• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.307
• /
• pp.69-69
• /
• 2016

지방계약법 시행령 개정을 통해 공사 분야의 최저가낙찰제가 과도한 가격경쟁을 유발함에 따라 300억원 이상인 공사입찰의 경우 국제표준에 맞게 시공실적, 기술능력, 시공품질 등을 종합적으로 고려하여 낙찰자를 선정하는 종합평가낙찰제로 전환하고, 지방재정 조기집행 활성화를 위하여 계약이행 대가의 지급기간을 단축했다. 또한 지방계약예규 개정을 통해 주계약자공동도급 시 주계약자가 선금 수령일로부터 5일 이내에 부계약자에게 지급토록 하였다.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• no.6 s.203
• /
• pp.44-48
• /
• 2007

건설공사 도급계약을 체결한 건설업체는 건설산업기본법 제22조 제3항에 의하여 건설공사에 관한 사항을 기재한 "건설공사대장"을 주된 영업소에 비치하도록 되어 있다. 건설공사를 도급받은 건설업자(수급인)은 건설산업지식정보시스템의 서브시스템인 건설공사정보시스템(Construction Work Information System)을 통하여 건설공사대장을 작성하고 발주자에게 그 내용을 통보할 수 있고 발주자는 그통보 내용을 확인할 수 있다. 자세한 내용은 다음과 같다.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.302
• /
• pp.82-86
• /
• 2015

정부는 건설산업기본법 일부 개정안을 지난 8월 11일 공포했다. 개정된 건산법은 앞으로 수급인이 일방적으로 하도급계약을 해제 해지하면 계약이행보증금 지급을 요청할 수 없고 하도급공사에 추가 변경사유가 발생한 경우 그 내용과 금액, 기간 등을 명시한 서면을 교부하도록 의무화했다. 한편 하자담보책임기간은 원칙적으로 법정기간으로 하되, 공사특성 등을 고려해 도급계약에서 따로 정할 수 있도록 하는 한편, 그동안 논란이 됐던 '완공일'의 개념도 '목적물의 관리 사용을 개시한 날과 준공검사를 완료한 날 중에서 먼저 도래한 날'로 명확히 규정했다. 이밖에 건설 관련 법령의 이해도 및 윤리의식 제고를 위해 신규 건설업자에 대한 교육제도를 신설하였으며, 건설 관련 공제조합 운영위원 수 상한을 확대하여 보다 많은 대표성 있는 조합원이 운영위원회에 참여할 수 있도록 했다. 개정된 건설산업기본법은 2016년 2월 12일부터 시행된다.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.243
• /
• pp.34-36
• /
• 2010

기획재정부가 모든 공사에 하도급지급확인제 실시 등 국가계약 회계예규를 개정하고 지난 9월 8일부터 시행에 들어갔다. 개정된 회계예규의 주요 내용은 $\Delta$하도급대금 지급 확인제도 도입 $\Delta$최저가낙찰제공사 PQ시 지역업체 참여도 반영 $\Delta$국가계약법 시행령 시행규칙 개정에 따른 후속 조치 등이다. 대한설비건설협회는 회원사의 원활한 하도급 공사대금의 확보와 부당한 공사대금의 수령을 막기 위해 그동안 관련 제도 마련을 관계기관에 지속적으로 건의한 결과, 기획재정부가 회계예규를 개정하여 국가기관이 발주하는 모든 공공공사에서 원도급자의 하도급대금 지급내역 및 하도급자의 하도급 대금 수령내역을 발주기관 및 공사감독관이 직접 대조·확인토록 하는 하도급대금지급 확인제도를 도입한 것이다. 이 제도의 도입으로 앞으로 발주기관이 원도급자의 하도급공사대금의 공정한 지급여부를 직접 확인함으로써 하도급자의 공사대금 적기수령에 도움이 될 것으로 기대된다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• v.2
• /
• pp.21-26
• /
• 2006

A contract for shipbuilding is usually a complicated process and involves a statement of rights, and obligations and responsibilities to which each party agrees vis-a vis the other. Most countries are now well settled with regard to liability of a manufacturer in tort for physical injury and on the other hand, for pure economic loss to remote owners of chattels. Where there is a breach of either contractual warranty or an implied warranty, there may be admiralty jurisdiction, depending once again on the situs of the event and its relationship to traditional maritime activity. First of all, this thesis deals with the contents of contract under English Law. Secondly, this thesis analyse ' s the liability of shipbuilders in Products Liability under English, United States, German and korean Law comparisons. In conclusion, the author gives some suggestions as countermeasures to Products Liability for the shipbuilders in Korea.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.23 no.1
• /
• pp.16-27
• /
• 2022

This study analyzed both the legal system regarding fair trade and the types of unfair trade in the construction industry. Then, it derived the factors with which to evaluate the level of fairness. These factors were classified by each type of participant in the construction industry, such as general contractors and subcontractors, and each construction stage, such as bidding, contracting, and construction. The perceived fairness level of factors was analyzed using a survey of 238 employees of general contractors and subcontractors. Next, the study developed a fairness index for the construction industry. The index showed that subcontractors perceived the level of fairness more negatively than general contractors, but both perceived the construction stage of the industry as having the lowest level of fairness. General contractors perceived the bidding and contracting stages as having the highest fairness levels, and subcontractors perceived the contracting stage as having the highest level of fairness. The developed fairness index identified the evaluation factors that need improvement and the fairness level perceived by each type of participant at each stage of construction. The results of this study can contribute to establishing measures that improve the level of fairness in the construction industry.

• Korean Architects
• /
• no.3 s.156
• /
• pp.82-84
• /
• 1982

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.9 no.5
• /
• pp.103-110
• /
• 2009

A construction project consists of a variety of contracts for the completion of work. The large number of contracts involved in a single project increases the likelihood that disputes will arise between the parties involved regarding the terms of service. Actually, there are many disputes that are caused by a change 0 order. While such disputes should be settled by interpreting the terms stipulated in the agreement entered between the two parties, the process of dispute settlement is often restricted to arbitration and lawsuit, and as a result the parties tend to avoid it due to its inefficiency. For this reason, in Korea it is hard to find cases of interpreting terms of service, while in the U.S. it is easy to find diverse cases of interpreting terms of service, since there is a process of dispute settlement by each stage by the party who has placed an order. Therefore, this study presents analysis of case studies of contract changes, looking specifically at changes in the scope of the work, changes in quantity, changes in the period of implementation, changes in the method of implementation or attitude, changes in items provided by the government or the delivery place, and the acceptance of such change procedure by a contractor, and the adjustment of a reduction.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.143-163
• /
• 2018

Implant procedure belongs to so called a commercialized medical treatment, its procedure is simple and clear, and the possibility of success is almost 100%. In addition, it is a selective method rather than an inevitable method for a patient's health, so the importance of liability for explanation is especially emphasized for protection of autonomous decisions by patients. Considering these characteristics, the plaintiff in the relevant case said that the contract of implant procedure has the characteristic of subcontract, and only the failure of implant itself and the violation of liability for explanation should be the defendant's fault liability. In addition, although the above procedure contract is considered as delegation rather than subcontract, whether it's the defendant's malpractice should be judged by general people's common sense rather than average people in the industry. Therefore, if all the implanted teeth were removed due to bleeding and pains, and the patient suffered from dysaesthesia during the process, the defendant's malpractice is fully proved. When the judgements of implant medical malpractice were researched, the court doesn't consider implant contract as subcontract, but it judges dentist's malpractice by whether the implant itself is successful, so it seems that the court acknowledges similar characteristics with subcontract whose purpose is completion of work to some degree. In addition, considering the detailed contents of presented medical malpractices, it seems that judging medical malpractice is based on the common sense of general people. Therefore, the argument of the plaintiff is valid when the fact the adjustment amount is relevant to the amount that the plaintiff initially claimed is considered even though the relevant case was decided to be compulsory mediation.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.265
• /
• pp.36-37
• /
• 2012

기획재정부는 불공정하도급거래로 과징금을 부과받거나 하도급법을 상습적으로 위반한 자의 경우 공공공사 PQ입찰 시 최고 7점의 감점(종전 3점)을 부과하는 등 건설 하도급사 보호를 위해 계약예규를 개정했다. 이번 계약예규 개정은 대한설비건설협회가 건설산업 공생발전위원회와 동반성장위원회에 참여하면서 회원사의 권리보호를 위하여 건설공사 불공정하도급 거래 방지 제도개선을 지속적으로 추진한 결과이다.