• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.117-124
• /
• 2011

Supplier selection is one of the most important activities of a company. This importance is increased even more by new strategies in a supply chain, because of the key role suppliers perform in terms of quality, costs and services which affect the outcome in the buyer's company. In addition, green production has become an important issue for almost every manufacturer and will determine the sustainability of a manufacturer. Therefore a performance evaluation system for supplier and green suppliers is necessary to determine the suitability of suppliers to cooperate with the company. Supplier and green supplier selection is a multiple criteria decision making problem in which the objectives are not equally important. In practice, vagueness and imprecision of the goals, constraints and parameters in these problems make the decision making complicated. The objective of this study is to construct a decision-making process using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and balanced scorecard (BSC) for evaluating supplier and green suppliers in the manufacturing industry. The BSC concept is applied to define the hierarchy with four major perspectives and performance indicators are selected for each perspective. FAHP is then proposed in order to tolerate vagueness and ambiguity of information. Finally, FAHP is applied to facilitate the solving process. With the proposed approach, manufacturers can have a better understanding of the capabilities that supplier and green supplier must possess and can evaluate and select the most suitable supplier for cooperation.

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.100-105
• /
• 2010

This study is to analyze the performance for ADS-B(Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast) operations by the Balanced Scorecard(BSC). It is also to collect the opinions of users(pilots, air traffic controllers and ground operators) relating ADS-B and to use the results as data about preparing political measures of aviation safety. For these purpose, BSC model redesigned on 4 different points of view is used for measuring the performance of the ADS-B operation. The proposed perspectives are affairs effectiveness, user orientation, system orientation and the capacity. As the results of this study, it is showed that the continuous development of ADS-B should be required and the users must be involved in the activities, additionally, the relevant authorities should try to be drawn the user-oriented results through the process.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.45-69
• /
• 2009

공급사슬관리(Supply Chain Management: SCM)는 새로운 정보기술의 재배치를 통해 조직을 재구축하고, 상품과 서비스가 경쟁력을 갖도록 전략적 제휴를 통해 기업의 업무 효율성을 강화시켜주는 협업전략으로 경영성과를 창출해주는 혁신기법이라 할 수 있다. 미국, 유럽, 일본 등에서 활발하게 추진되어온 SCM은 1990년대 후반부터 우리나라에 적극적으로 도입되기 시작하여 최근까지 상당한 기업들이 도입하여 운영하고 있다. 또한 효과적인 SCM의 활성화를 위하여 기업 전반의 핵심성공요인 도출 및 경영성과에 대한 설계에 대해서도 연구가 진행되고 있다. 따라서 SCM이 국내에 도입된 지 10년이 지난 현 시점에서 SCM이 기업의 경영성과에 실제로 기여하고 있는지를 알아보아야 할 필요성이 제기된다. 한편 SCM의 성과측정에 있어서 과거에는 비용, 자산회전율 등 재무중심의 성과측정치를 사용하였다. 이러한 성과측정은 다양한 측면을 고려하지 못하였기 때문에 문제의 발생소지가 있음으로, 이에 대한 대안으로 최근 들어 SCM 성과측정에 균형성과표(Balanced Scorecard: BSC)를 이용하려는 시도가 있었다(Brewer and Speh, 2000). Kaplan and Norton(1992)에 의해 개발된 BSC는 기업의 전략적 목표와 밀접하게 연관되어 있는 소수의 지표를 선정하고 이를 측정 관리하는 방법으로, 기존의 재무중심의 성과측정의 한계를 극복하기 위한 대안이 될 수 있다.

• 대한지역사회영양학회지
• /
• 제10권6호
• /
• pp.905-919
• /
• 2005

This study raised the necessity of developing performance indicators for measuring the management efficiency and effectiveness of school food service, and as a means of helping its implementation, a balanced score card (BSC) approach developed by Norton and Kaplan was adopted. This study established BSC in seven phases through literature: Phase 1 Defining a school food service and the scope of working activities, Phase 2 Establishing the vision of a school food service, Phase 3 Setting strategic goals, Phase 4 Identifying critical success factors (CSFs), Phase 5 Developing Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), Phase 6 Extracting cause and effect relationship, and Phase 7 Completing a preliminary BSC. The preliminary BSC was fumed into a survey, which was administered to food service related people working at the Office of Education and School Food Service including 16 offices,209 dietitians, 48 school administrators both from self-operated and contract-managed, and 9 experts in areas related to school food service. They were asked questions about strategies from 4 different perspectives,12 CSFs, 39 KPls, and the cause and effect relationships among them. As a result, among the CSFs based on 4 different perspectives, all factors other than ' zero sum on profit/loss ' from the financial perspective turned out to be valid. In terms of KPIs, manufacturing cost percentages, casualty loss count/reduction rates, school foodervice participation rates, and sales goal achievement rates were found to be valid from the financial perspective, while student satisfaction index, faculty satisfaction index, leftover ratio, nutrition educational performance count, index of evaluating nutrition education, customer claim count/reduction rate, handling customer claim count/reduction rate, and parent satisfaction index were found to be valid from the customers' perspective. Besides, nutritional requirement sufficient ratio, nutritional management score, food poisoning outbreak count, employee safety accident count, sanitary inspection assessment index, meals per labor hour (productivity index), computerization ratio, operational management index, and purchase management assessment index were also found to be valid from the perspective of internal business processes. From the perspective of innovation and learning, employee turnover ratio/rate of absenteeism, annual education and training count, employee satisfaction index, human resource management assessment index, annual menu-related customer feedback, food service information index for employees and parents/schools were also found to be valid. The significance of this study is to present indices for measuring overall performance of school lunch food service operations without putting any limitation on types of school food service management, and to help correctly assess the contribution of the current types of school food service management to schools and students. (Korean J Community Nutrition 10(6) : $905\∼919$, 2005)

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.203-224
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation perspectives of IT business value and empirically analyze the differences of evaluation perspectives between ex ante evaluation and post implementation evaluation, and among various information system types. 4 evaluation perspectives which have been used in the previous studies and in the field of industry practices are financial, customer, internal process, and growth, which are based on the BSC model. Data of 98 information systems have been collected from 89 companies including manufacturers, banks, insurances, and stock trading companies. As results of multi-way MANOVA test, 3 out of 8 hypothesis have been accepted statistically. While the order of importance of 4 perspectives in ex ante evaluation is customer, financial, internal process, and growth, the order of post implementation evaluation appears to be much different : that is, internal process, customer, financial, and growth. These findings provide insights for both IT practitioners and researchers.

• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.207-228
• /
• 2007

Measuring Information Technology(IT) organizations' activities have been limited to mainly measure financial indicators for a long time. However, according to the multifarious functions of Information System, a number of researches have been done for the new trends on measurement methodologies that come with financial measurement as well as new measurement methods. Especially, the researches on IT Balanced Scorecard(BSC), concept from BSC measuring IT activities have been done as well in recent years. BSC provides more advantages than only integration of non-financial measures in a performance measurement system. The core of BSC rests on the cause-and-effect relationships between measures to allow prediction of value chain performance measures to allow prediction of value chain performance measures, communication, and realization of the corporate strategy and incentive controlled actions. More recently, BSC proponents have focused on the need to tie measures together into a causal chain of performance, and to test the validity of these hypothesized effects to guide the development of strategy. Kaplan and Norton[2001] argue that one of the primary benefits of the balanced scorecard is its use in gauging the success of strategy. Norreklit[2000] insist that the cause-and-effect chain is central to the balanced scorecard. The cause-and-effect chain is also central to the IT BSC. However, prior researches on relationship between information system and enterprise strategies as well as connection between various IT performance measurement indicators are not so much studied. Ittner et al.[2003] report that 77% of all surveyed companies with an implemented BSC place no or only little interest on soundly modeled cause-and-effect relationships despite of the importance of cause-and-effect chains as an integral part of BSC. This shortcoming can be explained with one theoretical and one practical reason[Blumenberg and Hinz, 2006]. From a theoretical point of view, causalities within the BSC method and their application are only vaguely described by Kaplan and Norton. From a practical consideration, modeling corporate causalities is a complex task due to tedious data acquisition and following reliability maintenance. However, cause-and effect relationships are an essential part of BSCs because they differentiate performance measurement systems like BSCs from simple key performance indicator(KPI) lists. KPI lists present an ad-hoc collection of measures to managers but do not allow for a comprehensive view on corporate performance. Instead, performance measurement system like BSCs tries to model the relationships of the underlying value chain in cause-and-effect relationships. Therefore, to overcome the deficiencies of causal modeling in IT BSC, sound and robust causal modeling approaches are required in theory as well as in practice for offering a solution. The propose of this study is to suggest critical success factors(CSFs) and KPIs for measuring performance for IT organizations and empirically validate the casual relationships between those CSFs. For this purpose, we define four perspectives of BSC for IT organizations according to Van Grembergen's study[2000] as follows. The Future Orientation perspective represents the human and technology resources needed by IT to deliver its services. The Operational Excellence perspective represents the IT processes employed to develop and deliver the applications. The User Orientation perspective represents the user evaluation of IT. The Business Contribution perspective captures the business value of the IT investments. Each of these perspectives has to be translated into corresponding metrics and measures that assess the current situations. This study suggests 12 CSFs for IT BSC based on the previous IT BSC's studies and COBIT 4.1. These CSFs consist of 51 KPIs. We defines the cause-and-effect relationships among BSC CSFs for IT Organizations as follows. The Future Orientation perspective will have positive effects on the Operational Excellence perspective. Then the Operational Excellence perspective will have positive effects on the User Orientation perspective. Finally, the User Orientation perspective will have positive effects on the Business Contribution perspective. This research tests the validity of these hypothesized casual effects and the sub-hypothesized causal relationships. For the purpose, we used the Partial Least Squares approach to Structural Equation Modeling(or PLS Path Modeling) for analyzing multiple IT BSC CSFs. The PLS path modeling has special abilities that make it more appropriate than other techniques, such as multiple regression and LISREL, when analyzing small sample sizes. Recently the use of PLS path modeling has been gaining interests and use among IS researchers in recent years because of its ability to model latent constructs under conditions of nonormality and with small to medium sample sizes(Chin et al., 2003). The empirical results of our study using PLS path modeling show that the casual effects in IT BSC significantly exist partially in our hypotheses.

• 경영정보학연구
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.291-308
• /
• 2008

국내외의 여러 조직에서 구축하고 있는 BSC(Balanced Scorecard)의 성공요인중의 하나는 BSC 성과 관리시스템을 구축할 때 발생하는 현실적인 문제를 해결하는 것이다. 기존의 분산되고 중복되는 성과 관리시스템을 BSC 시스템이라는 골격에 적용하여 어떻게 통합적으로 관리할 것인가와 조직의 미션과 비전을 달성 할 수 있는 전략 실행의 요체인 핵심성공요인(CSF: Critical Success Factor)과 KPI(Key Performance Indicator)을 어떻게 도출할 것인가에 대한 대안을 제시하는 것이 BSC 성공에 필수적이다. 그래서 본 연구에서는 이러한 문제들을 개선 할 수 있는 모범적인 공공기관의 BSC 구축 사례를 토대로 성과평가를 효과적으로 관리할 수 있는 방안들을 제시한다. 즉, 공공부문의 BSC는 4가지 관점 중 재무관점에 있어서 민간부문과 달리 예산을 통한 재무자원 조달 측면을 고려해야 하며, 각각의 관점들을 개별 공공기관의 성격에 맞게 변용시키는 방법이 필요함을 언급하였다. 공공 부문에서의 BSC에서는 공공기관의 존립 근거, 즉 미션이 대 국민 서비스 차원이라는 목적에 부합되도록 고객관점이 강화되어야 함을 제안한다. 또한, 기존 공공 부문의 분산되고 중복성이 존재하는 성과관리(심사분석, 정부업무 평가, 직무성과계약제, 고객만족도 평가)시스템들이 BSC 시스템에 어떻게 적용되었는가를 살펴봄으로써 성과관리 시스템을 통합적으로 관리 할 수 있는 방향을 제시하고 있다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.47-71
• /
• 2009

공공도서관의 사명은 정보이용, 문화활동, 평생교육 등과 관련된 지역주민의 요구를 충족시키고 보다 편리하고 평등한 접근을 제공함으로써 지역사회 발전과 지역주민의 삶의 질을 향상시키는데 있다. 본 연구는 이러한 공공도서관의 사명을 달성하고 성과를 제고할 수 있는 성과지표 모형을 개발하고자 학습 및 성장 관점, 내부 프로세스 관점, 자원 관점, 이용자 관점의 4가지 관점 아래 12개의 주요성공요인, 36개의 핵심성과지표로 구성된 BSC 기반 공공도서관 성과지표 모형을 도출하고, 공공도서관 사서를 대상으로 도출된 성과지표 모형의 상대적 가중치를 산정하여 공공도서관의 사명달성과 성과제고에 어떠한 성과지표가 중요한지를 분석한 연구이다.

• 한국산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제11권5호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2006

본 연구는 공급사슬관리(SCM) 활동측면에서 발생하는 경영성과를 BSC 의 네 가지 관점으로 측정하였다. 네 가지 관점으로는 재무관점, 고객관점, 내부 프로세스관점, 학습 및 성장관점이 있으며, 이들 네 가지 관점들은 서로간의 인과관계가 있다. 따라서 SCM 을 추진하고 있는 기업들을 대상으로 이들 네 관점들에 대한 인과관계가 있음을 실증분석을 통하여 살펴보고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 국내 SCM 을 추진 중인 134개 상장기업의 데이터를 사용하였으며 SPSS 12.0과 Amos 4.0을 이용하여 빈도분석, 요인분석, 신뢰성분석, 그리고 구조방정식 등을 수행하였다. 연구결과, 학습 및 성장성과, 내부 프로세스성과, 고객성과는 재무성과에 유의적인 영향을 주었으며, 학습 및 성장성과는 내부 프로세스성과와 고객성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤다. 내부 프로세스성과의 경우에는 재무성과에 영향을 미쳤으나 고객성과에 유의하지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 내부 프로세스성과가 재무성과에 미치는 영향이 크기 때문인 것으로 판단된다.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.491-516
• /
• 2012

최근의 급격한 환경변화는 BSC 도입기업에서 사용하는 핵심성과지표(KPI)의 수정이 필요함을 나타내고 있다. 특히, BSC의 네 가지 관점 중 기업의 성과를 나타내는 재무적 관점의 KPI는 기업의 단기적 성과를 대표하는 재무적 지표로만 구성되어 있다. 하지만 이러한 지표로는 현재의 기업환경에서 필수적인 요소로 자리잡은 사회적 책임(CSR)과 지속가능경영을 대변할 수 없다. 이에 본 연구에서는 재무적 관점의 KPI로 사용하고 있는 이익 기반의 성과지표를 보완할 수 있는 공유가치창출(CSV)지표에 대한 개발의 필요성을 제시하고, CSV의 타당성은 지속가능경영 및 CSR과 기업가치와의 관련성을 통해 검증하였다. 2005년부터 2010년까지를 연구 기간으로 KEJI를 공시하고 있는 상장기업을 대상으로 분석한 결과, BSC 도입기업이든, 미도입기업이든 CSV가 높은 집단은 그렇지 않은 집단에 비해서 기업가치가 더 높음을 알 수 있었다. 또한 BSC 도입기업의 기업가치는 BSC 미도입기업의 기업가치보다 낮았으나 두 비교집단 간에 유의한 차이는 없었다. 본 연구의 한계점은 CSV지수 측정치의 구성 요소 간에 단위가 다르다는 본질적인 문제로 인해 비율척도로 나타낼 수 없어 좀 더 의미 있는 결과를 도출 할 수 없다는 점이다. 그럼에도 불구하고 본 연구는 경영환경에 맞추어 BSC 관점의 새로운 성과측정지표의 개발이 필요함을 제시하였다는 점이 본 연구의 공헌점이라 할 수 있다.