• Title/Summary/Keyword: Fluoride-releasing materials

Search Result 13, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

Flexible Energy Harvesting Device based on Hybrid Piezoelectric Nanocomposite made of Lead-Free BCTZ Ceramic and Piezo-polymer (비납계 BCTZ 압전세라믹과 압전폴리머로 제작된 하이브리드 나노복합체 기반의 플렉서블 에너지 하베스팅 소자)

  • Park, Sung Cheol;Lee, Jae Hoon;Kim, Yeon-gyu;Park, Kwi-Il
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Electrical and Electronic Material Engineers
    • /
    • v.35 no.1
    • /
    • pp.72-79
    • /
    • 2022
  • Piezoelectric energy harvesting technologies, which can be used to convert the electricity from the mechanical energy, have been developed in order to assist or power the wearable electronics. To realize non-toxic and biocompatible electronics, the lead-free (Ba0.85Ca0.15)(Ti0.90Zr0.10)O3 (BCTZ) nanoparticles (NPs) are being studied with a great attention as flexible energy harvesting device. Herein, piezoelectric hybrid nanocomposites were fabricated using BCTZ NPs-embedded poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) [P(VDF-TrFE)] matrix to improve the performance of flexible energy harvester. Output performance of the fabricated energy device was investigated by the well-optimized measurement system during the periodically bending and releasing motions. The generated open-circuit voltage and the short-circuit current of the piezoelectric hybrid nanocomposite-based energy harvester reached up to ~15 V and ~1.1 ㎂, respectively; moreover, the instantaneous power of 3.5 ㎼ is determined from load voltage and current at the external load of 20 MΩ. This research is expected to cultivate a new approach to high-performance wearable self-powering electronics.

SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF GIOMER AND SELF-ETCHING PRIMER ON THE DENTIN (Giomer와 자가 산부식 접착제의 상아질에 대한 전단 결합강도)

  • Yoon, Eun-Young;Lee, Nan-Young;Lee, Sang-Ho
    • Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry
    • /
    • v.37 no.4
    • /
    • pp.422-428
    • /
    • 2010
  • Giomer is fluoride-releasing, resin-based dental materials that comprise PRG(pre-reacted glass ionomer) filler. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of Giomer using self-etching primer systems to bovine dentin. Bovine incisors were mounted in self-curing orthodontic resin and the facial surfaces were wet ground on SIC paper to expose the dentin. Total 100 samples were made and divided randomly into 4 groups, Giomer group(I), Composite resin group(II) and Compomer group(III), Giomer and single bottle adhesive group(IV). The shear bond strengths of 25 samples per each group were measured using universal testing machine. And data were analyzed statistically with One-way ANOVA and Scheffe test. Giomer group(I) showed the significantly higher bond strength than Compomer group(III)(p<0.05). There was no significant difference between Giomer group(I) and Composite resin group(II)(p>0.05). And there is no significant difference between gourp(I) and group(IV). Based on the results of present study, the use of Giomer as an esthetic restorative material for primary teeth might be justified. It is considered that more study about the fluoride releasing ability is needed to evaluate the anticariogenic effect of giomer.

Surface roughness and surface free energy components of various orthodontic adhesives (다양한 교정용 접착제의 표면거칠기와 표면에너지 요소 분석)

  • Ahn, Hyo-Beom;Ahn, Sug-Joon;Nahm, Dong-Seok
    • The korean journal of orthodontics
    • /
    • v.36 no.5
    • /
    • pp.360-368
    • /
    • 2006
  • Objective: Surface characteristics of dental materials play an important role in bacterial adhesion. The purpose of this study was to investigate surface characteristics of 5 different light-cured orthodontic adhesives (1 fluoride-releasing composite, 3 non-fluoride-releasing composites, and f resin-modified glass ionomer). Methods: Surface roughness was measured using a confocal laser scanning microscope. Contact angle and surface free energy components were analyzed using the sessile drop method. Results: Surface roughness was significantly different between adhesives despite a relatively small variation (less than $0.05\;{\mu}m$). Lightbond and Monolok2 were rougher than Enlight and Transbond XT. There were also significant differences in contact angles and surface free energy components between adhesives. In particular, considerable differences in contact angles and surface free energy components were found between resin modified glass ionomer and the composites. Resin modified glass ionomer showed significantly smaller contact angles in 3 different probe liquids and had higher total surface free energy and stronger polarity, with notably stronger basic property than the composites. Conclusion: Resin modified glass ionomer may provide a more favourable environment for bacterial adhesion than composite adhesives.