• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.284-295
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 간호의 질을 향상시키기 위해 간호사를 위한 환자안전보고촉진전략을 개발하고 평가하기 위한 것으로, 구축-실행-평가단계로 진행하였다. 구축단계는 분석과 검증의 하위단계로 구성되는데, 분석단계에서는 문헌고찰과 현장연구의 단계로 구성되고, 검증의 단계는 두 명의 전문가에 의해 평가받는 과정을 거쳤다. 이 단계를 통해 환자안전보고시스템, 교육자료, 홍보계획, 보상으로 구성된 환자안전보고촉진전략을 개발하였다. 실행단계에서는 구축단계에서 개발된 내용을 일개 병원에서 근무 중인 간호사 51명을 대상으로 12주간의 중재 후, 활용 후 만족도, 스트레스인식, 업무성과정도를 전-후 점수를 비교하여 살펴보았다. 본 연구의 설계는 단일군 전후설계를 적용하였고 서술통계 및 paired t-test 를 SPSS WIN 18.0을 활용하여 분석하였다. 중재 후 업무성과는 3.62점에서 3.75점으로 유의하게 향상시켰다(t=2.653, p=.009). 반면 환자안전보고촉진전략의 활용이 대상자들의 직무 스트레스를 증가시킬 것이라는 가정 하에 중재 전-후 점수를 비교한 결과 중재 전 3.06점에서 중재 후 3.13으로 약간 증가하였으나 통계적으로 유의한 변화를 보이지 않았다(t=.785, p=.434). 따라서 본 연구에서 개발한 전략은 많은 임상환경에 적용할 수 있을 것이고 간호사를 위한 환자안전보고를 촉진하는데 도움을 줄 수 있는 프로그램이라 사료된다.

• 종양간호연구
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.11-21
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this study were to develop an web-based education program for Lung cancer patients and to test its effects on patients' self-care knowledge, compliance to medical regimen, nutrition status and pain. The program was developed by the following process: first, Lung cancer patients demand on the web-based program was investigated. and second, the program was developed with the help of various reference books and then validation of experts group. last, educations effects on the patients is evaluated and compared the differences in self-care knowledge, compliance to medical regimen, nutrition status and pain between on experimental group and a control group on before discharge 1day and 3weeks after. SPSS/Win 11.0 program was used for data analysis. It was proven with $x^2$ test and t-test, and Pearson Correlation coefficient, and Chronbach's alpha coefficient were done for the reliability of measuring instruments. 1. The summary of the Program development is as follows. The program is based on patients' questionnaire and reference material and is made for users friendly. Not only Bigger font size and bright colors but also illustrations or pictures were adopted to help enhance patients' understanding. 2. The summary of the study results is as follows. 1) Compared with control group, the web-based educated experimental group showed a statistical significant difference on self-care knowledge, Especially disease, radiation treatment, medication & analgesics, chemotherapy side effect, but there was no significant difference in the field of chemotherapy, in the fields of operation, diet & general knowledge. 2) Compared with control group, the web-based educated experimental group showed a statistical significant difference on compliance to medical regimen, especially in the field of follow up care, everyday life, diet, but there was no significant difference in the field of medication, exercise. 3) Compared with control group, web-based educated experimental group showed no significant difference in nutrition status, but partially significant difference in body weight. 4) Compared with control group, the web-based educated experimental group showed no significant difference in pain level. 5) The significantly positive correalation self-care knowledge with the compliance to medical regimen. 6) Users satisfaction with the web-based education program of the contents quality, the level of recommendation to others, content layout, medical information quality, but interesting got a low mark.

• 동의생리병리학회지
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.173-181
• /
• 2017

The aim of this study was to identify the reliability and the validity of Five Organs Questionnaire (FOQ). In this study, 335 data was collected from early adulthood of A-city, D-city and C-city in South Korea from Dec. 2016 to Jan. 2017, and the collected data was analyzed with SPSS 23.0 software. The result showed that the Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ of five organs was 0.775-0.853. The reliabilities of test and retest Intra Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for the five organs were .891-.929 in pattern identification and .874-.930 in functional evaluation, respectively. Each organ was divided by two factors, and the factor loadings of Liver, Heart, Spleen, Lung and Kidney were 52.973%, 54.534%, 57.060%, 53.803%, and 46.337%, respectively. The functional evaluation of five organs was associated with self-rated health status as r was -.443 to -.583(p<.001), and quality of life as r was -.5.17 to -.716(p<.001), respectively. The test-retest diagnostic agreement was 67.2% and Kappa was 0.562. This study revealed that FOQ is a reliable and valid questionnaire.

• 동의생리병리학회지
• /
• 제34권3호
• /
• pp.142-148
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of Deficiency and Excess Pattern Identification Questionnaire. The number of subjects enrolled in this study was 431. Pearson Correlation Coefficient analysis were conducted to reveal the correlation among Deficiency and Excess Pattern Identification Questionnaire, Grip Strength and Quality of life. ROC-curve analysis were used to suggest optimal cut off value. Cohen Kappa also used to analyze for diagnostic validity. The significant p-value was < .05. The Deficiency questionnaire had positive correlation with the score of the expert and negative correlation with Grip Strength and Quality of life (p<.001). The Excess questionnaire had positive correlation with the score of the expert and negative correlation with Quality of life (p<.001). The optimal cut off value was 56.5 to separate deficiency and non deficiency and 47.5 to separate excess and non-excess. Furthermore, AUC was .900 and .851 accordingly. Cohen Kappa value between deficiency questionnaire and the expert was .640. Cohen Kappa value between excess questionnaire and the expert was .513. This study reveals that Deficiency and Excess Pattern Identification Questionnaire is valid. However, further study considering of gender, age, and health condition and so on, is needed.

• 한국식생활문화학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.20-26
• /
• 2001

The rating instrument to evaluate the quality of nutrition information websites was developed and ten websites which were maintained by nutrition expert(s) and frequently linked to other related sites were evaluated. The rating instrument with 15 questions on credibility, content, purpose, and design was developed. Eleven college students majoring in Food and Nutrition rated each question as 'Yes', 'No', 'Cannot tell' while visiting each site. The questions rated most often as 'Yes' were 'Is it capable for a user to interact with a responsible person for the site?', 'Is the information provided by nutrition expert?', 'Does the information fit in with dietary guideline?' in the order. The questions rated most often as 'No' were 'Is the source of the information indicated?', 'Is the purpose of the site stated?', and 'Is an internal search engine working?', indicating these categories need betterment. The questions rated most often as 'Cannot tell' were 'Is the information current?', 'Is the information provider credible?', indicating that these may be difficult questions for college students to evaluate. Individuals or institutions who are providing nutrition information on the internet now or plan to provide later are expected to consider the problems pointed out in this study, and offer highly qualified information to the users in an effective way. Various rating instruments to evaluate the quality of nutrition information websites can be developed based on a variety of criteria. It is, however, to be desired that a standardized rating instrument would be developed by a leading group of nutrition experts, and the results of site review with the instrument be open to the public in order to improve the quality of Korean nutrition information on the internet.

• 한국의료질향상학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.69-90
• /
• 2017

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of healthcare accreditation and to provide empirical evidence to validate positive effectiveness. Methods:Six electronic databases (KERIS, KoreaMed, NDSL, Ovid-medline, Embase, Cochrane library) were accessed in May 2016. Keywords used were 'accreditation' and 'Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO)'. Of the initially identified 3,008 articles, 60 studies on healthcare accreditation were selected based on inclusion criteria that are hospital accreditation, accreditation by disease and clinical center accreditation. These were retrieved and analyzed. Result: The 60 study results were on the impact of healthcare accreditation. Results were classified into four perspectives of Balanced Score Card (Financial, Customer, Internal Process, Learning & Growth). In internal process perspective, results revealed that healthcare accreditation has made a positive impact on "care process and procedure". In learning & growth perspective, healthcare accreditation has made a positive influence on "leadership", "organizational cultures" and "change mechanisms". However, it revealed that healthcare accreditation does not directly affect financial performance. It is also difficult to reach a definitive conclusion that healthcare accreditation programs affect patient satisfaction of customer and clinical outcome of the internal process. Conclusion: Healthcare accreditation programs provide positive impact on change of care process and building communication-oriented hospital culture. However, more rigorous and diverse research is needed on financial effects and clinical outcomes of healthcare accreditation.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.472-484
• /
• 1995

The purpose of this study was to develop a home health care model in the public health system and to test the effectiveness of the model. Seven com-munity health practitioners in Yon- Cheon county. Kyunggi province, carried out home health care service for this research. The subjects of the home health care were a total of 111 community residents with chronic health problems and risk-prone infants and children; 29 persons with hypertension, 18 persons with diabetes, 12 persons with neurologic problems, 12 elderly, and 40 infants and children. During the period of study, from December, 1993 to March, 1995, a demonstrative home health care model was developed in the Yon-Cheon County community health centers with the cooperation of the Yon-Cheon Medical Center and Yon-Cheon Public Health Center for the first six months. A home care practice manual and recording system for home visits were also co-developed by the researchers and community health practitioners. Four workshops and monthly conferences were held for this purpose. Actual home care practice took place for two months, and on-going evaluation and replanning accompanied this process. The result of the evaluation of home care service were as follows. 1) For persons with hypertension, diabetes, neurologic problems, there was significant improvement in knowledge of disease and care, but no significant difference was seen in health behavior or symptoms after home care service. 2) No significant difference was seen in level of self esteem or depression after reminiscence therapy among 12 elderly subjects. 3) There were significant differences in satis-faction toward child rearing and parental sup-port, but no significant difference In education needs for parental role after home care service among parents of infants and children. 4) There was significant improvement in the quality of life among the subjects after the home care service. 5) Subjects responded that they were highly satisfied with the home care service given by the community health practitioners. Although, the actual implementation period was very short, and not all of the evaluation outcomes showed significant improvement, the home health care model of community health practitioners was, in general, positively evaluated. Through this re-search, the possibility of community health practitioners working as active home care personnel in the public health care system is supported. Further research with an expanded area and subjects for a longer period is recommended. Cost effectiveness research is also needed.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제17권10호
• /
• pp.158-167
• /
• 2016

본 연구의 목적은 사회복지관련 메타분석 연구를 대상으로 Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 도구를 이용하여 질 평가를 하기 위한 서술적 조사연구이다. '메타분석', '사회복지', '사회사업'을 키워드로하여 2000년부터 2015년에 KISS, DBpia, RISS4U 데이터베이스를 이용하여 출판된 연구 중 42개의 메타분석 연구에 대해 질 평가를 실시하였다. 수집된 자료는 기술통계, 독립집단 t-test, 일원분산분석으로 분석되었다. 평균 AMSTAR 질 평가점수는 $4.76{\pm}1.66$점이었고, 낮은 수준이 19개(45.2%), 중간 수준이 22개(52.4%), 높은 수준이 1개(2.4%)이었다. 질 평가점수는 연구의 특성인 출판년도, 대상자, 분석논문의수, DB의 수, 저널유형, 재정지원 유무, 연구의 질 평가유무, 분석대상논문을 추출흐름도 유무, 주제에 따라 차이가 분석되었다. 질 평가점수는 출판년도, DB의 수, 연구의 질 평가유무, 분석대상논문을 추출흐름도 유무에 따라 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었고, 4개 요인이 메타분석 연구의 질에 영향을 미치는 요인으로 51.9%의 설명력이 있었다. 본 연구는 메타분석 연구의 질을 향상시키기 위해 필요한 가이드라인을 제시하는데 기여하고 있다. 본 연구는 사회복지 분야 메타분석 연구의 질 향상과 분석 결과의 신뢰성 확보를 위하여 첫째, 메타분석 보고를 위한 공통적이고 구체적인 가이드라인을 마련하고 공유하는 것, 둘째, 근거기반의 실천적 개입을 위해서는 질 평가를 통해 근거강도가 높은 논문의 결과를 메타분석으로 합성하는 것, 셋째, 분석대상 논문의 연구특성을 제시하는 것, 마지막으로 문헌선택과 자료추출 과정에서 두 명이상의 연구자에 의한 독립적 실시와 최종 문헌추출을 위한 합의과정과 이해상충여부가 보고되어야 함을 제안하고 있다.

• Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.82-90
• /
• 2008

목적: 본 연구는 학령기 후기 말기 암 환아의 삶의 질 증진을 위한 의미요법 CD 프로그램을 개발하기 위해 시도되었다. 방법: 학령기 후기(만 $10{\sim}12$세) 말기 암 환아의 삶의 질 증진 프로그램을 개발하기 위한 방법론적인 연구로서 연구기간은 2006년 1월 1일부터 2007년 11월 30일 이었다. 교육내용은 Frankl의 의미요법의 이론적 틀과 치료기법을 근간으로 구성하였고, 교육매체개발은 Keller 와 Song의 ARCS 이론을 적용하였으며, Dick와 Cray가 제시한 프로그램 개발과정을 응용하였다. 개발된 의미요법 프로그램명은 [마음 속 보물찾기]였다. 결과: 총 5차시의 교육과정으로 구성되었으며 교육시간은 각 차시별로 $15{\sim}20$분용으로 5차시 교육내용의 주제는 삶의 본질적 특성, 창조적 가치, 경험적 가치, 태도적 가치, 자기주도적인 삶에서 선택과 책임의 중요성의 내용을 다루었다. 각 차시의 세부교육내용은 처음, 무엇일까, 여행가기, 웃음 송으로 진행되며, 교육자용 지침서는 알쏭달쏭(동기유발을 위한 6컷 만화), 각 차시별 교육내용(무엇일까, 여행가기, 웃음 송), 체험하기(퀴즈 및 정답, 체험하기내용)를 포함하고 있으며, 교육용 책자(환아용)는 CD를 통한 각 차시 교육 후 교육내용을 자신에게 직접 적용해 보는 체험하기 단계에서 활용되는 책자이다. 또한 이 교육용 책자에는 각 차시 마지막 부분에 마음 속 보물찾기 CD에서 각 차시 마다 소개된 웃음 송 악보를 넣어 환아들이 언제든지 따라 부를 수 있도록 하였다. 결론: 본 연구를 통해 개발된 학령기 후기 암 환아 교육프로그램은 간호사외에 호스피스 영역의 전문종사자들이 암 환아들의 정서적, 영적돌봄을 위해 현장에서 쉽게 활용할 수 있도록 제작되었으며, 교육자들을 위한 교육지침서와 환아들을 위한 교육용 책자도 동시에 개발하여 그 활용의 용이성을 최대한 높였다.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.91-105
• /
• 2005

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the current status of managing educational programs for tobacco use prevention at middle and high schools located in Busan. Methods: Using a survey method with a 29-item self-administration questionnaire, the data were collected from January 10 through February 18, 2005, from school nurses as well as teachers major in healthcare of 227 participant schools. Results: A strategic plan for school-based educational programs of tobacco use prevention was mainly developed by a school nurse at middle school and a teacher in charge of school discipline at high school. The educational programs for tobacco use prevention were implemented for approximately 40% of schools in Busan with the budget ranged from 110,000 won to 200,000 won a year. Eighty five percepts of the schools had anti-tobacco regulations and guidelines in place. Twenty two percents of the middle and high schools collected the data regarding adolescents' smoking status periodically. Over 70% of schools provided tobacco use prevention education programs as a part of regular semester curriculum. Conclusions: For making the management of educational programs for tobacco use prevention effective and consistent with government's anti-smoking policy, schools need (a) development of tobacco management guideline and regulations with participation of teachers, students, and parents, (b) clear job and role descriptions for personnel to plan and implement anti-tobacco programs, (c) compilation of the budget enough to implement the programs, (d) periodically assessment of adolescents' smoking status, and evaluation of the programs to monitor whether those are effective for adolescents' health promotion; and (e) to make an effort to less range of quality in educational programs for tobacco use.