• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.335-352
• /
• 2008

본 연구는 수학과 서술형 평가에 관한 문항개발 사례 연구로서 교사들이 학교 현장에서 실제적으로 활용할 수 있는 평가문항과 평가기준을 개발하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 평가문항과 평가기준의 개발절차를 마련하고 초등학교 4-나 단계의 각 단원에 해당되는 구체적인 서술형 평가 문항과 그에 대한 평가기준을 개발하였다. 개발 과정에서 문항의 신뢰도 검증을 위하여 서술형 평가 문항과 평가기준을 초등학교 4학년 학급에 적용한 결과를 분석하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제47권4호
• /
• pp.487-503
• /
• 2008

In this paper, descriptive assessment method for middle school mathematics was evaluated by developing a framework for designing and grading problems for descriptive assessment and analyzing the effectiveness of the problems. The new descriptive assessment problems were developed by reviewing the current 7th National Mathematics Curriculum of Korea and aligned mathematics textbooks to define a set of problem design principles and evaluation framework for the assessment strategy. The developed problems were first pilot tested and then revised based on the feedback from the test. The final version was field tested by 100 students in 7th grade middle school. After the field test, the problems were graded by two middle school math teachers and one math education researcher to determine the overall correlation between graders and also to analyze effectiveness of the evaluation framework of the test. This result of this study is expected to assist in the further development of descriptive problems and grading framework by providing a reference work for teachers to better understand the process and the limitations of executing the new assessment strategy.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.125-136
• /
• 2001

This research is about how the adapted learning of descriptive assessment problems influence on the extension of the ability of the students. As a result, adapted learning of descriptive assessment problems totally led to positive effect, and according to the analyses of behavioral objectives divided into knowledge, comprehension and problem solving, they had more effect on the ability of students' problem solving. Learning attitude of the students were changed into self-centered learning attitude and interest on the subject of mathematics were highly increased since the research had started. If we adapt this research to the learning of mathematics after we develop various problems that can develop creativity, I'm sure that it will be a effective way for both extension of the ability and problem solving ability of the students.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제46권1호
• /
• pp.121-149
• /
• 2022

서술형 평가는 수학과 교육과정에서 강조하는 문제해결 능력 신장, 추론 능력, 의사소통 능력과 관련하여 의미있는 평가 방법이라 할 수 있다. 우리나라에서는 제7차 수학과 교육과정 이후로 수행평가가 강조되면서 중등학교에서 수행평가의 한 방법으로 서술형 평가가 이루어지고 있다. 그렇지만, 대학수학능력시험에서는 여러 가지 이유로 서술형 평가가 도입되지 못하고 있다. 수학교실에서 서술형 평가가 강조되고 교육적으로 충분히 가치가 있다는 것을 감안하면, 대학수학능력시험에서 서술형 평가의 실시에 대한 진지한 논의가 필요할 것이다. 본 연구에서는 우리나라의 대학수학능력시험에 해당하는 러시아의 국가통합시험의 수학 교과에서 실시 중인 서술형 평가를 분석하였다. 문헌 연구를 통해, 국가통합시험에서 수학 시험 문제들이 어떻게 구성되었는지, 시험에서 요구되는 수학적 능력은 무엇인지 고찰하였다. 특히, 국가통합시험의 수학 2021년 출제 문제를 중심으로 문제들의 외적 구조를 분석하였고, 서술형 문제들의 채점 방법을 분석하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 우리나라의 대학수학능력시험에서 서술형 문제의 도입 가능성에 대한 다양한 정보를 제공할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.93-104
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between pre-service elementary teacher's prior knowledge and processes of observations and hypotheses generation via analysis of descriptive fault patterns during observation, problem generation and hypotheses generation processes. For the purpose of this study, thirty-four undergraduate students were participated and descriptions of participants' responds were analyzed. As the result, four patterns of descriptive fault on the process of generating hypothesis were classified; 1) descriptive fault from the causalities, 2) descriptive fault from repetition of observational facts, 3) descriptive fault from the priority of prior knowledge, and 4) descriptive fault from negation of the observational facts. From the result, the researcher was able to explore the faults caused by pre-service elementary students' prior knowledge through the observational descriptive analysis with hypothetical descriptive analysis.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.401-422
• /
• 2008

최근 학교 현장에서는 학생에 대한 총체적 이해와 평가의 필요성에 대두하고 다양한 과정중심의 평가방법이 강조됨에 따라 학생들의 사고력을 평가할 수 있는 대안적인 평가 방법으로 서술형 평가의 중요성이 인식되면서 이에 대한 효과적인 적용 방안이 구체적으로 논의되고 있는 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 서울시 소재 공립 초등학교 교사 197명을 대상으로 서술형 평가에 대한 인식 및 실태 파악을 위한 설문조사연구를 실시하여 서술형 평가의 현장 적용 가능성 및 효율적인 활용방안에 대한 시사점을 얻고자 하였다. 연구 결과, 대부분의 초등학교 교사들이 학기당 4-7회 이상, 단원별로 필요하다고 느끼는 시기에 단답형의 수행평가를 실시하였고, 서술형 평가는 학생들의 창의성과 사고력을 신장시키고 성취도를 정확히 측정하는 것을 목적으로 90% 이상의 교사가 실시하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 한편 서술형 평가 실시에 있어 교사의 업무부담 경감 및 교육 여건의 개선, 교사에 대한 자율성 부여, 문항과 평가 기준의 개발 및 보급이 시급히 개선되어져야 할 문제점으로 지적되었다.

• 기본간호학회지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.71-78
• /
• 2011

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the critical thinking disposition, problem solving ability, and clinical competence of nursing students in a 4-year baccalaureate university program. Methods: In this study, a descriptive survey design was used with convenience sample of 228 nursing students at a University in Chungbuk Province. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficient, and multiple stepwise regression. Results: The mean scores for critical thinking disposition, problem solving ability, and clinical competence were at the intermediate level. Significant positive correlations among critical thinking disposition, problem solving ability, and clinical competence were found. The regression model explained 46.8% of clinical competence. Problem solving confidence was the most significant predictor of clinical competence, other variables were intellectual fairness, intellectual eagerness/curiosity, and prudence. Conclusion: The study findings suggest that nursing students with higher levels of critical thinking disposition and problem solving ability will have a higher level of clinical competence. Furthermore, problem solving confidence might be the most important predictor in clinical competence. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce the new teaching strategies in nursing education, strategies that will improve critical thinking disposition, problem solving ability, and clinical competence.

• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.207-239
• /
• 2013

This research is a study on student's understanding fundamental concepts of mathematical curriculum, especially in geometry domain. The goal of researching is to analyze student's concepts about that domain and get the mathematical teaching methods. We developed various questions of descriptive assessment. Then we set up the term, procedure of research for the understanding student's knowledge of geometric figures. And we analyze the student's understanding extent through investigating questions of descriptive assessment. In this research, we concluded that most of students are having difficulty with defining the fundamental concepts of mathematics, especially in geometry. Almost all the students defined the fundamental conceptions of mathematics obscurely and sometimes even missed indispensable properties. And they can't distinguish between concept definition and concept image. Prior to this study, we couldn't identify this problem. Here are some suggestions. First, take time to reflect on your previous mathematics method. And then compile some well-selected questions of descriptive assessment that tell us more about student's understanding in geometric concepts.

• 보건의료산업학회지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.125-134
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study was to identify the influencing factors of college adjustment in nursing students. A quantitative descriptive design was used to study 400 nursing students in Busan and Ulsan, recruited from May 1 to 30, 2011. The instruments used were the clinical stress scale, stress coping scale and college adjustment problem checklist. The data were analysed SPSS program, using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficient, and simultaneous multiple regression. Findings of the study can be summarized as follows; First, the average of clinical stress was 3.68 points, the problem-solving coping was 2.85 points, the emotional-focused coping was 2.48 points, and college adjustment was 3.03 points. Second, The correlation of the clinical stress and college adjustment relations showed negative correlation in all areas. The correlation of problem-solving and emotional-focused coping and college adjustment showed positive correlation. Third, The significant predictors of college adjustment were satisfaction in major, psychological factors, problem-solving coping, perceived health status, emotional-focused coping, knowledge, skills, assignment/reports. These variables showed explanatory power of 43.2%. The study suggested to help reduce clinical stress and to strengthen problem-solving coping for college adjustment in nursing students.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제57권3호
• /
• pp.197-213
• /
• 2018

Descriptive problems can be used to grow student's ability of thinking logically and creatively, because it shows if the students had a reasonable way of thinking. Rate of descriptive problems is increasing in middle and high school exams. However, students in middle and high schools are generally used to answering multiple-choice or short-answer questions rather than describing the solving process. The purpose of this paper is to gain a theoretic ground to increase the rate of descriptive problems. In this study, students were to solve some multiple-choice problems, and after a few weeks, to solve the problems of same contents in the form of descriptive problems which requires the students to write the solving process. The difference of the scores were measured for each problems to each students, and students were asked what they think the reason for rise or fall of the score is. The result is as follows: First, average scores of 7 of 8 problems used in this study had fallen when it was in descriptive form, and for 5 of them in the rate of 11.2%~16.8%. Second, the main reason of falling is that the students have actual troubles of describing the solving process. Third, in the case of rising, the main reason was that partial scores were given in the descriptive problems. Last, there seems a possibility gender difference in the reason of falling. From these results, followings are suggested to advance the learning, teaching and evaluation in mathematics education: First, it has to be emphasized enough to describe the solving process when solving a problem. Second, increasing the rate of descriptive problems can be supported as a way to advance the evaluation. Third, descriptive problems have to be easier to solve than multiple-choice ones and it is convenient for the students to describe the solving process. Last, multiple-choice problems have to be carefully reviewed that the possibility of students' choosing incorrect answer with a small mistake is minimal.