• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.53-63
• /
• 2017

Managing the quantitative measurement of the data control activities in enterprise wide is important to secure management of data governance. However, research on data governance is limited to concept definitions and components, and data governance research on evaluation models is lacking. In this study, we developed a model of quantitative assessment for data governance including the assessment area, evaluation index and evaluation matrix. We also, proposed a method of developing the model of quantitative assessment for data governance. For this purpose, we used previous studies and expert opinion analysis such as the Delphi technique, KJ method in this paper. This study contributes to literature by developing a quantitative evaluation model for data governance at the early stage of the study. This paper can be used for the base line data in objective evidence of performance in the companies and agencies of operating data governance.

• World Technopolis Review
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.108-118
• /
• 2016

There are very few studies on governance structure for the collaboration between HEIs and science and technology parks until today. Major activities between science parks and HEIs are R&D activities, collaborative researches, technology transfer, space provision for BIs and Technology BIs in the science parks, provision of technical, legal and financial services for start-ups and venture firms. Governance structure for the collaboration of high education institutes with science and technology parks is the handling of complexity and management of dynamic flows of collaboration between two groups. Three models on the governance structure for the collaboration are suggested in this study. The first model is a governance structure that links R&D system such as universities, public research institutes and private research institutes with industrial production cluster such as a group of companies and industrial parks. The second model is a governance structure that has four layers of hierarchy. This hierarchical governance model is composed of four levels of organizations such as central government, three actors, one center for collaboration and many individual research performers. The third model is a governance structure that networks all the stakeholders horizontally. Under this structure, governance is conducted by the network members with no separate and unique governance entity.

• 인터넷정보학회논문지
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.63-72
• /
• 2019

기업 혹은 조직 거버넌스의 하위개념인 비즈니스 거버넌스와 IT 거버넌스는 학계에서 주요 연구과제가 되어 왔다. 그러나 비즈니스와 IT 도메인의 매개적 구조체로서 프로세스의 중요성에도 불구하고, 프로세스 거버넌스(PG)의 연구는 상대적으로 미흡하였다. PG는 비즈니스 전략을 IT시스템 구현과 연계하는 활동에 집중하며, 기업의 본원적 가치 창조 활동을 설명한다. 본 논문은 정치학, 사회학, 행정학에서의 기본적인 거버넌스 개념을 연구하고, 거버넌스 유형을 6개의 카테고리로 분류했다. 그리고 PG에 대한 일련의 메타모델을 제안한다. 예를 들면 전통적인 핸더슨과 벤카트라만의 SAM모델을 수정한 neo-SAM 모델, 조직 거버넌스 네트워크 모델, 조직거버넌스 순차모델, 조직 거버넌스 메타모델, 프로세스 거버넌스 큐브 모델, COSO와 프로세스 거버넌스의 비교 모델, 마지막으로 프로세스 거버넌스 프레임워크 등이다. SAM모델과 neo-SAM 모델의 주요한 차이점은 비즈니스 거버넌스와 IT 거버넌스 사이에 프로세스 거버넌스 도메인을 포함한 것이다. 여러 개의 메타 모델 중에서, 프로세스 거버넌스 프레임워크가 핵심 개념 모델로서 이는 4개의 활동차원 - 전략연계, 권한강화, 직능향상, 자율조직 - 으로 구성된다. 연구자는 각 활동차원 별로 5개씩 총 20개의 변인을 설계했다. 4개의 활동차원 외에도 프로세스 거버넌스 사이클을 움직이는 6개의 순환 동력 - 탈규범력, 미시권력, 활력, 자기조직력, 규범력, 센스메이킹 - 이 있다. 4개의 활동차원과 6개의 동력으로 조직은 내외부의 환경 변화에 대한 프로세스 거버넌스의 융통성을 유지할 수 있다. 본 연구는 프로세스 거버넌스 역량 모델과 프로세스 거버넌스 변인을 제안하는 목적을 가진다. 업계환경은 기능 중심 조직관리에서 프로세스 중심 관점으로 변화하고 있다. 연구자가 제안하는 프로세스 거버넌스 프레임워크가 향후 프로세스 거버넌스 도메인의 연구 확산을 위한 맥락적 참조모델과 아울러 프로세스 거버넌스 측정도구의 개발을 위한 조작적 정의의 틀을 제공할 것이다.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.65-77
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this paper is to develop a model of level evaluation for data governance that can diagnose and verify level of insufficient part of operating data governance. We expanded the previous study related on attribute indices of data governance and developed a level model of evaluation and items. The model of level evaluation for data governance is the level of evaluation and has items of 400 components. We used previous studies and expert opinion analysis such as the Delphi technique, KJ method in this paper. This study contributes to literature by developing a level evaluation model for data governance at the early phase. This paper will be used for the base line data in objective evidence of performance in the companies and agencies of operating data governance.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제7권4호
• /
• pp.169-180
• /
• 2009

IT governance implies a system in which all stakeholders with a given organization, including the board, internal customers, and related areas such as finance provide the necessary input into their decision-making process. However, the concepts of IT governance are broad and ambiguous, so IT governance is eventually needed multi-criteria decision making. This paper presents a hierarchical structure to better understand the relationship between control structure and the complexity of collective behavior with respect to IT governance and proposes a corresponding fuzzy model for analyzing IT governance complexity based on an extensive literature review. The results of this study are expected to provide a clearer understanding of how the concerns of IT governance behave and how they interact and form the collective behavior of the entire system.

• 인터넷정보학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.58-67
• /
• 2013

An essential prerequisite for negotiating governance of 'internet,' a world of 'end to end' nature, is to guarantee end-users' participation. Internet Governance Forum (IGF), the outcome of World Summit on the Information Society(WSIS) Tunis Agenda, has played an important role as a representative mulitistakeholder - based governance model, which puts emphasis on wide range participation of stakeholders. Notwithstanding multistakeholderism materialized in IGF has been challenged, IGF itself is a unique place for participation to broad internet governance discourse, as all voices get hearing grounded on openness, inclusion, and transparency, quite distinct from the multilateral negotiation based model such as 'Conference on Cyberspace.' Therefore civil society which represents end-users' interest, as a crucial stakeholder of internet governance, should establish more strategic and coordinated approach to IGF itself as well as reformation discourse of internet governance. In this regard, civil society groups of Korea, began with hosting workshops and Open Forum at the 2013 IGF in Bali, Indonesia. This report also describes the detailed activities of Korean civil society group in 2013 IGF.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제21권5호
• /
• pp.15-28
• /
• 2022

Recently, government agencies are actively adopting the platform model as a means of public policy. However, existing studies on the public platform are minimal and have focused on user experiences or the possibility of public usage of the platform model. Now the research concerning building governance structure and utilizing network effects of the platform after adopting the platform model in the public sector is keenly required. This study intended to ignite academic dialogue on the governance of public platforms in the context of digital transformation. This study focused on a case of the 'Special delivery,' a public delivery app established by Gyeonggi-do. In order to analyze the characteristics of the public platform and its governance structure, data were collected from press releases, policy reports, and news articles. Data was analyzed using the frame of Hagui's platform design factors and Ansell & Gash's collaborative governance model. The results of the public platform analyses showed 1) incompleteness in the value trade-off accounting, which was designed for platform business based on general cost-benefit analysis, and 2) a closed governance structure that limits direct participation of diverse user groups(i.e., service provider, customer) in order to enhance providers' utility by preventing customers' excessive online activities. The results of this study provided theoretical and policy implications regarding designing the strategy for accounting for value trade-offs and functioning governance structure for public platforms.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제14권11호
• /
• pp.91-102
• /
• 2016

Purpose - The objectives of this study are as follows. First, it aims to suggest an analysis model that has integrated the relationship between the two factors and export performance and conduct an empirical analysis of the factors. Second, the study seeks to analyze the mediating effect by setting direct channel governance as a specific activity to connect market orientation, a cultural asset, to export performance. Third, through these analyses, the study intends to apply the relationship between market orientation and direct channel governance that the existing studies have failed to observe comprehensively on SMEs in Korea. Based on these analyses, the study expects to expand the discussion of previous researches by analyzing the mediating effect of direct channel governance. Research design, data, and methodology - This study developed a model that has integrated market orientation, direct channel governance, and export performance. It established 7 hypotheses including the mediating effect of direct channel governance. Market orientation was consisted of customer orientation and competitor orientation, and 4 latent variables were measured by 18 questions. LISREL, an analysis tool of structural equation model, was used for hypothesis test and there were 183 sample for analysis. Results - The analysis results showed that customer orientation has a positive influence on direct channel governance, but competitor orientation did not have a statistically significant effect. On the contrary, export performance showed an opposite result. That is, customer orientation did not have any influence but competitor orientation had a significant influence on export performance. It was also confirmed that there was a significant influence in the relationship between channel governance and export performance. According to the analysis of mediating effect, direct channel governance had a full mediating effect between customer orientation and export performance. Conclusions - The study results demonstrated that it is important to build a direct channel governance on the export SMEs in Korea, especially since the direct channel governance complements the influence of customer orientation that does not directly influence export performance among market orientation activities. This implies that Korean export SMEs must strive to build an effective direct channel governance.

• World Technopolis Review
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.39-54
• /
• 2014

Recently, investment to basic science has been increased and infrastructure of science and technology has been expanded in developed countries like U.S.A, UK and Japan to foster high-tech industries. Science and research parks are built and under operation to acquire national competitive power and to activate regional economy over the world today. It is argued that more synergy effects are generated when science and research parks are operated in cooperation with related organizations and facilities such as firms, universities, research institutes and governments than it is operated by one organization. The aim of this paper is to develop a governance model of science and research parks. One comprehensive model and three individual governance models were developed according to the structure and relations of industry-science/research park-supporting organization interactions. When governance model of science and research parks is established and properly managed, national development capacity would be greatly enhanced through the acceleration of technology transfer, industrial production rise and enhancement of efficiency in the area of R&D and supporting system etc. One of the key factors in building governance system for science and research parks is establishing a control tower that supervises governance system comprehensively and systematically.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제22권8호
• /
• pp.403-415
• /
• 2022

본 연구의 목적은 청주시 도시공원 민관거버넌스의 성과를 Ansell & Gash(2007)의 '협력적 거버넌스' 모델을 중심으로 분석하고 시사점을 찾는 데 있다. 협력적 거버넌스 모델이 제시한 4대 범주와 13개의 성공 요소를 활용해 해당 거버넌스의 성과와 한계를 분석했다. 분석 결과를 보면, 초기조건, 제도설계, 리더십, 협력과정 등 4대 범주 모두를 충족시키고 있다. 13개 요소 중 8개 요소가 '양호' 수준으로 분석되어 성공적인 거버넌스로 평가되었으며, 신뢰 구축과 헌신적 협력을 성공적 거버넌스의 핵심 요소로 볼 수 있다. 반면, 한계점이 드러난 5개 요소는 '보통' 수준으로 평가되었다. 이와 같은 분석 결과는 협력적 거버넌스의 개선을 위해서는 사후 이행관리 체계를 마련하고, 참여의 포용성을 더욱 강화하며, 제도적 설계 단계부터 간접참여 주체 및 대중과의 정기적인 소통의 장을 보장하는 규정과 실행이 필요하다는 시사점을 주고 있다. 본 연구는 객관적으로 검증된 모델의 평가 범주를 기준으로 분석하였지만, 평가는 주관적 판단에 따랐다는 한계가 있다.