• 문화기술의 융합
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.421-426
• /
• 2024

계층화분석과정(analytic hierarchy process, AHP)는 쌍대비교를 이용하여, 사람들의 판단기준을 객관적인 수치로 변환해준다. 그런데 너무 많은 쌍대비교를 필요로 한다는 점이 문제이다. 본 연구의 목적은 표준 AHP보다 간편하면서도, 결과물은 유사하게 나오는 새로운 방식의 의사결정지원시스템을 만드는 것이다. 기존 연구들은 복잡한 쌍대비교 과정을 감소시키기 위하여 과정 분리(process separation) 방식을 가장 많이 사용하였다. 본 연구가 채택한 과정 분리 방법은 "분리와 혼합 방식"이다. 즉, 1)판단기준을 평가할 때는 정규 AHP 과정을 사용하고, 2)대안을 비교평가 할 때는 다속성효용모형(multi-attributive utility technique, MAUT)을 적용한다. 이 Hybrid 모형의 과정 감축효과를 이론적으로 도출하기 위하여 정보입력 횟수를 계산하는 산식을 만들었다. 그런 다음, 이 AHP-MAUT Hybrid 모형을 실제 분석 사례인 경기도 주민들이 분당-강남역 간 통근할 때 어떤 교통수단들을 선택하는지 분석하는 사례에 적용하였다. 그 결과 Hybrid 모형을 적용할 때 계산과정이 AHP 모형을 사용했을 때와 비교하여 42.03% 감소하였다. 그리고 Hybrid model을 적용한 주민들의 선택 결과와 표준 AHP를 이용한 주민들의 선택 결과를 서로 비교하였다. 혼동모형에서 도출한 두 모형 간의 선택 일치도(CA)는 82.1%로서, 상당한 정도로 일관성이 있다 할 수 있을 정도였다. 결론적으로 본 연구가 목적하는 바는 AHP보다 간단하고, 편리하면서도 동등하게 효과적인 의사결정지원시스템을 개발하는 것인데, AHP-MAUT Hybrid 모형이 그 목적에 부합하였다. 이런 결과에 힘입어 Hybrid 모형의 적용사례가 증가한다면, 그것이 표준 AHP의 대안 중 하나로 고려될 수 있다는 점이 본 연구의 기여이다.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 1999

This paper presents a DEA-AHP hybrid model to evaluate and select R&D projects. AHP collects and processes information on the weights of evaluation criteria. The processed information is used as an input for DEA/AR model. Only desirable number of projects are selected by the hybrid model. The model is examined by an example generated from a real data set.

• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 1999년도 제15회 하계 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.245-265
• /
• 1999

MAUT and AHP are widely used for quantification of subjective judgements in various fields of decision making. This study focuses on the introduction and application of MAUT/AHP method which is a hybrid of MAUT and AHP techniques in R&D project priority setting. This hybrid model can clarify each factors' contribution using MAUT method and can reduce the number of pairwise comparisons of AHP method. This study applies AMUT/AHP method to the evaluation of R&D projects in a Government - funded research institute. To evaluate R&D projects, six evaluation factors are derived. SMART(Simple MultiAttribute Rating Technique) and DVM(Difference Value Measurement ) out of many MAUT methods are used to design the utility function ad AHP is used to allocate the weights among evaluation factors. The major findings of this study can be summarized as follows. First, the SMART/AHP and the DVM/AHP have the same results with the SMART and the DVM, and they are different results with AHP. It is very hard to decide which one is better. Second, MAUT/AHP's strength is analyzed. MAUT reflects utility values of evaluators to alternatives and AHP results objective and consistent weights of factors through pariwise comparisons. Third, its possible application fields are proposed. It is applicable to subjective decision making problems with high complexity and inter-independent factors.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.55-77
• /
• 2012

Selecting promising technology is becoming more and more difficult due to the increased number and complexity. In this study, we propose hybrid AHP/DEA-AR method and hybrid AHP/DEA-AR-G method to evaluate efficiency of technology alternatives based on ordinal rating data collected through survey to technology experts in a certain field and select efficient technology alternative as promising technology. The proposed method normalizes rating data and uses AHP to derive weights to improve the credibility of analysis, then in order to avoid basic DEA models' problems, use DEA-AR and DEA-AR-G to evaluate efficiency of technology alternatives. In this study, we applied the proposed methods to clean technology and compared with the basic DEA models. According to the result of the comparison, we can find that the both proposed methods are excellent in confirming most efficient technology, and hybrid AHP/DEA-AR method is much easier to use in the process of technology selection.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.156-163
• /
• 2010

This paper suggests a DEA/AHP hybrid model to deal with an allocation problem of research budget for the national research lab(NRL) program. The qualitative factors are appraised by AHP model and the quantitative factors are dealt with DEA model to evaluate the performance of research activities considering tangible and intangible factors. The proposed hybrid model is applied to get the importance weight of research areas for research budget allocation of NRL program.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.179-194
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 컨테이너터미널의 서비스 투입자원 중 장비를 중점으로 컨테이너터미널의 효율성 비교 평가하기 위해 DEA와 AHP 기법을 혼합한 AHP/DEA 통합모형을 적용하였다. 분석은 광양항(GICT, KEC, KIT), 부산항(HBCT, KBCT, DPCT, UTC, 감만부두) 그리고 부산신항(PNC, PNIT, HJNC, HPNT)의 12개 운영사를 대상으로 하였다. 제안된 AHP/DEA 통합모형은 DEA 모형의 가중치간의 불균형으로 인하여 잘못 평가된 DMU 발생가능성과 효율적인 DMU간의 우열에 대한 변별의 어려움을 극복하기 위해 DEA-AR(Assurance Region)모형을 적용하였고, DEA-AR모형의 가중치 범위를 산출하기 위해 전문가의 의견을 객관적인 가중치로 변환할 수 있는 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) 방법론을 사용하였다. 연구모형의 투입변수는 C/C 수, TC 수, YT 수, RS 수로 하였고 산출변수는 컨테이너 물동량으로 하였다. 연구결과 AHP/DEA 통합모형은 기존의 항만 및 컨테이너터미널의 효율성 평가에 사용되었던 DEA, 또는 DEA 응용모형에 비해 최고의 효율성을 가지는 컨테이너터미널을 선정에 있어 유연하고, 우수한 능력이 있음을 분석결과의 비교를 통해 알 수 있었다. 분석결과를 보면 하역장비 효율성이 100%로 달성한 터미널은 DPCT로 나타났고, 상대적으로 부산항 터미널들의 장비 효율성이 높은 것으로 분석되었다.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.74-96
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this empirical study is to evaluate efficiency of the regional public hospitals, using DEA(Data Envelopment Analysis). to do this, we design a DEA-AR/AHP Hybrid model to evaluate efficiency of 34 Regional Public Hospitals. the proposed model is developed by adding Acceptance Region(AR). using analytical hierarchy process(AHP). this model is compared with those of typical DEA models. Financial data used in this study were obtained from Database of the Korea Association Regional Public Hospital and analyzed using DEA model. As a result of analysis, This study found that the DEA-AR/AHP Hybrid model was superior to those typical DEA models in determining the priority among efficient hospitals. the result of this study can provide helpful information to evaluate the efficiency of public hospitals for efficient operational management, to develop more precise measurement for the priority of the efficient hospitals.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.210-219
• /
• 2011

The traditional AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) is to evaluate subjectively the alternatives in the view point of each of criteria and has been widely used at the fields of real world application. The AHP has some drawbacks that makes it difficult to keep the consistency of decision makers' input and take too long to get accurate results because of requiring lots of pairwise comparison between criteria and alternatives. This research is to propose and develop a Hybrid-AHP system for complementing the critical points of traditional AHP methodologies. This system gets the quantitative information as well as qualitative inputs as the comparative ones between criteria and alternatives. We use the input as various type of information such as quantitative values, 9-scale ratings, and fuzzy-based inputs. Finally, we applied the system to the case of choosing strategic industries. The case study have shown the use of various input methods saves processing time, and reduces the input burden of users.

• 한국산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제20권5호
• /
• pp.45-52
• /
• 2015

하이브리드 하드디스크는 저전력이면서 마그네틱 하드디스크에 비해 읽기 성능이 우수하다. 이 디스크의 플래시메모리에는 지역성이 높은 블록이 저장되므로 효율적인 블록 교체 기법이 필요하다. 블록 교체에는 크기, 지역성, 빈도 등 다양한 요인에 의해 결정되므로 일종의 다중 기준 결정 모델로 정의될 수 있다. 이 문제를 해결하기 위해 본 연구는 AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) 모델을 적용하여 효율적인 블록 교체 기법을 제시한다. 실험의 효율성을 검증하기 위하여 철저한 시뮬레이션을 수행한 결과 일반응용 프로그램의 응답성뿐만 아니라 부트 시간이 단축됨을 확인하였다.

• 한국산업정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국산업정보학회 2003년도 추계공동학술대회
• /
• pp.239-250
• /
• 2003

In this research, we propose a hybrid group decision support mechanism (H-GDSM) based on Fuzzy AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and FCM (Fuzzy Cognitive Map). The AHP elicits a corresponding priority vector interpreting the preferred information among the decision makers. Corresponding vector was composed of the pairwise comparison values of a set of objects. Since pairwise comparison values are the judgments obtained from an appropriate semantic scale. However, AHP couldn't represent the causal relationship among information, which were used by decision makers. In contrast to AHP, FCM could represent the causal relationship among variables or information. Therefore, FCMs were successfully developed and used in several ill-structured domains, such as strategic decision-making, policy making, and simulations. Nonetheless, many researchers used subjective and voluntary inputs to simulate the FCM. As a result of subjective inputs, it couldn't avoid the rebukes of businessman. To overcome these limitations, we incorporated the Fuzzy membership functions, AHP and FCM into a H-GDSM. In contrast to current AHP methods and FCMs, the H-GDSM method developed herein could concurrently tackle the pairwise comparison involving causal relationships under a group decision-making environment. The strengths and contributions of our mechanism were 1) handling of qualitative knowledge and causal relationships, 2) extraction of objective input value to simulate the FCM, 3) multi-phase group decision support based on H-GDSM. To validate our proposed mechanism we developed a simple prototype system to support negotiation-based decisions in electronic commerce (EC).