• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.84 no.1
• /
• pp.127-149
• /
• 2023

It is important to distinguish uterine lesions from other lesions occurring in the pelvic cavity for the proper management. The primary radiological evaluation of uterine lesions is performed using transvaginal ultrasonography, and if the lesion is too large or shows atypical benign imaging findings, magnetic resonance imaging should be performed. Analyzing radiological findings of uterine lesions through a pattern recognition approach can help establish the accurate diagnosis and treatment plan. In this pictorial assay, we describe imaging characteristics of various lesions arising from the uterus and evaluate them based on the pattern recognition approach.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Medical Physics Conference
• /
• 2003.09a
• /
• pp.33-33
• /
• 2003

목적 : 현재 국내에서 사용되고 있는 방사선치료계획 장비는 거의 모든 방사선종양학과에서 외국 회사의 제품을 사용하고 있는 실정이다. 본 연구는 국내 기술로 개발된 3 차원 조형 방사선치료계획 장비인 Core Plan의 선량계산 알고리즘의 정확성 및 방사선 치료계획 장비로서의 유용성에 관해 평가하고 본 장비의 특징에 대해 간략히 소개하고자 한다. 재료 및 방법 : 본 연구는 2002 년 11 월에 가톨릭대학교 성모병원 방사선종양학과와 서울씨앤제이의 연구계약에 의해 시행되었다. 본 장비에 대한 평가는 방사선분포 및 계산상의 정확성과 임상적용시의 유용성의 관점에서 시행되었다. 본 장비에서 이용된 광자선 선량계산은 Clarkson-Cunningham 모델이며 전자선 선량계산은 2.5D Hogstrom 알고리즘이다. 방사선분포 및 계산상의 정확성 평가를 위하여 방사선치료 장비는 본 병원이 보유한 Clinac 2100CD (Varian, USA)를 이용하였고 폴리스티렌 팬텀과 필름 및 이온 전리함을 이용하여 방사선분포 및 계산상의 정확성을 평가하였다. 방사선분포의 평가 방법은 필름을 이용한 방사선분포의 중심부단면 선량분포와 CorePlan 에서 재현된 방사선분포의 동일면 선량분포를 비교하였다. 임상적용은 2003 년 3 월부터 7 월까지 방사선치료를 받은 50 명의 환자를 대상으로 분석하였다. 본 시험에 적용된 환자는 본 병원이 보유한 3 차원 방사선치료계획 장비인 Prowess 3D (SSGI Inc., USA)를 이용하여 실제 치료된 환자들이며 이 환자를 대상으로 CorePlan에서 동일하게 재현하여 비교하였다. 결과 및 결론 : 방사선분포 및 계산상의 정확성 평가에서는 실제 측정된 결과와 CorePlan에서 재현된 결과가 모두 $\pm$3% 이내로 평가되었다. 50 명의 환자를 대상으로 시행한 임상시험 결과 Prowess 3D에서 나타낸 결과와 비교하여 두경부에서는 1.678%, 흉부 1.578%, 복부 1.271%의 선량값의 오차를 보였다. 본 연구를 진행하는 과정에서 많은 부분의 프로그램 수정이 있었으며 실제임상에 필요한 부분에 대한 추가 및 보완이 이루어졌다. 앞으로 진행될 과정은 실제임상의 사용에 필요한 부분의 계속적인 업그레이드와 전자선에 대한 방사선분포 및 계산정확성 평가, 임상적용에 있어서 Prowess3D 뿐만 아니라 다양한 방사선 치료계획 장비와의 비교를 할 예정이다.

• Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal
• /
• v.22 no.6
• /
• pp.20-28
• /
• 2013

This study attempts to grasp outpatients' demands for interior space of outpatients departments through evaluating them. Six departments in H general hospital such as surgery, orthopedics, neurosurgery, plastic surgery, obstetrics, and urology, were evaluated. Evaluating items were consisted of ones related to spatial layout, furniture, interior climate, color and finishes, and dressing room of each waiting area, doctor's room and treatment room in six departments. The subjects were 210 outpatients who were using one of six departments. The results were ; 1) The outpatients evaluated very high interior space of waiting areas in six departments. 2) They evaluated doctor's rooms to be relatively high. However, visual privacy in there was not enough met. 3) The treatment room was also evaluated relatively high. However, furniture and equipment arrangement, consideration for patients and a dressing room were evaluated relatively low. 4) The outpatients' evaluation was significantly different by their gender and age. The male evaluated them higher than the female. Also, the older patients evaluated them higher than the younger. 5) The outpatients responded that ventilation, comfort interior, and space arrangement were very important elements in healthcare facility design.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Quality Management Conference
• /
• 2007.04a
• /
• pp.149-153
• /
• 2007

본 연구의 목적은 급변하는 의료환경에 효과적으로 대처하기 위하여 우리나라 병원들을 대상으로 미국의 말콤 볼드리지 국가 품질상 (The Malcolm Bladrige National Quality Award)모형 중 의료분야 평가모형을 이용하여 우리나라 병원들의 의료품질을 평가하였다. 이를 위해 미국의 말콤 볼드리지 국가품질상의 평가기준인 리더십, 전략 계획, 측정${\cdot}$분석, 지식관리, 인적자원 중심, 프로세스 관리, 환자${\cdot}$고객, 시장중심, 결과의 7개 항목을 이용하여 평가 항목들 간에 어떠한 인과관계가 있는지를 분석하고자 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Quality Management Conference
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.8-12
• /
• 2006

본 연구는 말콤볼드리지 의료서비스 분야 평가기준을 기반으로한 한국형 의료서비스 분야 국가품질상 평가도구의 타당성을 검증 하고자 한다. 이를 위해 미국의 말콤볼드리지 국가품질상(The Malcolm Bladrige National Quality Award)의 평가기준인 리더십, 전략계획, 환자 ${\cdot}$ 고객 ${\cdot}$ 시장 중시, 측정 ${\cdot}$ 분석 ${\cdot}$ 지식관리, 인적자원 중시, 프로세스 관리, 사업성과의 7 개 항목과 21 개의 세부항목을 토대로 국내 산업에 맞는 측정항목을 개발하였고, 이러한 평가항목들을 이용해 한국 의료서비스 기업들이 국가품질상에 대한 자체평가를 위해 활용할 수 있는 한국형 경영품질지수를 개발하고, 실제로 한국의 병원들의 사례를 통해 한국 의료서비스 산업 품질경영상태를 파악하고자 한다.

• Journal of The Korea Institute of Healthcare Architecture
• /
• v.5 no.9
• /
• pp.81-96
• /
• 1999

One-year post-occupancy evaluation was performed for a newly built hospital. Total of 133 in-patients were asked to evaluate their satisfaction on a scale of 1-5, and the lowest score was reported on the categories of the following : rest area insufficiency (2.939), inconvenient in-house shop (3.052), and too small patient room (3.065). We suggest several modifications of hospital structure to improve patient satisfaction.

• Korea Journal of Hospital Management
• /
• v.21 no.4
• /
• pp.63-70
• /
• 2016

• Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
• /
• v.51 no.2
• /
• pp.164-170
• /
• 2019

The absorption and release capacities, survival efficiency, and recovery rates of five kinds of transport media were evaluated based on the swab elution method (Quantitative) of CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) M40-A2. Liquid media showed mostly better results than semi-solid media in the three evaluations. The flocked swabs had better ability to absorption and discharge bacteria than the standard swabs. The liquid medium (S4) had the best survival efficiency. Pneumococcal strains with poor growth had a higher survival efficiency and recovery rate in liquid media (S4, S5). The results of microbial recovery showed that S. pyogenes met all the CLSI standards in all media. S. pneumoniae was inadequate in the semi- solid media (S2, S3) and all the remaining media met the criteria. H. influenzae was unsuitable in semi-solid media (S1, S3) and met the criteria in semi-solid medium (S2) and liquid medium (S4, S5). The viability of the H. influenzae, pneumococcal strain causing respiratory disease, was poor in most media. Overgrowth of P. aeruginosa was observed at room temperature. The combination of liquid medium and flocked swab confirmed the best results in the three evaluation methods.

• Korean Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine
• /
• v.31 no.2
• /
• pp.43-49
• /
• 2023

In Korea, the dependence on living donations is high due to the shortage of organs available for donation compared to the number of people waiting for transplants and the number of living organ donations continues to increase. In particular, the number of living-donor transplantations is high worldwide, highlighting the importance of pre-transplant psychosocial evaluation of living kidney donors. According to previous studies, when evaluating living organ donors before transplantation, it is crucial to determine whether the donor can give informed consent and be aware of the risks after surgery. Pre-transplant evaluation tests such as ELPAT living organ donor Psychological Assessment Tool (EPAT), Live Donor Assessment Tool (LDAT), Living Donation Expectancies Questionnaire (LDEQ), Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 questionnaire (MMPI-2) and Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) are conducted for donors. After reviewing the literature on these pre-transplant psychosocial assessment tools, we will also look at legal considerations for living kidney donors in Korea and suggest an effective and essential pre-transplant screening evaluation method for living kidney transplant donors.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.82 no.6
• /
• pp.1545-1555
• /
• 2021

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rates of unacceptable diagnosis and clinically significant diagnostic discrepancy in radiology sections and imaging modalities through a peer review of teleradiology. Materials and Methods Teleradiology peer reviews in a Korean teleradiology clinic in 2018 and 2019 were included. The peer review scores were classified as acceptable and unacceptable diagnoses and clinically insignificant and significant diagnostic discrepancy. The diagnostic discrepancy rates and clinical significance were compared among radiology sections and imaging modalities using the chi-square test. Results Of 1312 peer reviews, 117 (8.9%) cases had unacceptable diagnoses. Of 462 diagnostic discrepancies, the clinically significant discrepancy was observed in 104 (21.6%) cases. In radiology sections, the unacceptable diagnosis was highest in the musculoskeletal section (21.4%) (p < 0.05), followed by the abdominal section (7.3%) and neuro section (1.3%) (p < 0.05). The proportion of significant discrepancy was higher in the chest section (32.7%) than in the musculoskeletal (19.5%) and abdominal sections (17.1%) (p < 0.05). Regarding modalities, the number of unacceptable diagnoses was higher with MRI (16.2%) than plain radiology (7.8%) (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in significant discrepancy. Conclusion Peer review provides the rates of unacceptable diagnosis and clinically significant discrepancy in teleradiology. These rates also differ with subspecialty and modality.