• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제31권6호
• /
• pp.11-21
• /
• 2013

The main purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between perceived the authoritarian parenting style and academic achievement among college students. Specifically, it is hypothesized that authoritarian parenting would indirectly affect the academic achievement of college students through self-differentiation level and career decision-making self-efficacy. 283 college students, after the consideration of their grade and gender, were selected for this study as participants. Methods describing the primary analytical technique of Structural Equation Modeling were used for the study. The results demonstrate that an authoritarian parenting style negatively affected the academic achievement of college students. There are mediation effects of self-differentiation and career decision-making self-efficacy between the perceived authoritarian parenting style and academic achievement among college students. The findings imply that the positive development of adult children requires more egalitarian parenting styles than those used on early adolescents. Next, for female students, specialized career counseling programs focusing on reducing psychological career barriers and career stress are needed. Lastly, it is implied that parenting styles used on adult children in Korea may differ from Western styles. Therefore, it may be difficult to explain the relationship between parents and adult children with a traditional theoretical framework.

• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.441-451
• /
• 2016

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the effects of personality characteristics and decision making type on the self-leadership of nursing students. Methods: The participants were 336 nursing students using a self-report questionnaire. Data were analyzed using a t-test, ANOVA, $Scheff{\acute{e}}$ test, Pearson correlation coefficients, and stepwise multiple regression. Results: There were significant positive correlations between self-leadership and extraversion (r=.50, p<.001), agreeableness (r=.22, p<.001), conscientiousness (r=.60, p<.001), openness to experience (r=.36, p<.001), and rational style (r=.47, p<.001). However the correlation between self-leadership and dependent style was significantly negative (r=-.11, p=.044). Conscientiousness (${\beta}$=.60, p<.001), extraversion (${\beta}$=.28, p<.001), and rational style (${\beta}$=.21, p<.001), openness to experience (${\beta}$=.18, p<.001), and degree of leadership level (${\beta}$=.10, p=.020) were identified as factors affecting self-leadership. The explanation power of this regression model was 50.0% and it was statistically significant (F=67.52, p<.001). Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that effective self-leadership programs should be developed by including conscientiousness, extraversion, openness to experience, and rational decision making.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.137-146
• /
• 1992

As a preliminary work for the interrelations between individuals' learning style and their consumer decision-making styles in purchasing apparel, its theoretical backgrounds were reviewed. Several major approaches to measuring and characterizing learning styles were theories of Hunt, Schroder, Kolb, and sproles. - Relevant literature suggests several consumer decision-making styles including Morchis' and Sproles'. Researches on the practical' implication of theoretical learning styles model in the area of consumer decision-making styles were also explored.

• 가족자원경영과 정책
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.27-45
• /
• 2006

On this research, we classified Korean consumers into several comsumer groups based on the different decision-making process they endorse, and then investigated the difference among these consumer groups in frequency, expenditure, satisfaction in using different types of retail stores. For this research, we have surveyed consumers dwelling in Seoul and in near-Seoul areas in 2004. The following is the summary of the main results. First, 'enjoy shopping' group showed a high expenditure rate in department store shopping and internet shopping, whereas 'impulsive decision' group more frequently visited traditional market places, 'fashion pursuing' group and 'enjoy shopping' group visited department stores more frequently than traditional market places. Second, 'impulsive decision' group assessed that the traditional market place offers better price and quality. Also 'impulsive decision' group and 'enjoy shopping' group assessed positively on the AS provided by department stores, and assessed negatively on the AS provided by internet shopping malls. Finally, 'fashion pursuer' group preferred buying foods from traditional market places, while 'brand seeker' group and 'fashion pursuer' group preferred buying clothes from discount stores. While 'enjoy shopping' group showed a high preference in buying clothes in department stores, 'rational decision-making' group showed a low preference in buying clothes in department stores.

• 한국보육지원학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.83-100
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 보육교사가 인식한 원장의 지도성 유형과 의사결정 유형에 따른 보육교사의 직무만족도의 차이를 연구해봄으로써 보다 질 높은 보육과정의 운영을 위해 필요한 보육교사의 직무만족도를 높이는데 있어 원장의 지도성 유형과 의사결정 유형의 영향력을 검토해보는 데에 그 목적이 있다. 연구의 대상은 어린이집의 보육교사 184명을 대상으로 설문지 조사를 실시하였고, 원장의 지도성 유형및 의사결정 유형에 따른 보육교사의 직무만족도의 차이 분석을 위해 일원분산분석과 사후검증을 실시하였다. 결과 보육교사의 직무만족도는 대부분 가장 긍정적인 지도성 유형인 효율형일 때 가장 높은 점수를 나타냈다. 마찬가지로 원장의 의사결정 유형의 경우도 가장 이상적인 유형인 참여형 의사결정 유형이 교사의 직무만족도 모든 하위 요소에서 가장 높은 점수를 나타냈다. 이는 긍정적인 지도성과 민주적인 참여적 의사결정 과정을 선호하는 원장의 경우 교사의 직무만족도를 높여 주어 어린이집의 질적 발전을 위해 긍정적인 영향을 미칠 수 있음을 시사해 준다.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.144-149
• /
• 2008

Purpose: The aim of this study was to testify correlations between critical thinking disposition and decision making styles. Methods: The subjects of this study were 193 freshman nursing students in the 1 nursing school located in Incheon area. The data were collected by self-reporting questionnaires. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation coefficient analysis. Results: The score of critical thinking disposition was revealed 3.96 points. The highest was inquisitiveness, the lowest was systematicity. The most frequent decision making style was revealed a rational decision making. The next was dependant decision making, intuitional decision making as follows. The critical thinking disposition and rational decision making had a statistically significant positive correlation. However the critical thinking disposition and dependant decision making had a statistically significant negative correlation. Conclusion: With these findings, we are found that the more increasing critical thinking disposition, the more developing rational decision making. It will suggested that the program for increasing nursing student's critical thinking disposition focused on systematicity, analyticity and truth seeking in critical thinking sub categories.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제23권6호
• /
• pp.861-879
• /
• 2013

본 연구의 목적은 과학영재학생들의 우주개발사업에 대한 가치판단과 의사결정 과정을 탐색하기 위함이다. 이를 위하여 영재학교 1학년 64명의 학생이 1달 동안 의사결정을 위한 세미나 식 토론수업을 총 10차시에 걸쳐 실시하였다. 세미나식 토론 수업을 실시한 후, 우주개발사업에 대한 글쓰기와 설문지를 활용하여 영재학생들의 가치판단과 의사결정을 분석하였다. 연구 결과 과학영재학생들은 우주개발사업의 양면인 필요성과 위험성을 모두 인식하고 있었으며, 각자의 상황에서 증거를 선택하고 해석하는 차이 그리고 다양한 가치에 대한 우선순위의 차이에 따라 의사결정 결과가 상이함을 발견할 수 있었다. 대다수의 영재학생들이 우주개발사업의 사회적 중요성에 대해서는 매우 잘 인식하고 있는 점과 달리 우주개발사업에 대한 정보가 영재학생들에게 많이 부족한 실정임을 확인할 수 있었다. 본 연구를 토대로 우주개발사업에 대한 SSI교육의 시사점과 후속 연구에 대한 제언을 하였다.

• 융합정보논문지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.221-230
• /
• 2022

본 연구에서는 뷰티 전공 대학생의 진로 의사결정 유형을 확인하고, 진로 준비 행동과 전공 만족에 미치는 영향에 대한 분석을 통해 진로 준비 행동의 향상을 목적으로 한다. 2021년 11월 1일부터 30일까지 진행하였고, 질문지는 총 485부를 분석 자료로 활용하였다. 연구 방법으로 빈도 분석, 요인분석, 신뢰도 분석, 상관관계 분석, 다중 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 연구 결과로 첫째 진로 의사결정 유형이 진로 준비 행동과 전공 만족에서 정적(+) 상관관계가 나타나 통계학적으로 유의한 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 합리적 진로 의사결정 유형은 의존 및 직관적 유형과 상관 관계가 있었으며, 진로 준비 행동으로 시간 노력, 능력 활동, 정보수집의 진로 준비 행동과 전공 만족으로 수업 만족, 교과 만족에서 모두 통계적으로 유의한 정적(+) 상관관계를 나타냈다. 셋째 진로 의사결정 유형 중 합리형과 의존형이 진로 준비 행동의 하위요인인 능력 활동에 통계적으로 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

• 사상체질의학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.56-66
• /
• 2008

1. Objectives and Methods This study was performed to investigate the relationship between Sasang constitution and decision making style. Subjects were 69 men and 45 women. Decision making style score, physical measurements and results were measured and analyzed according to Sasang constitution. 2. Results Soeumin group had significantly high score in rational score compared with those of Soyangin. Soyangin group had significantly high score in intuitive score compared with those of Soeumin. Soeumin group had significantly high score in dependent score compared with those of Taeeumin. According to binary logistic regression analysis for decision making style score, Sasang constitution were significant risk factors and ORs of Taeeumin were significantly higer than those of Soyangin in rational score, ORs of Soyangin were significantly higer than those of Soeumin in intuitive score, and ORs of Soeumin were significantly higer than those of Taeeumin in dependent Score. 3. Conclusions Soyangin had significantly high score in intuitive score. Soeumin had significantly high score in dependent score. We found many evidences that Soyangin is intuitive style and Soeumin dependent style in the text of ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Suse Bowon${\lrcorner}$ and other research. But as far as Taeeumin was concerned, the result of Taeeurnin’s was not coincident with other research. More cases and research were needed to confirm the personality and phychological type of Taeeumin. This study result will be an important method that classify Sasang Costitution and consultation of student career decision making and studying attitude.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제6권3호
• /
• pp.121-129
• /
• 2008

This paper aimed to exam the influence factor of purchasing decision making of industrial buyer and analyzed their effects on success. From the previous studies, we extracted influence factor which are buying center, character of Industrial goods provider. The result showed the difference in the purchasing decision-making process in accordance with the type of buying task(Hypothesis 1). And a test was made the difference in the mode of purchase decision-making(Hypothesis 2). A test was made the difference in supplier's evaluative criterion in accordance with the type of buying task(Hypothesis 3).