• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2016.08a
• /
• pp.49-55
• /
• 2016

본 연구에서는 물리, 생명분야 연구자들의 인구사회학적 특성이 기관리포지터리 수용의도에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 그리고 이를 정보공유와 확산의 장으로 기관리포지터리를 활용할 수 있는 전략 수립의 근거자료로 활용하고자 하였다. 관련 문헌자료 조사, 설문조사와 심층면담을 수행한 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 기관리포지터리 인지경로는 도서관과 모체기관의 홍보, 동료들의 추천순으로 나타났다. 둘째, 연구자의 학술정보자원 공유는 면대면이 가장 높게 나타났으며, 그다음으로 오픈액세스 기반 기관리포지터리, 연구그룹단위 웹사이트 순이었다. 셋째, 학술정보자원 유형별 공개는 심사후 학술논문이 가장 높게 나타났으며, 실험데이터에 대한 공개의사는 매우 저조한 것으로 나타났다. 넷째, 학술정보자원의 공개를 통해 연구자들은 연구성과에 대한 인정, 우선권확보, 연구역량 강화에 대한 기대감, 취업에 대한 기대감, 중복연구 가능성 축소를 기대하고 있었다. 향후 다양한 학문분야별 연구자의 특성과 행태분석을 통해 주제분야별 특성이 반영된 기관리포지터리 개발이 필요할 것으로 보인다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.27-45
• /
• 1997

This study is intended to investigate and analyze overall information use pattern of researchers and scholars in the field of science and social science, and compare the information use habits between two groups. 300 questionnaires were sent out to 7 major libraries or information centers in the field, and 217 questionnaires were returned. Five hypotheses were tested based on the assumption that there would exist some differences between two groups in their information use pattern. Some commonalities a d differences were revealed as the findings of the study.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2017.08a
• /
• pp.19-22
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 국내 문헌정보학 분야 학술지를 대상으로 협업 특성과 연구주제를 파악하기 위해 지리적인 측면에서 기관들의 공동연구 특성을 살펴보았다. 기존의 협업 특성을 분석한 연구들은 공저 네트워크의 속성이나 연구자들의 연구생산성, 소속기관 및 국가 비교 등 통계적 측면에 초점을 맞추어 분석을 수행해왔다. 본 연구는 기존 연구에서 주된 분석수단으로 사용해 온 통계적 분석 외에 연구자의 협업 연구주제와 연구자가 속한 기관 및 지역정보를 활용하여 협업 패턴을 파악하도록 하였다. 연구자가 속한 기관들 간의 협업 네트워크를 지리적인 관점에서 연구주제와 함께 직관적으로 파악할 수 있다는 장점이 있다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.31 no.4
• /
• pp.201-227
• /
• 2014

The collaboration is becoming ever more widespread in scientific research. Unlike collaboration in other areas such as in a company, research collaboration has an unique feature that it is reflected by scholars' characteristics. Based on previous studies on research collaboration, five major factors are identified. We propose five hypotheses from them and examine these by using both in-person questionnaire survey and relational bibliometric analysis. The survey analysis informs individual choice factors and the bibliometric analysis informs collective consequence factors. The results of this study may have implications for science policies and digital collaboration services.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.61 no.3
• /
• pp.129-153
• /
• 2009

This study aims to examine the formation of Japanese Social Welfare Studies based on Michel Foucault's Genealogical perspective related with power-knowledge relationships. Namely, this study reveals that Japanese Social Welfare Studies has been built through interactions of power-knowledge relationships in the context of scholars' individual experience and social circumstances. For the study, 40 literary works of Japanese Social Welfare Studies written by 26 authors have been selected to construct the resourceful main data. From the main data, 671 concepts have been abstracted and shortly introduced in 3 parts: authors' individual experiences, social circumstances related with Social Welfare Studies, and composed contents of Social Welfare Studies. The resulted Genealogy of Japanese Social Welfare Studies from the categorization is emerged and analyzed as follows: 1) scholars' individual experience and dichotomous formation of Social Welfare Studies, 2) missionary's activities and development of social welfare, 3) searching essence of social welfare and formation of scholars' genealogy, 4) prosecution of wars including ups and downs of economy and social welfare, and 5) expansion of social welfare and enlarging of Social Welfare studies.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.10 no.6
• /
• pp.415-428
• /
• 2010

Converging technologies have become a major issue in science policy. This paper describes the current state of scientific collaboration for convergent technologies among researchers in South Korea, by conducting Social Network Analysis (SNA) with the data set of 1,095 researchers who have involved in the development of the convergent technologies. It is found that the researchers in convergent technology are more productive than the researchers in other technology domains. However, the researchers in convergent technologies have small number of collaborators, compared with their productivity. Only a few researchers have a role of the hub in the collaboration networks, meaning that the structure network is closer to than the core than the peripheral. The scientific collaboration network of the convergent technology researchers shows that the members of the network are close to each other, but there is small number of cliques.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.30 no.4
• /
• pp.13-38
• /
• 1996

This study focuses on investigating and analyzing overall information use behavior of the social science researchers. questionnaires were sent to 150 researchers in three major libraries or research institutes in the area of the social sciences, Five hypotheses were tested on the basis of the assumption that there would exist unique characteristics in the information seeking behavior of social science researchers The findings of the study shows that social science researchers prefer monographs and journals: they tend to use current material: the first information source for their research activities is the cited references in the book or journal article : they are likely to delegate literature searching to the librarian, but they tend to conduct direct searching in online setting: in general, they react positively for the rapid change in information environment caused by recent development of information technology, It is emphasized that to design an efficient information system and provide an effective information service in the social science related library or information center, it is essential to consider the major characteristics and attributes of social science researchers in terms of their information use behavior.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.40 no.2
• /
• pp.59-80
• /
• 2023

Traditional models for categorizing researcher types have mostly utilized research output metrics. This study proposes a new model that classifies researchers based on the characteristics of research collaboration. The model uses only research collaboration indicators and does not rely on citation data, taking into account that citation impact is related to collaborative research. The model categorizes researchers into four types based on their collaborative research pattern and scope: Sparse & Wide (SW) type, Dense & Wide (DW) type, Dense & Narrow (DN) type, Sparse & Narrow (SN) type. When applied to the quantum metrology field, the proposed model was statistically verified to show differences in citation indicators and co-author network indicators according to the classified researcher types. The proposed researcher type classification model does not require citation information. Therefore, it is expected to be widely used in research management policies and research support services.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.12
• /
• pp.423-450
• /
• 2001

수학교육학 분야에서는 학생들이 수학적 활동을 해나갈 때 학생들의 머리 속에서 어떠한 작용이 어떻게 일어나고 있는가에 대해 지대한 관심을 갖는다. 특히 급변하는 사회에서 개인차가 다양한 구성원을 대상으로 이들이 어떻게 수학을 습득해 나아가는가를 연구를 하고자 할 때 기존의 양적 연구 방법으로는 그들의 활동을 기술하는데 한계가 있어 그 대안으로 효과적으로 사용되는 방법이 질적 연구 방법이다. 주로 연구자의 관점에서 기술되는 질적 연구를 수행하다 보면 그 과정에서 연구자의 자세는 매우 중요한 위치를 차지한다. 따라서 사전에 질적 연구가 가지고 있는 특성과 요소들을 잘 인식하고 연구자의 독자적인(편견된) 관점을 최대한 배제하는 것이 질적 연구의 성패를 좌우한다. 본 논문은 질적 연구를 하는 연구자가 행하는 바람직한 방법과 자세를 질문과 몇 가지 예시들을 통해 알아봄으로써 질적 연구가 연구방법으로써 보다 더 잘 정착될 수 있길 기대한다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.43 no.4
• /
• pp.217-239
• /
• 2009

This study presents the research trends of Records and Archives Management in Korea by analyzing the articles of the Records and Archives Management in Korea according to subjects, issue periods, journals and researchers. For the study, 374 articles from 3 academic journals published between 1999 and 2009 were analyzed. As a result, several research trends in this field were discovered. The summary of the study is as follows: Firstly, it has been proven that the productivity of the articles of Records and Archives Management in Korea increases as time goes by. Secondly, there are differences in the subject fields among journals in Records and Archives Management. Thirdly, there are differences in the subject fields among researchers' institutions. Fourthly, there are no differences in the subject fields among researchers' specialized areas.