• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.18 no.2
• /
• pp.279-295
• /
• 2014

The Korean national curriculum will be revised in 2015. Before revisions are to be made, we must discuss the direction the curriculum changes will take. In this study, we compare the contents of the current 2011 elementary school mathematics curriculum in Korea with the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM) in the United States. The results from this comparative analysis may be helpful in the revision of the Korean mathematical curriculum. We find that the CCSSM introduces certain mathematical concepts earlier and in greater detail than the Korean curriculum does. The CCSSM also covers a broader range of mathematical concepts. These results indicate that the Korean curriculum needs to emphasize conceptual understanding, as well as procedural skill and fluency, in the early grades. Moreover, the 'grade band' is unnecessary in the mathematics curriculum. The Korean curriculum revision process must be debated more intensely, must be made public, and must take into consideration the key points of CCSSM.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.24 no.4
• /
• pp.645-668
• /
• 2014

This study was designed to gain insights into contemporary secondary mathematics curriculum revision in Korea. The two secondary mathematics curriculum reports submitted in the 1920s, the Kilpatrick Reports and 1923 Reports were compared and contrasted as the origin of recent math wars, and their backgrounds, committee members, viewpoints of math and math education and contents were analyzed to understand the perspectives of the two extreeme parts. Kilpatrick Reports was selected at that time, but nevertheless 1923 Report had taken a role of guiding secondary mathematics in US until the New Math era. The direction and process of mathematics curriculum revision were suggested based on the analysis of reports' short- and long-term influences. A close examination of the curriculum revision process in US and in Korea and the implications from the results are also included in the suggestion.

• The Mathematical Education
• /
• v.34 no.2
• /
• pp.251-256
• /
• 1995

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.289-308
• /
• 2015

This study analyzed mathematical processes elaborated in the mathematics curricula of Korea, China, Japan, and the US. Ten mathematical processes were extracted: (a) learning of concepts, principles, laws, and skills; (b) problem solving; (c) reasoning; (d) communication; (e) representation; (f) connections; (g) creativity; (h) character-building; (i) self-directed learning; and (j) positive attitude toward mathematics. This study specified the meaning of such processes and their sub-domains, noticing similarities and differences among the curricula. On the basis of the results, this study includes suggestions for the development of next mathematics curriculum in Korea.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.11
• /
• pp.451-468
• /
• 2001

해방 후 처음으로 1946년에 수학과 교수 요목이 발표되어 우리 나라 수학교육이 정식으로 시작되었다. 그런데 이 교수 요목은 해방전의 교수 요목의 내용과 대동소이한 것이었고, 교육여건의 변화와 더불어 수학교육이 정상적으로 이루어지지를 못했다. 6 ${\cdot}$25사변을 거치면서 작성된 제 1차 교육과정은 교수 요목의 난해한 내용에 지나치게 집착한 나머지, 제대로 된 교육과정이 되지 못했다. 따라서 이에 따른 수학교육은 성공을 거두지 못했다. 그리고 미국의 새 수학의 영향을 받은 제 3차 교육과정은 교사의 재교육 등 여러 가지 노력을 했음에도 불구하고 성공한 교육과정으로 인정되지 못하고 있다. 새 수학에 의한 상처가 20여 년의 세월을 거쳐 겨우 치유되려고 하는 이 마당에 또 제 7차 교육과정이라는 새로운 폭풍우가 우리 나라 수학교육에 불어 닥쳐왔다. 이것으로 인한 앞으로의 전망을 알아본다.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.25 no.3
• /
• pp.431-448
• /
• 2015

This study is conducted to understand the real shape of confusion surrounding mathematical terminologies, 'ratio' and 'rate' in both the US and Korea and to get some implications for Korean education. For this, various materials including textbooks and materials for kids and teachers, dictionaries, educational internet web sites, the past Korean elementary mathematics curriculums and etc are reviewed with respect to the terminologies related to 'ratio' and 'rate'. As a result, the findings are as follows. Firstly, the US and Korea have different views with ratio and rate. Secondly, Korean terminologies related to ratio and rate are not enough to treat the essentials of the concept of ratio and rate.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.311-334
• /
• 2015

This study compares and contrasts elementary mathematics curricula of Korea, China, Japan, and USA, as a part of efforts to compose contents of global elementary mathematics. This paper analyzed the similarities and the differences of mathematical contents in the domain of geometry. On the basis of this comparative analysis, this paper included implications that are expected to be informative in the revision of the Korean mathematics curriculum.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.11
• /
• pp.291-296
• /
• 2001

근래에 7차 교육과정에 관한 비판적 논의가 활발하다. 이러한 논의는 향후의 교육과정 개발에 많은 시사점을 제공하게 될 것이다. 본 논문에서는 러시아, 미국, 싱가포르, 영국의 사례를 통하여 우리의 수학과 교육과정 내용의 일부를 분석적으로 고찰한다.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.22 no.4
• /
• pp.557-580
• /
• 2012

Common Core State Standards for Mathematics(CCSSM) is a blueprint for school mathematics in 2010s of the United States. CCSSM can be divided into two major parts, the standards for mathematical content and the standards for mathematical practice. This study focused on the latter. Mathematical practice comes from the mathematical process in 'Principles and standards for school mathematics(NCTM, 2000)' as well as the mathematical proficiency in 'Adding it up(NRC, 2001)'. It is composed of eight standards which mathematically proficient students are expected to do. From Korean perspective, it can also be comparable with the mathematical process which contains mathematical problem solving, mathematical reasoning, and mathematical communication and was provided by the 2009 revised national curriculum for mathematics in Korea. However, few focused the standards for mathematical practice among the studies related to CCSSM in Korea. Moreover, there is a study that even ignores the existence of the standards for mathematical practice itself. This study aims to understand the standards for mathematical practice through analysing the document of CCSSM and its successive materials for implementing the CCSSM. This understanding will help effective implementation of the mathematical process in Korea.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.10
• /
• pp.303-324
• /
• 2000

수학 교육에서 새로운 정보기술의 교육적 사용의 범위는 커지고 교육 모형은 다양해지고 있다. 특히 중등 수학교육에서의 변화에 대한 기대도 커지고 있다. 본 논문은 미국 및 한국의 수학 교육계의 폭넓은 지지를 받는 NCTM의 컴퓨터 및 정보기술 활용에 관한 규준들의 교육적 의미, 방법, 효용 등을 정리하였다. 이어서 컴퓨터과학 교과과정에 포함된 수학 분야에 대한 컴퓨터과학자 Hamming의 견해를 소개하였다. 본 논문은 한국의 중등 교육에도 컴퓨터과학 교과가 시행될 것을 예정하면서 수학 교사들이 미리 컴퓨터과학을 교과과정을 이해함으로 통합 교과적 요소, 특성 그리고 역할 관계를 알아보았다.