• 제목/요약/키워드: EuroNCAP

검색결과 30건 처리시간 0.027초

고속도로 주행 시 선행차량의 전방 긴급 장애물 회피에 따른 Car-to-Car Cut-out 시나리오 기반 AES 성능평가 방법 연구 (A Study on AES Performance Assessment Protocol based on Car-to-car cut-out Scenario According to front Emergency Obstacle Avoidance of Preceding Vehicle during Highway Driving)

  • 김진석;이동훈
    • 자동차안전학회지
    • /
    • 제14권4호
    • /
    • pp.84-90
    • /
    • 2022
  • With the popularization of autonomous driving technology, safety has emerged as a more important criterion. However, there are no assessment protocol or methods for AES (Autonomous Emergency Steering). So, this study proposes AES assessment protocol and scenario corresponding to collision avoidance Car-to-Car scenario of Euro NCAP in order to prepare for obstacles that appear after the emergency steering of LV (Leading Vehicle) avoiding obstacles in front of. Autoware-based autonomous driving stack is developed to test and simulate scenario in CARLA. Using developed stack, it is confirmed that obstacle avoidance is successfully performed in CARLA, and the AES performance of VUT (Vehicle Under Test) is evaluated by applying the proposed assessment protocol and scenario.

기둥측면충돌시험에서 EuroSID-2와 WorldSID 인체모형 평가에 관한 연구 (Evaluation of EuroSID-2 & WorldSID in Pole Side Impact)

  • 김대업;우창기
    • 자동차안전학회지
    • /
    • 제7권1호
    • /
    • pp.40-44
    • /
    • 2015
  • In recent years, WorldSID dummy has been continuously developed and investigated to be a better represent biolfidelic ATD as well as a device for replacement of the current existing EuroSID-2. In Korea, the side impact accident is one of the major severe accidents in terms of numbers of accidents and fatality. Since 2003, 50kph 90degree side crash test has been initiated as a safety standard with EuroSID-1 at the first stage and also same time 55kph impact speed test has been conducted as a part of KNCAP program. Currently only EuroSID-2 is accepted as a regulatory tool for vehicle certification and KNCAP. In order to make use of WorldSID of KNCAP in the distant futuer the tests with WorldSID is conducted experimentally.

보행자보호 Lower Legform 충격의 해석 대 시험 상관성 개선에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Correlation Improvement between FEA and Test for a Pedestrian Lower Legform Impact)

  • 박동규
    • 한국산학기술학회논문지
    • /
    • 제12권4호
    • /
    • pp.1515-1522
    • /
    • 2011
  • 본 논문은 자동차 보행자보호 안전 항목 중 범퍼부에 해당하는 Lower Legform Impactor 충격에 대한 비선형 유한요소해석 결과와 보행자보호 충격 시험 결과와의 비교 및 정도 향상을 위한 해석적인 기법을 제시하였다. 유럽에서는 현재 법규로 평가되고 있는 범퍼부 보행자보호는 국내에서도 2013년부터 법규로 적용되어진다. 본 연구는 범퍼부 Lower Legform Impactor 충격을 위한 해석 시험의 상관성 확보를 위하여 굽힘각 저감용 스티프너의 단품 압축 시험을 통해 얻어진 힘 대 변위 커브의 분석을 통하여 해석 정도 확보를 위한 최적 모델링 방법을 찾아내고, 변위 측정 센서를 부착한 실차 시험과 해석 결과와의 변위값 및 거동간의 편차를 비교 분석하여 범퍼 보행자보호 해석의 정도성 확보를 위한 해석 기법을 제시하였다.

호주 신차안전도평가의 하부다리 상해치 개선을 위한 경차의 Footrest 형상 최적화 (Footrest design optimization of a small vehicle to improve ANCAP lower leg injury)

  • 김요셉;이만수;남정인;한재녕
    • 자동차안전학회지
    • /
    • 제7권1호
    • /
    • pp.27-32
    • /
    • 2015
  • In order to protect occupant during car crash accident, Regulation and NCAP(New Car assessment Program) have been developed among various countries like U.S.A., Europe, Korea and Australia. Especially NCAP scores affect to sales of vehicles. So vehicle makers are trying to get good score in NCAP. Low leg injuries play an important role in Australia and Euro NCAP and these injuries are related with footrest design. Optimization of footrest design in early stage of vehicle development is necessary to obtain better and robust results of low legs during crash tests. In this paper, DFSS method and finite element model were used to optimize the low leg performance in small RHD vehicles. Compared with the lower leg injury of base model, the lower leg injury of proposed model was slightly improved and robustness was enhanced also.

신 정면 충돌 시험의 시뮬레이션 비교 분석 (Simulation Analysis and Comparison of New Frontal Impact Tests)

  • 정경진;윤영한;박지양;김동섭;오명진;곽영찬;손창기;신재곤;이은덕;권해붕
    • 자동차안전학회지
    • /
    • 제9권2호
    • /
    • pp.20-25
    • /
    • 2017
  • KNCAP is a program to evaluate the automobile safety, providing consumer vehicle safety assessment results. The safety evaluation tests are Frontal Impact, Offset Frontal Crash, Side Crash, Side Pole Crash, Rear Impact. This is the study of the offset frontal impact safety evaluation. Currently, IIHS is performing a small overlap test. NHTSA plans to implement the oblique moving deformable barrier test. Euro-NCAP plans to implement a mobile frontal impact test. Simulation is used to compare occupant behavior and injury. We have investigated whether the introduction of the test at KNCAP is necessary. The dummy model used in the simulation was the 50th percentile male Hybrid III dummy.

한국시장에서의 카시트 장착성 평가 (CRS installation performance in Korean Market)

  • 조재호;서관호;이화수;이민수
    • 자동차안전학회지
    • /
    • 제5권2호
    • /
    • pp.39-44
    • /
    • 2013
  • Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause (70%) of children injury and fatality. 98% of Children under the age of 9 who came to emergency room with a traffic accident are not seated in CRS. Reduction in mortality when using CRS (NHTSA study), 71% for infants of 1-2 years old, 54% for 3-6 years old and 7-12 years old. It is very important and essential to use CRS for child passenger safety. But in Korean market, the CRS fitment rate is relatively low (20~40%). For European market, at the start of 2013, Euro NCAP started to check how easy it is to install the most common seats. And US market, NHTSA is planning a new consumer information program of CRS fitment for near future. This study examines CRS installation performance of 3 vehicles which are produced by GM Korea and 21 CRS which are based on sales volume in Korean market. Purpose of this study is to identify both vehicle and CRS design that causes bad interaction for CRS installation.

다양한 충돌패턴에 따른 승용차 범퍼의 응답특성에 관한 연구 (The response characteristics of various impact patterns on the front-bumper of a passenger car)

  • 홍동표;홍용;왕고평;황승호;박현우
    • 한국소음진동공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국소음진동공학회 2008년도 춘계학술대회논문집
    • /
    • pp.817-820
    • /
    • 2008
  • In this paper, a pendulum system is constructed to perform the fundamental research which is concentrated on the various frequency pattern of impact-object simulation tests. Because to reduce injuries of pedestrians, and to satisfy the criterions of the EECV and Euro-NCAP. We analyze the frequency responses to recognize the impact objects. This study will be the basic data to development the smart bumper to protect the pedestrians.

  • PDF

Q6, Q10 어린이 인체모형의 상해치 연구 (Injury Study for Q6 and Q10 Child Dummies)

  • 선홍열;이슬;석주엽;유원재;윤일성
    • 자동차안전학회지
    • /
    • 제8권1호
    • /
    • pp.31-37
    • /
    • 2016
  • The Child Occupant Safety Assessment was first introduced and carried out by Euro NCAP in 2003, with the goal of ensuring manufacturers to develop safe vehicles for passengers of all ages; the objective was to evaluate the safety and protection offered by different Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in the event of a crash. In 2013, the formerly used P child dummy series was replaced by newer and more biofidelic Q1.5 and Q3 child dummies, representing 1.5 and 3 year old children respectively. The frontal and side impact dynamic performances of the Q1.5 and Q3 were tested within all classes of vehicles assessed by Euro NCAP at the time. As an extension to that initiative, Q6 and Q10 child dummies were later developed representing children of 6 and 10 years old. Since the protection of larger children during vehicle crashes relies greatly on the interaction of vehicle restraint systems such as seat belt and the CRS, instrumented Q6 and Q10 dummies will be used to assess the protection offered in the event of front and side impact crashes. In this paper, we focused on injury criteria of Q6 and Q10 child dummies at 64 kph 40% offset frontal crash test. The whole procedure was designed with DFSS analysis. The full vehicle sled test results of both dummies were conducted with different restraint systems settled through previous sled test. It showed that several injury criteria and image data were collected as the result of the full vehicle sled test. Based on the results of these investigations, this paper describes which factor is most important and combination shows the best performance when evaluating rear seat occupant protection for Q6 and Q10 child dummies.

PDB 시험에 대한 충돌 상호 안전성 (Compatibility for Proposed R.94 PDB Test)

  • 장은지;김요셉;범현균;권성은
    • 한국자동차공학회논문집
    • /
    • 제18권3호
    • /
    • pp.149-155
    • /
    • 2010
  • Currently various safety tests are being performed in many countries with growing interest in vehicle safety. However the vehicles which have good safety performance in these tests could not secure the good performance in real car to car accident. So new test protocol using progressive deformable barrier (PDB) was proposed by EEVC in Europe, NHTSA in USA and some vehicle manufacturers, etc. The target of PDB test is to control partner protection in addition to self-protection on the same test. The proposal is to update current ECE R.94 frontal ODB test. So barrier, impact speed, overlap are changed to avoid bottoming-out in the test configuration. In this paper 3 different tests (R.94, EuroNCAP and PDB test) were carried out using current production vehicles with same structure. The results of these tests were compared to understand PDB test. As a result PDB test shows the highest vehicle deceleration and dummy injury because PDB offers a progressive increase in stiffness in depth and height. However vehicle intrusion was affected with rather test velocity than stiffness of deformable barrier. PDB deformation data is used for partner protection assessment using PDB software and it shows that the test vehicle is rather not aggressive.