• Knowledge Management Research
• /
• v.22 no.2
• /
• pp.209-225
• /
• 2021

Product Lifecycle Management is a well-defined management method consisting of 8 knowledge areas. Since the 4th industrial revolution is closely related to smart factories, the importance of product lifecycle management, which effectively manages the entire process from product idea generation to disposal, is emerging. This study analyzed the current and future applications of the knowledge domain of product life cycle management from the perspective of the 4th industrial revolution for experts in the field of product life cycle management. The expert's perception was analyzed from the current point of view and the future point of view to see how the product life cycle management knowledge area is applied in the field. The current and future application degree of the knowledge domain of product life cycle management was analyzed, and whether there was a difference between the knowledge domains in terms of the level of application was analyzed. Based on the analyzed results, its meaning and future flow are presented.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.349-381
• /
• 2002

The 21st century survive only who creating, taking, and managing to knowledge. Digital contents industry becomes to the core in the future. That is, to win in a competition have to the digitalizing knowledge contents to all knowledge and information resources. Therefore, it needs to the digital contents management and the distribution framework. This study aims to propose a model stages in the knowledge contents-decision process, KM Matrix, and KMI Score founded on digital contents framework and diffusion of innovation.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.2 no.3 s.7
• /
• pp.45-57
• /
• 2001

Knowledge management was introduced as a new strategy in many construction companies aiming at paradigm shift since Asian financial Crisis. However, intensive focusing on acquiring and sharing knowledge couldn't keep pace with the primary goal. Increasing financial profits. That is because clear strategic process and performance measurement are absent in time of the introduction of knowledge management. Based on case analysis in domestic construction industry, this research work presents an alternative plan on Balanced Scorecard(BSC) model. The objective of this study is to develop a model of strategic performance measurement in knowledge management by sorting and grasping core operational knowledge, which can draw key performance indicators accompanied by knowledge map from case study.

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.169-197
• /
• 2013

Despite many theoretical and empirical studies, general causality between IPRs system, firm technological innovation and financial performance is not clear. This study notices that the core factor to create financial performance is different by each industry. The study analyzed the effect of IPRs system on innovation and economic growth targeting 3 industries; pharmaceutical industry to which the basic track of creating performance is applied (strengthening IPRs${\rightarrow}$increasing R&D input/output${\rightarrow}$increasing sales); semiconductor industry where the relationship between stronger IPRs and R&D input/output is weak; and shipbuilding industry which has weak correlation between R&D and sales. It used panel data for 15 years since TRIPs when the patent institution in Korea reached up to the level of advanced countries, and applied the dynamic regression model which estimates the fixed effect model with difference-GMM. As a result, stronger IPRs increased R&D input/output, and financial performance in pharmaceutical industry, but has no influence on semiconductor and shipbuilding industries. That is, it is necessary to customize the construction of system and policy for strengthening IPRs by each industry, and unitary strengthening or weakening may have no significant impact on financial performance improvement in specific sectors.

• 프린팅코리아
• /
• v.13 no.8
• /
• pp.78-81
• /
• 2014

정보통신산업과 조우한 지식정보산업의 기술변화가 숨가쁘게 이뤄지고 있다. 이와 함께 기술적 트렌드를 반영하는 유행어도 수시로 바뀌고 있다. 2000년대 초까지는 인터넷이 폭풍처럼 몰아치더니 이후에는 클러스터, 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅, 유틸리티 컴퓨팅 등이 이를 대변했다. 얼마 전까지는 클라우드가 유행처럼 번지더니 최근에는 빅데이터가 '뜨고' 있다. 지식과 정보를 다루는 인쇄산업의 입장에서 관심이 가는 측면도 있지만, 도대체 얼마나 관련이 있는지 감이 잡히질 않는다. 하지만 메가트렌드의 한 요소라면 분명 짚고 넘어갈 필요가 있다.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.3 no.1 s.9
• /
• pp.65-73
• /
• 2002

By its nature, software part of the construction industry such as engineering and so forth has been kept secret to outside, as it determines a company$^{\circ}{\phi}s$ competitiveness. As a result, construction field knowledge usually disappears with the end of a project. The objective of this study is to develop the knowledge management (BM) learning model tuned in to construction area in order to manage project-related knowledge and promote the knowledge management. This study presented a learning model for knowledge management in the construction field, with the aim to integrate a series of processes. The model is composed of EIP, EDMS, knowledge and failure cases management, CoP and e-Learning.

• 전기산업
• /
• v.11 no.8
• /
• pp.37-52
• /
• 2000

• 월간산업보건
• /
• s.366
• /
• pp.51-51
• /
• 2018

• Journal of Service Research and Studies
• /
• v.10 no.4
• /
• pp.89-100
• /
• 2020

The smart factory is an important axis of the 4th industrial revolution. Smart factory is a system that induces the maximum efficiency and effectiveness of production using the IoT and intelligent sensing systems. The product lifecycle management technique is a method that can actively reflect the consumer's requirements in the smart factory and manage the entire process from the consumer to the post management. There have been many studies on product lifecycle management, but studies on how to organize product lifecycle management knowledge domains in preparation for the era of the 4th industrial revolution were insufficient. This study analyzed the opinions of a group of experts preparing for the 4th industrial revolution in terms of product lifecycle management. The impact of the 4th industrial revolution on the detailed knowledge areas of product lifecycle management was investigated. The changes in product lifecycle management were summarized using a qualitative data analysis technique for a group of experts. Based on the opinions of experts, the product lifecycle management, which consists of a total of 30 detailed knowledge areas, was prepared to supplement or prepare for the 4th industrial revolution. This study investigates changes in product lifecycle management in preparation for the 4th industrial revolution in the knowledge domain of the existing defined product life cycle management. In future research, it is necessary to redefine the knowledge domain of product life cycle management suitable for the era of the 4th industrial revolution and investigate the perception of experts. Considering the social culture and technological change factors of the 4th industrial revolution, the scope and scope of product life cycle management can be newly defined.

• Proceedings of the Technology Innovation Conference
• /
• 2003.02a
• /
• pp.121-135
• /
• 2003

기술 패러다임의 변화는 전체 산업구조를 변화시킬 뿐 아니라 새로운 산업 분야를 만들어내고 현존하는 산업분야 내의 기술을 변화시킨다. 기술혁신의 산업별 유형에 관한 Paviit의 연구는 이러한 산업분야 별 기술적 특성의 다양성, 즉 기술 패러다임 변화에 토대를 두고 있으며 그의 산업분류는 많은 후행 연구에서 인용되어 왔다. 그럼에도 불구하고 Paviit의 연구는 분석이 특정 시기에 국한되고, 정량적 분석이나 시간의 흐름을 고려한 동적 분석이 부족하며 일부 산업분야의 데이터가 미흡하다는 점 등, 데이터 분석과 관련된 몇 가지 한계점을 가지고 있다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 Paviit 연구의 한계점을 극복하고자 1975년과 1999년 사이에 미국특허청(USPTO)에 등록된 특허에 대한 자료 및 특허인용에 대한 자료를 이용하여 실험적인 분석을 실시하였다. 산업구조의 변화를 고려하여 Pavitt이 제시한 4개의 산업 유형은 1)공급자 지배형(Supplier dominated), 2)규모 집약형(Scale intensive), 3)전문 공급자형 (Specialized suppliers), 4)화학 기반형(Chemical science based), 5)생명과학 기반형(Bio-science based), 6)정보과학 기반형 (Information science based)의 6개로 확장되었다. 이와 같이 도출된 각 산업 유형 별로 A)특허 네트워크(Patent Network), B)기술 궤적 (Technology Trajectory) 두 가지 측면에서 분석을 실시하였다. 우선 특허 네트워크 분석은 기술발달 과정에서의 지식 흐름을 연구하기 위한 분석으로, 산업 내 분석으로는 각 산업에 속한 특허들의 관계의 측면에서 긴밀성을 나타내는 네트워크 밀도와 기술 지식의 집중 정도를 나타내는 네트워크 중심도를 산출하였고 산업간 분석으로는 산업간 지식 흐름의 양상을 살펴보았다. 또한, 기술 궤적 분석에서는 각 산업별 기술의 특성을 분석하는 것으로, 특정 기술 지식의 활용 기간을 통해 기술 주기를 도출하고, 산업 내 평균 권리 청구 항목 수를 이용하여 각 산업의 기술 범위를 비교하였다. 각각의 동적 분석을 통해 시간에 따른 변화 양상이 관찰하였고, ANOVA 분석을 이용하여 통계적 유의성을 검증하였다. 본 연구는 현재의 기술 패러다임 내에서 Pavitt이 제시한 산업 분류의 근거를 보충 설명하였고 특허 정보를 이용하여 기술혁신의 산업별 유형에 대한 폭넓은 분석방법을 제시하였다.