부터 2011년 8월 까지 지역사회에 거주하는 뇌졸중 클라이언트 51명을 대상으로 CDT와 K-MMSE(Korean Version of Mini Mental State Examination)를 검사하였다. 스피어맨 순위 상관계수 분석으로 CDT의 검사-재검사 신뢰도, 검사자간 신뢰도, 동시타당도를 분석하였고, 맨 휘트니 유 검정을 사용하여 구성타당도를 분석하였다. 검사재검사 신뢰도, 검사자간 신뢰도, 구성타당도, 동시타당도 분석 모두에서 통계학적으로 유의하였다(p<.01). 본 연구의 결과에서 생산과제 방법을 이용하고 Freedman 등의 양적 채점 방법을 사용한 CDT는 인지손상을 선별하는 검사로서 지역사회에 거주하는 뇌졸중 클라이언트에게 적용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 중환자간호학회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.48-57
• /
• 2009

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to establish reliability and validity and to identify the conversion index. Method: The WMSCN for ICU was revised from Workload Management System for Nurses(WMSN) of Walter Reed Army Hospital. Reliability of the WMSCN was evaluated interrater reliability between head nurses and staff nurses at 124 patients in April 2008. Validity through the correlation between direct nursing care hours and WMSCN score was conducted at 20 ICUs of 10 hospitals. Finally the conversion index was identified by total nursing hours and it divided by WMSCN score. Results: The scores by nurses were highly correlated with head nurses’(p=.967), and also scores of the WMSCN were highly correlated with the direct nursing care hours(p<.001). The distribution of patient classification ranks into class V(61.3%), class IV(24.2%) and class VI(11.3%). The scores of the WMSCN were no differences between MICU and SICU. Finally, the conversion index was 8.2 minutes. Conclusion: WMSCN is available to classify the nursing workload for critical care patients. The repeated evaluation of validity and reliability are requisite to use WMSCN effectively. And the conversion index should be adjusted to estimate the appropriate staffing in Korea.

• PNF and Movement
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.45-53
• /
• 2011

Purpose : Many researchers have attempted to identity the reliability used in clinical examination of balance and gait performance for individuals of hemiparetic stroke. The study aims to evaluate whether the reliabilities of three popular clinical measures of balance and gait performance was consistency regardless of applicate experience of those clinical measures compared with previous studies for persons with hemiparetic stroke. Methods : A total of three hemiparetic stroke populations and twenty-six physical therapists were recruited from Glory hospital, Inchen, Korea in this study. The three clinical measures, involving Berg balance test (BBT), dynamic gait index (DGI), and Tinetti performance-oriented mobility assessment (POMA), were assessed in two sessions that were seven days apart. Results : The POMA was showed a good intrarater and interrater reliabilities in people with hemiparetic stroke regardless of measure's experience in clinical field. However BBT and DGI were showed below moderate intrarater and interrater reliabilities. Conclusion : The POMA could be a reliable measure to evaluate functional postural stability and gait performance in hemiparetic stroke patients compared with other two clinical measures regardless of measure's experience of physical therapists.

• 임상간호연구
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.127-140
• /
• 2010

Purpose: This study was performed to verify reliability and validity of Korean Patient Classification System for nurses(KPCS-1), to estimate nursing time conversion index, and to classify patients into groups according to KPCS-1 scores. Methods: KPCS-1 was revised from KPCS by a professional review team. Interrater reliability and construct validity of KPCS-1 were verified by data from 433 patients. Direct and indirect nursing time of 204 patients were measured by stopwatch observation and self reports for 24 hours. Nursing time conversion index was calculated. Results: KPCS-1 consisted of 12 area, 50 nursing activities, and 73 items. The interrater reliability was tested between two nurse group (r=.88, p<.001) and construct validity was verified according to medical department (F=10.97, p<.001) and patient pattern (F=5.54, p=.001). The correlation of nursing time and classification score was also statistically significant (r=.56, p<.001). The nursing time conversion index was 9.03 minutes per 1 classification score. The patients were classified into 4 groups by the classification scores. Conclusion: KPCS-1 can be a useful factor type patient classification system for general ward. Further study is needed to evaluate validity and reliability for refining KPCS-1 and to develop ways connecting the scores with nursing outcomes.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.40-44
• /
• 2000

연구목적은 새로운 레이저형광측정기술을 응용한 휴대용 우식진단기구인 Diagnodent를 사용한 우식진단법의 검사자내 신뢰도를 분석하는 것이었다. 발거된 사람 대구치와 소구치를 대상으로 열구를 3회, 평활면을 5회 반복 검사하였다. 측정치들의 평균치간 차이의 유의성을 t-검사로 검정하였고 측정치들간의 상관성을 Pearson 상관계수와 Spearman 순위상관계수로 산출하였으며 척도 신뢰도분석으로 검사자내 신뢰도를 분석하였다. 연구성적에서, 열구측정치들 간에 유의한 차이는 없었으나, 평활면측정치들간에는 10개 조합 중 2개에서 유의한 차이가 있었다(P<0.05). 그러나, Pearson 상관과 Spearman 순위상관은 모두 상관계수 0.9 이상의 유의한 상관성을 나타내었고(P<0.01), 신뢰도의 값은 열구측정에서 0.9980 내지 0.9981로, 평활면측정에서 0.9992로 산출되었다. Diagnodent를 사용한 우식진단법은 생체외에서 한 검사자가 반복 검사를 시행하였을 때 완전한 일치에 가까운 재현도, 곧 매우 높은 검사자내 신뢰도를 가지고 있는 것으로 나타났다.

• 중환자간호학회지
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.15-27
• /
• 2012

Purpose: To evaluate the applicability of Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) as an evaluation tool for hypoglycemia simulation practicum on Korean nursing students. Methods: The methodological study was done to evaluate the reliability and validity of the LCJR. Based on Benner's 4 levels of nursing grading rubric, ten items of the LCJR was evaluated for interrater reliability and internal consistency. The content validity was tested by eight experts and concurrent validity was done by Clark (2006)'s clinical simulation grading rubric. Fifty five video-taped cases of senior nursing students in Y University were used for the reliability and concurrent validity of the LCJR. Results: The interrater reliability was r=.90 (p<.001); Kendall tau b=.87 (p <.001), and Cronbach's alpha was .90. A value of item content validity index of the LCJR was .97 and correlation coefficient between the LCJR and Clark's instrument was .90 (p<.001). The mean (${\pm}SD$) of the nursing students' clinical judgment was 2.04 (${\pm}50$). Conclusion: The LCJR is a useful tool to examine the simulation performance evaluation for improving competency among nursing students. The results indicated that the LCJR may provide valuable information regarding clinical judgment of nursing students and thus, suggested to use to develop a simulation-based education program.

• Journal of Acupuncture & Meridian Studies
• /
• 제11권6호
• /
• pp.367-374
• /
• 2018

This study describes the reliability of pragmatic combinations of acupuncture points for lateral epicondylalgia (LE) as prescribed by physiotherapists who were experts in acupuncture. Raters (n = 14; 33-59 years) independently prescribed acupuncture points for 30 simulated human patients with LE who were surveyed via a printed questionnaire. The frequency and cooccurrence of acupuncture points prescribed for patients with lateral epicondylitis were assessed. Absolute agreement and Light's kappa (${\kappa}_{Light}$) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to quantify the interrater agreement. Raters prescribed 103 unique acupuncture points in different combinations with a median (min-max) of 5 (0-11) acupuncture points. The most prescribed acupuncture point was LI-11 (297 of 420; 71%), and the most common cooccurring acupuncture points were LI-11 and LI-4 (160 of 420; 38%). The absolute agreement for prescribing the acupuncture points ranged from 70% (point GB-20) to 0% (points LI-10, SP-6, LI-11, GB-34, LI-12, and LI-4). Point LR-3 showed the highest interrater reliability for prescribing the acupuncture points [${\kappa}_{Light}=0.112$, 95% CI = (0.055-0.194)], whereas point LI-4 showed the lowest reliability [${\kappa}_{Light}=-0.003$, 95% CI = (-0.024 to 0.024)]. These findings suggest that pragmatic prescriptions of acupuncture points for LE are unreliable among physiotherapists who are experts in acupuncture. Explicit, high-level evidence-based rules for prescribing and teaching combinations of acupuncture points for LE are warranted.

• 동서간호학연구지
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.91-99
• /
• 2020

Purpose: The study aims to assess the inter-rater reliability of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale between the research nurses and the triage nurses. Methods: Interrater reliability was measured on 400 adult (≧15) and 400 pediatric (<15) patients who visited the emergency medical center from January 4 to June 30, 2018. Results: The study result showed that the inter-rater reliability of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale was substantial, with κ=.73 (95% Confidence interval= .68-.78) and 77.0 percent agreement. The inter-rater of Pediatric Korean Triage and Acuity Scale was also substantial, with κ=.76 (95% Confidence interval= .71-.82) and 83.8 percent agreement. Conclusion: Although the inter-rater reliability of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale was acceptable, the percent agreement was lower than the desirable level (<80.0%). It was confirmed that Pediatric Korean Triage and Acuity Scale had an acceptable level of inter-rater reliability and percent agreement for clinical use. Efforts should be made to improve the reliability in the future.

• 재활치료과학
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.51-61
• /
• 2018

목적 : 본 연구의 목적은 호주에서 개발된 수행기반의 관찰평가도구인 Melbourne Low-Vision ADL Index(MLVAI)를 한국 문화에 적합하게 구성하여 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하는 것이었다. 연구방법 : 연구대상자는 지역사회에 거주하고 있는 만 20세 이상의 저시력인 26명, 정안인 42명으로 총 68명이었다. 한국판 MLVAI는 번역 검증 및 도구 구성에 대한 전문가 검증을 통해 완성하였다. 한국판 MLVAI의 타당도는 내용타당도, 판별타당도, 수렴타당도 검증을 통해 수립하였고, 신뢰도는 항목에 대한 내적일치도, 검사-재검사 신뢰도, 검사자간 신뢰도를 분석하였다. 결과 : 내용타당도 수립을 위해 저시력 관련 분야의 전문가들이 시행한 문항적합도 검증에서는 .78이상으로 타당성이 수립되었다. 판별타당도 검증은 저시력 집단의 평균점수가 통계적으로 낮았다(p<.05). 수렴타당도는 Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire(LVQOL)을 이용하여 한국판 MLVAL 총점과의 상관계수 .751을 산출하였고 통계적으로 유의하였다(p<.05). 전체 항목에 대한 Cronbach's ${\alpha}$값은 .983으로 높았으며 검사-재검사 신뢰도는 .976(p<.05), 검사자간 신뢰도는 급간 내 상관계수(ICC2,1) .91로 모두 양호하였다(p<.05). 결론 : 본 연구 결과 국내 실정에 맞게 수정한 한국판 MLVAI는 신뢰도와 타당도를 모두 갖춘 일상생활 평가도구로 작업치료 중재 시 저시력인의 일상생활활동의 평가를 위해 유용하게 사용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.633-643
• /
• 2002

Purpose : This study was conducted to develop a patient classification system for hemodialysis and to test its validity and reliability. Method : The process of the system development was as below. The lists of hemodialysis nursing activities were collected from literature and hemodialysis practice guideline and they were classified into 10 factors and 16 elements. And then, 4 classification levels were identified for each element. The content validity and interrater reliability of developed patient classification system were tested. Result & Conclusion : 10 factors of patient classification system for hemodialysis were consisted of psychosocial support, mobility, access, teaching, assessment, stability, supportive therapy, test, general nursing during hemodialysis, hemodialysis room management. According to validity and reliability results and experts' opinions, 4 classification levels revised to 3 classification levels and 2 elements were deleted. Finally, patient classification system were consisted of 10 factors, 14 elements, 3 classification levels, 3 categories.