• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.70
• /
• pp.37-45
• /
• 2001

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.318
• /
• pp.52-53
• /
• 2017

대한기계설비건설협회는 입찰참가 제한을 과도하게 하는 국가공사의 적격심사 신용등급평가 기준 개선을 중점 추진과제로 선정하고 그동안 국회, 국무총리실, 기획재정부 등에 국가공사의 적격심사 신용등급평가 만점기준 하향 조정을 지속적으로 건의하여 왔다. 이에 따라 기획재정부는 규제개선 정상화 과제 이행을 위해 계약예규를 개정하고 시행에 들어갔다.

• TTA Journal
• /
• s.37
• /
• pp.125-129
• /
• 1995

(재)전기통신단말기기심사협회(JATE)는 전기통신사업법에 기초하여, 우정성 장관으로부터 지정받고 우정성법령에 정해 놓은 기술기준(단말설비등의 규칙) 및 제1종 전기통신사업자가 우정성 장관의 인가를 받아 정한 접속 기술적 조건과의 적합성 심사를 하여, 적합인정을 일원화하고 있다. 1994년도 상반기의 인정상황 개요를 소개한다.

• Food Science and Industry
• /
• v.52 no.2
• /
• pp.153-170
• /
• 2019

With the breathtaking stride beingmade in the field of biotechnology, biocatalyst research using genetically modified microorganism (GMM) is actively being pursued in food industry. However, domestic food and food additive regulation standards and the number of examination management examples currently used in industry is lacking significantly. Up till now, there are only 6 examples of domestic GMM examination and approval cases for food production purposes and furthermore they are limited to the production of functional sweeteners. Domestically, although GMM is developed as a processing aid (contained use), if they are used in the production of food, the safety of GMM, including environmental safety, is evaluated. Also the produced food or food additives using GMM need to be separately examined and approved as a novel food. On the other hand, imported products produced using GMM need to gain approval for the final product only. Thus the expense and the time to obtain regulatory approval is advantageous for imported products versus domestically produced products. This commentary is written to create the opportunity to reform the current domestic food GMM regulation by comparing and discussing domestic and foreign case analyses of safety evaluation of GMM and related regulations.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.23 no.3
• /
• pp.139-207
• /
• 2022

As various state restrictions on individual freedom were imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns have been raised that excessive infringements on fundamental rights were indiscriminately permitted based on the public interest of preventing infectious diseases. Therefore, the question of how to set acceptable limits of liberty restrictions on individuals has emerged. However, since the phenomenon of infections spreading to the population is only predicted statistically, how to deal with the risk of the infected individual as a subject of legal analysis has become a problem. In the absence of a theoretical framework of legal analysis of risk, the risk of infected individuals during the pandemic was not analyzed strictly, and proportionality review of infection prevention measures was often only an abstract comparison of the importance of public interest and individual rights. Therefore, this research aims to conduct a theoretical review on how risk can be conceptualized legally in a public health crisis, and to develop a theoretical framework for proportionality review of the risk of liberty-limiting measures during a pandemic. Chapter 2 analyzes the legal philosophical concepts of risk, which are the basis for liberty restrictions during a public health crisis, and applies and extends them to the pandemic. Chapter 3 reviews previous studies related to liberty restriction measures in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and points out they have a limitation that specific criteria for the proportionality review of public health measures in the pandemic have not been presented. Accordingly, Chapter 3 specifies the methodological framework for proportionality review, referring to the theoretical discussion on risks in Chapter 2. Chapter 4 reviews the legitimacy of gathering restriction orders, applying the theoretical discussion in Chapter 2 and the criteria for proportionality review established in Chapter 3. In particular, Section 4 examines logic of proportionality review in judicial precedents over the ban on gathering restrictions implemented in the COVID-19 pandemic. In analyzing the precedents, the logic of proportionality review in each case is critically reviewed and reconstructed based on the theoretical framework presented in this research.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.29 no.2
• /
• pp.255-275
• /
• 2013

The purpose of the study is to examine compliance criteria for documents of the Letter of Credit(L/C) by the Korean Supreme Court in practical use. The judgement criteria of the court in documents' examination is supported by the doctrine of strict compliance. And, in examination of documents by the Supreme Court, the difference between documents presented and the credit should be followed by the allowance of international standard banking practices. In this case, the Supreme Court makes a reference for ICC's opinion or decision proposed as the international standard banking practices, or otherwise admit by exploring the practices. However, when documents reviewing by the bankers' auditors, it is very difficult for them to judge in a short time due to the lack of high level of knowledges and insights. As shown the cases of this study, the doctrine of strict compliance of an L/C be relaxed, and most of the recent precedents be ruled by the exception of the doctrine. Because, therefore, it is difficult for to documents reviewers of bank to judge these consistencies, conducting arbitrary document review will be inevitable. As a result, it will be difficult for banks and applicants to ensure the strictness of the documents, and free use of L/Cs in international transactions will be avoided. Finally, the expanded usage of the electronic negotiation system that simplifies the highly difficult compliance criteria to ensure the strictness of documents will be needed, and not only be eradicated the acts of arbitrary documents examination practices, but also be promoted the freely usage of L/Cs.

• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.103
• /
• pp.32-38
• /
• 2004

현재까지 우리나라에서는 지적재산권의 일탈남용과 관련된 불공정거래행위에 대한 케이스는 없는 실정이다. 그러나 지적재산권의 중요성이 점차 증가하고 있는 실정에 비추어 조만간 지적재산권 관련 불공정거래행위에 대한 실제 케이스가 많이 발생할 것으로 예상된다. 따라서 구체적 심사기준 등을 보다 명확하게 정비해 나갈 필요성이 있다고 본다. 한편, 지적재산권의 정당한 행사와 일탈$\cdot$남용간 명확한 경계 또는 구분기준을 보다 명확히 정립하기 위해서는 지적재산권 보호 관련 법률과 공정거래법을 전체 체계 하에서 단일의 기준에 의해 그 보호대상과 금지대상을 파악하고 경쟁제한효과를 분석해 나가야 할 필요가 있다고 할 것이다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society Conference
• /
• 1996.05d
• /
• pp.529-534
• /
• 1996

본 논문은 현재까지 수행된 신규 핵연료가공시설의 안전성 평가 내용, 안전심사의 경험을 통해 도출된 문제과 해결 현황 등을 제시한다. 이를 위해 신규 핵연료가공시설의 인허가에 관련된 국내의 관련 원자력법령체계의 특성을 고찰하고, 관련되는 국내외 규제요건 및 기술기준과의 비교를 통해 적용가능한 규제기준을 도출하여, 본 적용 기준에 따른 신규 핵연료가공시설의 안전설계 특성 평가 결과를 제시한다. 이러한 과정에서 도출된 주요 문제점과 그 해결을 위한 개선방향을 제언한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Sciences Conference
• /
• 2016.10a
• /
• pp.139-141
• /
• 2016

With the introduction of national standards (KS) for call centers, customers are expected to have access to better-quality services in the future. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relative importance of certification criteria for call center services using the Fuzzy AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) approach. Fuzzy AHP is the combination of the fuzzy set theory and AHP to deal with the uncertainty or ambiguousness of the decision-making process. The evaluation method proposed in this study can be applied to the KS services certification promoted by government.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.44 no.1
• /
• pp.95-100
• /
• 2024

The public survey performance review conducted by the Spatial Information Quality Management Institute is conducted at the screening rate in accordance with the regulations, and the examiner directly judges the overall trend of the submitted performance based on the extracted sample. However, the evaluation of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, the evaluation trustee shall be specified by random extraction (Random Collection) is specified by the sample. In this study, it analyzed the details of the actual site and analyzed through securing actual performance review data. In addition, we analyzed considerations according to various field conditions and studied ways to apply the public survey performance review sampling algorithm. Therefore, detailed sampling criteria analysis by performance reviewers is necessary. A relative comparison was made feasible by comparing the data for which the real performance evaluation was performed with the outcomes of the Python automation program. This automation program is expected to be employed as a foundation program for the automated application of public survey performance evaluation sampling in the future.