• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• 제40권2호
• /
• pp.267-286
• /
• 2024

This study investigates the perceptions toward prospective elementary teachers regarding the revised 2015 elementary mathematics curriculum. The aim is to understand the importance and implementation of the revised curriculum and provide implications for curriculum improvement in elementary teacher education institutions, using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). The research findings are as follows: Firstly, prospective elementary teachers perceived that the areas of the revised 2015 elementary mathematics curriculum that require particular focus are number and operations and data and probability. Secondly, they identified the specific elements within these areas that demand dedicated attention as follows: numbers up to four digits in number and operations, mixed calculations with natural numbers, shapes of solid figures, spatial sense of solid figures, comparison of quantities in measurement, etc. These findings can inform the improvement of the curriculum in elementary teacher education institutions.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.102-115
• /
• 2019

This study investigated how elementary school teachers reconstruct science curriculum and how they perceive about their experiences. In-depth interviews were conducted with four elementary school teachers who had experience in restructuring science curriculum. Two distinct types of reconstruction were found; restructuring within the subject and integrating between subjects. The teachers who were restructuring science curriculum from personal needs usually substitute, delete, add some contents or activities and change the order of unit within science subject. In contrast, the teachers who were participating in research school usually integrated science with other subjects, developing a new unit or project. The latter recognized the need of teachers' reconstruction of science curriculum more strongly and the importance of teacher's voluntary learning community in implementing the reconstruction. Though they had some difficulties in identifying students' interests and level of understanding and lack of time, all teachers valued curriculum reconstruction by relating it to teacher professional development, identity as a teacher, and job consciousness.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.207-223
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 유치원 교육과정과 초등 교육과정의 연계성을 강조하는 2015 개정 교육과정 개발 연구가 진행되고 있는 현 시점에서 3~5세 연령별 누리과정과 2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등학교 수학과 교육과정의 내용 연계성을 분석하고, 그 결과에 기초하여 연계가 미흡한 내용에 대한 연계성 확보 방안을 제안하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 누리과정 내에서 '수학적 탐구하기'의 위상을 고찰하고, 수학적 내용측면에서 내용 영역의 범주 및 3~5세 누리과정의 수학적 탐구하기의 세부 내용과 초등학교 수학과 교육과정의 1~2학년군 성취기준을 비교 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 각 내용 영역에서 역연계 및 비연계 요소가 파악되었으며, 그에 따른 논의로부터 유치원 교육과정과 초등수학 교육과정의 내용 연계성을 확보하기 위한 시사점을 제안하였다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.243-251
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships between elementary school teachers' points of view about the organization of the science curriculum and their views on the nature of science (NOS). We surveyed 132 elementary school teachers' view points about these two kinds of views, analyzed the data by their variables, and compared the two viewpoints with their personal details. The elementary school teachers thought the science curriculum should be emphasized through the process more than contents. They thought the contents of the science curriculum should be integrated rather than separated. As teachers' career progressed, they focused on the contents more than the process. On the other hands, because elementary school teachers showed the NOS views as relativism, deductivism, decontextualism, content, and instrumentalism, when we plotted sub-viewpoints of NOS in process-content dimension, we thought it would be similar distributions with point of views on the organization of science curriculum. However, there was no meaningful relation. This showed that teachers' views on the organization of the curriculum and the NOS are totally different. These findings suggest further research is needed to find how factors influence elementary school teachers' views on the organization of the science curriculum and what inclinations can occur in science classes with their different views.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.32-42
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to provide meaningful basic materials for organizing a science curriculum in future by analyzing the status and changes of contents about astronomical phenomena in textbooks according to the changes of the science curriculum of elementary school. A main target of analysis is science textbooks of elementary school in curriculums from 1st to 7th. For the analysis, the analytic frame based on contents in astronomy textbooks of teachers colleges and colleges of education was used. The result of the analysis is as in the following. First, astronomy accounted for average about 7% of all pages of textbooks in all of science curriculums. The 1st educational curriculum had the most learning quantity of 10.40%, and the 6th curriculum had the least quantity of 4.39%. These results show that astronomy was not a small part and was considered important in each science curriculum of elementary school considering that earth science accounted for 17-26% of all pages in elementary school science curriculum. Second, the things that have been dealt with in common in all science curriculums from 1st to 7th of elementary school are the shape of the earth, the rotation and the revolution of the earth, the occurrence of the seasons, the apparent motion of the sun, the status and motion of the moon, the movement of a star, the brightness and distance of a star, constellations, the sun, planets and others. These contents are expected to be dealt with continuously as basic contents to organize astronomy regardless of the changes of curriculum. Third, in science curriculum of elementary school, astronomical phenomena based on life experiences regarding the earth, the moon and the sun are mainly dealt with in the first and the second grade. Contents requiring principles-understanding and research are dealt with in the fifth and sixth grade. These results show that elementary school science curriculum dealing with astronomy reflects the developmental stages of students and considers principle of learning possibility.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.633-658
• /
• 2010

이 연구는 2006년에 고시된 교육과정과 지난 제 7차 교육과정을 비교하여 내용 항목과 관련된 개정 사유와 개정 과정에서 있었던 쟁점을 분석하고자 한 것 이다. 이를 위하여 이번 교육과정 개정과 관련된 보고서와 연구물을 수집, 분석하였다. 2006년 개정에서 초등학교 내용과 관련하여 쟁점이 있었던 개정 사항을 학년 간 이동된 내용, 분수 개념의 지도 계열, 문제해결 영역 설정 등의 세 가지로 나누어 정리하고, 각 개정 사항이 어떤 문제의식에서 출발하였는지, 개정 과정에서 어떤 논쟁이 있었는지, 그리고 개정 사항에 대하여 어떤 사유가 제시되고 있는가를 확인하였다. 이로부터 이번 교육과정의 개정에서 다양한 이견이 있었음을 확인할 수 있었으며 이러한 이견은 초등수학의 양과 수준에 대한 근본적인 신념의 차이나, 초등 수학 내용의 도입 시기나 지도 계열에 대한 수학 교육적 견해의 차이 그리고 교육 과정의 내용을 제시하는 하는 방식에 대한 인식의 차이에서 비롯되고 있음을 논의하였다. 이와 같은 분석으로부터 수학과 교육과정의 내용의 선정 및 조직과 관련된 시사점을 얻을 수 있을 것이다.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.287-302
• /
• 2010

The purpose of the study was to figure out elementary school teachers' Stages of Concern(SoC) between senior teachers and new comers to integrated units of integrated curriculum which was revised in 2007 and applied in 2009 by using CBAM. Seventy-four home-room teachers in elementary schools took part as participants. For data collection, as Hall and Hord suggested in 2005, Questionnaire of Stages of Concern was used. Profiling of teachers' concern and one-way ANOVA were employed in data analysis. In the results, 55% of the teachers were in the stage of Awareness. In the stage of Informational, 22% of the teachers were appeared. Most of elementary teachers' concern about integrated units was closed to indifference of self-interest level. The difference of concern between senior teachers and others will be illustrated as findings. The results of the study provided that factors which influenced teachers' concern about the curriculum. Physical factors such as a curriculum guideline or on-line system to access boarder-cross curriculum influenced teachers' concern. Little intervention about the boarder-cross curriculum appeared in elementary schools. The authors of the study suggested to emphasizing the roles of facilitator for the revised curriculum.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제4권4호
• /
• pp.657-675
• /
• 2002

This paper is to make strides toward an enriched understanding of the difficulties and issues raised by applying the 7th mathematics curriculum to elementary school classrooms. A general overview of the curriculum is presented in line with teaching and learning methods emphasized in the curriculum. Four classroom episodes are presented in brief in order to diagnose the problems in situating the curriculum in elementary mathematics classrooms. These episodes deal with lessons emphasizing activity rather than its associated concepts or principles, overusing multimedia data, pursuing play rather than its associated thinking, and distributing various individual worksheets in the name of differentiated instructional methods. In addition to the episodes, interview data with elementary school teachers also are presented as needed. This paper discusses two aspects of activating the curriculum into elementary mathematics classrooms. One deals with the issues of the curriculum and textbooks themselves, and the other covers those of research trends on mathematics education and teaching practices. This paper finally emphasizes a collaborative working relation among classroom teachers, mathematics educators, and policy makers with their own places and roles.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.579-598
• /
• 2011

본 연구에서는 2007 초등학교 수학과 교육과정과 2011 초등학교 수학과 교육과정을 비교 분석하였다. 첫째로, 2011 교육과정에서 취급하지 않게 된 학습 내용에 관해 비판적으로 논의했다. 둘째로, 2011 교육과정의 학습 내용에서 찾을 수 있는 두드러진 특정을 찾았다. 차기 교육과정의 개발에 도움이 될 수 있도록, 이러한 결과로부터 얻을 수 있었던 다음의 세 가지를 결론으로 제시하였다. 첫째, 교육과정 개발 절차를 보완할 필요가 있다. 공청회 시안 개발 및 최종 교육과정 개발 과정은 어디에도 드러나 있지 않다. 교육과정의 개발과 연구를 위해서는 이 과정을 잘 정리하여 공개할 필요가 있다. 둘째, 교육과정에서의 진술 방식을 수정 보완하는 것이 필요하다. 의미가 충분히 확립되지 않은 표현이나 모호한 표현은 어느 정도 규정하고 사용하는 것이 필요하다. 셋째, 학습 내용별 성취 기준의 진술이 일관적일 필요가 있다. 성취 기준 진술의 원칙을 설정하는 것이 필요하다. 넷째, 초등학교 교육과정과 중학교 교육과정 사이의 연계가 잘 이루어지고 있는지 검토하는 것이 필요하다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제41권2호
• /
• pp.217-235
• /
• 2022

본 연구는 차기 교육과정 개정을 앞둔 시점에서 지난 몇 차례 동안의 초등학교 물리 영역에서의 교육과정 변화를 분석하고 초등 과학 교육과정의 쟁점을 논의하기 위해 수행되었다. 이를 위해 제7차 교육과정부터 2015 개정 교육과정까지 내용 요소의 변화를 분석하고, 2015 개정 교육과정 이후 수행된 교육과정 연구들을 살펴보았다. 더불어 물리교육 전공 교수 3인이 교육과정 분석 결과에 대해 논의하였다. 연구 결과 제7차 교육과정 이후의 초등 물리 교육과정은 전반적으로 내용이 축소되거나 어려운 개념들이 삭제하거나 상위 학교급으로 이동하는 형태로 변화가 이루어졌다. 과학 교육과정 쟁점은 현 교육과정의 내용 적정성과 난이도, 수학 교과와의 연계성, 누리과정과 초등 1,2학년 통합 교육 과정과 연계문제, 성취기준 서술어 문제를 다루었다.