• Title/Summary/Keyword: 일본의 수학과 교육과정

Search Result 57, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

한국과 일본의 고등학교 수학 교육과정과 확률통계 교육

  • 이상복
    • Proceedings of the Korean Statistical Society Conference
    • /
    • 2004.11a
    • /
    • pp.23-28
    • /
    • 2004
  • 본 연구에서는 고등학교 확률통계교육의 바람직한 방향 제시를 위하여, 한국의 제7차 수학과 교육과정과 일본고등학교 학습지도요령의 수학과 구성과 성격을 비교, 연구하였다. 또한, 교육과정상의 확률통계교육의 구성과 성격 및 편제에 대하여 비교하였다. 양국의 고등학교 수학과 교육과정을 비교, 고찰한 결과, 한일 양국의 새 교육과정에 따른 교육위주의 교육과정의 구성과 내용 및 편제가 상당한 부분 비슷하거나 같았다 그러나, 지도목표 서술과 학제가 다르며, 실제 수학과 교과운영에는 차이가 많이 있다.

  • PDF

A Study on the Purpose of the Elementary Mathematics Education - Based on Korea and Japan's Curriculum and Its Handbook which was Revised in the Last 20th Century (한국과 일본의 초등학교 수학과 목표에 관한 고찰 - 20세기 말 개정된 교육과정 및 해설서를 중심으로 -)

  • Lim, Mun-Kyu
    • Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
    • /
    • v.9 no.2
    • /
    • pp.111-135
    • /
    • 2005
  • In this study I compared Korea's elementary school mathematics curriculum and its handbook with Japan's curriculum and its handbook. Based on that work, I induced some suggestions which is useful to develop mathematics curriculum in the future. First, the purposes of Korea's elementary school mathematics curriculum focused on the system of mathematics, scholastic ability and learning volition. On the other hand, Japan's curriculum concentrated on the utility of mathematics in daily life and the motive of learning mathematics. Secondly, purposes of mathematics education written in Japan's curriculum handbook, differing from Korea's, are closely divided into concrete items. Finally, purposes of mathematics education in each grade, written in Japan's curriculum handbook, are presented in outlined form according to general purpose of mathematics curriculum. The merit of this way is that the researcher could display flexibilities and creativities in making mathematics textbook.

  • PDF

Comparison of Recurring Decimal Contents in Korean and Japanese Mathematics Textbooks (우리나라와 일본 수학 교과서의 순환소수 내용 비교)

  • Kim, Bumi
    • Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
    • /
    • v.25 no.4
    • /
    • pp.375-396
    • /
    • 2022
  • In this paper, to provide an idea for the 2022 revised mathematics curriculum by restructuring the content of the 2015 mathematics curriculum, the content elements of recurring decimals of textbooks, which showed differences in the curriculum of Korea and Japan, were analyzed. As a result of this study, in Korea, before the introduction of the concept of irrational numbers, repeating decimals were defined in the second year of middle school, and the relationship between repeating decimals and rational numbers was dealt with. In Japan, after studying irrational numbers in the third year of middle school, the terminology of repeating decimals is briefly dealt with. Then, when learning the concept of limit in the high school <Mathematics III> subject, the relationship between rational numbers and repeating decimals is dealt with. Based on the results of the study, in relation to the optimization of the amount of learning in the 2022 curriculum revision, implications for the introduction period of the circular decimal number, alternatives to the level of its content, and the teaching and learning methods were proposed.

A Comparative Study of Mathematics Curriculum and National Assessment Between Japan and Korea (일본과 우리나라의 수학과 교육과정과 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 비교)

  • Rim, Haemee;Kim, Bumi
    • School Mathematics
    • /
    • v.16 no.2
    • /
    • pp.259-283
    • /
    • 2014
  • This research investigated the Revised mathematics curriculum and the National Achievement Test of Japan that advanced by leaps and bounds in PISA 2012. As compared with Korea, Japan shows similar trends in the affective domain and the cognitive domain of international achievement test. To put it concretely, this research compared and analyzed the mathematics contents domain of the 2009 revised mathematics curriculum of Korea and the 2008 revised mathematics curriculum of Japan being applied. The analysis was conducted in many aspects including overall of Japanese mathematics education system, the contents to be covered in each grade, and the methods of essential learning themes. We compared the mathematics contents dealt with each country based on the framework of analysis such as

    . Also, this research compared and analyzed overview of evaluation system, assessment frame, item characteristic, type of item of NAEA, NAT, and PISA. The results show the introduction time, the degree of deepening themes handled in each country, common themes and topics were very similar between Korea and Japan. But content area of Japan and Korea have been highlighted in the curriculum of middle school and elementary school in each are different. We know that Test B of NAT also emphasized the use of mathematical knowledge. Form the results, we obtained the basic data for the improvement of the next our curriculum. In addition, this results suggests the implications for the improvement of school mathematics curriculum of Korea.

  • PDF
  • A study on the comparison of contents in mathematics curriculums - focused on Korea, California in USA England, Japan- (수학과 교육과정에서의 내용 비교 연구 - 우리나라, 미국의 캘리포니아주, 영국, 일본을 중심으로 -)

    • 나귀수;황혜정;임재훈
      • Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
      • /
      • v.13 no.3
      • /
      • pp.403-428
      • /
      • 2003
    • This study intends to compare the mathematics contents included in the mathematics curriculum of Korea, California in USA, England, and Japan. The result of this comparison is that there are big differences on ranges, depths, and grades between mathematics contents in four countries' mathematics curriculum. In Korea, more contents are dealt in earlier grade and to higher level than other countries. And, these features are revealed more apparently in the area of algebra, analysis, and geometry than probability and statistics.

    • PDF

    A Comparative Analysis of Elementary School Curriculum for Mathematics in Korea and Japan: Focus on 2015 Revised Curriculum (한국과 일본의 초등학교 수학과 교육과정 비교 연구: 2015 개정 교육과정을 중심으로)

    • Kang, Hyo Min;Ryu, Sung Rim
      • Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
      • /
      • v.23 no.2
      • /
      • pp.219-245
      • /
      • 2019
    • The purpose of this study is to provide basic data for the next curriculum revision, as well as to foster improvements to the quality of the Korean elementary school math classes by analyzing and comparing the Korean 2015 revised curriculum with the current Japanese curriculum of math. To accomplish this purpose, the research questions were set as follows. 1. What are the directions for revising Korean 2015 revised curriculum and the Japanese curriculum for elementary school mathematics? 2. What is the difference between the elements of learning content offered in the respective Korean and Japanese curriculums for elementary school mathematics? The conclusions of this study are as follows. Firstly, although Korea and Japan share common core statistical education objectives, they approach their goals with different methods. Korea focuses on academic competency, while Japan focuses on fostering the "power to live". For the learning process, Korea emphasized process-focused evaluation, while Japan emphasized fostering mathematical thought and thinking through mathematical activities. For class improvement, Korea focused on reducing the learning burden through appropriating the amount of learning by shifting or removing some elements of the learning content. Japan, on the other hand, refocused their attention on improving active learning within the classroom, and also increased the hours of math class within their curriculum. Secondly, there was a difference in the content composition of the curriculums of Korea and Japan. By comparing the elements of learning content, I got the conclusions for the next curriculum revision in Korea.

    • PDF

    일본의 고등학교 수학 교육과정과 확률통계 교육

    • Lee, Sang-Bok
      • 한국데이터정보과학회:학술대회논문집
      • /
      • 2004.10a
      • /
      • pp.87-92
      • /
      • 2004
    • 본 연구에서는 2003년부터 시행된 일본 고등학교 학습지도요령의 수학과 구성과 성격을 연구하였다. 또한, 교육과정상의 확률통계교육의 구성과 성격 및 편제에 대하여 고찰한 결과, 새 교육과정에 따른 교과위주의 교육과정의 구성과 내용 및 편제의 특징은 통합학습시간 신설로 미국식 주제 교육의 도입, 완전학교 주 5 일제실시, 중고 일관교육, 단위제 고등학교학교 신설, 종합 학교의 설치로 설명된다. 확률통계 교육의 내용과 범위는 과거 교육과정과 크게 달라진 점은 없으나, 7교과 분야 가운데 3 교과 부분에 자료 위주의 실용통계계산 교육과 통계소프트웨어교육 강화가 그 특징이다.

    • PDF

    A Comparative Study on the Elementary School Mathematics Curricula of Korea and Japan - Focused on the Revised Curricula - (한.일 초등학교 수학과 교육과정 비교 연구 - 개정 교육과정을 중심으로 -)

    • Lim, Hyun-Soo;Kang, Hong-Jae
      • Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
      • /
      • v.14 no.2
      • /
      • pp.337-353
      • /
      • 2010
    • The purpose of this study is to provide a useful reference for the elementary school mathematics curriculum of Japan. For this research, we compare the new version of the elementary school mathematics curriculum of Japan and Korea. Roughly speaking, Japan emphasized learning through mathematical ability. On the other hand, the case of Korea, a special emphasis was placed on the ability of problem-solving and mathematical communication. These abilities developed on the base of the mathematical knowledge and skill. The ratio of teaching time are high on mathematics, but Japan ensures much more hours than Korea. Finally we will focus on the result for the application process of the primary school mathematics curriculum.

    • PDF

    A comparison between Korean and Japan elementary school mathematics curriculum format: centered on elements, areas, objectives, and lesson time numbers (우리나라와 일본의 초등학교 수학과 교육과정 체제 비교 -요소, 영역, 목표, 시수를 중심으로-)

    • Park, Kyo Sik
      • Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
      • /
      • v.17 no.1
      • /
      • pp.123-137
      • /
      • 2014
    • In this paper, the format of the Korean 2011 & the Japan 2008 elementary school mathematics curriculum are compared especially centered on elements, areas, objectives, and lesson time numbers. Through this comparison, suggestions can be obtained as follows. First, grade-group system which does not meet the actual elementary mathematics education needs to be reconsidered. Second, the area name 'number and operation' needs to be reduced into the area name 'number and calculation'. Third, using the area name 'pattern' needs to be reconsidered. Fourth, using the area name 'probability' needs to be reconsidered. If 'possibility' which some event occurs is seen as ratio, it can be contained area 'quantity relationship'. Fifth, containing the nature of mathematics into the school mathematics objectives needs to be reconsidered. Sixth, it is necessary to enhance the phase of mathematics in elementary education.

    • PDF

    A Comparison of the Mathematics Curriculum of Korea and Japan in Viewpoint of Promotion of Key Competencies (핵심 역량 육성의 관점에서 비교한 한국과 일본의 수학과 교육과정)

    • Jo, Yun Dong;Yun, Yong Sik
      • Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
      • /
      • v.24 no.1
      • /
      • pp.45-65
      • /
      • 2014
    • Today, people need to prepare key competencies demanded for life to be worthy of individual and to be successful for not only individual life but development of society. We can look for these competencies in the process of analysing of present and future society. On the basis of this cognition we desire to suggest certain key competencies in korea mathematics curriculum and to investigate how to realize them in this paper. First, we investigated key competencies demanded generally from several articles to deal with key competencies. Secondly, we inspected backgrounds and processes of implementing mathematics curriculum in Korea and Japan and checked the reason for laying key competencies on the center of curriculum. Thirdly, we arranged key competencies suggested in mathematics curriculum of two countries and compared how to realize them. Finally, on the ground of third contents we proposed current affairs to Korea mathematics curriculum.

    • PDF

    (34141) Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, 245, Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon
    Copyright (C) KISTI. All Rights Reserved.