• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2019.10a
• /
• pp.54-59
• /
• 2019

본 논문은 대화 시스템인 챗봇의 성능 향상을 위한 생략 복원 기술의 정확률을 올리기 위한 유효 발화문 인식 모델을 제안한다. 생략 복원 기술은 챗봇 사용자의 현재 발화문의 생략된 정보를 이전 발화문으로부터 복원하는 기술이다. 유효 발화문 인식 모델은 현재 발화문의 생략된 정보를 보유한 이전 발화문을 인식하는 역할을 수행한다. 유효 발화문 인식 모델은 BERT 기반 이진 분류 모델이며, 사용된 BERT 모델은 한국어 문서를 기반으로 새로 학습된 한국어 사전 학습 BERT 모델이다. 사용자의 현재 발화문과 이전 발화문들의 토큰 임베딩을 한국어 BERT를 통해 얻고, CNN 모델을 이용하여 각 토큰의 지역적인 정보를 추출해서 발화문 쌍의 표현 정보를 구해 해당 이전 발화문에 생략된 개체값이 있는지를 판단한다. 제안한 모델의 효과를 검증하기 위해 유효 발화문 인식 모델에서 유효하다고 판단한 이전 발화문만을 생략 복원 모델에 적용한 결과, 생략 복원 모델의 정확률이 약 5% 정도 상승한 것을 확인하였다.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.187-197
• /
• 2013

Public research institutes in Korea have been criticized for attaching great importance to developing new technologies than actively moving them to the industry. Despite the various effort to enhance the technology transfer and commercialization by Korean government and government-funded research institutes, the gap between R&D outcome and real world application does not seem to be reduced. In this context,this study investigates a successful case of TT by a research institute. The aim of this study is to draw the factors of successful and TT which may be applied to other government funded research institute. The finding suggest marketability of technology, commercialization-oriented attitude, technology complementary assets and technological absorption capacity, matching of goals between the partenars and finally the timely utilization of public support program of commercialization are important factors.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.20 no.3
• /
• pp.664-683
• /
• 2017

The technology transfers from public institutions have positioned themselves as knowledge conduits for stimulating firms' capabilities under 'catching-up' economy paradigm. While this view is still relevant, the policy for public technology needs to be extended to a more marketoriented way. This study explores how public technology affects the financial performance of demanding companies by comparing the revenues and profits of 'technology commercialised group (TC)' and 'in-house research group (InR)'. The estimation results by hierarchy regression suggest that the size and the patents of TC firms have a more influential impact than InR group, although the ratio of maintaining research staff was reported an inverse relation. The contribution to the operating profit seems to be indifferent between the groups. The positive impact of public technology over the firm's performance is highly related to the technology commercialisation capability, signalling that the aim of technology transfer needs to gear toward the enhancement of commercialising capabilities rather than the promotion of technology transactions.

• Knowledge Management Research
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.105-121
• /
• 2020

With regard to the development of new drugs, what is most important for a Korean Biotech, where no global sales network has been established, is decision-making related to out-licensing of new drugs. The probability of success for each clinical phase is different, and the licensing amount and its royalty vary depending on which clinical phase the licensing contract is made. Due to the nature of such a licensing contract and Biotech's weak financial status, it is a very important decision-making issue for a Biotech to determine when to license out to a Big Pharma. This study defined a model called 'optimal timing for out-licensing of new drugs' and the results were derived from the decision tree analysis. As a case study, we applied to a Biotech in Korea, which is conducting FDA global clinical trials for a first-in-class new drug. Assuming that the market size and expected market penetration rate of the target disease are known, it has been shown that out-licensing after phase 1 or phase 2 of clinical trials is a best alternative that maximizes Biotech's profits. This study can provide a conceptual framework for the use of management science methodologies in pharmaceutical fields, thus laying the foundation for knowledge and research on out-licensing of new drugs.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.16 no.8
• /
• pp.624-639
• /
• 2016

Among various types of public research institutes (PRI), the government-funded research institutes (GRIs) are having a difficult time in enhancing the efficiency of technology transfer. This study specifically analyzed 1,163 projects conducted by GRIs from 2009~2013 to ascertain the determinants that affect technology transfer process. Along with conducting qualitative analysis on relevant researches, we examined the hypotheses by relying on quantitative analysis, using national R&D data from National Science and Technology Information Service (NTIS). As a result of the analysis, we found that whether or not the project generated applied patent, the royalty varied. Also, depending on different R&D development stage, a number of researchers and the amount of R&D funding, the royalty varied. Finally, we derived that out of all the independent variables, a number of applied patents, a number of researchers and the amount of R&D funds can affect the royalty generated from technology transfer. Based on such results we suggest several policy implications.

• Information and Communications Magazine
• /
• v.34 no.1
• /
• pp.16-24
• /
• 2016

기술사업화는 R&D의 결과물인 기술에 내재된 잠재가치를 실현하는 과정이다. 따라서 R&D기획부터 기술개발, 기술이전, 상용화에 이르는 기술성장의 전 과정을 포괄하며, 각 과정은 다양한 경제주체들의 참여와 이들 간의 상호작용으로 이루어진다. 본고에서는 먼저 기술사업화의 개념과 중요성을 살펴보고, 이어 본론에서 R&D성과의 기술이전 사업화 촉진과 관련한 정책 동향과 현황, 기술사업화 과정 및 유형, 그리고 공공연구기관에서 개발한 기술이 사업화 되는 주요 경로인 기술이전과 기술창업 등에 대해 살펴본다. 아울러 공공R&D 성과의 사업화와 관련하여 그 중요성이 부각되고 있는 중소기업 지원 이슈를 소개하고 기술사업화 활성화 및 성공을 위한 전제조건으로서 필요한 몇 가지 제언을 제시한다.

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.10 s.128
• /
• pp.34-41
• /
• 1989

프랑스가 제안하는 효율적인 기술이전계획은 점진적인 과정이다. 시작단계에서는 프랑스에서 제공하는 잠수함의 정비유지에만 제한 적용되며, 정비 엔지니어와 기술자들이 계획된 방법으로 잠수함의 개념과 기술에 관한 지식을 획득할수 있을 것이다. 목표는 현지 조선소가 잠수함의 창정비(overhaul)를 능숙히 수행할 수 있도록 하는 것이다. 또한 기술이전은 자국내 잠수함 건조의 경우 3단계에 걸쳐 수행된다(p.39 참조)

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.444-475
• /
• 2013

This study explores the trajectories of institutionalization for technology transfer both in the U.S. and Korea, particularly focusing on two universities: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), and the University of California (UC). By comparing the diverging paths of the two universities in setting up institutions, this paper examines the limits of and lessons for technology transfer policies both to Korean government and universities in Korea. The University of California was involved in designing rules and codes, on one hand, to stimulate its members' engagements with technology transfer activity and, on the other hand, to keep its academic integrity since, no later than, the 1960s. The efforts and consequences range from its rules of patenting system to its codes of conducts. Through making rules formal and resolving conflicts on technology transfer activity, the U.S., and the University of California have decreased uncertainties for its members' engagements with industries. By contrast, KAIST has not built up such range of rules or codes due to its shorter experience and its constraining legal contexts. Korea introduced the legal format of the US Bayh-Dole Act in 2002, and its central government has led the initiatives for technology transfer, not allowing much latitude for its universities. This study implies a set of policy recommendations to the Korean government and KAIST: to build entrepreneurial universities, the government should give greater latitude to universities, so universities should be more rigorously engaged in developing their own rules and routines; the government, rather, should focus on providing bridging R&D funds like the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR), so researchers could draw on resources to move their basic research into next phases; KAIST would be better to promote its members to engage with industries, and introduce conduct codes that allow its academics to engage in industrial activity, rather than building up its commercialization facilities.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.18 no.1
• /
• pp.28-48
• /
• 2015

This study is public R & D institutions report to verify what the impact factors on the course of progress of industrialization based on technology companies who previously received prior to the developed technology, what policies and plans for the next requirements based on this by offering the implications for business rate was to contribute to the improvement of the public research institution technology transfer. In this study, the influence factors on technology commercialization derived through the analysis of existing and previous studies, the characteristics of the previously received corporate environmental characteristics and previous technologies through a survey of the company received a technology transfer from public research institutions commercialization decisions and contributions, including sales and commercialization of the results were analyzed by logistic regression analysis demonstrated how to have relevance. Analysis, and linkage with high production company has an existing case of IT technology transfer, commercialization of higher technical success rate was higher compatibility. On the other hand, were observed and expected success rate were higher when a rather commercialized technologies independently be earlier than if participating in joint research in the development of the technology, unlike previously, completeness of the prior art did not significantly affect. This study has the following policy implications. Public research institutions have developed technologies are commercialized to figure out what the requirements of the technical aspects of consumer technologies in order to create economic wealth. And for technology commercialization for enough technical competencies to absorb the technology, and that the technology and considering the link between business and technology commercialization success to be applied. This study has some limitations. First, the sample size was not sufficient. In relation to the presence and participation of corporate success and commercialization of the R & D process, with many previous studies are needed more in-depth analysis by leading research in the sense that different results are obtained. Also did not reflect the will or the corporate culture, management and organizational skills and belongs to the external environment and internal corporate enterprises industry characteristics affecting the success of corporate management of the business. And lacked sufficient consideration of the various technical characteristics present in the form of joint research and industry. Finally, there is a limit of generalizations about other industries.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.11 no.8
• /
• pp.2758-2765
• /
• 2010

A technology transfer from public research centers or national universities to a company is an increasing phenomenon. The purpose of this study is thus to identify the major evaluation criteria of technology transfer from a company viewpoint and establish the importance weights of criteria through 2 level AHP analysis. First, 12 critical elements are extracted from previous studies and professional interview and these elements are tied into 4 factors; technological factor, organizational factor, environmental factor, and strategic factor. The results of AHP analysis show that strategic factor is more important and 'the growth of the technology' in the strategic factor is the most important element. This study will be used usefully when researchers in public research centers or national universities try to develop a technology considering a technology transfer to the other company.