• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.6 no.4
• /
• pp.115-121
• /
• 2020

The primary aim of this paper is to discuss the historical development or grammaticalization of English adverbial -ly suffix and provide a diachronic analysis of manner adverbs and sentence adverbs from the perspective of secondary grammaticalization. The grammaticalization includes both the primary grammaticalization from a lexical to a grammatical and the secondary grammaticalization from a less grammatical to a more grammatical status. The emergence of the manner adverbs is due to the primary grammaticalization from OE adjectival suffix -lic to ME adverbial suffix -ly. In contrast, the emergence of sentence adverbs is due to the secondary grammaticalization from manner adverbs in VP domain to sentence adverbs in TP domain with grammatical features of tense and modality. This paper concludes that the secondary grammaticalization of the English adverbial -ly suffix includes the change from manner adverbs to sentence adverbs which obtain a new grammatical function of tense and modality.

• Koreanishche Zeitschrift fur Deutsche Sprachwissenschaft
• /
• v.5
• /
• pp.23-51
• /
• 2002

이 글은 문법화의 관점에서 관사, 비인칭구문, 재귀동사 구문을 독일어와 우리말을 중심으로 비교하였다. 우리말의 경우 관사의 범주가 아직 문법 화하지는 않았지만 수사 '하나/한'은 서양 언어에 못지 않게 다양한 문법적 기능으로 발전하였다. 독일어의 정관사나 대명사에 해당되는 요소는 우리말에서 자주 생략된다. 비인칭구문도 유럽언어의 특징인데 독일어의 경우 이는 지시대명사에서 문법 화한 것이다. 우리말의 경우 비인칭구문은 문법 화하지 않았으며 이를 위해 우리말은 주어생략 통 다른 문법적 기재들을 사용한다. 독일어에는 또 재귀구문이 잘 발달되어 있는데 우리말은 재귀구문이 그렇게 다양하게 문법 화되지 않았다 한편 우리말의 재귀사는 다양한 지시적 기능을 발전시켰다. 즉 이들은 순수하게 재귀적으로 쓰이는 경우 이외에 문장 내적 혹은 문장 외적 지시사로 사용되고 있으며 부분적으로 독일어의 man과 같은 부정대명사의 기능도 가지고 있다.

• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.6 no.3
• /
• pp.245-251
• /
• 2020

From the perspectives of grammaticalization and corpus, the purpose of this study is to examine the motivation of the emergence of the split infinitives in American English and to discuss the justification of the split infinitives based on the corpus empirical data such as COHA and COCA. The formerly ungrammatical split infinitives in the form of [to + adverb + verb] are now definitely grammatical forms in Present Day English (PDE). The corpus-based data confirms the legitimacy of the split infinitives with the empirical reasons like clarifying sentences (i.e., disambiguation) or strongly focused readings. In addition, the split infinitives are natural consequences caused by the grammaticalization of an infinitival particle to and most crucially by the loss of verb movement. When verb movement to T position does not occur in infinitival clauses, the word order results in [to + AdvP + V], thus forming the split infinitives. The split infinitives are no longer a matter of discussion and will continue to increase in both formal and informal contexts as being definitely grammatical forms.

• Korean Journal of Cognitive Science
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2003

In implicit learning tasks, human participants learn grammatical letter strings better than random letter strings. After learning grammatical letter strings, participants were able to judge the grammaticality of new letter strings that they have never seen before. EPAM (Elementary Perceiver and Memorizer) IV, a rote learner without any rule abstraction mechanism, was used to simulate these results. The results showed that EPAM IV with a within-item chunking function was able to learn grammatical letter strings better than random letter strings and discriminate grammatical letter strings from non-grammatical letter strings. The success of EPAM IV in simulating human performance strongly indicated that recognition memory based on chunking plays a critical role in implicit learning.

• Journal of KIISE:Software and Applications
• /
• v.29 no.1_2
• /
• pp.126-131
• /
• 2002

The problem whether a given grammar G generates an LL language or not is investigated in respect of LL transformable grammars. The previous work involves a nondeterministic intricated parser construction for the characterization of LL transformable grammars. The method hence does not give the intuitive understanding of the essence of LL languages. This paper suggests a characterization of LL transformable grammars based on grammatical derivations instead of the complicated parser construction. The new characterization contributes to intuitive understanding of the essence of LL languages.

• Journal of KIISE:Computer Systems and Theory
• /
• v.37 no.6
• /
• pp.319-322
• /
• 2010

Extended PLR grammars are currently the largest subclass of LR grammars whose grammars are transformed into LL grammars satisfying covering property. This paper suggests a simplified covering transformation of the original covering transformation for extended PLR grammars. The proposed covering transformation reduces the original four rule types to the three rule types.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2003.04c
• /
• pp.513-515
• /
• 2003

본 논문에서는 코퍼스를 이용한 확률 의존문법 자동 생성 기술을 다룬다. 의존문법 생성을 위해 구성성분의 기능어들 간의 의존관계를 학습했던 기존 연구와는 달리. 한국어 구성성분은 내용어와 기능어의 결함 형태로 구성되고 임의 구성성룬 기능어와 임의 구성성분 내용어간의 의존관계가 의미가 있다는 사실을 반영한 의존문법 학습방법을 제안한다. KAIST의 트리 부착 코퍼스 31,086문장에서 추출한 30,600문장의 Tagged Corpus을 가지고 학습한 결과 초기문법을 64%까지 줄인 1.101 개의 의존문법을 획득했고. 실험문장 486문장을 Parsing한 결과 73.81%의 Parsing 정확도를 보였다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2001.10a
• /
• pp.507-510
• /
• 2001

본 논문에서는 코퍼스를 이용한 확률 의존문법 자동 생성 기술을 다룬다. 특히 의존 문법 생성을 위해 확률 재추정 알고리즘을 의존문법생성에 맞도록 변형하여 학습하였으며 정확한 문법 생성 및 회귀데이터(Data Sparseness)문제 해결을 위해서 구성요소의 대표 지배소들 간의 의존관계 만을 학습했던 기존 연구와는 달리 구성요소 내부의 의존관계까지 학습하는 방법을 제안한다. KAIST 의 트리 부착 코퍼스 31,086 문장에서 추출한 25,000 문장의 Tagged Corpus 을 가지고 한국어 확률 의존 문법 학습을 시도 하였다. 그 결과 초기문법을 10.97% 에서 23.73% 까지 줄인 2,349 개의 정확한 문법을 얻을 수 있었다. 문법의 정확성을 실험 하기 위해 350 개의 실험문장을 Parsing 한 결과 69.61%의 파싱 정확도를 보였다. 이로서 구성요소 내부의 의존관계 학습으로 얻어진 의존문법이 더 정확했으며, 회귀데이터 문제 또한 극복할 수 있음을 알 수 있었다.

• Cross-Cultural Studies
• /
• v.50
• /
• pp.453-482
• /
• 2018

This study is about the French preposition de. This preposition is considered to have no meaning in the French language, and to have only the grammatical function in its use. This study begins with doubts about such views regarding this preposition. We organize and classify general descriptions of the uses of this preposition. The uses are classified as 'expressing starting point,' 'giving characteristics' and 'performing grammatical functions' and this data is analyzed in terms of the associated cognitive grammar. In the case of expressing the starting point, it is assumed that the trajector moves from the starting point, to the destination point, in the domain of space and in the domain of time. Therefore, it is noted in this case that the preposition de has a dynamic concept. On the other hand, it is significant to understand that the preposition of the 'giving characteristics' defines an outline of a particular class by giving the class's characteristics. The preposition de has a static concept in this case. For the preposition de which introduces the infinitive, all of these dynamic and static concepts are faded and extremely grammaticalized.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.16 no.6
• /
• pp.283-292
• /
• 2016

This paper is intended as an investigation of 5 sentence patterns which have exerted a strong influence on the English education in Korea. The 'learning grammar', which is defined as the grammar in learning materials, was compared with 'reference grammar' derived from linguistic grammar with theoretical accuracy and validity. Although the notion of 5 sentence patterns has been assumed to be vestiges of old Japan textbooks, the classification system was originally established in 1929 by C. T. Onions. Particularly, new explanations regarding 'obligatory adjuncts' and 'marked construction' were provided in the learning materials, which could be seen as examples of the reflection of linguistic grammar theories on sentence patterns. If reference grammarbooks and the fruits of linguistic grammar research are used actively, material writers can avoid the errors of grammar description and more correct learning grammar can be taught to advanced learners.