• Proceedings of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute Conference
• /
• 2010.04a
• /
• pp.243-246
• /
• 2010

본 연구에서는 초고층 건물의 구조시스템에 대한 다양한 대안으로부터 각 대안의 성능을 합리적으로 평가하는 방법을 연구하였다. 이를 위해 우선, 대안평가를 위한 평가항목과 각 평가항목별 평가기준을 도출하고, 도출된 기준에 따라 평가결과를 산정하는 방법을 제안하였다. 그리고 평가항목간의 관계와 평가항목의 중요도를 산정하고, 퍼지적분을 이용하여 평가결과를 종합화하는 방안을 제안하였다. 평가항목은 크게 세가지로 이에는 구조성능, 경제성, 공기가 있다. 대안에 대한 평가는 예비평가, 본평가, 실시평가의 세 단계로 이루어지며, 각각 보수적인 관점에서와 낙관적인 관점에서의 평가를 실시하고 주어진 평가결과를 바탕으로 최종적으로는 엔지니어가 대안을 선정하는 방향으로 평가를 진행한다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Concrete Institute Conference
• /
• 2008.04a
• /
• pp.965-968
• /
• 2008

This study is interested in modeling the selection of optimal repair materials in view of the qualitative evaluation. In order to architecting the evaluation model of various repair alternatives, Analytical hierarchy process techniques was applied to this study. It is composed of aesthetics, easy-to-application, economical efficiency, and environment-friendly properties in upper level. Among the qualitative evaluation items, Environment-friendly properties and execution cost included in economical efficiency is highly weighted. It was concluded that the evaluation model by this study is very useful to choose the best alternative among various repair materials.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.52-62
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to develope an assessment method for parking lot remodeling alternative by adopting the asset management technique. In order to identify the Level of Service(LOS) and the Evaluation Measurement(EM), literatures was implemented which documented the consideration of parking lot plan, needs of the apartments' tenant, and various design standards. In addition, the authors conducted a three-time delphi survey for the identified 5 LOS and 19 EM to evaluate suitability and necessity of them and to collect additional opinion of experts. The LOS of parking lot were categorized into 5 areas such as Environmental effect and Convenience, Accessibility and so on. The 19 EM were determined to estimate the LOS quantitatively. The researchers analyzed the degree of importance of LOS and EM by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. But construction cost was excepted from the analysis, because it is used as an independent variable in alternative assessment. In conclusion, the authors proposed the estimation criteria for EM, and the method and process for alternative assessment be performed to benefit-cost analysis using the LOS variation and construction cost. The assessment method for parking lot remodeling alternative was demonstrated effective to assess the parking lot remodeling alternative by case-study. This study has a academic significance by adopting the asset management techniques in the area of the parking lot remodeling. And the assessment method is expected to help deciding a reasonable remodeling alternative of parking lot, as it ensures the diversity for remodeling of the parking lot and reflects the needs of the occupant.

• Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.425-434
• /
• 2010

This study presents the alternative evaluation technique for the high-rise building structural system. The alternative evaluation of the structural system is performed in three steps, that is, preliminary evaluation, main evaluation and detailed evaluation. The evaluation categories are composed of structural performance, economic feasibility and term of work. Each categories are composed of detailed items to evaluate of its own. In preliminary evaluation, qualitative evaluation based on experimental knowledge is performed. In main and detailed evaluations, quantitative evaluations based on numeric data are performed. The weighted-sum method is applied to integrate the evaluated results of each items and its importance. The applicability of the proposed method was verified by applying it to the practical buildings and simulate the procedures.

• 한국방재학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2008.02a
• /
• pp.703-706
• /
• 2008

Structural flood defensive alternatives have been evaluated based on economic feasibility, riskiness of safety and sustainability. Social problems associated with structural flood defensive alternatives such as dams, flood control channels, etc. are currently issued. The evaluation items of policy presented in KDI(2001) are should be modified in order to resolve the social problems. Hence, this study conducted a questionnaire survey of public servants, researchers, and engineers to obtain how to determine evaluation items for policy assessment and to compute their weights in the analytic hierarchy process. This study also compared the weights of the items in KDI(2000) with the weights from the survey in this study. The policy assessment weight was estimated higher than KDI(2000). This result suggests that social awareness increases and the analysis of policy becomes important for selecting optimal structural defensive alternatives.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation
• /
• v.9 no.3
• /
• pp.117-126
• /
• 2009

Various dimensions of watershed structural/non-structural planning can be applied in comprehensive flood mitigation plan in a river basin. Especially structural counterplans have very broad and diverse nature as flood control facilities. It is not easy to find the optimum alternative to maximize the ability of a basin to reduce flood risk using a combination of structural counterplans. In addition, there is no standard for evaluating the performance of structural counterplans and for selecting optimal combination of them. This study focused on how to select the best alternative of a comprehensive watershed structural plan from various flood defense alternative candidates. By introducing an analytic hierarchy process, we would like to show how we decide the best alternative using standard worksheets developed in this study for economics and policy evaluation, and Expert Choice 11.5, which calculates weights for evaluation items. Based on the results from this study, we would like to suggest the best practice of a standardized watershed plan for flood protection.

• Proceedings of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute Conference
• /
• 2011.04a
• /
• pp.22-25
• /
• 2011

본 연구에서는 경제성에 기반한 초고층건물 구조시스템의 대안평가 방안에 대하여 연구하였다. 초고층건물 구조시스템의 대안평가 항목은 크게 구조성능, 경제성, 공기의 세 가지로 나눌 수 있다. 일반적으로 구조성능은 주어진 기준의 만족여부로 평가하며, 최종적으로는 경제성이 평가에 결정적인 영향을 미치게 된다. 본 연구에서는 구조성능을 만족하는 대안에 대하여 공기를 비용으로 환산하고, 최종적으로는 물량에 의한 비용과 공기에서 환산된 비용을 합산하여 대안을 평가하는 방안을 제안하였다. 공기의 비용화는 공기의 비용연동지수를 구하고 이로부터 공기의 대체경제성비용을 산정하는 방법으로 고려하였다. 제안된 대안평가 과정은 수많은 대안을 짧은 시간에 평가할 수 있도록 전산시스템 구현가능성을 염두에 두고 구축하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2005.05b
• /
• pp.275-279
• /
• 2005

수자원 개발에 있어 중요한 문제 중의 하나는 개발가능지의 선택과 후보지가 복수일 때 개발 우선순위를 결정하는 것이라 할 수 있다. 이러한 문제 해결을 위하여 적지분석을 실시한다. 적지분석 과정은 크게 기초 조사 및 자료수집, 예비후보지의 선정, 대안평가, 입지선정의 :t단계로 구분되는데 여기서 2-3단계인 예비후보지 선정과 대안평가 단계가 적지분석 기법이 적용되어야 할 과정이다. 기존의 의사결정 방법론들은 각 대안의 우선순위를 위해 각 항목들에 대한 가중치나 확률치를 이용한 수치적 계산에 의한 방법들이 대부분이며, 또한, 각 후보지에 대해서 동일한 항목에 대한 정보를 요구하게 되어 한 후보지이라도 정보가 없는 경우 우선순위를 위한 계산과정에서 제외하거나 결정자의 경험 등에 의한 추정 값을 사용할 수밖에 없다. 이러한 이유로 본 연구에서는 입지선정에서 대상 후보지의 인자비교를 위한 항목의 자료 유무에 관계없이 적지분석이 가능하도록 게임이론을 적용하여 수자원 개발 가능 후보지를 도출하기 위한 기본모형을 개발하였다.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.13 no.6
• /
• pp.585-593
• /
• 2013

For a successful construction project, systematic and objective decision-making is a prerequisite from the planning and designing stages. However, previous LCC analysis methods have focused only on simple cost savings and the accompanying economic efficacy while missing the environmental aspects of a structure. Although recently, a new approach of integrated $CO_2$ analysis has been introduced, which is more advanced than the existing simple LCC methods, it is difficult to collect all of the data necessary for each evaluation item since the product-specific cost is not presented under the LCC. In this research, cost evaluation items were selected by relatively high weights and items with heavy influence over a decision-making process in order to suggest an LCC-LCA integrated analysis model that is useful in comprehensively assessing the economic cost and environmental cost throughout the whole life cycle of a structure. The developed LCC-LCA integrated analysis model was applied to actual practices and compared with previous methods to test the model's effectiveness.

• Journal of Wetlands Research
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.71-80
• /
• 2009

Due to the various characteristics of urban river, rehabilitation project for natural river requires distinct alternative approach and selection method for each different types of river. In this study, naturalness of a river was used to establish such alternative for the business and rehabilitation plan for natural river. To assess the naturalness of a river, through AHP, designed to fit the environmental conditions in Korea, was employed. Furthermore, a method that conveniently compares and selects an alternative for rehabilitation plan for natural river by referencing Urban River Basin Enhancement Methods (URBEM) was proposed. After selecting the evaluation items for assessing the naturalness of the river based on the characteristics of the river, multiple alternatives were constructed and the naturalness of river for each of those alternatives were estimated. Comparing the estimated values has made the measurement of the natural recovery effect and the product of river rehabilitation plan for each alternative efficient. In conclusion, selecting the items for evaluating the naturalness of a river with respect to its characteristics was found to be effective for establishing the rehabilitation plan for natural river.