• Title/Summary/Keyword: 왕따

Search Result 32, Processing Time 0.044 seconds

Korean Wang-ta: Characteristics and Prevention Program (한국의 왕따와 예방프로그램)

  • Keumjoo Kwak
    • Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue
    • /
    • v.14 no.1_spc
    • /
    • pp.255-272
    • /
    • 2008
  • When observing the subjects and seriousness of Korea's Wang-ta, it is urgent that we know the characteristics of Wang-ta and its conditions. In this study, we investigated the definition of Wang-ta, which partly differs from bullying. Also, the phenomenal characteristics of collectivism, the victimization of an individual once stigmatized in the Wang-ta process, the generalization of the Wang-ta process where bullies extend their territory into general students were examined. Moreover, external environment such as Korea's school environment, negative house environment, and collective culture were examined. The three general structures in researching Korea's Wang-ta were presented. The first structure consists of a bully, victim, and a bully-victim. The second structure focuses on the certain groups, which consists of followers, outsider, and the defender. The last structure deals with the psychological characteristics of the participant roles, which are the bully, reinforcer, assistant, defender, victim, and outsider. Wang-ta prevention programs, which reflects the characteristics of Wang-ta, are presented. Implications on future Wang-ta prevention programs are discussed.

  • PDF

THE PRELIMINARY STUDY ON THE ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS THAT SHOW THE CHRACTERISTICS OF PEER GROUP NEGLECT OR REJECTION (청소년 정신과 환자 중 외톨이 혹은 왕따 특성을 보이는 환자에 대한 예비 연구)

  • Kim, Eun-Jung;Hong, Sung-Do;Lee, Si-Hyung;Hong, Kang-E;Son, Jung-Woo
    • Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    • /
    • v.11 no.2
    • /
    • pp.240-251
    • /
    • 2000
  • This study was a preliminary study on the adolescent psychiatric patients that show the characteristics of peer group neglect or rejection. We divided the adolescent psychiatric patients(n=25) into neglect-reject group(n=15) and non-neglect group(n=10). Each patient answered 8 scales and several questions about general relationships with friends. And, both the score of each 8 scales and answer about qusetions were examined. Lastly, records of 5 cases from neglect-reject group were analyzed. The depression dimension score of SCL-90-R, anxiety dimension score of SCL-9O-R, paranoid dimension score of SCL-90-R, interaction anxiousness scale(IAS) score were significantly different between 2 groups. On the result of case analysis about 5 patients of neglect-reject group, the adolescent psychiatric patients had a tendency to be rejected or neglected in case of having developmental problems(for example, language development or cognitive impairment).

  • PDF

빠르게 변하는 사회 왕따에서 함께로의 희망

  • 이한센
    • 가정의 벗
    • /
    • v.37 no.12 s.436
    • /
    • pp.8-9
    • /
    • 2004
  • 옛날에는 함께 술래잡기나 딱지치기를 하고 놀았었지만 지금의 아이들은 컴퓨터 앞에 앉아 철저히 혼자만의 시간을 가진다. 급변하는 사회속에서 자시의 또래와 비슷한 사람을 보유하려는 심리가 왕따를 만드는 것은 아닌가 생각해본다. 건강한 아이들의 성장을 위해 더 많은 관심이 필요한 때다.

  • PDF

THE DIFFERENCE OF THE BEHAVIORAL PROBLEM AND MATERNAL REARING PATTERN BETWEEN ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS IN PEER NEGLECT OR REJECT AND THOSE IN NON-NEGLECT - A PRELIMINARY STUDY - (외톨이 혹은 왕따 상태인 청소년 정신과 환자와 비외톨이 환자의 문제 행동 및 어머니의 양육 태도의 차이 - 예 비 연 구 -)

  • Son, Jung-Woo
    • Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    • /
    • v.13 no.1
    • /
    • pp.177-188
    • /
    • 2002
  • Objectives:The major goal of this study was to investigate and compare the behavior problems and mothers' rearing pattern between adolescent psychiatric patients either neglected or rejected by peer and those who were neither neglected nor rejected by peer. Methods:Adolescent psychiatric patients(N=25) performed peer neglect scale, peer reject scale. And their mothers performed the part of Child Behavior Checklist(CBCL), Maternal Behavior Research Instrument(MBRI), the scale for the maternal concern about the social life of their own patients, and the scale for maternal concern about the friendship of their own patients. According to the score of the peer neglect scale and the peer reject scale, we divided the patients into 'peer neglect-reject' group(n=15) and ‘on-loneliness’ group(n=10), and compared the scores of other scales between each group. Also, we investigated the correlation among all scales. Results:1) The scores of the part of CBCL(p<.05), depressed/anxious subscale of CBCL(p<.05) and thought problem subscale of CBCL(p<.01) in peer neglect-reject group were significantly higher than those in non-neglect group. The score of peer neglect scale was significantly correlated with that of the part of CBCL(r=.516), depressed/anxious subscale of CBCL(r=.483), thought problem subscale of CBCL (r=.651), social problem subscale of CBCL(r=.517). And the score of peer reject scale was significantly correlated with that of attention subscale of CBCL(r=.414), thought problem subscale of CBCL(r=.446), social problem subscale of CBCL(r=.531). 2) But, each group was not significantly different on the scores of MBRI, the scale for the maternal concern about the social life of their own patients, and the scale for maternal concern about the friendship of their own patients. And there were no significant correlation between the scores of peer neglect / peer reject scale and those of scales for maternal rearing pattern. Conclusion:The thought problem and depression/anxiety problem of adolescent psychiatric patients neglected or rejected by peer were estimated more higher than those of adolescent psychiatric patients neither neglected nor rejected by peer. But, from the view of maternal rearing pattern, each 2 groups seemed not to be different. Further research using more subjects will be needed.

  • PDF