• 한국보육지원학회지
• /
• 제14권6호
• /
• pp.143-170
• /
• 2018

Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop assessment indicators and to verify the validity and reliability of the developed assessment indicators. Methods: A Delphi survey, focus group interviews, and content verification were conducted in order for experts to develop an evaluation index of the strengths of the day care center. A main survey was conducted on 438 daycare center principals and teachers to test their item quality, validity and reliability. Results: The final assessment indicators consisted of three areas, seven assessment criteria, 19 evaluation factors, 41 assessment items and a five-point rubric rating scale. As for the common strengths indicators, there were three assessment areas, five assessment criteria, 12 assessment elements and 22 assessment items. In regard to the selective strengths indicators, there were 3 assessment areas, 5 assessment criteria, 12 assessment elements and 16 assessment items. Conclusion/Implications: The efforts to confirm the strengths of daycare centers are expected to facilitate the identity building of the daycare center itself and for its organizational members to make a contribution to the qualitative improvement of childcare.

• 대한영양사협회학술지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.146-159
• /
• 2010

This study was conducted to determine the appropriateness of the indicators and items on teacher evaluations for professional development and to provide insight for their improvement. To accomplish this, the perception of the importance and performance frequency of 318 nutrition teachers regarding their roles inherent in the indicators and items were evaluated through a survey questionnaire based on a five-point Likert scale. The quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a paired t-test. In addition, the reflective analysis and constant comparison method were employed to analyze the responses to the open-ended questions asking problems in the indicators and items. The results revealed that the mean scores for the importance and performance frequency of most indicators and items were over four points, which implies that most indicators and items are appropriate for evaluating the job tasks of nutrition teachers. However, it was suggested that a few items be revised or removed for their improvement and appropriateness. This study concluded that nutrition teachers should have more chances to provide nutrition education for students to enable them to perform as teachers and not simply dietitians.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.71-83
• /
• 2011

An ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) approach becomes more important as an alternative management method for a sustainable development of fisheries domestically and internationally. Many methods of applying a practical EBFM to fisheries management have been investigated, and considerable attention has been given to developing effective indicators of the present status of and changes in ecosystems and putting them to practical use. Among ecosystem indicators, developing socioeconomic indicators for EBFM is particularly important. This is because socioeconomic factors have direct effects on ecosystems, and ecosystems have direct effects on socioeconomic factors. Therefore, it is imperative that socioeconomic indicators are developed and evaluated in order to predict changes in ecosystems and to provide advice for effective fisheries management. This study is aimed to develop socioeconomic indicators which can be combined with biological and ecological indicators, in order to conduct the ecosystem-based fisheries assessment. In terms of socioeconomic indicators, five socioeconomic criteria were considered as important attributes of socioeconomic changes. These criteria include economical production, business conditions, income, market, and employment indicators. For evaluation of newly developed socioeconomic indicators, the Traffic Light System (TLS) method was used. In addition, on the basis of the application of developed indicators to the Korean large purse seine fishery, the socioeconomic conditions of the fishery and the usefulness of the indicators were evaluated and management implications were discussed.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.140-150
• /
• 2014

University ranking models, though they consider multiple indicators to evaluate universities, determine the overall score of each university based on their own normalization and aggregation methods. Thus, the rankings provided by such models primarily depend on actual scores of evaluation indicators, but they are also significantly affected by the normalization and aggregation methods. We examine the normalization methods of four university ranking models used in South Korea, China, and United Kingdom. We discuss a possible unintended consequence of these methods, i.e., some universities who want to improve their rankings may focus on unnecessary indicators, contrary to the evaluator's intension, due to the normalization methods. We suggest a new normalization method based on the statistical characteristics of the distribution of each evaluation indicator so that the new method can motivate the universities to move into the desirable directions intended by the evaluator.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 4th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management Organized by the University of New South Wales
• /
• pp.426-431
• /
• 2011

The quality of performance evaluation on engineering consultants that provide design-related technical services is difficult to be measured, and only a handful of papers discussed the quality during the design stage. Although design cost is relatively far less than construction cost for a project, the decisions made in the design phase have a significant impact on the final products of the project, especially for large public construction projects. Therefore, this research focuses on reviewing and then establishing a performance evaluation framework for the consulting firms that execute detailed design and provide technical services for the Taipei Rapid Transit Systems (TRTS). By interviewing experts, this study first established a set of indicators to evaluate these firms' performance. Then, those indicators were incorporated into the four aspects of balanced scorecard (BSC) to establish the architecture of the evaluation mechanism. The weight of each indicator was calculated by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) from a survey conducted among experts. The results showed that the top-three indicators were quantity take-off, functions conformity, and budgeting. The framework of performance evaluation established by this study can be applied to measure service performance during the design stage. It not only facilitates the monitoring of consulting firms, but also helps to reduce unnecessary change orders and disputes during the construction stage.

• 대한교통학회지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.141-156
• /
• 2010

본 연구에서는 기존의 차량 및 보행환경의 평가에 있어서 종합적이고 통합적인 접근방식에 한계가 있다고 진단하고, 이를 고려하는 평가 방법 개발에 중점을 두었다. 여기에서의 통합적인 평가라 함은 차량환경과 보행환경에서 쓰이고 있는 수단별 평가 지표에 대한 통합과 더불어, 공간적 개념에서 선/축의 평가방식을 포함한 면적인 차원의 평가라 할 수 있겠다. 본 연구에서는 통합 평가를 위한 이론적 배경으로 Grey System Theory(GST)를 적용하였으며, 대상지역은 보행우선구역 시범사업지로 하여 차량 및 보행환경에 대한 평가를 수행하였다. GST에 의한 종합평가 및 분석결과, 같은 서비스수준 또는 상대적으로 차량 및 보행환경의 운영지표상(도로용량편람)에서는 보다 양호한 상태라 할지라도 관측된 데이터가 Grey Category 범위에 따라 통합 평가시에는 평가지표 간 가중치 등이 고려되어 산정되었기에 Category 상에서의 종합점수는 달라지는 것을 알 수 있었다. 이러한 점을 종합적으로 고려해 볼 때, 도로운영상의 지표들이 상대적으로 좋다고 하더라도 안전상의 지표들이 나쁠 경우에는 그에 따라Grey Category상의 점수들도 변화하는 것을 알 수 있었으며, 본 평가방법을 통해 향후 도시가로 형태별로 현재 상태를 진단할 뿐 아니라 노선별(축별), 면적인 개념에서의 평가와 더불어 평가지표간 통합평가가 이루어 질 것으로 기대하고 있다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제31권5호
• /
• pp.343-358
• /
• 2022

최근 증가하는 장애인구와 복지 패러다임의 변화에 따라, 정부는 장애인을 위한 기본법과 편의증진법의 제정 등 장애인의 생활환경 개선을 위하여 녹색환경 불평등 문제와 인간의 삶의 질 향상을 추구하는 녹색복지와 환경복지에 주목하고 있다. 그에 따른 장애인을 위한 녹색환경복지가 정책적으로 지원되고 있지만, 조성된 녹색복지공간 및 치유환경에 대한 평가지표는 전무한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구는 치유환경을 물리적 측면·심리적 측면·사회적 측면으로 구분하고 치유환경의 역할 및 공간적 기능이 적합한가에 대하여 판단할 수 있는 평가지표를 제시하고자 전문가 FGI를 활용하여 연구를 진행하였다. 연구 결과, 물리적 측면 평가항목 26개, 심리적 측면 평가항목 14개, 사회적 측면 평가항목 11개로 최종 51개의 치유환경 평가항목이 도출되었다. 본 연구에서 도출된 평가지표를 활용하여 장애인거주시설 내 조성된 치유환경에 대한 평가가 가능하며, 향후 조성될 치유환경의 계획단계에서 기초자료로 활용이 가능하다.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.105-119
• /
• 2011

In order to develop the indicators which evaluate the management effectiveness for the protected forest areas in Korea, candidate indicators were listed based on literature and experts interviews, then questionnaire survey on the experts were conducted. 5 elements of context, planning, input, process, output and outcome and 32 indicators were selected. Context element includes 6 indicators of 1) documentation and assessment of values; 2) documentation and assessment of threats, 3) influence of government policy, 4) related regulations, 5) community cooperation and 6) the structure of management organization. 6 indicators of Planning element were 1) the management objective, 2) protected area design, 3) protected area size and number, 4) representation, 5) standards and categories and 6) management planning. Input element of 3 indicators were 1) management staff, 2) funding, 3) establishment and application of information. Process element were consisted of 1) governance, 2) management guidelines, 3) human resource management, 4) law enforcement, 5) eco-management, 6) disaster management, 7) education program and 8) research and monitoring. The element of outputs and outcomes were 1) accomplishment of plan, 2) accomplishment of program, 3) private land management, 4) threats change, 5) biodiversity change, 6) ecosystem health and vitality, 7) impact on community, 8) international management level and 9) visitors' satisfaction and variation in civil compliant. It is recommended to have further research on evaluation methods development by applying those above developed indicators for the protected forest areas to ensure the practicality of the indicators.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.113-136
• /
• 2009

국가 연구개발사업의 효율성과 생산성을 제고하기 위하여, 정부에서는 '국가연구개발사업 등의 성과 평가 및 성과관리에 관한 법률'을 제정하여 정부 각 부처의 연구개발 사업 성과의 효율성을 증대시키고 있다. 본 논문은 국방연구개발사업 자체평가시스템 측면에서 메타평가를 실시하기 위하여 요인분석(Factor Analysis)을 통한 계층분석적 의사결정기법(AHP, Analytic Hierarchy Process)을 사용한 평가지표를 개발한 결과이다. 국방연구개발사업의 메타평가를 위한 평가요소로서 평가상황, 평가투입, 평가수행, 평가결과 등 4요소로 구분하여 평가지표를 개발하였다. 평가항목 선정을 위하여 평가요소 및 평가지표간 요인분석을 실시하여 Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ 값을 측정한 결과, 평가상황요소는 0.877, 평가투입요소는 0.755, 평가결과요소는 0.792, 평가결과요소는 0.906으로 내적일관성을 고려한 신뢰성은 있는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 평가요소 및 평가항목별 가중치 산정은 AHP기법을 사용하여 분석하였다. 분석결과 조사자의 전체 일관성 지수는 0.09로 조사자의 일관성은 있는 것으로 분석되었다.

• 에너지공학
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.90-95
• /
• 2013

기술 중심의 ESCO 전문화를 위한 전문 ESCO 지정제 평가기준 마련이 요청되어 왔다. 이에, 본 연구는 전문 ESCO 지정제도에 관한 평가기준을 설정하기 위해 5가지 목적을 전제하였다. 즉, 에너지 절감의 우수성, 경영지표의 건전성, 고객만족도, 원천기술 보유업체의 참여 유도, 절약성과 보증계약 중시 등이다. 이를 바탕으로 전문가 자문을 통해 전문 ESCO 지정을 위한 평가배점(안)을 전문성(40점), 경영상태(15점), 고객만족도(20점), 기술능력(25점) 등 평가지표로 구성하고, 각각 세부 평가항목의 선정 및 배점기준을 설정하였다. ESCO 업계 설문조사를 통해 비교적 높은 동의율을 보였다. 전문 ESCO 지정제도의 적용 시 기업규모를 중소기업으로 한정하고 적용기술 대상을 조명, 열병합발전, 공정개선, 폐열회수, 냉 난방설비 등 5개의 특정 기술분야로 지정하는 것이 가능할 것이다.