Journal of Science Education (과학교육연구지)

Science Education Research Institute Kyungpook National University (경북대학교 과학교육연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Descriptive Assessment of Mathematics in Russia's Unified State Examination

러시아의 국가통합시험에서 수학교과의 서술형 평가 연구

  • Received : 2022.02.21
  • Accepted : 2022.03.22
  • Published : 2022.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Descriptive assessment is a meaningful assessment method in relation to problem solving ability, reasoning ability, and communication ability as emphasized in mathematics curriculum. In Korea, as performance assessment has been emphasized since the 7th mathematics curriculum, descriptive assessment is being conducted as a method of performance assessment in schools. However, descriptive assessment has not been introduced in the university scholastic ability test for various reasons. Considering that descriptive assessment is emphasized in the mathematics classroom and has sufficient educational value, a serious discussion on the implementation of descriptive assessment in the university scholastic ability test will be necessary. In this study, we analyzed the descriptive assessment of Russia's unified state examination (USE) in the mathematics, which corresponds to Korea's university scholastic ability test. Through a literature review, we investigated how mathematics examination problems were structured in the USE and which mathematical abilities were required for the examination. In particular, the outer structure of the problems was analyzed focusing on the mathematics problems of the USE 2021, and the scoring method of the descriptive problems was also analyzed. The results of this study are expected to provide a variety of information on the possibility of introducing descriptive assessment in the Korean university scholastic ability tests.

서술형 평가는 수학과 교육과정에서 강조하는 문제해결 능력 신장, 추론 능력, 의사소통 능력과 관련하여 의미있는 평가 방법이라 할 수 있다. 우리나라에서는 제7차 수학과 교육과정 이후로 수행평가가 강조되면서 중등학교에서 수행평가의 한 방법으로 서술형 평가가 이루어지고 있다. 그렇지만, 대학수학능력시험에서는 여러 가지 이유로 서술형 평가가 도입되지 못하고 있다. 수학교실에서 서술형 평가가 강조되고 교육적으로 충분히 가치가 있다는 것을 감안하면, 대학수학능력시험에서 서술형 평가의 실시에 대한 진지한 논의가 필요할 것이다. 본 연구에서는 우리나라의 대학수학능력시험에 해당하는 러시아의 국가통합시험의 수학 교과에서 실시 중인 서술형 평가를 분석하였다. 문헌 연구를 통해, 국가통합시험에서 수학 시험 문제들이 어떻게 구성되었는지, 시험에서 요구되는 수학적 능력은 무엇인지 고찰하였다. 특히, 국가통합시험의 수학 2021년 출제 문제를 중심으로 문제들의 외적 구조를 분석하였고, 서술형 문제들의 채점 방법을 분석하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 우리나라의 대학수학능력시험에서 서술형 문제의 도입 가능성에 대한 다양한 정보를 제공할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Federal Institute of Pedagogical Measurements [FIPM]. (2017). USE in mathematics 2017. Retrieved December 15, 2021, from http://shkolkovo.net (In Russian).
  2. FIPM (2018). USE in mathematics 2018. Retrieved October 20, 2021, from http://math100.ru (In Russian).
  3. FIPM (2019). USE in mathematics 2019-far east version. Retrieved December 15, 2021, from http://kotolis.ru (In Russian).
  4. FIPM (2020a). Codifier requirements for the level of training of graduates educational organizations to conduct USE mathematics. Retrieved November 12, 2020, from http://fipi.ru (In Russian).
  5. FIPM (2020b). Specification control measuring materials to be held in 2021 USE mathematics. Retrieved November 12, 2020, from http://fipi.ru (In Russian).
  6. FIPM (2020c). USE in mathematics 2020. Retrieved December 15, 2021, from http://math100.ru (In Russian).
  7. FIPM (2021a). Guidelines for teachers, based on an analysis of typical mistakes of USE participants in 2021 in mathematics. Retrieved October 11, 2021, from http://fipi.ru (In Russian).
  8. FIPM (2021b). Methodological materials for chairmen and members of subject commissions on checking the completion of problems with a detailed answer to the examination papers of the USE 2021: Mathematics. Retrieved September 13, 2021, from http://fipi.ru (In Russian).
  9. FIPM (2021c). Specification control measuring materials to be held in 2022 USE mathematics. Retrieved November 12, 2021, from http://fipi.ru (In Russian).
  10. Han, I. (2001). A study on analyzing structure of mathematical problem, J. Korea Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. E: Communications of Mathematical Education, 11, 279-290.
  11. Han, I. (2009). An analysis of geometrical differentiated teaching and learning materials using inner structure of mathematics problems, J. Korea Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. E: Communications of Mathematical Education, 23(2), 175-196.
  12. Hwang, H., Choi, S., Cho, S., & Park, J. (2020). New theories of mathematics education 2. Seoul: Mooneumsa.
  13. Kang O. (2007). Theories of teaching and assessment of mathematics, Seoul: Kyungmoonsa.
  14. Kolyagin, Yu. (1977). Problems in teaching mathematics. Moscow: Prosveshenie. (In Russian).
  15. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation [KICE]. (1999). Improvement of assessment methods in high school mathematics. Seoul: KICE. (Training data CRE 99- 1-3).
  16. KICE (2003). Performance assessment materials of secondary school mathematics. Seoul: KICE. (R&D RDM 2003-11).
  17. KICE (2014). Improvement method of performance assessment: Focusing on Korean, mathematics and English subjects. Seoul: KICE. (R&D CRE 2014-3).
  18. KICE (2019). Substantialization method of essay and descriptive assessment of the school. Choongbuk: KICE.
  19. Krupich, V. (1995). Theoretical foundations of teaching mathematical problem solving. Moscow: Prometei. (In Russian).
  20. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2018). 2015 revised curriculum evaluation criteria: High school mathematics, Sejong: MOE.
  21. Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation [MERF]. (2004). Federal component of the state standard of general education. Part 2. Secondary (complete) general education. Moscow: MERF. (In Russian).
  22. MERF (2021). On approval of the unified schedule and duration of the unified state examination for each academic subject, the requirements for the use of teaching and upbringing means during its conduct in 2021. Retrieved November 1, 2021, from http://publication.pravo.gov.ru (In Russian).
  23. Pankratiev, A. (2021). Profile unified state examination in mathematics: Statistics on the solvability of problems and features of the solutions, Lecture Video Materials in MTsNMO. Retrieved January 22, 2022, from http://youtube.com.
  24. Park, D. (2014). Three suggestions for improving college entrance examination, JoongAang Ilbo 2014. 12. 03. Retrieved January 10, 2022, from http://www.joongang.co.kr.
  25. Park, H. (1991). History of Korean mathematics education. Seoul: Daehan Textbook Co., Ltd.
  26. Yashchenko, I., Semenov, A., & Vysotsky, I. (2020). Methodical recommendations for teachers prepared on the basis of the analysis of typical mistakes participants of the USE 2020 in mathematics. Pedagogical measurements, 2020(3), 3-26.
  27. Yashchenko, I., Vysotsky, I., & Semyonov, A. (2019). Methodical recommendations for teachers prepared on the basis of the analysis of typical mistakes participants of the USE 2019 in mathematics. Pedagogical measurements, 2019(3), 23-40.
  28. Yashchenko I., Vysotsky I., & Semyonov A. (2021). Methodical recommendations for teachers prepared on the basis of the analysis of typical mistakes participants of the USE 2021 in mathematics. Pedagogical measurements, 2021(4), 3-28.