• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.3 no.3
• /
• pp.299-302
• /
• 1996

표본조사에 있어서 층화추출법은 모집단에 관한 예비정보를 필요로 하고 있다. 조사자가 표본설계시 층화와 표본배분의 문제를 막연히 추상적으로 처리함으로 생기는 오류를 줄이기 위해서 다원적 입장에서 모집단에 대한 예비 정보를 정확하게 파악하고 이용해야 층화추출법의 효율을 올릴 수 있음을 지적하고 있다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Statistical Society Conference
• /
• 2002.11a
• /
• pp.35-42
• /
• 2002

본 연구에서는 2000년 어업총조사에서 얻은 어가를 모집단으로 하여 어가경세조사를 위한 표본설계룰 하였다. 진체 어가를 전업 및 1종 겸업어가를 포함하는 부차모집단1과 2종 겸업어가로 구성된 부차모집단2로 구분하였다. 새로운 표본설계에서는 최적 집락크기를 구하고, 층화를 위해서 SAS Enterprise Miner에서 제공하고 있는 의사결정나무모형(Decision Tree Model)을 이용하였다. 층별 표본배정은 네이만 배정법을 사용하였고 두 가지 추정법을 제시하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Association for Survey Research Conference
• /
• 2001.04a
• /
• pp.73-86
• /
• 2001

In this paper, we conducted an empirical study to investigate the design and weighting effects on descriptive and analytic statistics. We compared the regression models using the design-based approach and the generalized estimating equations(GEEs) approach with the model-based approach through the design and weighting effects analysis.

• Survey Research
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.155-168
• /
• 2009

As an efficient sampling design, stratified random sampling is often used when auxiliary information is available at the designing stage. Although one - per - stratum design is an efficient design that can be used when many auxiliary variables are available, it does not provide any unbiased variance estimator. With a two - per - stratum sample in which two elements are selected from each stratum, it is possible to obtain an unbiased variance estimator. However the loss of efficiency could be significant if any important stratification variable is missed. In this study, we investigated a sampling design that uses the all given auxiliary information and also permits an unbiased variance estimator suggested by Park and Fuller(2008). Through a simulation study, we compared several stratified random sampling and systematic sampling design. We also applied the proposed stratified sampling designs to 2007 youth panel data.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2001

In PPS sampling, measure of size(MOS) is used to determine the probability of selection of sampling unit. However, some large scale surveys conducted in NSO(National Statistical Office) showed that the sampling units have the similar MOS. In such case, simple cluster sampling method instead of PPS sampling is recommended to give the interviewers a similar work load. In this paper, MSE and CV of the above two sampling methods applied to the 1997 Economically Active Population Survey sample design are compared.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.28 no.6
• /
• pp.1047-1061
• /
• 2015

Stratified random sampling is a powerful sampling strategy to reduce variance of the estimators by incorporating useful auxiliary information to stratify the population. Sample allocation is the one of the important decisions in selecting a stratified random sample. There are two common methods, the proportional allocation and Neyman allocation if we could assume data collection cost for different observation units equal. Theoretically, Neyman allocation considering the size and standard deviation of each stratum, is known to be more effective than proportional allocation which incorporates only stratum size information. However, if the information on the standard deviation is inaccurate, the performance of Neyman allocation is in doubt. It has been pointed out that Neyman allocation is not suitable for multi-purpose sample survey that requires the estimation of several characteristics. In addition to sampling error, non-response error is another factor to evaluate sampling strategy that affects the statistical precision of the estimator. We propose new sample allocation methods using the available information about stratum response rates at the designing stage to improve stratified random sampling. The proposed methods are efficient when response rates differ considerably among strata. In particular, the method using population sizes and response rates improves the Neyman allocation in multi-purpose sample survey.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.15 no.6
• /
• pp.883-897
• /
• 2008

This paper provides correct informations inflecting the present situation using the sample design in population that the National Statistical Office puts in operation of the mining and manufacturing industry statistical survey in 2006. This paper proposes new sampling design which is able to grasp business fluctuations and provide basic data for the rearing policy and management of the material industry and components industry. These sample design are the modified cut-off method and multivariate Neyman allocation using principal components and sampling method is the probability proportional systematic sampling.

• Survey Research
• /
• v.6 no.1
• /
• pp.39-62
• /
• 2005

In this paper we investigate some concepts frequently called in sample surveys such as 'representative of sample' as well as 'consistency', 'unbiasedness', and 'efficiency' in estimation. The first is strongly related with sampling procedure including coverage rate of survey population, response rate in establishment survey, and recruit rate of final samples. The others, however, are concerned with both sampling design and corresponding estimators simultaneously. Whereas both consistency and unbiasedness are based on the representative sample, efficiency does not depend on the representative sample. The representative of sample can be increased by raising the rate of coverage, response and recruit as well. Consistency may be investigated according to variables of interest and auxiliary variables. The well-known raing-ratio weighting method is a method to increase consistency of auxiliary variables by means of matching population size in each cell. Efficiency is not directly related with the representative of sample, and allocation methods such as proportional and Neyman allocation in stratified sampling and post-stratification are all methods to increase the efficiency of estimation under the condition of satisfying the representative of sample.

• Survey Research
• /
• v.2 no.2
• /
• pp.153-165
• /
• 2001

In this paper we point out another advantage of systematic sampling over simple random sampling, which have not yet been spelled out in the literature. After a single sample is drawn by a sampling scheme, it is important to check whether the achived sample represents the population well or not. Therefore. a sampling scheme which avoids the possibility of selecting non-preferred samples is desirable. The simulation results are given to illustrate that, in the ordered population, the possibility of selecting non-preferred sample by systematic sampling is lower than that by simple random sampling.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.179-188
• /
• 1996

복합조사표본추출법(complex survey sampling)에 근거한 분할표분석에 카이제곱검정법을 사용할 때의 문제점들과 해결방법들을 살펴보았다. 나아가, 군집표본추출의 경우에 붓스트랩방법의 타당성을 보였으며, 실제자료분석을 통하여 실제 활용가능성과 잇점을 제시하였다.