• Korean Journal of Child Education & Care
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.129-143
• /
• 2019

Objective: The purpose of the present study is to develop a teacher efficacy scale of early childhood teachers and explore the validity and reliability of it. Methods: As the first step of this research, 17 teacher efficacy factors were extracted from previous studies on related areas and a survey from directors, teachers, and professors. The preliminary 83 items applicable to the chosen factors were developed and revised through content validity test from seven early childhood professionals, pilot test, item correction, main survey, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Four hundred seventy one teachers working in a kindergarten or day care center participated in this study. Results: The teacher efficacy scale for early childhood teachers was finalized with 3 factors and 23 items. The teacher efficacy scale was composed of 16 items in teaching competence, 4 items in interpersonal relationship, and 3 items in a sense of calling. Conclusion/Implications: In this study, the valid and reliable teacher efficacy scale was developed. This scale might be a useful tool to develop the further studies in the topics of teacher efficacy and teacher education by analyzing the relationship between efficacy of early childhood teachers and other variables.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.18 no.10
• /
• pp.611-623
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to develop and validate the Korean Job Crafting Scale. First, previous studies on the concept and measurement of job crafting were reviewed, and items were developed based on this review. The content validity of the scale was examined using a focus group interview consisting of 10 HRM professionals. Following modification of the items, the measurements were administered to 305 employees from 8 Korean firms, and exploratory factor analysis was conducted in order to examine the factorial validity of the scale. Subsequently, confirmatory factor analysis was implemented concerning data collected from 295 employees who work in 7 Korean firms. Results indicated that the measurement model sufficiently explained the data at an appropriate level, and the subscales featured convergent and discriminant validity. If the scale developed in this study is validated in further studies, it can be employed to conduct research regarding job crafting in Korean organizations.

• 한국지구과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2010.04a
• /
• pp.17-17
• /
• 2010

본 연구는 학생들의 과학 경험의 정도를 정량화 하는데 있어 통일된 측정 도구를 제시하는 것이다. 측정 도구를 구성하는 요인들은 선행연구를 통해 학교 안 과학 경험은 일반 활동 경험, 과학 탐구 경험, 실험 기구 경험으로 세분화 되며 학교 밖 과학 경험은 일반 활동 경험, 취미 활동 경험, 현장 견학 경험 6개의 영역으로 구분을 할 수 있었다. 각각의 요인을 구성하는 질문은 NAEP(1987)에서 사용된 과학 경험 검사 도구와 신영준(2000)의 과학 경험 검사 도구의 문항 중 일부를 발췌하고 더불어 과학 경험에 대한 개방적인 설문지를 통하여 1차 검사를 실시하여 얻은 답변 중 빈도가 많은 답변과 중등 교과서의 탐색적 분석을 통해 영역별 10문항씩 6개 영역의 문항을 선정하였다. 사전 설문조사와 선행 연구를 바탕으로 개발한 검사지를 고등학교 1학년 학생 413명을 대상으로 2차 검사를 실시하였다. 개발한 측정 도구의 타당도는 내용타당도와 구인타당도로 검사하였다. 내용타당도는 2명의 현직 중등교사와 2명의 과학교육전문가가 각 문항이 측정하고자 하는 목적에 부합하는지 심사하였고, 구인타당도는 요인분석을 통해 검사하였다. 신뢰도는 Cronbach $\alpha$를 통하여 문항을 분석하였다. 6개의 영역의 요인에 대하여 타당도와 신뢰도 분석 결과 6개 영역으로 구성된 60문항의 측정 도구는 학생들의 과학 경험을 측정하는 도구로서 적절하다는 결론을 내렸다.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.35 no.3
• /
• pp.233-255
• /
• 2021

The purpose of this study is to develop math anxiety scale for middle school students for planning and implementing math anxiety treatment programs. In this study, we describe the process of developing and validating math anxiety scale for middle school students and detailing exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to verify construct validity. As a result of the study, we developed the Math Anxiety Scale for Middle School Students (MASS-M) of 30 items with four factors: mathematical curriculum content, mathematical attitude, mathematical test, and environment. As a math anxiety factor for middle school students, MASS-M was developed, which includes mathematical anxiety factors such as mathematical test factor and environmental factor, especially mathematical curriculum content factor describing mathematical treatment, and mathematical attitude factor describing psychological treatment. MASS-M, derived from this study, is a standardized scale for measuring math anxiety in middle school students and is expected to serve as the basis for maintaining consistency in research on math anxiety in middle school students and developing programs to treat math anxiety in middle school students.

• Korean Journal of Forensic Psychology
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.191-210
• /
• 2020

Developed by Paulhus and Carey(2011), the Free will and Determinism Plus Scale (FAD-Plus) is a widely-used tool for measuring the individuals' lay beliefs in free will and three closely related constructs: scientific determinism, fatalistic determinism, and unpredictability. Since no attempt has been made to validate Korean version of FAD-Plus, it is necessary to assess the psychometric properties as well as reliability analysis of Korean version of FAD-Plus. Total 202 people were surveyed and the subjective well-being and personality traits were measured to see how free will and related constructs relate to other psychological constructs. The study found that six of the total 27 items were deleted, which proved to be a reliable and validate questionnaire. The theoretical implications of the results and future directions for research are discussed.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for the Gifted Conference
• /
• 2005.11a
• /
• pp.122-122
• /
• 2005

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.36 no.1
• /
• pp.75-86
• /
• 2016

The purpose of the present study is to develop and validate an instrument to assess STEM career motivation. We developed 32 items for 7 constructs (i.e. education experience, career value, academic self-efficacy, career self-efficacy, career interest, parents' support, and career motivation) on STEM career motivation based on Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT; Lent et al.,1994). 767 first year high school students participated in this study. The items were validated by Messick's framework (1995). In this study, we examined the validity of items in four aspects (i.e. content, substantive, structural and generalizability of validity). Methodologically, we used Rasch analysis, Exploratory factor analysis, confirmative factor analysis based on structural equation modelling. We confirmed that our instrument with 32 items as valid and reliable for measuring the STEM career motivation. In addition, we tested the STEM career motivation model based on SCCT. Our model explained the data well, suggesting that external factors (education experience and parents' support) and cognitive factors (perception of value, self-efficacy and interest) were significantly related to STEM career motivation.

• Women's Health Nursing
• /
• v.27 no.1
• /
• pp.10-13
• /
• 2021

내용타당도는 측정도구의 내용이 측정하고자 하는 구성개념을 얼마나 적절히 반영하고 있는가에 대한 것이다. 그 과정은 예비측정 도구 개발 단계와 개발된 것이 측정하고자 하는 구성개념을 잘 반영하는지를 판단하는 단계로 나누어 볼 수 있다. 첫 번째 단계에서는 측정하고자 하는 구성개념에 대한 개념화와 예비질문지 개발이 이루어진다. 그 후, 전문가와 측정도구를 사용하고자 하는 대상자를 대상으로 개발된 예비문항의 관련성, 포괄성, 및 이해성을 판단하게 된다.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.8 no.4
• /
• pp.109-121
• /
• 2010

E-learning has become an ever-increasing delivery method in school and workplace. Many Web sites provide Internet users with lots of information and resources on study, research, and career development in workplace. First, this study aimed at presenting a process of validating instruments to measure perception of using the Web for learning. Secondly, this paper attempted to find out a list of critical constructs that university students recognize when they access Web sites to get some resources on their fields of study. This study also suggested the features of those constructs. This paper would help improve our understanding of Web usage for schoolwork and research. This result of the paper will facilitate further understanding of constructs associated with Web usage in other areas, thereby enabling researchers, practitioners, and policy makers to draw much attention to e-learning.

• Korean Public Health Research
• /
• v.44 no.4
• /
• pp.99-109
• /
• 2018

Objective : Health literacy (HL) is, defined as "the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information and services needed to make appropriate health decisions." Being old is one of the main risk factors with limited health literacy. This study aims to adapt Chew's health literacy scale into the Korean language and validate the scale for the use of the elderly. Methods : Data were drawn from the '2016 Seoul Survey on Elderly Health and Functional Assessment, which includes a total of 725 people aged 60 to 79. The sample was randomly divided into two groups for reliability and validity tests of the modified Chew's scale of 8 items. The Korean version of the questionnaire was developed by group translation, expert reviews, and forward-backward translation. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to assess and validate the factor structure of the scale. Results : Results suggest the two-factor structure ("Understanding" and "Applying" of HL) with 8 items. Exploratory factor analyses of the first sample (n=400) revealed that the internal reliability of the scale was high (Cronbach's ${\alpha}=.904$). Principal axis factoring extracted two factors ("Understanding" and "Applying" of HL) and explained 78.3% of total variance (KMO=.872, Bartlett's ${\chi}^2=2431.3$, df=28, p<.001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the second sample (n=325) was performed and the two-factor model was supported (GFI=.960, CFI=.979, TLI=.969, RMSEA=0.075). Conclusions : This study provides evidence for adequate criterion and validity of the health literacy scale for the community dwelling elderly in Korea.