• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.29-43
• /
• 2002

Having Efficient Contracting Laws and Regulations is one of the critical success factors for SI (System Integration) industry growth. This paper explores problems in contracting systems for SI business. Two perspectives have been used in this analysis. One is on law itself perspective, the other is on industry growth perspective. A comprehensive survey on contracting practices has been done, and the structure of SI industry has been analysed. Also, characteristics of SI contracting processes have been analysed. A framework for efficient contracting laws and regulations for SI industry has been discussed based on the characteristics of SI business and SI industry. Future research will be needed to expand the current framework and to examine the effectiveness of the proposed framework.

• 한국화재소방학회논문지
• /
• 제23권5호
• /
• pp.43-49
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 소방시설공사에서의 분리발주제도의 도입을 통하여 소방산업의 발전과 더불어 국민 생활의 안전을 확보하는데 궁극적인 목적이 있다. 현재 국내의 공공공사에서 실행되고 있는 분리발주제도 현황과 외국의 공공공사 분리발주제도에 대한 사항을 분석하여 우리 실정에 적합한 소방시설공사에서의 분리발 주제도 도입 방안을 제시하고자 하였다. 또한 현재 시행되고 있는 일괄발주제도와 분리발주제도의 비교 분석을 통하여 소방시설공사업의 분리발주제도 도입의 타당성을 검토하였으며, 이에 대한 법제화 추진 전략과 소방시설공사업법 및 동법 시행령 개선방안을 제시하였다.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.35-49
• /
• 2003

SI(System Integration) Projects need more efficient project processes. Having efficient contracting laws and regulations is one of the critical success factors for SI industry growth. Former researches developed a framework for efficient contracting laws and regulations for SI industry based on the characteristics of SI business and SI industry. However, the effectiveness of the proposed framework has not been analyzed. This paper tests the validity and effectiveness of the proposed framework. Emprical analysis has been performed to show consensus of each interested parties. Developers and outsourcers have some conflicts in several critical issues of SI project processes. However, comprehensive analysis shows overall consensus among interested parties.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제58권
• /
• pp.99-124
• /
• 2013

International commercial arbitration is a specially formed mechanism for the final and binding settlement of disputes arisen between contracting parties regarding procedures, structures or other contractual relationship agreed by them. It is a resolution system which is processed autonomously by arbitrators who are appointed by contracting parties without involving the national court. If the contracting parties want to settle their disputes by arbitration, there must be a valid agreement. With a valid agreement, the most important concern is which law(called as the substantive law) should be applied in order to determine the rights and obligations of both contracting parties in relation to the dispute. At this point, the substantive law is really important because it is applied to the dispute itself directly during proceedings as well as it plays an crucial role in scrutiny and enforcement of arbitral awards. This article discusses about the substantive law under international commercial arbitration, specially focusing on the regulations of the ICC rules of arbitration, which is the most widely used all over the world and UNCITRAL Model law, which most countries' rule and laws are based on. By discussing how these rules and regulations should be interpreted and applied, it is expected to provide practical help to practitioners when they agree on an arbitration agreement.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제30권
• /
• pp.91-120
• /
• 2006

An Arbitration agreement is one kind of contracts between two or more contracting parties; any possible disputes that arise concerning a contract will be settled by arbitration. Contracting parties who have made a valid arbitration agreement will submit a dispute for settlement to private persons(arbitrators) instead of to a court. Arbitration may depend upon the agreement of the private parties, but it is also a system which has been built on the law and which relies upon that law in order to make it effective both nationally and internationally. That is to say, arbitration is wholly dependent on the underlying support of the court. The complementarity of the courts and of the arbitrators is a well-established fact; they seek for the common purpose, the efficacy of international commercial arbitration. Most states' laws contain the provisions which have been set for the supportive role of the courts relating to arbitration; (1) the enforcement of the arbitration agreement(rulings on validity of the arbitration agreement), and the establishment of the tribunal at the beginning of the arbitration, (2) challenge of arbitrators, interim measures, and intervention during evidence in the middle of the arbitral proceedings, (3) filing of the award, challenge of the arbitral award, and recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award at the end of the arbitration. Most international instruments and national laws concerning arbitration believe that authoritative courts should play their power not to control and supervise arbitration but to support and develop the merits of arbitration at most. 1985 UNCITRAL Model Law also expressly limit the scope of court's intervention to assist arbitration, not to control it.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.87-122
• /
• 1998

This study reports on the Arbitration system in the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration commission (CIETAC) and the International Arbitration problems of Korea and China. The Chines laws including Arbitration laws are influenced by the civil Code system Particulary the German system. China is contracting state of the U N Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958 New York Convention), which became effective in the China April 22, 1987. International Commercial Arbitration is popular in China. CIETAC is the sole International Commercial Arbitration body in China. CIETAC has two sub-commissions, on is shen zhem S E Z and the other in shanghai. The CIETAC rules, are similar to the rules in effect in Countries using a civil Code system. Both an agreement to submit an existing dispute to Arbitration and an Arbitration clause in a contract relating to future disputes are recognizeal as valiad Arbitration agreements. CIETAC has the power to make a decision on disputes concering the validity of the Arbitration agreements, or jurisdiction over a specicific case.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.184-193
• /
• 2013

국내 건설산업은 경직된 산업 구조와 건설 생산 활동에 대한 비효율적인 제도적 규제 등으로 인해 성장세가 저하되고 경쟁력이 뒤떨어지는 등의 문제점이 지적되고 있다. 현행 분할 분리발주 제도의 경우 국가 계약법에서는 분할발주는 원칙적으로 금지하고 있으나, 그 예외 조항으로 두고 있어 전기, 정보통신, 기계설비, 건축폐기물 공종의 경우 분할발주가 의무화 가능하고, 소방시설공사의 경우 의무화 추진을 위한 노력으로 소방시설공사업법 일부개정법률안을 발의하는 등 지속적으로 의무화 추진중이다. 기계설비공사업은 분할발주 관련 법률은 없으나 국가계약법 제68조 제3호를 근거하여 일부 시 도 교육청에서는 기계설비공사의 분리발주 확대 추진하고 있는 실정이며, 공종별 별도 법안을 추진하고 있는 공종도 있는 것으로 파악되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 분리분할 발주에 대한 제도 분석 및 분리발주에 대한 전문가의견 청취 및 유관기관별 의견을 정리하여 건설산업 제도 선진화 방안을 제시하고자 한다. 이에 본 연구에서는 발주자의 효율적인 발주방식의 선택권 확보차원에서 발주자의 역량 및 프로젝트의 특성 등에 따라 분할 발주 여부를 유연하게 결정할 수 있도록 분리분할발주 제도의 개선안을 제시하여 건설사업차원에서의 효율적이고 생산적인 건설생산이 가능한 유연한 건설사업 수행 체계를 형성할 수 있는 기반을, 그리고 건설 산업차원에서는 국내 건설산업의 균형 발전과 함께 국제 경쟁력 향상을 고려한 구조를 제공할 수 있는 방안을 제시하고자 한다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.53-70
• /
• 2019

This study analyzed some cases of the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commision (CIETAC) related to the application of the Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG). As a contracting party of the CISG, China has accumulated a considerable amount of experience in applying CISG through commercial arbitrations. This study sought to understand how CISG is operated in commercial arbitration in China. By analyzing actual cases in China, Korean commercial arbitration can avoid mistakes and further improve. This study of Chinese cases will give some useful information for Korean companies. As defined by the CISG, the applicability can be divided into direct application and indirect application. When China joined the CISG, it made a reservation out of Article 1(1)(b). Korea and China are contracting parties to CISG and CISG is, therefore, directly applied. It is beneficial for Korea to understand how CIETAC is indirectly applied in China then. Some of the results of this study are as follows: First, CIETAC made a correct judgment most of the time on the direct application of CISG. However, there were mistakes in the judgment of the nationality of the parties in a few cases. The parties must clearly define applicable laws when entering into a contract. Secondly, the 2012 "CIETAC Arbitration Rules" was revised so that the "party autonomy" was introduced into Chinese commercial arbitration concerning indirect application. Therefore, the principle of autonomy of the parties was not fully recognized in the past judgments. Instead, the domestic law of China was applied in accordance with the reservation of Article 1(1)(b). Thirdly, China did not explain the application of CISG in Hong Kong, which led to ambiguity in concerned countries. Therefore, it is necessary to confirm the status of CISG in Hong Kong. In addition, Korean companies should clearly define the applicable laws when dealing with Hong Kong companies.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제61권
• /
• pp.29-55
• /
• 2014

Subject matter of international trade are various. They contain not only tangible assets such as goods but also intangible assets including service, technology, and capital etc. Technology, a creation of the human intellect, is important as it is the main creative power to produce goods. It can be divided into Patent, Trademark, Know-how and so on. These Technologies are protected by the national and international laws on regulations for the Intellectual Property Rights(IPR), since technology development is needed a lot of time and effort, and the owner of the technology may have crucial benefits for creating and delivering better goods and services to users and customers. Therefore, any licensee who wants to use the technology which other person(licensor) owns, he(the licensee) and the original owner(the licensor) shall make Technology Transfer Contract. Differently from the International Sales Contract in which seller provides the proprietary rights of goods for buyer, in the case of International Transfer of Technology Contract, the licensor doesn't provide proprietary rights of technologies with the licensee, on the contrary the right of using is only allowed during the contract. The purpose of this paper is to examine the main issues in International Transfer of Technology Contract. This author focused on the main obligations of both parties, namely licensor's obligation to provide the technology and licensee's obligation to pay the royalty. As every country has different local mandatory laws about Intellectual Property Rights(IPR) and these mandatory rules and laws prevails over the contract, the related rules and laws should be examined carefully by both parties in advance. Especially the rules and laws about the competition limitation in the local country of licensee and the economic union(like the EU) should be checked before contracting. In addition, the contract has much more complicate and delicate aspects than other international business contracts, so both parties should review carefully before singing the contract.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제25권
• /
• pp.41-71
• /
• 2005

"UNIDROIT Principles 2004" focused on an enlargement rather than a revision. An additional Section or Chapter so to speak, which are about, the Authority of a Agents, Third Party Rights, Set-off, Assignment of Rights, Transfer of Obligations and Assignment of Contracts, and Limitation Periods have been added, while the only change of substance made to the 1994 Edition, apart from two paragraphs in the Preamble, and three new provisions in Chapter 1 and 2 which are necessary to adapt the Principles to the needs of electronic contracting. The Principles which have the nature of the restatement of international uniform laws (for example CISG) are continuous exercise. Therefore we should note whether in the future our concerns would be on a additional topics on a improvement of the current text by monitoring the reception of the "UNIDROIT Principles 2004" in practice, and the application by contracting parties. The purposes of the Principles may be classified into three ; the rules of law governing the contract, means of interpreting and supplementing international uniform law or domestic law, or models for national and international legislator. Among them, the function of governing law may be applied by the express choice by the parties or by the implied choice like "general principles of law" or "les mercatoria", and it may be applied in the absence of any choice of law by the parties. Among there importance functions, this writer would like to emphasize the function to supplementing international uniform law instruments. The reason is that the CISG which has been established as an international uniform sales act and to which our country would be a contracting State from March, 2005, needs a lot of gap-filling. For this purpose it is advisable the parties to insert following provisions in their contract. "This contract shall be governed by the CISG, supplemented when necessary by the UNIDROIT Principles 2004" Thus success in practice of the UNIDROIT Principles over the last then years has surpassed the most optimistic expectations. It is hoped that the 2004 Edition of the UNIDROIT Principles will be just as favorably received by legislators, business persons, lawyers, arbitrators and judges and become even better known and more widely used throughout the World.