• Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society Conference
• /
• 1998.05b
• /
• pp.988-993
• /
• 1998

본 연구의 목적은 플루토늄 이용 국제환경을 조사·분석하여 우리나라의 플루토늄 이용 환경조성에 기여하는데 있다. 플루토늄 이용 국제환경에 영향을 푸는 것으로는 크게 핵비확산 체제, 플루토늄 이용에 대한 부정적 시각, 그리고 미국의 핵비확산 정책을 들 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 플루토늄 이용 환경을 이러한 세 요소에 입각해서 분석하였으며, 향후 플루토늄 이용에는 현재보다 더욱 엄격한 국제적 통제가 수반될 것으로 평가된다.

• Journal of International Area Studies (JIAS)
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.161-202
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to analyze the ex-post evaluation reports of KOICA's grant aid project in terms of criteria, methods, and contents. To this end, we will examine the evaluation history and process with particular reference to EDCF and KOICA. Our key research questions are: 1) How are the evaluation standards of the OECD DAC reflected in the KOICA ex-post evaluation reports? 2) Whether did Korea's practices of development evaluation change after its entry into the OECD DAC. The paper attempted an content analysis on the key words used in findings and recommendation section of the reports since 1998 that ara available on the website of KOICA. The main results can be summarized as follows. First, the frequency of OECD DAC criteria(relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, sustainability) and the use of quantitative methods have been increasing after joining the OECD DAC. Second, in the ex-post evaluation reports issued after 2010, the reference indices including the Project Design Matrix (PDM), baseline data, and performance have increased exponentially.

• 한국경영정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.300-305
• /
• 2007

재무성과와 지식자산을 함께 관리할 수 있는 통합적 성과평가 방법을 도입함으로써 미래 기업가치를 제고시킬 수 있는 필요성이 증가하고 있다. 국제적인 추세에 발맞추어 본 연구의 목적은 지식자산 평가에 대한 기존 연구와 Kaplan & Norton이 주창(1992)한 균형잡힌 성과기록표(Balanced Score Card : BSC)를 이용하여 지식자산 평가 지표 개발과 이러한 평가를 위해 Saaty가 개발한(1980) 계층적 분석과정(Analytic Hierarchy Process : AHP)방법론을 적용한 평가모델을 제시하고, 국내 A은행을 대상으로 지점을 평가하는 연구를 수행하였다.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.15 no.12
• /
• pp.7012-7017
• /
• 2014

The process of international technical cooperation is quite complex. If the complexity is reduced and mirrored as a simple model, it could be of great assistance to government agencies and staff to support international technical cooperation. The purpose of this paper was to develop the underlying process model in international technical cooperation in the evaluation phase. The paper provides in the second chapter the theoretical background for developing a process model. In the third chapter, the features and the practical model of the evaluation phase are presented. Chapter four presents a case with substantial empirical analysis of the development model. EU FP7th as a case study was examined in the hindsight of international technical cooperation in the evaluation process. The concluding, chapter five, presents the limitations and future research directions. The results show that a new phase can be analyzed on the level of the evaluation step. The limitation of this study was that the empirical study consists of a single case study only. In the future, it will be necessary to study the sub stages of other steps in international technological cooperation.

• Review of KIISC
• /
• v.10 no.3
• /
• pp.49-62
• /
• 2000

인터넷을 통한 기업간(B2B) 전자거래 시장규모가 올해 17조원대에 이르고 기업과 소비자간(B2C) 전자상거래 시장규모 또한 1조원을 넘어서는 등 전체 국내 전자상거래 시장 규모가 18조원을 넘어 설 전망이다. 이는 정보통신시스템에 대한 사회 전반의 의존도가 한층 증대하고 있음을 보여주는 단적인 예라 할 수 있다 오늘날 인터넷 사용이 보편화되고 전자상거래의 규모가 커져 갈수록 정보보호시스템에 대한 신뢰성 및 안전성에 대한 입증 노력 또한 더 강하게 요구되고 있는게 사실이다. 특히 안전성이 입증되진 않은 취약한 정보보호시스템을 사용한 시스템 구축은 오히려 그 위험성을 증가시킬 수 있음을 최근의 많은 해킹사례를 통해 경험한바 있다, 향후 예견되는 이러한 엄청난 사회적 손실을 막기 위한 제도적 노력의 일환으로 미국, 영국, 독일, 프랑스 등 선진국에서는 10여년 전부터 자국의 환경에 적합한 평가기준을 마련하여 정보보호시스템을 평가해오고 있다 본고에서는 정보보호시스템 평가제도와 관련하여 최근의 국제동향과 그에 따른 국내 대응방안을 모색해 보고자한다. 특히 정보보호시스템 평가를 위한 국제기준의 CC(Common Criteria)와 이를 기반으로 맺어진 MRA(Mutual Recognition Arrangement)의 전개과정을 살펴보고 유럽의 상호인정협정인 ITSEC-MRA의 출범배경과 올 5월에 새롭게 출범한 CC-RA체제와 특징적인 모습을 고찰해 보고자한다.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.19-36
• /
• 2001

The aim of the study is to explore some problems that we have to solve to execute assessments effectively and in agreement with the objectives of them. We analysed the practices of some assessments Including our national assessment of educational achievement and the third international mathematics and science study with focussing on the frames of assessments, the analyses of results, and the items presented in the assessments. The results of the study are the following. Firstly, we need to make the frame of assessment to agree with the objectives of assessment and to reflect the characteristics of the item related to a few areas. Secondly, we need to analyse the results of assessment with reflecting the frames of assessment. Thirdly, we need to discuss more concretely on the level and presentation of items including the order of conditions to need to solve the items. And lastly, we need to minimize the difference caused by the variations of translation in the international assessments.

• International Area Studies Review
• /
• v.21 no.1
• /
• pp.303-324
• /
• 2017

Current methods to evaluate the performance of ROK military contingents to UN missions unnecessarily raises the issues of relevance, validity and reliability. Thus, this article aims to suggest how the result based evaluation (RBE) model which is widely adopted in the UN field missions as well as the international development community would be modified and applied to peace operation of the ROK contingent. As a result of the study, the model presents a framework that integrates the planning process and monitoring and evaluation with a logical framework, which entails a cycle of assessment of pre-deployment planning, monitoring and phased evaluation, and post-deployment evaluation. Secondly, according to measurement of RBE benchmarks to the present ROK's monitoring and evaluation system, factors in an evaluation unit and a logical framework approach are unmet or partly met to the benchmarks. In addition, ex-post impact evaluation has been rarely performed. Finally, the policy recommendations for resolution of the aforementioned challenges as well as a joint evaluation unit, participated by experts in a civilian, public, and a military domain are proposed.

• Korean Journal of Comparative Education
• /
• v.28 no.5
• /
• pp.1-19
• /
• 2018

The purpose of educational assessments such as the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) is to compare groups such as countries. When the unit of measurement is above the student level, group-level diagnostic assessment based on multilevel item response theory (ML-IRT) can be considered just as cognitive diagnosis models are developed from item response theory. This study suggests an ML-IRT-based group-level diagnostic assessment model by modifying an item feature model by Park and bolt (2008). The model is illustrated on the recently released TIMSS 2015 Grade 8 mathematics assessment. The results provide skill profiles for the studied countries and the nine cognitive attributes; that is, the attribute effects can be compared across the countries and also across the attributes. By controlling unexplained variance, the suggested model may provide more reliable and more informative group-level comparisons. The results are interpreted using an example. Limitations and directions for future research are also discussed.

• Nuclear industry
• /
• v.28 no.12
• /
• pp.25-32
• /
• 2008

• KSCI Review
• /
• v.1 no.2
• /
• pp.169-200
• /
• 1995