• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.10 no.2 s.122
• /
• pp.81-90
• /
• 2000

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.10 no.6 s.126
• /
• pp.38-51
• /
• 2000

• Journal of Environmental Policy
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.3-24
• /
• 2012

Many ecosystems in Korea are currently managed by government organizations. Thus, public managers' decision-making has great influence on the management of ecosystems in Korea, and their decision-making could influence the matter of whether the ecosystems of Korea are managed effectively. This paper regards the goal of management of ecosystems as securing the sustainablilty of target ecosystems, and investigates public managers' decision-making and their psychological attitude on the management of ecosystems. Basically, managerial activities on ecosystems have uncertainties and usually public managers utilize the knowledge of law, science, intergovernmental relations, and local governance as their references for decision-making. To elucidate public managers' managerial decision-making on ecosystems, this paper adopts some psychological theories in explaining the judgment of human beings under uncertainties. Effective ecosystem management by public managers can be judged by how public managers adopt and utilize all of the above mentioned four kinds of knowledge on ecosystem management. An important factor in order to let them utilize the four kinds of knowledge is policy support. Therefore, as conclusion, this paper recommends some relevant policy measures that can support the ecosystem management of public managers.

• Informatization Policy
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.25-44
• /
• 2010

In order to improve organizational performance, organizations should make a knowledge management system to share, distribute, and create related knowledge effectively in the operational process. It is not too much to say that organizational performance depends on the level of network and networking for the use of knowledge among the agents. Theoretically, a web portal is known as a useful instrument not only to link among the actors who have a specific interest and purpose but also to promote social networking which creates new knowledge relevant to user's environment. In the context, this article explored policy implications of building and operating government portals by analysing the efficacy of the "Innovative Portal", which the Korean government had opened to diffuse its innovation activities and to improve organizational innovation capacities in 2005, in innovation process from the knowledge management perspective. In particular, this study tried to identify how did the "Innovation Portal"influence network and networking of innovation knowledge using hyperlink network analysis method.

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.10 no.4 s.124
• /
• pp.104-118
• /
• 2000

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.10 no.4 s.124
• /
• pp.2-12
• /
• 2000

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.10 no.6 s.126
• /
• pp.83-87
• /
• 2000

• Journal of Scientific & Technological Knowledge Infrastructure
• /
• s.12
• /
• pp.62-65
• /
• 2003

지난 30여년 간 우리나라는 추격적인(catch-up)기술개발을 통해 효과적으로 선진국과의 기술격차를 좁히는데 성공하였다. 그러나 기술부문의 제조생산에는 큰 발전을 이룩하였음에도 불구하고, 원천기술(original technologies)의 기초가 되는 연구는 매우 미흡한 수준에 머물고 있다. 따라서 성장엔진으로서 새로운 기술을 창출할 수 있는 지식이 활발히 생산될 수 있는 여건을 조성하는 차원에서 과학기술정보인프라정책에 관심을 강화할 필요가 있다.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.06a
• /
• pp.545-555
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 학습 부진아 진단 지식을 온톨로지로 표현함으로써 교사와 학생 간에 발생하는 학습 용어의 불일치성을 해소할 수 있으며 진단 과정에 있어 학습 부진아의 정보를 기반으로 한 추론을 기능하도록 한다. 또한 특정한 진단을 보여주는 일반적인 학습부진아 진단시스템과는 달리, 이러한 지식베이스를 이용하여 사용자에게 정확한 개념어(정답어)를 습득하게끔 해주고, 사용자의 인지 체계 속에 내포되어 있는 개념적 지식을 더욱 더 표면적으로 확장해 나갈 수 있는 온톨로지를 구축하는 방안을 제시한다.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.227-234
• /
• 2016

This study compares and analyzes the national competitiveness in IP finance using the diamond model. The main findings of our analysis are as follows. First, assuming Korea's competitiveness in IP finance to be 1, USA with 1.63 has the highest competitiveness of all countries compared, and Israel is 1.49 followed by Japan with 1.37. Second, Korea and other countries compared show large differences in the areas of demand conditions, strategic structure, and competition. Third, Korea is inferior compared to other countries considered in terms of the factors including the protection of investors and IPR, and government policies. Since most of the factors in which Korea shows inferiority can be managed by public policies, to strengthen the competitiveness of IP finance, the government's active support to build industrial foundation are required.