• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제6권5호
• /
• pp.9-20
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study is to construct a database for landscape ecological planning with evaluation and analysis of structure of biotope of city center area for the preservation of species and biotope examining Jung-gu district of Daegu Metropolitan City which is the most extremely and rapidly urbanizing area. The assumption of this study is that the biotope structure of a city center area would be different from the other city area. The results of this study were as follows. 1) The results of the biotope type classification is that there were 11 biotope type groups and 41 detailed biotopes. 2) The primary evaluation is the process for grading general value of classified biotope types, and the result of primary evaluation is that there were 5 biotope types that were greater than third grade besides the biotope type of artificial riverbank with abundant green high water level land. The first grade of biotope type have not appeared in this area, however the fifth grade of biotope type have appeared total of 19 biotope types with the biotope type of the general shopping area with scarce green fields. 3) The secondary evaluation is the process for searching biotopes which are special value, and the result of secondary evaluation is that there were 2 biotopes for la, 7 biotopes for 1b, 2 biotopes for 2a, 1 biotope for 2b and there was no biotope for 2c, and for example, la is the large area that has many magor biotope site in terms of the living space. 4) Finally. scientific method for biotope type classification, the derailed investigation plan of high value biotope and the improvement plan based on the biotope map of city center area must be continued.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.42-53
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the biotope structure of the city center area of Jung-gu for nature experiences and recreation purposes. Jung-gu is the most extremely and rapidly urbanized area of Daegu. This study was conducted under the assumption that the biotope structure of a city center area would be different from the urban area. The results of this study are as follows: 1) There are 11 biotope type groups as designated as commercial and work-area biotope type group, and 41 detailed biotope types designated as commercial areas with a lack of greenspace biotope type. 2) The commercial and work area biotope type group has the largest area with 34% of the total area, and the square biotope type group has the smallest area with 34% of total area. 3) The result of primary biotope evaluation is that there are 12 biotope types that have greater than third grade, apart from the biotope type of park that includes natural vegetation. The first grade of biotope type has not appeared in this area, however, the fifth grade of biotope type has 20 biotope types with the biotope type of construction work area (JA). 4) The results of the secondary biotope evaluation are 1 biotope for la, 9 biotopes for 2a, 9 biotopes for 2b, 14 biotopes for 2c and no biotope for 2a. This study suggests that a detailed investigation and improvement plan for high-value biotope areas in the city center area must be continued.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제28권6호
• /
• pp.29-51
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this research is to analyze of biotope structure focused on the evaluation for the species and biotope preservation in the case of Soosung District in Daegu metropolitan city. We analyzed the structure of urban biotope, and investigated the disposition of space and several characteristics through the material collection relating to the existing urban ecological material and the field investigation. The results of this study were as follows; 1) The result of biotope type classification was divided into 17 biotope type groups and 90 biotope types belonging to them. 2) The biotope type of mixed forest(QD) has the highest rate in occupation area, 1.764ha and the biotope type of cultivation areas by vinyle-hothouse(KC) has the lowest rate, 0.3ha. 3) In the result of the first evaluation for the species and biotope preservation, biotope types such as QB, QI, PA, PB, NB and NC etc. possess great value. Particulary, these biotope types come from forest areas and transition zone. They have not appeared in the inner of cities. 4) The biotope types such as CA, NA, NB, ND and PB are proved to possess high value in the result of rarity and riskiness evaluation. There appear EE, MA, NB, QC and QD in IV grade which is impossible to have them regenerative. They usually have appeared in forest areas. 5) There emerge 3a biotope type that has the highest value in the result of the second evaluation such as CC, EE, KF, LD, MB, NC, PB, QB and QI etc. Most of them were presented into the large area of site size and were distributed in the forest areas intensively. So, it is certain that the space for the species and biotope preservation connected with residential district is scarce. 6) The detailed biotope plan must be made out specially continuously. It is about biotope spaces that are especially important for the species and biotope preservation from the result of this research. Also, the study on the detailed index settlement of the urban landscape plan based on the biotope map must be continued.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.100-112
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this study is to construct the evaluation criteria based on the relative importance and various combination of each evaluation index and then to evaluate urban biotope in terms of conservation of species and habitat. After the standard of evaluation had been developed through the literature review, the relative importance of the evaluation index through expert survey was found out, and the evaluation model of biotope value has been established. The results of this study are as follows; 1) We have constructed the nineteen evaluation criteria through literature reviews, and have provided relative importance to each evaluation index of the diversity of typical species in biotope, afforestation rate, stratification, Hemeroby grads, and the diversity of landscape patterns based on the results of expert survey. and then we have constructed the evaluation system using the relative importance criteria. 2) To evluate urban biotope using the evaluation system constructed, we selected 14 sites. The final evaluation results of each site is as follows; The III grade areas are Seohan and Hwasung high-rise apartment at Beummul-Dong, Korea Men Power /Agency in Sungs 대 industrial zone, the adjacent area of St. Tongil, and Hyomyung elementary school. The II grade areas are the farm land behind the third Anshim Jugong apartment, and Ehyun park. The I grade areas are swampy land in front of Kangchon and Anshim construction site, water space with semi-natural style in front of Gangchon Woobang apartment, forest zone near page Temple at mt. Palgong, the edge area of Jisan and Gosan, and the tendril yard against Anshim middle school. The only grade IV area is the commercial zone near Taegu Department 3) It is highly useful to evaluate urban biotope using the evaluation criteria constructed for this research, the evaluation criteria we developed may be difficult to guarantee the ability for reproduction and recovery, the appearance-number of the rare and endangered species are difficult to estimate urban biotopes. In the future, it is highly useful to evaluate biotope in terms of conservation of species and habitat through its valuation criteria developed in this research and it is necessary to develop the evaluation criteria applicable to estimation of biotope inventory and reproduction of biotope.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제13권5호
• /
• pp.59-80
• /
• 2010

This research This research aims at developing systemic evaluation model in terms of biotope preservation through reports, literatures, and expert survey analysis by implementing biotope structure analysis in area level with selecting Hyunpoong and Yuga-myeon, Dalseong county, Daegu metropolitan city as a site. First of all, as a result of biotope type classification of research site, biotope type groups are classified into total 13, and its biotope types are divided into total 61. Also, as a result of literature analysis, total 18 items are drawn such as diversity of biotope typical species as a index item to assess the preservation value of biotope, and the first evaluation index are divided into 10 and the second ones are divided into 8 according to characteristic of index items. As a result of expert survey analysis, All 10 index items, first evaluation index, show high importance average (above 4.7). As a result of implementation of main cause for categorizing evaluation index by characteristic, there are 3 factors such as 'obstructive factor.' Based on above survey analysis result, as a result of estimating the weight of each item, 'restoration factor' showed the highest, 3.4541, but 'factor of habitat stability' showed 3.1468, which is the lowest The systemic value evaluation was set by comprehensively analyzing these results. As a result of biotope preservation value evaluation through applying research site, total 19 types which are abundant in vegetation are classified into I class, 12 types in II class, 5 types in III class, 10 types in IV class, and 15 types in V class respectively. Lastly, as a result of second evaluation, it is analyzed that there are 17 special meaningful space to preserve species and biotope(1a, 1b) and 61 meaningful space to preserve species (2a, 2b, 2c).

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study is to construct an evaluation criteria based on the relative importance and various combinations of each evaluation index and then to appraise urban biotope in terms of nature experience and recreation. After the standard of evaluation had been developed through the review of existing literature, the relative importance of the evaluation index through expert survey was determined, and the evaluation model to assess biotope value was established. The results of this study are as follows; 1) We have constructed the seventeen evaluation criteria through literature reviews, and have provided relative importance to each evaluation index of the natural in biotope, the diversity of landscape patterns, the appearance-existence of water space, the special landscape elements, and the access based on the results of expert survey. and then we have constructed an evaluation system using the relative importance criteria. 2) To evaluate urban biotope using the evaluation system constructed, we selected 14 sites. The final evaluation results of each site is as follows; The first grade areas are the water space with semi-natural style in front of Gangchon Woobang apartments, the forest zone near Page Temple at Mt. Palgong, the edge area of Jisan and Gosan and the tendril yard against Anshim middle school. The second grade areas are Hyomyung elementary school, the farm land behind the third Anshim Jugong apartment, Ehyun put and the swampy land in front of the Kangchon and Anshim construction site. The third grade areas are Seohan and Hwasung high-rise apartments at Beummul-Dong, the Korea Manpower Agency in the Sungseo industrial zone, and the adjacent area of St. Tongil. The only fourth grade area is the commercial zone near Taegu Department Store. 3) It is highly useful to evaluate urban biotope using the evaluation criteria constructed for this research, the evaluation criteria we developed may be difficult to encompass all expert opinion and the period of space-formation is difficult to estimate urban biotopes. In the future, it is necessary to gather the basic data suitable to estimate biotope and it is necessary to develop detailed evaluation criteria applicable to estimate every biotope that has specific property.

• 한국환경생태학회지
• /
• 제23권6호
• /
• pp.594-602
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 효율적 비오톱평가를 위해 일반적으로 적용할 수 있는 평가항목 및 평가체계를 개발하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 지금까지 선행된 연구사례들을 비교 검토하여, 현실적 적용가능성이 높은 비오톱 평가 항목 및 평가체계(안)을 도출하고, 선정된 사례지역의 적용과 자문회의 등의 계속적인 피드백 과정을 통하여 효율적인 비오톱평가를 위한 평가항목 및 평가체계를 제안하였다. 첫째, 비오톱평가를 위한 항목으로는 자연성 및 헤메로비, 다양성, 면적, 고립성 및 연결성, 복원능력, 희귀성 등 6개 항목을 제안하였다. 둘째, 비오톱 평가체계는 1단계 평가인 전체 비오톱유형에 대한 평가와 2단계 평가인 개별 비오톱에 대한 생태적 보전가치평가로 구분한다. 유형평가단계에서는 자연성 및 헤메로 비와 다양성 항목을 중심으로 평가하고, 개별평가단계에서는 고립성 및 연결성, 복원능력, 희귀성 등과 같은 항목을 중심으로 평가할 것을 제안하였다. 그러나 비오톱평가는 지역의 특성이 고려되어야 하므로, 본 연구에서 제안된 평가항목 및 체계를 기반으로 하여 지역의 상황과 여건에 맞는 평가항목 및 지표들을 충분히 검토하여 선택하고 필요시 세부평가지표들이 추가 보완되어야 할 것이다.

• 환경정책연구
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.113-127
• /
• 2005

토지이용 강도가 높은 도시비오톱을 대상으로 조류다양성 확보를 위한 비오톱 면적지수의 활용방안에 대한 연구를 수행하였다. 이 연구의 목적은 비오톱 평가지표들사이의 상관관계를 살펴보고 조류다양성을 보호하기 위한 비오톱 평가지표를 개발하여 생태적으로 건전한 도시비오톱의 효과적인 복원방법을 계획하는 데 있다. 도시 비오톱에서 조류 다양성에 영향을 주는 평가지수의 분석을 위해서, 각각의 사이트에 대해 비오톱 면적, 곤충종수, 인접도로와의 거리, 비오톱 면적지수를 조사하였다. 결론적으로, 비오톱평가 지수들 사이의 상관관계는 다음과 같은 결과가 나타났다. 조류종수와 곤층종수 > 조류종수와 비오톱 면적지수 > 곤충종수와 비오톱 면적지수 다시말해, 조류다양성은 실질적으로 곤충종수와 비오톱 면적지수에 의해 영향을 받는다. 결과로부터 얻어진 등식은 조류종수는 6.124 $\times$ 비오톱면적지수 + 0.095 $\times$ 곤충종수 - 1.197 이다. 그러므로, 비오톱면적지수와 곤충을 위한 수직적 경관다양성이 유지된다면, 작은 면적의 비오톱이라 할지라도 도시지 역에서 조류다양성을 증진시키는 데 도움을 줄 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.72-87
• /
• 2000

The purpose of this research was analysis of biotope structure focused on the evaluation for the nature experience and recreation in the case of Suseoung District in Daegu metropolitan area. The results of this study were as follows; 1) The result of biotope type classification was divided into 17 biotope type groups and 90 biotope types belonging to them. 2) In the result of the first evaluation for the nature experience and recreation, biotope types such as MA, NA, OE, PH, QB etc. possess great value. Particulary these biotope types come from forest areas and transition zone. The have not appeared in the inner of cities. 3) The biotope types such as JC, ME, OA, OE, PB, QD, QF etc. are proved to possess high value in the result of the utility evaluation. 4) There emerges 3a biotope type that has the highest value in the result of the second evaluation - such as ME, NB, NC, PD, QB etc. Most of them range widely except in the urbanized areas. Most of them were presented into the large area of site size and in the outer forest areas. But most of them were distributed in the forest areas intensively. So, it is certain that the space of nature experience connected with residential district of the urban people s scarce. Finally, the detailed plan must be made out specially continuously. It is about biotope spaces that are important for the nature experience and the recreation from the result of this research. Also, the study on the detailed index settlement of the sight green plan based on the biotope map must be continued.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.67-79
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the biotope value in a metropolitan area after constructing the biotope evaluation model to develop biotope networking in the light of ecological landscape planning. In addition this study is to provide a basic frame of constructing the biotope networking system in the future with the evaluation results. The scope of this research is limited to high density residential area including some part of the forest adjacent to urban boundary. The results of the classified biotope in the research area have been turned out to be 24 patterns. According to the result of estimated nature value having the forth grade, three were forests combined with urban natural parks, schools near forests, and grasslands. There is a little place having first grade. We an deduce this fact that we have surveyed biotopes, having the minimum nature value and wider than children's park. As for the result of evaluated the structure, there were the forests of Seong-Dong, Meaho-Dong, and Kumho river, which is the forth grade. As for the evaluation of connection-function, the followings area were evaluated as the third grade-linear biotopes having highly valued and sustainable similarity - Seoul-Pusan Railroad, Dong-Daegu St., Kumho river, river basins. Bum대 park and a botanic park near Suesung lake, As for the evaluated the buffer-function, higly valued production biotopes, existing at a transition belt between he residential density areas, are Sawol-Dong, Meaho-Dong and Kumho river. When each of the indexes was evaluated, the core of the biotop contained most of natural biotopes. Large artificial biotopes were evaluated as an important biotopes, while small artificial biotopes were classified as a dot biotope. The future research on the concrete biotope networking construction, based upon performed evaluation in this research, should be conducted.