• Current Optics and Photonics
• /
• 제3권3호
• /
• pp.210-214
• /
• 2019

The allowable path-deviation time of aircraft in a free-space optical communication system has been estimated from various trajectories, using different values of aircraft speeds and turn rates. We assumed the existence of a link between the aircraft and a ground base station. First, the transmitter beam's divergence angle was calculated through two different approaches, one based on a simple optical-link equation, and the other based on an attenuation coefficient. From the calculations, the discrepancy between the two approaches was negligible when the link distance was approximately 110 km, and was under 5% when the link distance ranged from 80 to 140 km. Subsequently, the allowable path-deviation time of the aircraft within the tracking-error tolerance of the system was estimated, using different aircraft speeds, turn rates, and link distances. The results indicated that the allowable path-deviation time was primarily determined by the aircraft's speed and turn rate. For example, the allowable path-deviation time was estimated to be ~3.5 s for an aircraft speed of 166.68 km/h, a turn rate of $90^{\circ}/min$, and a link distance of 100 km. Furthermore, for a constant aircraft speed and turn rate, the path-deviation time was observed to be almost unchanged when the link distance ranged from 80 to 140 km.

• 한국항행학회논문지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.109-120
• /
• 2005

본 논문에서는 MSSI 보상 기법을 채택한 1,200 km의 WDM 전송 시스템에서의 비트 에러율, 수신 감도, 입사 전력 최소 허용치를 증폭기 간격에 따라 수치적으로 살펴보았다. 변조 파형 형식에 관계없이 수신 감도와 입사 전력 최소 허용치 모두 증폭기 간격이 증가할수록 나빠지는 것을 알 수 있었다. 수신 감도 측면에서는 NRZ 전송보다 RZ 전송을 하는 경우 감도를 개선할 수 있었지만 실제 입사 전력 허용치 면에서는 NRZ가 RZ 전송보다 유리한 것을 확인하였다. 아울러 증폭기 간격을 50 km 이하로 해야만 수신 감도와 입사 전력 최소 허용치 모두 분산 계수, 채널 파장, 펌프광 전력에 비교적 영향을 적게 받는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.

• 대한임상검사과학회지
• /
• 제37권2호
• /
• pp.65-70
• /
• 2005

Those specifications of the CLIA analytical tolerance limits are consistent with the performance goals in Six Sigma Quality Management. Six sigma analysis determines performance quality from bias and precision statistics. It also shows if the method meets the criteria for the six sigma performance. Performance standards calculates allowable total error from several different criteria. Six sigma means six standard deviations from the target value or mean value and about 3.4 failures per million opportunities for failure. Sigma Quality Level is an indicator of process centering and process variation total error allowable. Tolerance specification is replaced by a Total Error specification, which is a common form of a quality specification for a laboratory test. The CLIA criteria for acceptable performance in proficiency testing events are given in the form of an allowable total error, TEa. Thus there is a published list of TEa specifications for regulated analytes. In terms of TEa, Six Sigma Quality Management sets a precision goal of TEa/6 and an accuracy goal of 1.5 (TEa/6). This concept is based on the proficiency testing specification of target value +/-3s, TEa from reference intervals, biological variation, and peer group median mean surveys. We have found rules to calculate as a fraction of a reference interval and peer group median mean surveys. We studied to develop total error allowable from peer group survey results and CLIA 88 rules in US on 19 items TP, ALB, T.B, ALP, AST, ALT, CL, LD, K, Na, CRE, BUN, T.C, GLU, GGT, CA, phosphorus, UA, TG tests in chematology were follows. Sigma level versus TEa from peer group median mean CV of each item by group mean were assessed by process performance, fitting within six sigma tolerance limits were TP ($6.1{\delta}$/9.3%), ALB ($6.9{\delta}$/11.3%), T.B ($3.4{\delta}$/25.6%), ALP ($6.8{\delta}$/31.5%), AST ($4.5{\delta}$/16.8%), ALT ($1.6{\delta}$/19.3%), CL ($4.6{\delta}$/8.4%), LD ($11.5{\delta}$/20.07%), K ($2.5{\delta}$/0.39mmol/L), Na ($3.6{\delta}$/6.87mmol/L), CRE ($9.9{\delta}$/21.8%), BUN ($4.3{\delta}$/13.3%), UA ($5.9{\delta}$/11.5%), T.C ($2.2{\delta}$/10.7%), GLU ($4.8{\delta}$/10.2%), GGT ($7.5{\delta}$/27.3%), CA ($5.5{\delta}$/0.87mmol/L), IP ($8.5{\delta}$/13.17%), TG ($9.6{\delta}$/17.7%). Peer group survey median CV in Korean External Assessment greater than CLIA criteria were CL (8.45%/5%), BUN (13.3%/9%), CRE (21.8%/15%), T.B (25.6%/20%), and Na (6.87mmol/L/4mmol/L). Peer group survey median CV less than it were as TP (9.3%/10%), AST (16.8%/20%), ALT (19.3%/20%), K (0.39mmol/L/0.5mmol/L), UA (11.5%/17%), Ca (0.87mg/dL1mg/L), TG (17.7%/25%). TEa in 17 items were same one in 14 items with 82.35%. We found out the truth on increasing sigma level due to increased total error allowable, and were sure that the goal of setting total error allowable would affect the evaluation of sigma metrics in the process, if sustaining the same process.

• 한국컴퓨터그래픽스학회논문지
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.19-29
• /
• 2019

본 논문에서는 임계값 자동 설정 기능을 지원하는 효과적인 뉴로피드백 시스템을 제안한다. 실시간 뇌파의 신호 처리를 통해 보상 주파수와 억제 주파수에 대한 정확한 피드백을 생성하는 알고리즘을 설계하고, 이를 기반으로 치료사가 정한 목표 성공률을 얻기 위해 자동으로 임계값을 계산하는 기술을 제시한다. 본 논문에서 제시한 자동 임계값 설정 기술은 피험자의 이전 뇌파 패턴을 분석하여 목표 성공률과의 차이를 최소로하는 최적의 임계값을 계산한다. 다양한 조건의 실험을 통해 제안된 기법의 효율성과 안정성을 입증한다.

• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제54권7호
• /
• pp.485-493
• /
• 2021

지하수는 지표수와 함께 용수로 사용가능한 중요한 수자원이며 특히 섬 지역의 경우 전체 수자원 중 지하수의 이용 비율이 상대적으로 높기 때문에 안정적인 이용을 위해 지하수위 변동성에 대한 연구는 필수적이다. 지하수위 변동성의 예측 및 분석을 위해 인공지능 모델을 활용한 연구들이 지속적으로 증가하고 있으나 지하수위 예측결과의 적절성을 판단할 수 있는 평가기준을 제시한 연구는 충분하지 않다. 본 연구에서는 허용가능한 지하수위 예측오차의 범위를 제시하기 위해 과거 20년 동안 전 세계 다양한 지역을 대상으로 인공지능 모델을 활용하여 지하수위를 예측한 연구결과들을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과 관측지하수위의 변동성이 커질수록 인공지능 모델에 의한 지하수위 예측오차는 증가하였다. 따라서 관측지하수위 최대변동폭과 예측오차 간의 상관성과 기존 연구들에서 제시한 평가지수들을 고려하여 평가기준을 산정하였으며, 인공지능 모델에 의한 지하수위 예측결과의 적절한 평가기준은 도출된 선형회귀식에 의한 평균제곱근오차 또는 최대오차 이하이거나, NSE ≥ 0.849 또는 R² ≥ 0.880 이다. 이 허용가능한 오차범위는 인공지능 모델을 활용한 지하수위 예측결과의 적절성 판단을 위한 참고자료로 사용할 수 있다.

• 제어로봇시스템학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 제어로봇시스템학회 1987년도 한국자동제어학술회의논문집; 한국과학기술대학, 충남; 16-17 Oct. 1987
• /
• pp.125-129
• /
• 1987

The stability margin of the LQ regulator is investigated in the time domain. it is shown that the same guaranteed gain margin as that of the frequency domain analysis can be obtained with simple assumptions for the continuous time systems. It is also shown that the allowable modelling error bound can be expressed in terms of system matrices and Riccati equation solution. Guaranteed qain. margin and the allowable modelling error bound for the discrete time systems are also obtained by the similar procedures. In this case, through the some examples, the gain margin is shown to be less conservative than the frequency domain analysis result.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제13권8호
• /
• pp.3470-3476
• /
• 2012

본 연구에서는 현행 지적측량 관련 법률에서 규정하고 있는 지적측량에 대한 성과인정 범위와 적용 장비 규정, 관련 규정에서의 정확도와 적용 규정 등을 종합적으로 고찰하여 지적재조사에 관한 특별법에서 규정하고 있는 지적측량의 성과인정 범위에 적합한 지적측량 장비의 성능 기준을 마련해 보고자 하였다. 연구성과는 다음과 같다. 적용 장비의 성능과 성과인정 범위에 대해 현행 법률과 지적재조사에 관한 특별법 규정의 비교를 통해 지적재조사사업시 장비의 성능 개선이 필요한 부분에 대해서 기초측량과 세부측량으로 구분하여 기준을 제시하였다. 본 연구의 성과는 지적재조사사업을 위한 기본계획수립시 측량 장비 수급 계획 등에 기초자료로 활용이 가능하다.

• Architectural research
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.31-37
• /
• 2007

This study presents the so-called Modified Allowable Stress Design (MASD) method for structural designs. The objective of this study is to qualitatively estimate uncertainties of tensile steel member's cross-sectional structural designs and find the optimal resulting design which can resist all uncertainty cases. The design parameters are assumed to be interval associated with lower and upper bounds and consequently interval methods are implemented to non-stochastically produce design results including the structural uncertainties. By seeking optimal uncertainty combinations among interval parameters, engineers can qualitatively describe uncertain design solutions which were not considered in conventional structural designs. Under the assumption that structures have basically uncertainties like displacement responses, the safety range of resulting designs is represented by lower and upper bounds depending on given tolerance error and structural parameters. As a numerical example uncertain cross-sectional areas of members that can resist applied loads are investigated and it demonstrates that the present design method is superior to conventional allowable stress designs (ASD) with respect to a reliably structural safety as well as an economical material.

• 한국전산구조공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국전산구조공학회 1994년도 가을 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.95-102
• /
• 1994

This paper presents a Cable Stayed Bridge Construction Management System, which consists of Structural System Identification Method (SSIM), Error Sensitivity Analysis and Optimum Error Adjustment & Prediction System. The 1st System Identification Method builds an error influence matrix using the linear superposition of each error modes. The 2nd SSIM also considers the second error mode term, which shows good error factor estimation. The optimal cable adjustment can be accomplished within the allowable range of both cable tension and camber. The Post processor, constituted with Motif and GL library on SGI platform, is useful for monitoring construction stage management by displaying construction data, adjustment and prediction results at each construction step.

• 대한임상검사과학회지
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.184-188
• /
• 2006

The purpose of the recovery experiment in clinical chemistry is performed to estimate proportional systematic error. We must know all measurements have some error margin in measuring analytical performance. Proportional systematic error is the type of error whose magnitude increases as the concentration of analyte increases. This error is often caused by a substance in the sample matrix that reacts with the sought for analyte and therefore competes with the analytical reagent. Recovery experiments, therefore, are used rather selectively and do not have a high priority when another analytical method is available for comparison purposes. They may still be useful to help understand the nature of any bias revealed in the comparison of kit experiments. Recovery should be expressed as a percentage because the experimental objective is to estimate proportional systematic error, which is a percentage type of error. Good recovery is 100.0%. The difference between 100 and the observed recovery(in percent) is the proportional systematic error. We calculated the amount of analyte added by multiplying the concentration of the analyte added solution by the dilution factor(mL standard)/(mL standard + mL specimen) and took the difference between the sample with addition and the sample with dilution. When making judgments on method performance, the observed that the errors should be compared to the defined allowable error. The average recovery needs to be converted to proportional error(100%/Recovery) and then compared to an analytical quality requirement expressed in percent. The results of recovery experiments were total protein(101.4%), albumin(97.4%), total bilirubin(104%), alkaline phosphatase(89.1%), aspartate aminotransferase(102.8), alanine aminotransferase(103.2), gamma glutamyl transpeptidase(97.6%), creatine kinase(105.4%), lactate dehydrogenase(95.9%), creatinine(103.1%), blood urea nitrogen(102.9%), uric acid(106.4%), total cholesterol(108.5), triglycerides(89.6%), glucose(93%), amylase(109.8), calcium(102.8), inorganic phosphorus(106.3%). We then compared the observed error to the amount of error allowable for the test. There were no items beyond the CLIA criterion for acceptable performance.