• Journal of the Korean Academic Society of Industrial Cluster
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.1-15
• /
• 2007

Regional innovation and cluster policies are the new agenda of regional policy, an agenda that began to spread over recent years throughout different countries and regions. In this context, our main question arises: how are we going to evaluate regional innovation and cluster policies? What models and methods are we going to use? Since 1990, regional and national governments have put more emphasis on evaluation as a tool directed to produce knowledge to design better policies. The objective of this article is to summarise the main challenges arising from the evaluation of regional innovation and cluster policies and make some methodological proposals that can contribute to produce better evaluations. In the first section, there is a brief presentation of regional innovation and cluster policies, followed by a more detailed analysis, in the second section, of their principal characteristics and of the main challenges posed by their evaluation. In the third section, some evaluation proposals that can help to improve current evaluation practice are presented. The paper concludes with a short number of general recommendations that we should bear in mind when designing an evaluation of regional innovation and cluster policies.

• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.9 no.6
• /
• pp.947-955
• /
• 2023

The aim of this study is to evaluate Korea's employment policy for people with disabilities by utilizing situational feasibility evaluation of Fisher's multi-dimensional policy evaluation methods (1995, 2003). A number of related studies conducted so far have been focused only on quantitative research methods. In other words, balanced and comprehensive evaluation studies were insufficient. Therefore, this study attempted a balanced policy evaluation through a qualitative or phenomenological approach that complements the limitations of the existing empirical methodology. In this study, the sub-topics for evaluation were divided into employment delivery system, employment program, and institutional employment environment for people with disabilities. Improvement measures and policy implications for each topic were presented. In order to improve employment services and jobs for people with disabiliyies, it was suggested that there is a need to strengthen linkages and cooperation between institutions, eliminate blind spots in employment services, improve quality, expand customized employment services, strengthen programs, improve policy and institutional environments, and strengthen individual psychological and emotional support.

• Survey Research
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.57-79
• /
• 2010

This study evaluated the policy performance of i) Public Notice of Critical Information, ii) Substantiation of Facts in Labeling and Advertising, iii) Temporary Injunctions, and iv) Advertisement Correcting Misrepresented Facts, which were main policies belonged to Fair Labeling and Advertising Act(hereinafter referred to as "FLA Act"). The data was collected by visiting 76 persons personally, who were consumer policy and law experts, labeling and advertising staffs of corporations, and persons in charge of policies including public officials dealing with consumer policies at Korea Fair Trade Commission, while using a structured questionnaire at the same time. The survey was performed to examine the general policy performance and evaluation the results of FLA Act by evaluation methods. The results of the analysis are comprehensively summarized as follows. There were differences in the ranking of policies evaluated by labeling and advertising staffs of corporations and persons in charge of policies according to evaluation methods, and, in Simple Evaluation, higher scores were gained compared to Weighted Evaluation which reflected weighted values or Fuzzy Evaluation. The result shows that evaluation results can vary in policy performance evaluation according to evaluation methods.

• Journal of Environmental Policy
• /
• v.12 no.4
• /
• pp.23-44
• /
• 2013

Climate change affects human and natural environment. Many countries, including Korea, are trying to develop climate change adaptation strategies to minimize adverse impacts of climate change. To deal with climate change efficiently, decisions have to be made among many options. The objectives of this paper is to analyzes methodologies for prioritizing climate change adaptation measures. Each methodology has strength and weakness and information requirements are differ. We find multi-criteria analysis is one of useful tools considering current level of understanding on climate change adaptation. We suggest climate change risks(timing, likelihood, intensity of climate change impacts), feasibility of policy (equity, main-streaming, democracy), effectiveness (economic effectiveness, co-benefits, propagation effects) of adaptation measures as main evaluation criteria of prioritization.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.13 no.5
• /
• pp.57-67
• /
• 2003

Security Policy Model is a structured representation using informal, semiformal or formal method of security policy to be enforced by TOE. It provides TOE to get an assurance to mitigate security flaws resulted from inconsistency between security functional requirements and functional specifications. Therefore, Security Policy Model has been required under an hish evaluation assurance level on an evaluation criteria such as ISO/IEC 15408(Common Criteria, CC). In this paper, we present an evaluation method for security policy model based on assurance requirements for security policy model in Common Criteria through an analysis of concepts, related researches and assurance requirements for security policy model.

• Spatial Information Research
• /
• v.19 no.6
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2011

The evaluation systems on the National Spatial Information Policy(NSIP) has been changed, since the Establishment and Use of the National Geographic Information System Act(NGIS Act, 2000) was abolished and the National Spatial Data Infrastructure Act(NSDI Act, 2009) was enacted. As compared to the NGIS Act, the policy evaluation systems for National Spatial Information are regarded as unified and centralized. However, some argue that the claim of budget and the legal feasibility of the NSIP was weakened. Given the different views on the two laws, this study aims at analyzing the changes in the evaluation system by comparing the NGIS Act and the NSDI Act. A Comparative Analysis framework is employed. The subjects of the comparative analysis are evaluation mechanism, evaluator, evaluation target and range, after-assessment utilization, and agent. In order to improve the effectiveness of the evaluation system, it is recommended that the clarification of evaluation purposes, institutional enhancement for evaluation agency, the development of evaluation indexes, the combination of top-down approach and bottom -up approach, and the increased linkage between budget and evaluation result.

• 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2009.11a
• /
• pp.297-297
• /
• 2009

EERE(Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy)는 미국 DOE(Department of Energy)의 산하기관으로 에너지 효율화와 신재생에너지 정책 전반의 기획 및 프로그램 평가를 담당하고 있다. EERE에서 수행하는 평가 Tool중 가장 일반적으로 쓰이는 것은 General program evaluation(프로그램 일반 평가)인데 여기서는 크게 다섯 가지의 세부 평가 방법을 제시하고 있다. 이중 Impact evaluation은 기술 확산이론(diffusion of innovations)를 이론적 토대로 하고 있는 보급 및 R&D프로그램의 평가 방법론이다. 이는 프로그램 성과를 높은 수준으로 정량화 시킬 수 있으며 특히 외부효과들을 제외한 순수한 프로그램의 결과만을 도출하는 것을 평가의 목표로 하고 있어 실제 성과분석에서 매우 유용하게 사용된 다. Impact evaluation의 시행은 Impact evaluation framework라 불리는 일련의 과정을 거쳐 실시되는데 이것은 체계적인 평가를 돕고 평가 전반의 신뢰도를 높이는 역할을 한다. 본 연구는 Impact evaluation 방법론을 심도 있게 고찰하고 이를 통해 국내 신재생에너지 정책평가로의 적용가능성을 살펴보았다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.127-127
• /
• 2017

과학기술기본법 제12조 및 성과평가법 7조에 따라 국가연구개발 투자의 효율성 제고를 위해 장기간 대규모 예산이 투입되는 사업, 사업간 중복조정 또는 연계가 필요한 사업, 다수 중앙행정기관이 공동으로 추진하는 사업, 국가적 사회적 현안으로 대두된 사업 등에 대해 특정평가를 실시하고 있다. 사업군 특정평가는 "08년부터 "17년까지 총 17회 실시되었으나 사업군 단위의 평가보다 사업군 내 개별사업 중심으로 평가가 수행되어 왔다. 본 연구의 목적은 사업군 특정평가의 평가틀을 제시하는 것으로 기존의 사업 단위 특정평가 방법을 차용해왔던 방식을 사업군 단위 특정평가에 적합한 평가틀을 제안하고자 한다. 평가의 계층구조에서 사업평가와 정책평가 사이에 위치한 사업군 평가에 대한 틀 제시는 향후 과학기술분야의 정책평가 도입을 위한 탐색연구에 해당한다. 이러한 연구목적의 달성을 위해 먼저 기존에 수행되었던 사업군 특정평가의 사례들에 메타평가를 수행하여 현 사업군 평가틀의 한계를 조사하고, 국내외 정책평가 사례 분석을 통해 사업군 특정평가 틀에 활용 가능한 벤치마킹하고자 하였다. 이러한 기존 사업군 평가의 한계와 선행 정책 평가의 시사점을 바탕으로 사업군 특정평가틀을 제시하였다. 메타평가는 선행 문헌조사를 기초하여 본 연구에 적합한 메타평가틀을 구성하여 적용하였고, 국내외 정책평가 사례에 대한 선정과 분석은 정책평가 전문가들의 지문과 면접조사를 활용하였다.

• 한국방재학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2008.02a
• /
• pp.703-706
• /
• 2008

Structural flood defensive alternatives have been evaluated based on economic feasibility, riskiness of safety and sustainability. Social problems associated with structural flood defensive alternatives such as dams, flood control channels, etc. are currently issued. The evaluation items of policy presented in KDI(2001) are should be modified in order to resolve the social problems. Hence, this study conducted a questionnaire survey of public servants, researchers, and engineers to obtain how to determine evaluation items for policy assessment and to compute their weights in the analytic hierarchy process. This study also compared the weights of the items in KDI(2000) with the weights from the survey in this study. The policy assessment weight was estimated higher than KDI(2000). This result suggests that social awareness increases and the analysis of policy becomes important for selecting optimal structural defensive alternatives.

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.1 no.15 s.15
• /
• pp.3-6
• /
• 1991

연구개발의 성과는 투입 자원의 크기로만 결정되는 것이 아니라, 이를 어떻게 효율적으로 관리하느냐에 보다 크게 의존된다. 따라서 한 국가의 기술혁신능력은 연구 개발의 관리 능력에 의해 좌우되며 이의 요체는 연구기획·평가기능이라 할 수 있다. 최근 첨단 기술의 주도권을 둘러싸고 선진국들 간의 개발 경쟁이 치열해짐에 따라 각국은 국가적 차원에서 대규모의 전략적 연구개발의 대형화·복합화 추세가 가속화되고 있고, 이에 대응하여 연구 기획·평가에 있어서 새로운 체계적인 방법론 및 기법이 요구되고 있다. 본 토에서는 '80년대 이후 선진국을 중심으로 변화·발전하고 있는 연구평가의 새로운 접근 방법을 파악하고, 미국,일본,EC,영국의 연구 평가 추진 현황 및 사례를 분석함으로써 우리 나라의 연구평가 시스템의 구축에 관한 시사점을 찾고자 한다. (편집자 주)