• 한국도로학회논문집
• /
• 제7권4호
• /
• pp.21-30
• /
• 2005

교통량 자료는 도로의 계획, 설계 및 운영 등에 폭넓게 활용되는 자료이다. 일반국도를 대상으로 1955년부터 전국 규모의 교통조사가 시행되고 있으며, 도로의 결절점을 기준으로 구간을 설정한 후 상시조사를 실시하고 있다. 그러나 전 구간에서 상시조사를 수행하는 데에는 한계가 있기 때문에 우선순위를 결정하는 것은 중요한 문제이다. 본 연구에서는 우선순위 결정을 위한 방법론으로 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process)를 적용한 다기준 의사결정 기법 (MCDM : Multiple Criteria Decision Making)을 적용하였다. 판단 기준변수로는 도로계획 [AADT, VKT, 첨두시간 교통량, 도시부유출입구간] 도로설계 [Volume(pcu), 방향별교통량, 중차량비], 그리고 도로운영 (속도, 밀도, V/C)으로 정의하였다. 평가자료를 정량화 및 규준화하였고, 설문조사를 통해 얻은 쌍대비교 값들을 가지고 고유벡터 방법으로 계층별, 가중치를 구하였다. 교통량 조사구간에 대한 교통조사 우선순위 선정은 규준화 값과 계층별, 가중치를 곱하여 구한 대안 값의 전체 합의 크기에 따라 결정하였다. 이를 통하여 상시 교통량 조사를 위해 다수의 구간으로 분할된 일반국도를 대상으로, 상시 교통량 조사 지점 우선순위를 결정하였다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.192-198
• /
• 2010

To maximize effectiveness of standardization activities, it is essential to set priorities for determined standardization work items in the next generation internet protocol television (NG-IPTV) technologies. In this study, the analytic hierarchy process(AHP) is employed and applied to ranking of NG-IPTV standardization work items as a multi-criteria decision making tool which involves comprehensive surveys. Survey results are analyzed and we identified a useful three level segmentation of standardization strategic plan which shows standardization work item priorities.

• 한국정보통신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정보통신학회 2016년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.139-141
• /
• 2016

콜센터에 국가표준(KS)이 도입되면서 고객들이 질 좋은 서비스를 이용할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다. 본 연구는 Fuzzy AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) 기법을 이용하여 콜센터 서비스 인증 심사기준의 상대적 중요도를 평가하기 위해서 수행되었다. Fuzzy AHP는 AHP 기법에 Fuzzy 집합 이론을 결합한 것으로, 의사결정과정에서 발생할 수 있는 애매모호함과 불확실성을 해결하기 위하여 제시된 방법이다. 본 연구에서 제시한 평가방법론은 현재 국가적으로 추진되고 있는 KS 서비스 인증제도에서도 응용될 수 있을 것으로 본다.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.53-65
• /
• 1992

Decision Support System(DSS) is an advanced information system concept prevailing since 1980s. It supports managers' decision making activities by providing not only information but decision alternatives. It essentially consists of the components of database, modelbase and dialogue systems. With the development of its databases, POSCO needs a number of modelbases in establishing DSSs in various areas such as production planning and investment. This research particularly focuses on establishment of a mid-and long-range investment DSS and investigates the necessity and the problems of an investment DSS and the decision criteria for investment priority. We (1) propose a modelbase which uses the concepts of Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) and Zero-Base Budgeting(ZBB), along with an appropriate scoring method, database and dialogue system to support the investment manager in evaluating investment proposals ; (2) implement the system using relational database management system ; and (3) discuss the results of implementing the investment DSS.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.310-317
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this study is to investigate and to develop a decision support system for supporting the outworn facility replacement analysis in shipbuilding. This paper also provides an information system which can be effectively applied to various criteria in decision making. The modelbase of decision support system uses the concepts of the analytic hierarchy process along with an appropriate scoring methods. The AHP represents an improvement over other well-known scoring approaches since the criteria weights of priorities established by the AHP are not based on arbitrary scales, but use a ratio scale for human judgements. The proposed methodology in this research enables the decision maker to evaluate the investment alternatives based on qualitative data and quantitative data in a systematic way.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제21권45호
• /
• pp.11-23
• /
• 1998

This paper presents a more efficient evaluation of alternatives by use of multi-criteria decision making methodlogy under fuzzy intersectional dependence relations. The performance evaluation of most systems such as weapons, enterprise systems etc. are multiple criteria decision making problems. The descriptions and judgements on these systems are usually linguistic and fuzzy. The traditional methods of Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) are mainly used in crisp(non-fuzzy) decision applications with a very unbalanced scale of judgements and rank reversal. To overcome these problems, we will propose a new, general decision making method for evaluation models using fuzzy AHP(FAHP) under fuzzy intersectional dependence relations. The T.M.S alternatives A, B and C will be evaluted by the Fuzzy Analytic Hierachy Process (FAHP) based on entropy weight in this study. We will use symmetric triangular fuzzy numbers to indicate the relative strength of the elements in the hierachy and degree of intersection between criteria. These problems are evaluated by five criteria : tactical criteria, technology criteria, maintenance criteria, economy criteria, advacement criteria.

• ETRI Journal
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.572-580
• /
• 2014

Mobile operators in saturated markets increasingly favor mobile network sharing (MNS) over facility-based competition. Previous research examining MNS primarily focused on its positive effects, while the negative effects were largely overlooked. This study proposes a decision-making model using an analytic hierarchy process technique to evaluate decision-making criteria among various types of MNS policies. The decision-making model was applied to Wireless Broadband services in Korea to determine the relative importance of both positive and negative evaluation criteria and preference among multiple types of MNS policies. Positive evaluation criteria (that is, efficiency) were far greater in importance than negative evaluation criteria (that is, competition harm). The preference for adopting MNS among five alternative approaches was also revealed. The study findings offer immediate policy insights in Korea and provide a decision-making framework for policy makers in other countries to utilize.

• 한국음향학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국음향학회 2000년도 학술발표대회 논문집 제19권 2호
• /
• pp.131-134
• /
• 2000

본 논문에서는 각 지역의 수중 음향 센서로부터 중앙의 정보 융합 센터로 전송되어진 동일한 또는 상이한 표적의 Identity 정보들을 종합해 최종적으로 표적의 Identity를 결정하는 Decision Fusion 기법을 다룬다. 기존의 연구는 표적의 속성 정보로부터 정보 융합을 통해 표적의 Identity를 선택하는 기법을 주로 다루고 있다. 그러나 본 논문에서는 기존의 연구보다 한 단계 나아가 선택된 표적의 Identity들로부터 운용자가 가장 합리적인 결정을 내릴 수 있도록 하는 표적의 Identity 결정을 위한 Decision Fusion 기법을 제안한다. 이러한 수중 음향 표적 식별 시스템에서의 Identity Decision Fusion 기법으로 Voting 기법, 센서 정보의 신뢰도를 고려한 Weighted Voting 기법, 그리고 다 기준 의사 결정 기법인 Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) 기법을 제안하고 그 성능을 평가한다

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.66-84
• /
• 1994

The investment to advanced manufacturing techniques is essential to reinforcement of furture competitiveness. To make a decision for selecting an appropriate manufacturing facility is very important ; it is, however, rather difficult to get a precise evaluation through conventional cost analysis methods. The supreme decision-maker does not only take into consideration tangible cost attributes in decision-making ; he also takes into account such intangible attributes as strategic ones. This study combines Analytic Hierarchy Process and Simulation in order to graph the variations of weighted indices of alternatives for effective decision making when cost attributes are uncertain. A numerical example is illustrated to explain the basic mechanics of the proposed decision procedure.

• 한국국방경영분석학회지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.37-55
• /
• 2001

The main purpose of this study is to review the current system and to develop a decision support system for evaluating the priorities among those possible alternatives in the army facility enterprise. This paper also provides an information system which can be effectively applied to various criteria and stages in decision making process such as Planning and Programming phases in PPBEES. The model base of decision support systems uses the concepts of the analytic hierarchy process along with the supplementary techniques such as TOPSIS and 0-1 integer programming. Both AHP and TOPSIS are used scoring approaches in the Planning phase and IP is induced at the Programming phase to give GO/NO-GO solution for each project. We use Expert Choice, Excel and LINDO s/w's to implement a prototyped model. The proposed methodology in this paper enables the decision makers to evaluate the priority based on quantitative and qualitative data in a systematic way.