• 인터넷정보학회논문지
• /
• 제21권6호
• /
• pp.81-94
• /
• 2020

This study developed evaluation indicators for the comfort experience of virtual reality (VR) headsets by classifying, defining, and weighting cybersickness-causing factors using the Delphi research method and analytic hierarchical process (AHP) approach. Four surveys were conducted with 20 experts on VR motion sickness. The expert surveys involved the 1) classification and definition of cybersickness-causing dimensions, classification of sub-factors for each dimension, and selection of evaluation indicators, 2) self-reassessment of the results of each step, 3) validity revaluation, and 4) final weighting calculation. Based on the surveys, the evaluation indicators for the comfort experience of VR headsets were classified into eight sub-factors: field of view (FoV)-device FoV, latency-device latency, framerate-device framerate, V-sync-device V-sync, rig-camera angle view, rig-no-parallax point, resolution-device resolution, and resolution-pixels per inch (PPI). A total of six dimensions and eight sub-factors were identified; sub-factor-based evaluation indicators were also developed.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제17권6호
• /
• pp.1-15
• /
• 2014

A dredging on erosion control dam has been enforced without evaluation the factors that affect the dredging. In addition, there is the negative effect much more than positive effect by dredging on erosion control dam. Therefore, this study was carried out to develop evaluation indicators and to suggest fieldbook in order to determine whether sand deposits at erosion control dam should be dredged up or not. The most important six evaluation indicators that can decide to dredge up at erosion control dam were obtained from three round delphi technique and were selected in the following order: the current sand deposit ratio(0.339), existence of cultivated land and house downstream(0.276), the slope of streambed(0.162), the amount of movable soil and gravel(0.118), the history of any disasters(0.063), the basin area(0.043). The weighted score for each evaluation indicator were acquired from AHP analysis with respect to the degree of importance and then the modified weighted score for actual measurements were classified as three categories: large(2.53), medium(1.60) and small(1.01). Based on delphi technique, erosion control dam dredging evaluation fieldbook introduced the four evaluation indicators out of the total six evaluation indicators and two low effected evaluation indicators were excluded. This results showed that the values for reliability analysis and consistency ratio were acceptable.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.69-77
• /
• 2010

This methodological research was designed to develop performance evaluation key indicators (PEKIs) for management by objectives (MBO) and to estimate their weights for hospital nurses. Methods: The PEKIs were developed by selecting preliminary indicators from a literature review, examining content validity and identifying their level of importance. Data were collected from November 14, 2007 to February 18, 2008. Data set for importance of indicators was obtained from 464 nurses and weights of PEKIs domain was from 453 nurses, who worked for at least 2 yr in one of three hospitals. Data were analyzed using $X^2$-test, factor analysis, and the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Results: Based upon Content Validity Index of .8 or above, 61 indicators were selected from the 100 preliminary indicators. Finally, 40 PEKIs were developed from the 61 indicators, and categorized into 10 domains. The highest weight of the 10 domains was customer satisfaction, which was followed by patient education, direct nursing care, profit increase, safety management, improvement of nursing quality, completeness of nursing records, enhancing competence of nurses, indirect nursing care, and cost reduction, in that order. Conclusion: PEKIs and their weights can be utilized for impartial evaluation and MBO for hospital nurses. Further research to verify PEKIs would lead to successful implementation of MBO.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.43-62
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 국내 공공도서관에서 장서개발정책 수립 시에 활용할 수 있는 다양한 장서평가 지표를 제시할 목적으로 수행되었다. 이러한 탐색적 연구를 위하여 공공도서관의 실제 데이터를 개별 장서평가 지표에 적용하는 사례연구를 통해서 그 활용 가능성을 확인하고자 하였다. 장서평가 지표 분석을 위하여 서울시 광진구립도서관의 최근 10년간 장서대출 데이터가 이용되었다. 주요 장서평가 지표로는 연도별 구입도서의 장서회전율과 이용계수, 연도별 사서 추천도서 장서회전율과 이용계수, 연도별 비대출도서 비율, 대출자 거주지별 도서관 이용도 등이 분석되었다.

• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.70-79
• /
• 2009

Currently, the investment on Research and Development(R&D) for defense core technology is continuously increasing to maintain advanced country's R&D level. In accordance with this trend, the national defense R&D investment management system is being more strengthening, and importance of performance evaluation is being emphasized more and more. However, the existing indicators of performance evaluation for defense core technology R&D is limited in efficient management because of the qualitative evaluation items and subjective allocation of points. In this paper, we developed a novel indicator for defense core technology R&D performance evaluation through domestic and foreign related literature and inquiry, brainstorming, and analysis techniques by Stepwise Multiple linear Regression(SMR) and Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). And we verified effectiveness of proposed indicators of performance evaluation by comparing with the existing evaluation indicators. Our proposed indicators for performance evaluation will create superiority performance on defense R&D fields.

• 대한영양사협회학술지
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.364-382
• /
• 2009

The purposes of this study were to develop the standard indicators to evaluate the food and nutrition systems in hospitals and to test the validity of those items scientifically. The results were as follows: First, the conceptual validity was examined with recognition degrees of importance from the hospital nutrition department managers. All of the hospital nutrition department's operation evaluation standards and the indicators' conceptual validity tested were in the range of 3.71~4.93 out of 5.0, and the mean score was 4.36. Therefore, the conceptual validity was verified. Second, to verify the factor validity of the items of the standards and indicators for the hospital nutrition department's operation evaluation, the standards and indicators were analyzed as key-factors. Key-factor analysis after vertical rotation showed that four factors appeared and were composed of (a) facilities management, (b) sanitation management, (c) operation & foodservice management, and (d) nutrition management. Third, the reliability of the standards and indicators for the hospital nutrition department's operation evaluation was analyzed and resulted in a score of 0.98, which showed good internal consistency. Fourth, the discriminative power of each item of the standards for the hospital nutrition department's operation evaluation was tested by checking the differences between groups with first quartile and forth quartile of total evaluation scores. The indicators having low distinction power were modified into obligatory items or eliminated for better differentiation.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.41-64
• /
• 2007

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to verify the validity of the evaluation indicators on safety and health education programs provided to Korean industrial workers, by developing further. Methods: To develop the early evaluation indicator, the secondary analysis was made on 'Survey on Industrial safety & health trends', the national wide survey data product by Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency, as well as the various examinations on literatures. To validate such developed evaluation indicator, 13 safety and health managers in Focus Group discussion to prove the reliability of the contents were composed. To confirm the face validity, the interview with 6 industrial safety and health education experts was held to study the appropriateness of the content. With the cooperation from Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency, the structured survey was performed with the safety and health managers from 588 businesses who participated in the education program for the later half of 2006. In this study, the number of responses was randomly divided into 1:1 two groups, in which one group was for the Exploratory Factor Analysis and the other group was for the Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Results: The results were as follows. First, for the Structure category, 18 evaluation indicators were developed into 4 evaluation categories such as a preliminary examination, education staff and organization, education environment and rules/ regulation. Secondly, the Activity category was comprised of 10 evaluation indicators with respect to 2 areas of curriculum satisfaction and program evaluation. Finally, for the Output category, 9 evaluation indicators were developed into 2 evaluation areas such as documentation and information share and education effects. Conclusions: The evaluation indicators developed through this study will possibly develop and be applied to evaluation tools on safety and health education program, which may further become the standardized indicators to better operate the industrial safety and health education programs.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.25-46
• /
• 2021

이 연구에서는 작은도서관의 활성화 및 내실화 측면에서의 평가를 통해 작은도서관 운영의 질적 수준을 향상하고 자생력을 강화하기 위하여 현행 작은도서관 평가지표 분석, 국내외 작은도서관 관련 평가지표 분석, 국내 타 관종 평가지표 분석, 작은도서관 운영자 및 관련 단체 전문가 등을 대상으로 의견수렴 등을 통해 작은도서관 평가체계 및 지표를 개선하여 제안하였다. 이 연구에서 제안된 작은도서관의 평가체계는 단위 작은도서관을 대상으로 하는 트랙 1과 기초지방자치단체 평가하는 트랙 2로 구분된다. 작은도서관의 평가지표는 트랙 1 작은도서관에 대하여 통계를 통해 확인되는 지표는 생략하고 단순화하였으며, 작은도서관 운영에 따른 도서관 경영, 도서관 인프라, 도서관 서비스의 3개 평가영역, 8개 평가항목, 10개 평가지표 100점으로 구성된 정량평가와 20점 총 120점으로 된 정성평가로 구성하였다. 트랙 2 기초지방자치단체의 평가지표는 정성평가 없이 작은도서관 정책 수립 및 시행과 작은도서관 지원 등에 관하여 도서관 경영, 도서관 인프라의 2개 평가영역, 4개 평가항목, 5개 평가지표 100점으로 구성된 정량평가로 구성되어 있다.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.49-59
• /
• 2017

The importance of information system evaluation has increased according to ICT development and this evaluation is required for objective verification. The aim of this study is to develop evaluation indicators for web-based information system and verify the availability of these evaluation indicators through applying to agricultural water integrated information system. This study finds and provides eight evaluation items and 64 indicators for a web-based information system using $3{\times}3$ Mandal-Art matrix that is a tool for creating creative ideas. These evaluation items are design, contents, navigation, stability, community, convenience, usefulness, and accuracy. Total 64 evaluation indicators were presented by deriving eight evaluation items for each using $9{\times}9$ Mandal-Art matrix. When evaluating information system using evaluation indicators, it can be identified the vulnerable items in the information system. Also, the comprehensive results of the information system could be understood when appearing a single score after weighting. In addition, it can also help to prepare a questionnaire for evaluation systematically.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제57권1호
• /
• pp.309-338
• /
• 2023

사회적·환경적 이슈에 대한 인식이 증가함에 따라 ESG 경영에 대한 관심이 높아지고, ESG 경영평가의 영향력은 점점 더 강해지고 있으며, 도서관도 ESG 경영평가에 참여할 필요가 있다. ESG 경영을 도서관에 적용하기 위해서는 도서관에 적용 가능한 ESG 경영을 정의하고 범주를 확인한 후, 먼저 적용과 지속적인 환류를 전제로 평가지표 개발이 필요하다. 이에 본 연구에서는 기업을 포함하여 공공기관 ESG 경영평가지표를 포괄적으로 살펴보고 이로부터 도서관에 적용가능한 ESG 경영평가지표를 제안하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 ESG 관련 선행연구 조사·분석, 선행연구 기반 도서관 ESG 예비경영평가지표 도출, 예비경영평가지표에 대한 전문가 FGI 의견 수렴, 전문가 FGI 의견 수렴 기반 1차 도서관 ESG 경영평가지표 개발, 1차 도서관 ESG 경영평가지표의 적합도 조사과정을 거쳤다. 최종적으로 환경 영역은 총 25개 항목, 사회 영역은 총 56개 항목, 지배구조 영역은 총 32개 항목을 선정하였다. 향후 연구에서는 이 지표를 기반으로 도서관을 대상으로 ESG 경영평가를 수행할 필요가 있다고 본다.