• 월간 기계설비
• /
• no.10 s.219
• /
• pp.99-106
• /
• 2008

최근 경기침체로 인한 건설사의 도산으로 설비업계의 어려움이 가중됨에 따라 공제조합에 대한 보증금 청구가 급격하게 증가하고 있어 조합의 부담이 커지고 있다. 이러한 사태는 고유가에 따른 원자재 가격 상승이 가장 큰 원인이나 "저가수주"도 한 몫 하고 있어 조합원 스스로 자정이 필요하다는 여론이 대두되고 있다. 이러한 문제를 근원적으로 해결하기 위한 방법 중 하나로 현행제도의 이해와 문제점 사례, 문제해결을 위한 방안 등을 자세히 알 필요가 있다. 본지는 '저가수주공사에 대한 이해와 대처방안'을 5회에 걸쳐 연재 할 계획이다.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.143-161
• /
• 2009

This study was designed to gain insights into students' visualization process in geometric problem solving. The visualization model for analysing visual process for geometric problem solving was developed on the base of Duval's study. The subjects of this research are two Grade 9 students and six Grade 10 students. They were given 2D-geometric problems. Their written solutions were analyzed problem is research depicted characteristics of process of visualization of individually. The findings on the students' geometric problem solving process are as follows: In geometric problem solving, visualization provided a significant insight by improving the students' figural apprehension. In particular, the discoursive apprehension and the operative apprehension contributed to recognize relation between the constituent of figures and grasp structure of figure.

• The Mathematical Education
• /
• v.60 no.3
• /
• pp.297-319
• /
• 2021

The present study explored a relationship between mathematical understandings of teachers and ways in which their knowledge transferred in designing lessons for hypothetical students from Gess-Newsome (1999)'s transformative perspective of pedagogical content knowledge. To this end, we conducted clinical interviews with four secondary mathematics teachers of their solving and teaching of equation writing. After analyzing the teacher participants' attention to Key Developmental Understandings (Simon, 2007) in solving equation writing, we sought to understand the relationship between their mathematical knowledge of the problems and mathematical knowledge in teaching the problems to hypothetical students. Two of the four teachers who attended the key developmental understandings solved the problems more successfully than those who did not. The other two teachers had trouble representing and explaining the problems, which involved reasoning with improper fractions or reciprocal relationships between quantities. The key developmental understandings of all four teachers were reflected in their pedagogical actions for teaching the equation writing problems. The findings contribute to teacher education by providing empirical data on the relationship between teachers' mathematical knowledge and their knowledge for teaching particular mathematics.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.15
• /
• pp.77-86
• /
• 2003

초등학교 영재들은 여러 사설 교육기관이나 국립기관 그리고 개인 교습을 통하여 많은 양의 선수학습을 행하고 있다. 이들 중 일부는 방법과 이유를 아는 관계 이해를 하기보다는, 주어진 규칙을 적용하여 정답을 찾아내는 도구적 이해를 하고 있다. 그들은 수학을 능동적이기보다는 수동적인 입장에서 받아들이기에 새로운 수학적 지식을 창출하지 못하는 성향을 강하게 보이고 있다. 이에 본 연구자는 이러한 문제의 해결을 위해 초등학교 영재들이 가지고 있는 수학적 스키마와 선생님들이 가르치는 스키마 사이의 간격에 초점을 맞추어 연구하였다. 대전에 있는 영재교육기관에 등록된 초등학교 3학년 영재들을 대상으로 하여 연구한 결과, 스키마와 스키마 사이의 간격이 멀수록 학생들이 방법과 이유를 아는 관계적 이해를 하기보다는 주어진 규칙을 적용하여 정답을 찾아내는 도구적 이해를 하고, 그 간격을 줄일수록 수학에 흥미를 느끼고 고학년의 수학내용까지도 스스로 파악하고 이해하려는 성향이 나타난다는 사실을 발견하게 되었다. 그 간격이 적을수록 학생들은 교사로부터 학습받은 내용을 자신의 지식으로 재구성하여 새로운 문제에 적용을 쉽게 하였다. 본 발표에서는, 학생들의 수학적 스키마와 선생님들이 가르치는 스키마 사이의 간격을 줄이는 것이 학생들이 수학을 관계적 이해를 하는데 큰 도움을 줄 수 잇음을 보이려고 한다.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.6 no.1
• /
• pp.135-161
• /
• 2003

This research is how students and teacher apprehend mathematics education, pointing out problem areas as a basis on how to improve students understanding of mathematics through improved guidance by teachers in the future. 1107 high school students and 105 teachers from around Daejeon and Choongnam province were surveyed and the results were as follows. 1. 77 %( 852) of students viewed the "application of problem solving methods" as understanding mathematic problems. 2. Replies to the question on understanding the study of mathematics resulted in 85.7% of teachers saying "it is the understanding of the basic concept to which you solve the problems" 3. For questions relating to the large difference in-class mathematics achievements and mock University entrance exam achievements, students' response that "for in-class tests you only have to learn problems with similar form but the mock tests are not like that" pointed out the problem in the area of mathematics education. 4. For future mathematic education teachers will have to "explain better and more completely the basic principles and concepts before solving problems" , and make an effort to stimulate students by "creating a more fun atmosphere" . There will also be the need to prevent as much as possible, the use of "formula or memory driven problems" and encourage students to initiate problem solving for themselves.; and encourage students to initiate problem solving for themselves.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2017

In this study we analyse the features of process of problem posing and explore the development of mathematical knowledge of primary preservice teachers as result of their engagement in problem posing activity. Data was collected through the preservice teachers' class discussions. Analysis of the data shows that preservice teachers developed their ability to understand connections among mathematical concepts.

• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.185-232
• /
• 2016

In order to explain why begging the question is a fallacy, some of the challenges must be met. First we need to understand what begging the question is in subtle ways. In addition, it is necessary to reflect on the nature and the purpose of arguments in order to explain why begging the question is a fallacy. In this paper, I first have a general proposal about the main purpose of arguments. Then I place my own multi-layered theory of begging the question proposed in a previous study in the context of the proposals in this paper for the main purpose of arguments. Moreover, I develop a more comprehensive theory of why begging the question is a fallacy. Finally, I examine and criticize the main previous theories of begging the question, such as Frank Jackson's theory, Douglas Walton's theory, David Sanford's theory, John Biro's theory.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.165-206
• /
• 2018

Researchers, Institutional Bioethics Committee(IBC)/Institutional Review Board (IRB) members, Research Institutions that have multiple interests in relation to research should ensure that conflicts of interest(COI) do not arise in making professional judgments. In other words, according to the role that must be performed or the obligation to fulfill it, the primary interest, which must be considered or should be prioritized, should not be affected by the secondary interest. Therefore, standards and methods should be prepared so as to prevent and solve the problems of COI that have arisen, and the basic matters on standards and methods should be clearly defined in terms of the law and policy so that all parties such as Researchers can understand and follow them. In order to establish a more realistic legal policy, it is necessary to grasp the current situation. Therefore, I have reviewed results of the questionnaire survey and interview conducted for the administrative staff of IBC/IRB to confirm their opinions on legal policy problems related to COI and countermeasures for resolving them. Also, I have reviewed the main contents of issued by the US Department of Health and Human Services in order to assist in the preparation of domestic legal policy about conflicts of interest. Finally, I have analyzed the present state of domestic legal policy in relation to the Researcher's COI, the IBC/IRB member's COI, and Institutional COI and suggested way to improve it.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.21 no.1
• /
• pp.63-89
• /
• 2018

In this study, the researcher developed a course integrated mathematical problem posing activities in order to enhance pre-service mathematics teachers' ability to carry out problem posing activities in mathematics classroom, and examined the changes of pre-service mathematics teachers' perceptions about problem posing through the course. The problem posing course developed in this study consisted of three stages: education on the theories regarding problem posing; activities with problem posing; development and implementation of problem posing tasks. According to the results of the questionnaires, interviews, and class journals data analysis, the problem posing experiences provided in this study were very effective in improving pre-service mathematics teachers' understanding of the problem posing strategies and the benefit of problem posing activities to student learning. Particularly, the experience in various problem posing activities and the implementation experience of problem posing provided in the course played a key role in the improvement of pre-service mathematics teachers' understanding of problem posing and PCK.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.609-612
• /
• 2007

정보사회와 컴퓨딩환경의 발전으로 언어, 학력, 인지도 등의 평가도구로서 컴퓨터기반의 평가환경이 보편화되었다. 특히 컴퓨터기반의 학력평가 환경을 위해서는 문항의 난이도와 변별도 등 문항의 특성을 정확히 분석하는 것이 필수적이다. 문항분석은 컴퓨터기반의 평가를 위한 양질의 문제은행 구성 및 문항과 수험자 능력의 정확한 추정과 체계적이고 과학적인 평가를 위한 전제조건이라 할 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 고전평가이론의 문제분석을 적용한 문제은행 시스템을 구현하였으며 수험결과를 분석하여 각 문제의 곤란도나 변별도, 문항분포도를 통하여 문제를 분석할 수 있도록 하였다. 또한 수험자가 각 문제를 푸는데 걸린 시간을 기록하여, 수험자의 문제에 이해도를 정확히 분석하고 수험자의 추측, 랜덤 선택 등으로 인한 정답을 맞힐 가능성과 한 문제를 읽고 이해하는 시간이 너무 오래걸린 이유에 대해서도 추정하였다. 문제분석 및 수험결과의 평가 및 분석으로 교사들은 문항의 양호도를 높일 수 있고 문제은행에 저장되어 있는 문항들을 수정하고 보완하여 양질의 문항을 출제할 수 있도록 하였다.