• 한국응급구조학회지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.21-28
• /
• 2013

Purpose : The aim of the study is to compare the effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with voice and CPR without voice by one rescuer. Methods : Subjects were 26 students in C University who had basic life support certificate for Healthcare Provider. They performed 30:2 CPR for 6 minutes by two groups of CPR with voice and CPR without voice by one rescuer from August 14 to 16, 2012. They performed CPR with Resusci Anne SkillReporter$^{TM}$ and Laerdal PC SkillReporting System Ver. 2.4.1(Laerdal Medical, Norway and recored voice using TES-1350A(TES Electrical Electronic Corp, Taiwan). Between each experiment, 1 day of rest was given, providing enough time to recover from the fatigue of CPR. Results : The depth, rate of chest compression, and ventilation volume were not affected by a voice (p >.05), and the ratio of chest compression to ventilation kept 30:2, when the subject made a sound (p <.05). Conclusion : Making voice during CPR was associated with an accurate ratio of 30:2 and the reduction in hands off time.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.157-162
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 유치원생 대상 심폐소생술 교육 효과를 분석하여, 최초반응자로서의 역할이 가능한지 파악하고 향후 유치원생 대상의 심폐소생술 교육 프로그램 개발 및 활성화를 위한 기초자료로 사용하기 위하여 진행되었다. J시 소재 일개 유치원 6세, 7세반 어린이를 대상으로 10주간 5회의 심폐소생술 교육을 반복하였으며, 피드백 장비를 활용하여 객관적 자료를 수집하였다. 자료 분석은 SPSS 23.0 for win 통계 프로그램을 이용하여 t-test와 paired t-test 분석을 하였다. 연구결과, 반복 교육 후 가슴압박 깊이, 가슴압박 적정 속도, 적절한 가슴압박 위치 모두 유의하게 증가하였다. 결론적으로 유치원생 대상 심폐소생술 교육에 효과가 있었으며, 유치원생들도 최초반응자의 역할 수행이 가능할 것으로 보여진다.

• 한국응급구조학회지
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.7-19
• /
• 2022

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the interrupted chest compression time during the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED) depending on different AED practice training methods, and to report differences in self-efficacy before and after training. Methods: We enrolled university freshmen who have had cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training but have not or have had AED training but over 6 months. We examined differences between the group that practiced only shockable rhythms during training and the group that practiced both shockable and non-shockable rhythms. Results: A total of 72 individuals participated in this study, with 36 individuals each in the control and experimental groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the proficiency of AED usage between the two groups. In non-shockable cases, the experimental group showed shorter chest compression interruption time than the control group (2.30±1.21sec vs. 3.16±1.73 sec; p<0.01). In terms of self-efficacy before and after training, both groups showed higher self-efficacy after than before training. Conclusion: Individuals who underwent training that provided practice on both shockable and non-shockable rhythms had a shorter interrupted chest compression time when using the AED.

• Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
• /
• 제84권4호
• /
• pp.333-334
• /
• 2021

• 한국응급구조학회지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.99-107
• /
• 2019

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the position for the most accurate head-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by comparing saddle position CPR (SPCPR) and traditional CPR (TCPR). Methods: Sixty certified persons who completed a basic life support provider course between May 1 and June 21, 2019 were enrolled in the study. The participants were asked to perform 2 minutes of CPR, and the depth of chest compression, rate, position, full release, and hands off time were assessed. Accuracy was evaluated based on data collected from a smart phone application connected to the manikin via bluetooth and analyzed using frequency, percentage, t-test, analysis of variance and ${\chi}^2$. Results: The accuracy of chest compression was statistically significantly higher for SPCPR, 63.03%[${\pm}8.75$] for SPCPR and 55.50%[${\pm}10.17$] for TCPR [t=3.074, p=.003]. The depth of chest compression was statistically significantly greater for SPCPR, 4.51cm[${\pm}0.45$] for SPCPR and 4.16cm[${\pm}0.61$] for TCPR [t=2.503, p=.015]. The rate of chest compression was statistically significantly higher for TCPR, 105/min[${\pm}10.79$] for SPCPR and 111/min[${\pm}11.57$] for TCPR [t=-2.008, p=.049]. Accuracy of position of chest compression was statistically significantly higher for SPCPR, 96.10%[${\pm}13.73$] for SPCPR and 79.93%[${\pm}30.34$] for TCPR [t=2.659, p=.011]. Accuracy of full release was higher with SPCPR, with 86.30%[${\pm}30.53$] for SPCPR and 71.10%[${\pm}36.05$] for TCPR, but the difference was not statistically significant [t=1.762, p=.083]. Conclusion: Saddle position CPR was found to be more accurate than TCPR in the performance of manual head-up CPR.

• 한국화재소방학회논문지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.103-109
• /
• 2020

이 연구는 기본심폐소생술 교과목을 이수한 응급구조과 학생을 대상으로 수행자 엉덩관절 각도에 따라 기본심폐소생술의 질이 향상되는지 알아보고자 하였다. 기본심폐소생술 중 엉덩관절 각도에 따른 기본심폐소생술 질(가슴압박 깊이, 완전한 이완, 압박속도 등)을 측정하기 위해 SimPad SkillReporter와 Resusci Anne® QCPR®을 이용하여 비교 분석하였고, 2015 AHA Guideline 따랐으며, 가슴압박과 인공호흡의 비율은 30:2로 5주기 시행하였다. 실험군과 대조군의 일반적인 자세에서는 엉덩관절 각도, 인공호흡정도, 가슴압박 깊이, 가슴압박 속도, 가슴압박 이완, 가슴압박 정확도, 가슴압박 중단시간(Hands off time), 가슴압박 적용시간 비율은 큰 차이를 보이지 않았다(p > 0.05). 엉덩관절 각도를 90도로 유지하는 기본심폐소생술은 유지하지 않았을 때와 큰 차이는 없었으나, 적정깊이와 100% 이완에서는 좋은 결과를 보여 주어 보다 더 나은 심폐소생술 질 향상을 기대할 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.105-110
• /
• 2017

We propose a effectiveness of the assistant pad during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and provide basic data for high quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The subjects of the study were 28 students in the emergency department who completed the BLS Health Care-Provider under the experimental study by the randomized crossover design. Data were analyzed by using SPSS 20.0 Version. The results of this study showed that chest compressions using assistant pads decreased pain and fatigue than normal chest compressions, and the depth of chest compressions was deeper than normal depth. The results of this study shows that the use of assistant pads between the one hand and the other hand during cardiopulmonary resuscitation may increase accuracy and depth were improved. Therefore intensive indicator also improved. However, with regard to the use of assistant pads, further studies will be needed to identify the potential for clinical use.

• 한국화재소방학회논문지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.67-72
• /
• 2015

영아 심폐소생술 1인 수행시 효과적인 가슴 압박 방법을 모색하기 위해 시뮬레이션을 활용하여 두 손가락에 지지대를 사용하기 전 후의 가슴 압박 효과를 측정하였다. 여자 대학생 50명을 대상으로 실험을 실시하고 paired t-test, 카이제곱 검정 및 Fisher's exact test를 이용하여 결과를 분석하였다. 가슴 압박의 깊이는 두 손가락에 지지대를 사용하기 전 $2.50{\pm}0.59cm$에 비해 사용 후 $3.73{\pm}0.33cm$로 유의하게 개선되었다(p < 0.001). 두 손가락 지지대 사용은 대상자의 가슴 압박에 대한 자신감과 효과를 유의하게 증가시켰다(p < 0.001). 결론적으로 영아 심폐소생술 1인 수행시 두 손가락 지지대 사용은 가슴 압박의 깊이와 자신감 그리고 효과를 유의하게 증가시켰다. 따라서 지지대를 이용한 두 손가락 압박법은 영아 심폐소생술 1인 수행시 유용할 것으로 판단된다.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제24권12호
• /
• pp.151-155
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 물리 치료사의 심폐 소생술(CPR)의 지식 및 가슴압박 수행 능력을 조사하는 것이다. 심폐 소생술 교육받은 그룹과 교육받지 않은 물리치료사 그룹 간의 심폐소생술 지식과 가슴압박 수행 능력을 비교하였다. 이 연구에서 물리치료사들의 심폐소생술에 대한 정확한 이론적인 지식과 가슴압박 수행력간의 불일치가 있음을 확인 할 수 있었다. 물리치료사들의 응급상황에 대한 조기대응 능력 향상을 위해 심폐소생술 지식수준 향상과 가슴압박 수행능력 향상을 위한 체계적이고 반복적인 교육 및 훈련이 정기적으로 이루어져야 한다.

• 한국학교보건학회지
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.130-139
• /
• 2014

Purpose: The object of this study was to compare the educational effect about self-efficacy and the quality of chest compressions of Hands-only CPR and Basic CPR. Methods: It's a nonequivalent control group pre-post repeated quasi-experiment study conducted with entire fifth grade students belong to one school in H city. The study participants are 68 persons, and data were collected from December 2, 2013 to February 7, 2014. Self-efficacy was measured by 10 items, and the quality of chest compressions was measured by 5 variables which are average compression depth(mm), average rate (n/min), average count per minutes (n), abnormal placement (n), compression accuracy (%). Results: Self-efficacy of the experimental group and control group showed no significant difference but showed significant difference over time and was the highest at posttest 1 (immediately after education), the lowest at pretest (before education), middle at posttest 2 (8weeks after education) (p<.001). Experimental group was significantly higher than control group in average rate per minute. At posttest 1, experimental group was $130.0{\pm}9.38$ times, control group was $95.1{\pm}11.82$ times. At posttest2, experimental group was $124.0{\pm}14.89$ times, control group was $90.8{\pm}14.89$ times.(p<.001). Average rate (n/min) was significantly declined at control group in the quality of chest compressions over time (t=-2.400, p=.022). Average count per minute and compression accuracy were declined significantly so it were not maintained to posttest2. Conclusion: We need continuous CPR education because self-efficacy of CPR getting lower significantly over time. Hands-only CPR can't be seen as a way to increase the CPR ability of elementary school students having difficulty to perform artificial breathing. And, because the effect of education is not maintained 8wks after training, the technique centered repeated training is needed and a method which can increase compression accuracy is also needed.