• Title/Summary/Keyword: 안향(安珦)

Search Result 28, Processing Time 0.028 seconds

CEO essay

  • An, Hyang-Ja
    • Venture DIGEST
    • /
    • no.9 s.122
    • /
    • pp.43-43
    • /
    • 2008

  • PDF

원(元) 간섭기(干涉期) 성리학(性理學)의 고려(高麗) 유입(流入)과 지포(止浦) 김구(金坵)의 역할(1)

  • Kim, Byeong-Gi
    • 중국학논총
    • /
    • no.53
    • /
    • pp.37-58
    • /
    • 2017

  • 鑒於性理學傳入韓國的時期, 有學者主張是北宋時期, 也有部分學者對此持否定意見, 指出是南宋時期經由高麗末期的安珦傳入韓國.筆者認爲與其說是某一時期由特定人物將性理學'導入'韓國, 不如說是時代潮流下諸多人士關心與努力的結果, 這一自然而然的'流入'說更爲妥當.本文以此爲前提, 指出止浦金坵正是奠定性理學'流入'礎石的代表性人物, 並對此加以論證. 本文首先考察了止浦金坵初赴大都時中國的儒學即性理學的具體展開情況, 其次對元朝儒臣王鶚這一人物進行了了解, 不管是采取何種方式, 總之王鶚與止浦之間有著交流, 論文對其在學問上直接或間接影響止浦的可能性進行了判斷. 通過以上的考察與辨析.

A Study of the foundations of culture established the Sosu Seowon (소수서원(紹修書院) 건립의 문화적 토대 연구 - 회헌(晦軒) 안향(安珦)의 선비정신을 중심으로 -)

  • Lee, Jeong-Hwa
    • (The)Study of the Eastern Classic
    • /
    • no.48
    • /
    • pp.41-63
    • /
    • 2012

  • This research paper is aims to study the Zhu Xi school of Neo-Confucianism culture based on the Sosu seowon. Also This research paper is to discuss study and scholars correlation the Sosu seowon. The Sosu seowon is mainly made up of the Zhu Xi school of Neo-Confucianism development. The Sosu seowon was the cradle of scholars and bureaucrats. Scholars who study of orthodox Neo-Confucianism in the our country was respected academic spirit of An Whyang in the study of orthodox Neo-Confucianism. An Whyang is symbolic existence of the Sosu seowon. He knew well the importance of learning. He was the person to represent the Sosu seowon. Toegye and Sinje are handed down to the fundamental principle brought in on the orthodox Neo-Confucianism caused by An Whyang. This research paper is to based upon on academic spirit of An Whyang in the study of orthodox Neo-Confucianism. Scholars who study of orthodox Neo-Confucianism thought that the nation's happiness made appointment to a competent person learned the orthodox Neo-Confucianism caused by An Whyang related to the Humanism education.

Theory of Jeong, Sin-bo(鄭臣保論) - With regard to the Introduction of Neo-Confucianism to Korean Dynasty from Southern Song Dynasty (정신보론(鄭臣保論) - 남송 성리학의 고려 전래와 관련하여 -)

  • Choi, Young-song
    • The Journal of Korean Philosophical History
    • /
    • no.36
    • /
    • pp.7-42
    • /
    • 2013

  • This article is on the introduction and origin of Korean Neo-Confucianism. In this article, it is verified and clarified that a scholar named Jeong, Sin-bo (鄭臣保) from Southern Song settled on today's Seosan Ganwoldo (看月島) in the year of 1237 (24th year of the king Gojong in Korean Dynasty) and he introduced the Neo-Confucianism both by Jeong, Myung-do (程明道) and Jeong, Yi-cheon (程伊川) who are also called Double Jeong to Korean scholars. Based on these facts, it overturns the history that Anhyang (安珦) first introduced Neo-Confucianism to Korean Dynasty in the year of 1290 even with 35 years ahead. When this gains official approval by the academia, the history of Neo-Confucianism seems to be rewritten. This article first examines changes in history of Korean Neo-Confucianism with three stages and then concentrates on the life of Jeong, Sin-bo. It presents that Jeong, Sin-bo was a descendant of a Southern Song's noble family named Pogang Jeong (浦江鄭氏) and he committed to Chunqiu thoughts (春秋思想) and spirit of loyalty (義理精神) naturally as the posterity of Pogang Jeong. Lastly, it also infers the transmission of Jeong, Sin-bo's scholastic mantle and his influence on the posterity.