• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.21-33
• /
• 2006

한국의 공학교육 인증은 1999년에 한국공학교육인증원을 설립하면서 시작되어 2001년부터 공학교육 프로그램을 인증하였다. 우수한 인재의 공과대학 진학 유도와 우수한 공학도의 양성 및 국제적으로 인정받는 공학도 양성 등이 목표가 되었다. 이러한 이유로 도입된 공학교육인증은 해를 거듭하면서 인증을 받고자 참여하는 대학과 프로그램의 수가 늘어 활성화되고 있다. 이 연구에서는 한국의 공학교육과 공학교육인증의 현황을 살펴보고 이를 바탕으로 한국 공학교육이 나아갈 방향을 모색해 보았다. 한국의 공학교육이 더욱 발전하기 위해서는 우수한 학생을 공과대학에 유치하기 위한 노력과 질 좋은 교육을 할 수 있도록 많은 지원이 필요하고, 국제적인 수준의 공학교육을 인정 받기 위한 워싱턴 협정의 정식 회원국이 되어야 하며, 이를 위한 공학관련 기관과 단체, 기업들의 적극적인 협조가 필요하다.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제42권7호
• /
• pp.917-927
• /
• 2012

Purpose: A curriculum development model is presented to examine the processes necessary to develop new programs or evaluate existing programs within the philosophy of outcomes-based education in nursing, especially in the context of accreditation. The philosophy of outcomes-based education is to produce individuals who can demonstrate the evidence of competencies in designated areas of education. For nursing education, this means competencies in performing the role of professional nursing as defined by the profession and social needs at the beginning level upon completing a nursing program. Methods: A curriculum development model has been developed analytically based on the literature and experiences. Results: A 10-step process framework incorporating the tenets of outcomes-based nursing education is illustrated. Conclusion: This curriculum development framework can be applied in developing new educational programs in nursing or to evaluate and revise existing programs in anticipation of the accreditation process that is moving with a full force in such countries as Korea.

• Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
• /
• 제40권3호
• /
• pp.233-240
• /
• 2023

The purpose of this study aims to analyze research trends related to 'evaluation' in Korean medical education through a systematic review. This study used a systematic review method, which is a research methodology for research trends and 'literature analysis.' Researchers searched the Korean journal literature published until the end of December 2020 in the Korean research database with keywords related to medicine and evaluation. Thus, 5,205 cases were identified. Based on these data, 143 papers were selected through a logical screening process, requiring 1 month to complete the data search and analysis process. In terms of publications, medical journals overwhelmingly outnumbered nonmedical journals until 2015; however, after 2016, the number of papers published in nonmedical journals increased, and the number of published papers was similar to that of medical journals. In terms of evaluation-related research, research on student and program evaluations has been very active compared to that on accreditation. As the number of evaluation studies has gradually decreased over the past 10 years, preparing a plan to revitalize them in Korean medical education is necessary. Considering that the role of evaluation in education has been emphasized in recent years, research on reestablishing the concept of evaluation; developing evaluation indicators; analyzing the status of student evaluation, program evaluation, and accreditation; and deriving measures to improve medical education through evaluation is required.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.70-75
• /
• 2016

This paper deals with a result of case study for the development of CEA(Course-Embedded Assessment) design tool for engineering education accreditation implementing programs. Many programs have been devoting efforts to apply CEA to their engineering education. In order to effectively apply the CEA to educational program, it is required to develop the standardized form or scheme for CEA application. As a preliminary approach, we propose the design tool and the result of a case study for CEA application in engineering education.

• 대한기관윤리심의기구협의회지
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.37-48
• /
• 2020

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the operational status and level of understanding among IRB and HRPP staffs at a hospital or a research institute to the HRPP guideline set by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) and to provide recommendations. Methods: Online survey was distributed among members of Korean Association of IRB (KAIRB) through each IRB office. The result was separated according to topic and descriptive statistics was used for analysis. Result: Survey notification was sent out to 176 institutions and 65 (37.1%) institutions answered the survey by online. Of 65 institutions that answered the survey; 83.1% was hospital, 12.3% was university, 3.1% was medical college, 1.5% was research institution. 23 institutions (25.4%) established independent HRPP offices and 39 institutions (60.0%) did not. 12 institutions (18.5%) had separate IRB and HRPP heads, 21 (32.3%) institutions separated business reporting procedure and person in charge, 12 institutions separated the responsibility of IRB and HRPP among staff, and 45 institutions (69.2%) had audit & non-compliance managers. When asked about the most important basic task for HRPP, 23% answered self-audit. And according to 43.52%, self-audit was also the most by both institutions that operated HRPP and institutions that did not. When basic task performance status was analyzed, on average, the institutions that operated HRPP was 14% higher than institutions that only operated IRB. 9 (13.8%) institutions were evaluated and obtained HRPP accreditation from MFDS and the most common reason for obtaining the accreditation was to be selected as Institution for the education of persons conducting clinical trial (6 institutions). The most common reason for not obtaining HRPP accreditation was because of insufficient staff and limited capacity of the institution (28%). Institutions with and without a plan to be HRPP accredited by MFDS were 20 (37.7%) each. 34 institutions (52.3%) answered HRPP evaluation method and accreditation by MFDS was appropriate while 31 institutions (47.7%) answered otherwise. 36 institutions answered that HRPP evaluation and accreditation by MFDS was credible while 29 institutions (44.5%) answered that HRPP evaluation method and accreditation by MFDS was not credible. Conclusion: 1. MFDS's HRPP accreditation program can facilitate the main objective of HRPP and MFDS's HRPP accreditation program should be encouraged to non-tertiary hospitals by taking small staff size into consideration and issuing accreditation by segregating accreditation. 2. While issuing Institution for the education of persons conducting clinical trial status as a benefit of MFDS's HRPP accreditation program, it can also hinder access to MFDS's HRPP accreditation program. It should also be considered that the non-contact culture during COVID-19 pandemic eliminated time and space limitation for education. 3. For clinical research conducted internally by an institution, internal audit is the most effective and sole method of protecting safety and right of the test subjects and integrity for research in Korea. For this reason, regardless of the size of the institution, an internal audit should be enforced. 4. It is necessary for KAIRB and MFDSto improve HRPP awareness by advocating and educating the concept and necessity of HRPP in clinical research. 5. A new HRPP accreditation system should be setup for all clinical research with human subjects, including Investigational New Drug (IND) application in near future.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.26-47
• /
• 2001

한국공학교육인증원 인증기준 중 세 번째인 교육요소와 그에 따른 교과과정 개발은 현재 국내의 많은 대학들이 시행하고 있는 학부제가 특정 전공의 교육 프로그램을 인증하는 인증제와 상충하며, 또한 현재까지 인증기준에 따라 인증을 준비한 전례가 없기 때문에 여러 가지 흔란과 의문을 야기하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 명지대학교 공과대학 전자공학 전공을 예로 선정하여 인증기준에 의한 교육요소를 개발하고 그에 따른 교과과정을 개발한 사례를 소개함으로써 인증기준에 따른 교과과정 개발의 문제점을 조사하고 개발과정에서 경험한 여러 문제점과 개선점을 논의하고자 한다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제14권6호
• /
• pp.41-47
• /
• 2011

Professional communication skills in writing and speaking with multiple and complex audiences are required to engineers in society of modern technology. In this paper, we proposed the effective assessment system for the Program Outcomes on the communication skill competence(PO7), which is one of the 12 program outcomes stipulated by ABEEK (Accreditation Board for Engineering Education of Korea). To ensure logical connectivity of the assessment system, we carefully selected the performance criteria by defining the core concept of "written communication" and "verbal communication". Based on the selected performance criteria, the whole process of creating assessment tools and rubrics was explained in detail. It can be expected that the assessment for the Program Outcomes on the communication skill competence would be more systematic by using the proposed assessment system.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.35-46
• /
• 2016

With the emphasis on core competencies, the University of Seoul has exerted efforts to reflect the importance of core competencies in university curricula. The main assessment tool used in Korea is the Korea Collegiate Essential Skills Assessment (K-CESA), developed by the Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training (KRIVET). This study examined whether core competencies measured using K-CESA are valid as a tool for assessing educational achievements among college students, and analyzed the correlation between K-CESA scores and course grades. The analysis was performed on approximately 204 engineering students at the University of Seoul. According to the correlation analysis between core competencies and courses, MSC courses were shown to be related to the resource and through information use competency and higher order thinking competency. Through the Analysis of Variance, students in the accreditation programs and students living in urban area showed higher competency scores. In the multiple regression, it was shown that Accreditation and MSC courses grades were the important variables to predict the competency of the students. Based on these findings, we confirmed that the K-CESA tool has a certain level of correlation with academic performance and that it functions as one of several ways to evaluate the program outcomes of engineering education accreditation.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.45-54
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to analyze performance problems in establishing and improving program educational objectives (PEO) and to set up action strategies for the civil engineering program at the A university. To fulfill the purpose, according to the typical needs analysis model, research problems were defined, current conditions and desired conditions were identified, discrepancies and their reasons were examined, and action strategies were derived. Current conditions and desired conditions were identified by analyzing the A civil engineering program's self study report, conducting surveys and interviews with constituents. After the discrepancies and the reasons were examined, performance problems and field force analysis were conducted to draw short term and long term action strategies to improve PEO. Short term action strategies were to announce PEO to current students, to hold faculty seminars to establish and to improve PEO, to renew the list of constituents regularly, to composite an annual milestone, to define roles of the committees, and to enforce educational opportunity toward industrial advisory board members. For the long term strategies, improvement and documentation of PEO assessment system, collection and analysis of constituents' suggestions, establishment of effective accreditation support system, and arrangement of compensation system for the faculties who are in charge of engineering education accreditation responsibility.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제26권3호
• /
• pp.777-785
• /
• 2016

공학교육인증제는 공학 교육의 질적 향상을 통해 국제 경쟁력을 갖는 공학기술 인력의 양성을 목적으로, 공학교육인증 프로그램의 학생들이 졸업할 시점에 달성해야 하는 학습 성과를 프로그램의 교육목표에 맞게 설정하고 적합한 절차에 따라 성취도를 평가하도록 하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 호서대학교 정보보호학 프로그램에서 설정한 프로그램 학습성과를 달성하기 위해 수행 준거, 평가 체계, 문서 체계 및 순환형 자율개선 체계 등을 포함하는 성취도 평가 시스템과 이러한 평가체계에 따라 성취도를 측정한 사례에 대해 연구한다.