• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2017.05a
• /
• pp.501-535
• /
• 2017

이 연구는 한국 학계가 그간 많은 성장을 일구어 왔음에도 질적 수준에 대해서 지속적인 비판을 받고 있는 현 상황에 의문을 갖고 연구를 시작하였다. 최근 연구의 질적 수준 제고를 위해 연구개발 성과평가 제도가 전면적인 변화를 겪고 있음에도 정작 한국 학술연구의 질적 수준 문제가 어떠한 양상으로 나타나고 있는지 과학적인 증거를 제시하고자 하는 노력은 지금까지 매우 미흡했다. 이에 이 연구에서는 한국 연구의 양적 성장과 질적 성장 간의 괴리가 어떠한 양상으로 나타나는지 가시적인 일면을 제시하기 위하여 한국 연구자가 포함된 모든 SCI 논문을 수집하고 이를 대학, 출연연, 기업, 해외기관, 기타 소속 저자로 구분하여 양적 추세와 피인용횟수 추세를 비교하고자 하였다. 분석결과 해외기관 소속 저자와 국내기관 소속 저자 간에 유의미한 수준의 피인용횟수 격차가 나타나고 있으며, 이러한 격차는 시간의 흐름에 따라 해소되지 않고 있는 것을 확인하였다. 또한 분야별로 격차가 다르게 나타나 생화학 분자생물학이나 신경과학 신경학 등의 분야에서 피인용횟수의 격차가 보다 높게 나타나고 있었다. 이러한 결과는 최근 한국 공공연구 영역에서 전면적으로 일어나고 있는 질적 평가체제로의 전환 움직임에 대해서 그 세부적인 설계와 차등 요건의 적절성에 대해 다시 한 번 생각해볼 수 있는 계기를 제공한다.

• Education of Primary School Mathematics
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.177-192
• /
• 2017

In theory, mixed methods that incorporate both quantitative and qualitative approaches can maximize strengths of each method while minimize the short comings of each. Mixed methods research is a feature of educational research nowadays, and the number of studies applied mixed methods research has been gradually increasing. This study investigates how mixed methods research was applied in the field of mathematic education, especially focusing on how qualitative and quantitative methods are combined to best address their research questions. With this in mind, this study carefully selects and analyzes 4 research articles that used mixed methods and were published by Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea in 2015. This study provides detailed result of qualitative analysis on mixed methods research while other a few previous analysis on mixed methods research were tend to focusing on quantitative analysis, producing numeric quantitative information. The result of this study provides practical and in-depth analysis on how to improve validity and possibility of mixed methods research, addressing alternative ways to combine two different research methods and key elements to take into account.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2016.10a
• /
• pp.228-237
• /
• 2016

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.46 no.2
• /
• pp.245-260
• /
• 2012

This study aims to analyze the change in the correlation between the index values and qualitative quantitative evaluation elements by applying 'the decile of total number of articles' instead of the average annual number of articles in Kor-Factor2, and to evaluate the distinction ability between registered journals and register nominee journals of the KCI. The correlation between the index values and qualitative quantitative evaluation elements was analyzed by calculating the correlation coefficient between the index values and the evaluation elements, and then the correlation was compared with that of Kor-Factor2. To evaluate the distinction ability, we carried out independent samples t-test on the mean difference between index values of register nominee journal group and registered journal group and compared the mean difference with that of Kor-Factor2, IF and journal h-index. As a result, we found that the modified index applying the decile of total number of articles was effective in improving the balance among the correlation between the index values and qualitative quantitative evaluation elements compared to Kor-Factor2, and the new index appeared to be superior to other indexes on distinction ability of the journal's registration condition in the KCI.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.457-484
• /
• 2015

This study aims to investigate an approach to teach proportional reasoning in elementary mathematics class by analyzing the proportional strategies the students use to solve the proportional reasoning tasks and their percentages of correct answers. For this research 174 sixth graders are examined. The instrument test consists of various questions types in reference to the previous study; the proportional reasoning tasks are divided into algebraic-geometric, quantitative-qualitative and missing value-comparisons tasks. Comparing the percentages of correct answers according to the task types, the algebraic tasks are higher than the geometric tasks, quantitative tasks are higher than the qualitative tasks, and missing value tasks are higher than the comparisons tasks. As to the strategies that students employed, the percentage of using the informal strategy such as factor strategy and unit rate strategy is relatively higher than that of using the formal strategy, even after learning the cross product strategy. As an insightful approach for teaching proportional reasoning, based on the study results, it is suggested to teach the informal strategy explicitly instead of the informal strategy, reinforce the qualitative reasoning while combining the qualitative with the quantitative reasoning, and balance the various task types in the mathematics classroom.

• Journal of KIISE:Computing Practices and Letters
• /
• v.6 no.1
• /
• pp.45-57
• /
• 2000

Traditional network management technologies don't have interoperability to use differentprotocols or management information models each other. Many researchers have tried to find solutions of these problems to use distributed paradigms. But the benefits of existing models are mainly supported only by qualitative evidences rather than by quantitative evidences. In this paper, we present a quantitative evidence of the efficiency of network management model using mobile agent paradigm. To compare distributed paradigms and proposed model, we use parameterized traffic models for measuring the amount of whole traffic generated by each model.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.44-55
• /
• 2018

The importance of establishing a greenhouse gas inventory is emerging for policymaking and its implementation to cope with climate change. Thus, it is needed to establish Approach 3 level Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) matrix that is spatially explicit regarding land use classifications and changes. In this study, four types of spatial information suitable for establishing the LULUCF matrix were analyzed - Cadastral Map, Land Cover Map, Forest Map, and Biotope Map. This research analyzed the classification properties of each type of spatial information and compared the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the maps in Boryeong city. Drawn from the conclusions of the quantitative comparison, the forest area showed the maximum difference of 50.42% ($303.79km^2$) in the forest map and 46.09%($276.65km^2$) in the cadastral map. The qualitative comparison drew five qualitative characteristics: data construction scope difference, data construction purpose difference, classification standard difference, and classification item difference. As a result of the study, it was evident that the biotope map was the most appropriate spatial information for the establishment of the LULUCF matrix. In addition, if the LULUCF matrix is made by integrating the biotope, the forest map, and the land cover map, the limitations of each spatial information would be improved. The accuracy of the LULUCF matrix is expected to be improved when the map of the level-3 land cover map and the biotope map of 1:5,000 covering the whole country are completed.

• 한국약용작물학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2011.04a
• /
• pp.230-231
• /
• 2011

• Proceedings of the KSR Conference
• /
• 2002.05a
• /
• pp.163-173
• /
• 2002

우리의 교통시설은 선진국에 비해 양적 질적으로 크게 부족하며 철도는 더욱 열악한 실정 o 경쟁시설인 도로와의 적정 역할 분담정도를 시사하는 도로와 비교한 철도의 수송분담율이 유럽의 1/2 수준 o 철도연장이 부족할 뿐만 아니라 운행속도가 낮고 다수의 미연결구간과 노선별ㆍ구간별 용량차이로 운행이 비효율적(중략)

• Maritime Security
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.61-96
• /
• 2023

Amidst the ongoing instability and military tensions between North and South Korea, it is essential for us to comprehend and assess North Korea's military capabilities, while preparing for potential contingencies through military reinforcement. However, to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the military balance on the Korean Peninsula, it is imperative to move beyond simplistic quantitative comparisons of combat capabilities and embrace a broader perspective, which includes qualitative comparisons of military strength, operational capabilities, and a nation's ability to wage war. To address this need, this study employs the method of "Net Assessment" to evaluate the relative combat power of South and North Korean conventional naval forces, with a particular focus on surface combatants. This evaluation involves both quantitative and qualitative comparisons of military assets (personnel and equipment) and intangible factors (naval strategies, geography, etc.). By conducting a holistic assessment, the research aims to identify and analyze strategic asymmetries that may exist between the two navies.