• 농촌계획
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.65-73
• /
• 2006

This study attempts to develop an interim evaluation system for the Integrated Rural Village Cluster Development Project(IRVCDP) which can secure its identity and sustainability, and induce its early settlement, and to derive plans for its steady progress. The evaluation system consists of three levels. The highest-order level is evaluation purposes, which describe IRVCDP's goals. They are expansion of income bases(EIB), improvement of living environments(ILE), strengthening of regional capabilities(SRC) and constructing effective project operation system(CEPOS). The second level is evaluation items, which each characterize the relevant evaluation purposes. The last level is evaluation indices, which observe achievement f3r evaluation purposes. 22 evaluation indices are selected to satisfy the purposes of this study through a brainstorming process and a survey on opinions of experts for those evaluation purposes and evaluation items which are derived from analyzing the IRVCDP's properties. The relative importance of the evaluation indices selected are determined through the AHP analysis. The most intriguing result from the AHP analysis is that strengthening of regional capabilities is found to be the most important one among evaluation purposes. It can be said that this result is parallel to a ultimate goal of the IRVCDP.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.314-328
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study is to establish a conceptual model of the course evaluations. in University. This paper has examined the course evaluations according to the levels, purposes, objects, and methods of them. And this paper has been classified for a conceptual model of the course evaluation. As the result of this analysis, four dimensions of course evaluation have been found. First, formative and summative evaluation have been found. The purposes of formative evaluation were improving quality of courses and collecting information for improvement of curriculum. The purposes of summative evaluation were offering informations on faculty staffing and improving of learning outcomes. Second, the levels of course evaluation were classified into university-level, professor-level, and student-level. Third, the objects of course evaluation were classified into analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. Forth, the methods of course evaluation were classified into questionnaire, observation, interview, and content analysis. As a result of this analysis, 120 types of course evaluations have been found.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.93-101
• /
• 1992

The purposes of this study were; 1) to apply the network analysis to evaluation of students' laboratory reports, 2) to test the applicability of the systematic network analysis. For this purposes, 7th grade 88 students from 22 middle schools in Inchon city of Korea were selected and their laboratory reports were evaluated by a evaluation criterion network developed in this study. The evaluation criterion consisted of 4 categories and 10 subcategories. The results of this study suggested that the network analysis approach was suitable one for the evaluation of students' laboratory reports. This was supported by total score distribution, means/weight, Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ coefficient(0.70), and the subcategories' reliabilities. The resluts of the factor analysis indicated that the evaluation criterion network of this study had two factors.

• 한국농공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국농공학회 2005년도 학술발표논문집
• /
• pp.429-435
• /
• 2005

This study attempts to develop indices in order to make an objective and effective evaluation of achievements in the first stage of operation of the Rural Village Development Project(RVDP) (the first 3 years of its operation). The results are as follows 1. Evaluation purposes are expansion of income-generating bases, improvement of living environments, strengthening of village's competence and establishment of an effective project's management system. 2. Evaluation items for the first three evaluation purposes, which are income-generating bases, improvement of living environments and strengthening of village's competence, are record of performance and substantiality in project's operation, results from operation, and capability in managing the project. Those for establishment of an effective project's management system are participation of habitants and the projects's management system. 3. As this study aims to develop the indices which can evaluate the state of operation in the interim of the project's operation and outcomes generated by then, the evaluation indices are selected by considering those criterions of representativeness, accessibility, usefulness and reliability. 4. As the indices developed in this study efficiency evaluate the process of project's operation and thus evaluate basically the project's operation on the basis of its efficiency. But, considering the purposes of the RVDP, it is included for the overall project's management system and plans for managing activities of the project to be evaluated on the basis of effectiveness.

• 한국어교육
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.149-179
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study was to establish a Korean reading ability assessment category based on a reading comprehension theory, and to establish an evaluation framework for Korean reading ability after creating the evaluation factors corresponding to each category through expert Delphi survey. The three levels of reading comprehension that were constructed are the following: language knowledge, text comprehension, and interpretation and comprehension of new ideas and application. This study suggested that constructs of Korean reading assessment reflected reading theory. This study has meaningful consequences which suggest verified constructs through Delphi surveys.

• 비교교육연구
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.97-121
• /
• 2017

오늘날 교사 양성 질 관리 기제인 교원양성기관평가가 정착되면서 그 본질적 기능에 대한 의구심도 증폭되고 있다. 특히, 교사 공급 과잉이 발생하는 국가의 경우, 평가 자체의 적합성은 물론, 평가 결과의 활용이 예비교사 교육의 질 관리에 기여하지 못한다는 비판도 제기된다. 이러한 문제인식에서 본 연구는 중등교사가 과잉 공급되고 있는 한국과 중국의 사범대학을 대상으로 한 평가의 특징을 평가의 주체, 목적, 주기, 지표, 방법, 결과 활용이라는 여섯 가지 준거에 따라 비교분석할 목적으로 수행되었다. 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 한국과 중국의 사범대학 평가는 교원양성기관 교육 수준의 질 향상을 공식적 목적으로 표방하고 있지만 실제 평가 추진의 내용 및 결과 활용은 본질적 목적에서 벗어나 형식적으로 운영되고 있다는 공통적 문제가 발견되었다. 둘째, 평가 주체나 지표, 결과 활용 등에 있어서는 정부 주도의 관리 감독이나 양성 자원 통제 등에 치우쳐 있고 교사 직전교육의 질을 높이기 위한 사범대학의 질 제고는 뒷전이라는 상황은 교사 과잉 공급과 밀접하게 연관되어 있다는 점을 확인하였다. 이상 연구결과를 토대로 양 국가의 사범대학 평가가 본질을 회복하고 진정한 의미의 질 관리 기제로 개선되기 위해 필요한 정책적 제언을 제시하였다.

• 대한지역사회영양학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한지역사회영양학회 2007년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.58-66
• /
• 2007

• Advances in environmental research
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.43-57
• /
• 2021

Evaluation of groundwater quality is vital due to its diverse use for several purposes. In the present study, groundwater quality and suitability from the Peshawar basin, Pakistan, were evaluated for drinking and irrigation purposes. The water samples were analysed for major cations (Ca, Mg, Na and K) and anions (chloride, bicarbonate and sulphate) along with other physicochemical parameters (pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, and total hardness). About 95% of the water samples were found to be within the WHO, US-EPA and Pak-EPA permissible levels for drinking purposes. Seventy percent (70%) of the water samples belonged to the hard water category. Irrigation water quality parameters, such as, chloride, residual sodium bicarbonate, sodium adsorption ratio, percent sodium, magnesium adsorption ratio, Kelly's ration and permeability index were evaluated which demonstrated that the groundwater was highly to moderately suitable for irrigation. A correlation study was conducted to find out the mutual associations among the variables. Piper diagram indicated the overall chemical nature of the study area was calcium-magnesium bicarbonate type. Cluster analysis revealed mutual apportionment of various parameters in the groundwater of the Peshawar basin, Pakistan.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제31권6호
• /
• pp.1109-1118
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this study was to analyze the appraising frame and the accreditation system of universities in both Korea and the United Sates, as well as developing a standard plan to appraise 4 year nursing education institutions in Korea. Research design of this study was descriptive comparative research. The results of the research can be divided into six fields, educational purposes, educational courses, students, faculty, facility .equipments and administration.finance in Korea. Then the results were further categorized into seven fields : mission and governance, faculty, students, curriculum and instruction, resources, educational effectiveness and integrity. Thus Korean appraising frames were suggested to have eight fields of standard. The fields are philosophy and purposes of educational institution, educational courses and instruction, students, faculty, facility .equipments, adminstration.finance, educational effectiveness and integrity.

• 융합정보논문지
• /
• 제9권9호
• /
• pp.126-132
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 관리적 목적에서 대학의 학과 홈페이지 평가를 위한 TOPSIS 기반의 응용을 제시한다. 학령인구 감소시대를 맞아 대학의 학과 홈페이지는 입시 전략의 관점에서는 중요한 홍보 수단의 의미를 갖는다. 하지만 대부분 리뉴얼과 같은 전면적 개편 전에는 관리가 잘되지 않는다. 비록 입시전략 차원에서 홈페이지 관리는 중요한 일이지만 단순한 관리 목적의 평가에 많은 노력이나 비용을 투자하기는 어렵기 때문이다. 그래서 본 논문은 현실성을 고려하여 관리 목적에서 대학의 학과 홈페이지 평가에 부분적으로 수정된 TOPSIS를 적용하여 그 유용성을 보이고자 한다. TOPSIS는 각 기준에 대한 이상적인 목푯값으로 부터 편차 거리를 기반으로 하여 우선순위를 결정해 주는 개념적 이유로 목표 관리를 위한 평가도구로 사용하기에 합당하다고 본다. 그리고 사용되는 평가 기준들의 방향성이 같은 단조증가 함수 같은 경우 본 연구에서 제시된 바와 같이 부분적으로 수정된 절차를 통하여 계산량을 줄여도 동일한 결과를 얻을 수 있다.