• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.35 no.3
• /
• pp.509-521
• /
• 2015

Argumentation is a social and collaborative dialogic process. A large number of researchers have focused on analyzing the structure of students' argumentation occurring in the scientific inquiry context, using the Toulmin's model of argument. Since SSI dialogic argumentation often presents distinctive features (e.g. interdisciplinary, controversial, value-laden, etc.), Toulmin's model would not fit into the context. Therefore, we attempted to develop an analytical framework for SSI dialogic argumentation by addressing the concepts of 'discourse clusters' and 'discourse schemes.' Discourse clusters indicated a series of utterances created for a similar dialogical purpose in the SSI contexts. Discourse schemes denoted meaningful discourse units that well represented the features of SSI reasoning. In this study, we presented six types of discourse clusters and 19 discourse schemes. We applied the framework to the data of students' group discourse on SSIs (e.g. euthanasia, nuclear energy, etc.) in order to verify its validity and applicability. The results indicate that the framework well explained the overall flow, dynamics, and features of students' discourse on SSI.

• Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• v.64 no.5
• /
• pp.291-303
• /
• 2020

This study aimed to explore the patterns of college students' dialogic argumentation in the context of nanotechnology issues, and to compare these patterns based on their idiocentrism and allocentrism. Nanotechnology represents the characteristics of socioscientific issues in that it is widely used in various fields, but at the same time, it includes the likelihood of negative effects. 33 college students who enrolled in science-related course participated in this study. Participants were divided into idiocentric groups and allocentric groups based on the INDCOL scores, and they participated in group discussions on nanotechnology. All discussions were audiotaped and analyzed using the framework of discourse clusters and schemes. Results showed that participating students engaged in dialogic argumentation with the process of exchanging of individual perspectives, exploration of different perspectives, and coordination and negotiation; specifically, they spent most of their time in exploring different values and perspectives regarding nanotechnology. Results also indicated the differences in discourse clusters and discourse schemes between idiocentric and allocentric groups. Allocentric groups more often negotiated to settle on a group decision than idiocentric groups did, and discourse schemes in their negotiation process were slightly different from the ones in idiocentric groups.

• Cross-Cultural Studies
• /
• v.45
• /
• pp.381-431
• /
• 2016

This paper deals with Slavic discourse deixis comparing Russian, Polish, Czech and Bulgarian demonstrative and personal pronouns. In general, the Slavic proximal pronouns have precedence over the distal ones. Proximal pronouns, such as Russian eto, Polish to, and Bulgarian tova, are employed more frequently and widely than their distal counterparts to, tamto and onova. The distance-neutral pronoun to in Modern Czech was also a proximal pronoun in the past. These Slavic proximal and former-proximal pronouns function as a discourse deixis marker, whereas, in most other languages, the discourse deixis is mainly a function of distal or non-proximal demonstrative pronouns. However, the Russian, Polish, Czech, and Bulgarian discourse deixis differs in distal demonstrative and personal pronouns. In general, the Polish and Czech discourse deixis does not employ the distal demonstrative pronoun tamto or the personal pronoun ono. The Russian distal demonstrative pronoun to is actively used as a discourse deixis marker, and the personal pronoun ono can also be used to refer to the preceding discourse, though it is not frequent. In Bulgarian the distal demonstrative pronoun onova is rarely used to refer to a discourse, but the personal pronoun to frequently indicates a discourse that is repeatedly referred to in a text. The discourse deixis, which is a peripheral deixis and can be both deixis and anaphora, reveals different characteristics in different Slavic languages. In Russian, where all of the proximal, distal, and personal pronouns function as a discourse deixis marker, the deixis itself plays a crucial role in distinguishing these three pronouns from each other, revealing the speaker's psychological, emotional, temporal, and cognitive proximity to or distance from a given discourse. In Bulgarian, the most analytic Slavic language, the personal pronoun is used more as a discourse deixis marker to reveal the highest givenness of a discourse, and it seems that Bulgarian discourse deixis is more anaphoric than the other Slavic discourse deixis is.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.33 no.1
• /
• pp.181-192
• /
• 2013

This study aims to explore scientific reasoning that students and their teachers constructed in elementary science classroom discourses in terms of basic reasoning types; deduction, induction, and abduction. For this research, data were collected from 13 classes of 4th grade science activities during a period of three months and analyzed three types of scientific reasoning in elementary school science discourses. We found that deduction (one discourse segment), induction (one discourse segment), and deduction-abduction (two discourse segments) were presented in the discourses. They showed that: first, scientific reasoning proceeded explicitly or implicitly in elementary science discourses; second, the students and their teachers have potentials to increase the quality of reasoning depending on their inter-subjectivity; and last, the students' background knowledge were very important in the development of their reasoning. Implication and remarks on science education and research were presented based on this results as well.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.36 no.4
• /
• pp.487-509
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study is to analyze classroom discourse in the math classroom of middle school in China, which has a unique math classroom background of entrance examination for high school. To this end, this study analyzed teacher question statistics and episodes by teacher question type as starting speech in mathematics classroom discourse, and five IRF subtypes were especially identified by class discourse structure analysis. The data were analyzed focusing on a total of 15 transcripts of math classes recorded by three math teachers at H School in Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China, and written interviews of teachers. According to the results of this study, an average of 20 teacher questions were observed for each class, and the teacher question type was classified into confirmation question (understanding confirmation question, explanation request question, and double check question) and information question (information presentation question). In addition, according to classroom discourse analysis, the IRF discourse structure was divided into fragmentary evaluation, evaluation+reason, evidence of explanation, evaluation+student response re-statement, guidance on other thoughts or solutions, and student answer correction or teacher opinion presentation.

• Proceedings of the Acoustical Society of Korea Conference
• /
• 1998.08a
• /
• pp.419-424
• /
• 1998

담화 구조를 파악하기 위한 대표적인 방법으로 Litman과 Allen 의 계획 기법에 의한 것과 RDTN을 이용한 것을 들 수 있다. 그 중에서도 RDTN을 이용하여 대화의 흐름을 파악하려는 시도는 간단하며, 결정적이라는 장점이 있는 반면에 몇 가지 단점도 가지고 있다. RETN을 이용한 대화 분석의 가장 큰 단점은 정확히 분석된 화행을 입력으로 사용한다는 것이다. 즉, 현 상태에서 다음 상태로의 전이에 정의된 화행 이외의 화행이 입력으로 사용되면 분석을 실패하게 된다. 또 하나의 단점은 RDTN 이 어느정도 영역에 의존적인 특성을 보인다는 것이다. 본 논문에서는 이러한 확장성에 대한 문제점을 해결하고, 화행 분석의 어려움을 덜기 위해 신경망을 이용한 새로운 대화 전이망을 제안한다. 제안된 대화 전이 신경망은 지역적 대화 전이 신경망과 전역적 대화 전이 신경망은 이전의 두 발화와 현재 발화와의 관계를 살펴서 현재 발화가 이전 대화의 연속인지, 새로운 대화이 시작인지, 아니면 부대화의 시작인지를 결정하는 역할은 한다.전역적 대화전이 신경망은 담화 스택과의 상호 작용을 통해 담화의 전체구조를 살피고,전체 담화 구조에서 현재 발화가 어떤 역할을 하는지를 결정한다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Society of Elementary Mathematics Education
• /
• 2010.08a
• /
• pp.13-34
• /
• 2010

수학적 의사소통이 학습과정에서 뿐만 아니라 수학교육의 목표로 강조되고 있으나 실질적으로 초등학교에서 수학적 의사소통 수업에 대한 구체적인 지도방법이나 수업 사례 분석 등의 연구가 미흡한 실정이다. 이에 본 논문에서는 수학적 의사소통 중에서 담화 중심형 의사소통 수업의 성취 요소와 목표를 고려하여 2 4 6학년 수학 수업을 실시한 후, 수업에서 나타난 교사와 학생 간의 상호작용을 분석하였다. 담화 중심 수업을 실시한 세 교실에서 나타나는 공통점과 차이점을 분석하여 수학수업에서 담화 중심의 수학수업 구현에 관한 시사점과 논의거리를 제공하고자 한다.

• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2010.10a
• /
• pp.147-151
• /
• 2010

본 연구는 대화 시스템에서 처리되는 사용자 발화의 의도 분석 기법과 담화 정보를 사용하여 음성 인식 결과로서의 인식 후보 문장들을 재순위하는 방법을 제안한다. 담화 정보는 사용자 발화의 의도 분석에 매우 중요한 자질로 사용되고 있기 때문에 음성 인식 결과들의 후보를 선택하는 문제에서도 담화 정보는 매우 중요한 자질로 사용될 수 있다. 음성 인식 결과의 후보 문장들을 모두 의도 분석 과정을 거치고 각각의 후보 의도들과 이전 담화 정보의 연관성을 이용하여 음성 인식 결과를 재순위화 한다. 실험을 통하여 재순위 과정을 수행한 결과 1순위 음성 인식 결과는 재순위 과정을 거치지 않는 결과에 비해 7.08%의 오류 감소율을 보였다.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.25 no.4
• /
• pp.525-547
• /
• 2015

This study analyzed the written texts of textbook and the teacher's discourse explaining 'the relationship between quadratic functions and quadratic equations' in the 9th grade high school mathematics class. Data consisted of the lecture recordings and the textbooks were analyzed based on the Halliday's systemic functional linguistics. According to the results, the written texts of the textbook used lexico-grammatical strategies such as generalization using hyponomy of meanings, mathematical objectification through nominalization and materialization of meaning through change in themes to compose mathematical concepts. The textbook generalized from an example in the description of formulating mathematical concepts, and in this process the organizational interactions of discourse-semantic level and lexico-grammartical level appeared. On the other hand, the teacher's doscourse appeared the change in transitivity and the addition of the reasons and the process. Also the teacher used explanation process of formulating the relationship between quadratic functions and quadratic equations. The linguistic characteristics of the teacher were linguistic implication and omission of lexemes due to contextual ommission. And there was no use of structural lexico-grammatical resources that influence the discourse-semantic level. This results provide a new framework for analyzing mathematical discourse, and suggest the lexico-grammatical strategies that can be used to explain mathematical concepts by teachers in math classrooms.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.30 no.6
• /
• pp.815-835
• /
• 2010

This study aimed at understanding the characteristics of interactive discourses between docents and visitors in natural history museums. Two docents participated in this study. One worked in Seodaemoon Natural History Museum and the other in Gwacheon National Science Museum. To analyze the characteristics of interactive discourses, especially understanding the mediation of visitors' learning, Pedagogic Discourse Analysis method was adopted. The results show two contrasting types of interactive discourses, Encouraging Visitors' Meaningful Participation (EVMP) and Encouraging Visitors' Simple Participation (EVSP). In the EVMP discourse, structural cohesion is strong in thematic flow and information flow. Docent and visitors share the role of information provider and "Themes" are developed through the interactions between the docent and the visitors. On the contrary, in the EVSP discourse, structural cohesions are weak. Even though the visitors participate in the discourse, their discourse scarcely contribute to develop "Themes" in the discourse. Most of the information is developed and expanded by the docent. These results helped us to suggest that docents have to understand and use visitors' prior knowledge as a discourse "Theme." It is also suggested that docents need to have not only the competent content knowledge about exhibitions but also the capability to lead discourses that allow the visitors to participate meaningfully during the education processes.