• Title/Summary/Keyword: 국가기록관리기구

Search Result 30, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

A Study on the National Archives and Records Management Committee (국가기록관리위원회 연구)

  • Kwak, Kun-hong
    • The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
    • /
    • no.58
    • /
    • pp.5-29
    • /
    • 2018
  • This article analyses 10 years of the operation condition of the National Archives and Records Management Committee since its constitution. The object is to provide basic data for its evaluation. The Committee deliberated specific issues defined by records management act. The issues and the reports were concentrated on the task of the National Archives. As a consequence, the Committee could not play a role as a governance organization but as merely a consultative body of the National Archives.

A Comparative Study on Archives Management System in North America (북미지역 기록관리체제에 관한 비교 연구)

  • Noh, Kyung-Ran;Park, Hee-Young
    • Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
    • /
    • v.4 no.2
    • /
    • pp.164-191
    • /
    • 2004
  • Archives managements practices and laws are different according to various histories and traditions of nations. And it depends on a various of specific conditions of each nation. This paper reviews each laws, regulations, and organization concerned with archives managements of America and Canada that lead in archives managements, although they have relatively short histories. And this paper reviews acquisitions, classification and cataloging, and user access of archives in central archives management institutions. Finally, it reviews education system and professional positions of archivists in America and Canada.

Evaluation and Overlook on the National Archives System in the Perspective of Democracy (민주주의 관점으로 본 국가기록관리체계 평가와 전망)

  • Jo, Minji;Lee, Young-nam
    • The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
    • /
    • no.53
    • /
    • pp.5-43
    • /
    • 2017
  • This article adapts the democratic approach to the National Archives System. We must now search for a new archival landscape. Authors are agreeing that democracy is a basic principle for the new national archives model. This research looks into the direction of reform of the national record organizations in terms of individuality, integrity, and professionalism. It is, the fact that there are discussions rising on the need to reform the national records organization in the recent perspective of democracy. Democracy is a system that takes responsibility of even the results. This article describes all the discussions on what the best model for national archives system could be. In this social regulation, the archives carry out a noble mission of accountability. The discussion that suggests a clear perspective of democracy must be taken in to notice. Authors try to represent the voices of records managers. They also argue that records managers are the common wealth for our society. The national archives system is now the signature for the moral identity of national ruling powers. We argue that the new archives model should be derived from the point of the Candle Revolution.

New Government's Responsibility and Achievement in Records & Archives Management (공공기록물 관리에 있어 이명박정부의 책임과 '업적')

  • Lee, Seung-Hwi
    • The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
    • /
    • no.18
    • /
    • pp.257-280
    • /
    • 2008
  • The purpose of this paper is reviewing the hot issue called 'draining away the presidential records' case occurred recently and finding the root cause why the state of affairs has been happened in Korea. Though the presidential records management law ensures the rights for the prior president to view his presidential records, the prior president has copied his presidential records produced while in office and moved to his private house at his retirement. He might have interpreted his right to his presidential records too broadly and done the 'draining away' them. There was a motive why the prior president did that at that time. The reason was because the National Archives didn't guarantee the services for right viewing the records to him who wanted to review his records from right after his retirement. The National Archives have judged the draining away the prior presidential records as illegal and accused a few public servants suspected to be responsible for the affairs. The formal accuser is the National Archives, but the actual accuser might be the current Presidential Secretariat. Whatever the results of juristic judgement are, the reason why the records management field should focus and treat this case importantly is that the collapse possibility of the protection wall needed essentially and critically to the Presidential records becomes very high. The root cause of this case might exist in the fact that the records and archives management organizations have not owned the political independence. But the National Archives has submitted the revised bill of the public records and archives management law which lower the position of the National Records Management Committee controlled under from the Prime Minister to the Ministry of Administration and Security. It might be hot concern that the records and archives management organizations have difficulty for keeping the political independence if the revision would be passed. Besides the political independence factor, the most important factor needed for the right records management is the establishing the professional specificity of records management. The specific action for the establishing professional specificity would be employing of specialists and introducing the open official appointment. But it was found from the reorganization after the governmental change that the professional specificity of the National Archives have been reduced. Although the policies introduced by the new government are worrying, it might be an inheritance from the prior government. If new government would build establish the institution for the political independence of the records and archives management organizations and expand the employment of the records management professions to the local government, these affairs can be not only the responsibilities but also the achievements of the new government.

'Demolition and Reconstruction' : The Direction of Organizational Reform in the Field of History and Archives for the Next Government ('해체와 재구성' 차기 정부의 역사·기록 분야 조직 개혁 방향)

  • Kwak, KunHong
    • The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
    • /
    • no.52
    • /
    • pp.39-58
    • /
    • 2017
  • It is the responsibility of the government organization in the field of history and archives to control preproduction of records and their production sphere. Moreover, it should also manage all kinds of archives and presidential records as its function is to manage and share public information, and carry out compilations of historical records. With this, this study explains how having all these functions would make the ideal reorganization of the government. It should correspond to principle of Government's reorganization such as transparency, responsibility, communication. A plan for reformation needs two-track approach. I would like to propose the establishment of the 'Ministry of National Archives' or the 'National Memory Committee' at the organization that is in charge of national records and memory management. It means that the National memory isn't limited to public sphere. In terms of Total archives, the organizations should contain the whole community's memory. This organization should be formed independently.

The Task and View of National Archive System in the Fourth Industrial Revolution Era: Cloud Record Management System (4차 산업혁명 시대에서의 국가기록관리 현실과 전망: 클라우드 기록관리시스템 운영을 중심으로)

  • Nam, Kyeong-ho
    • Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
    • /
    • v.19 no.3
    • /
    • pp.205-222
    • /
    • 2019
  • This study analyzed the problems that occurred while constructing and operating the cloud record management system at the record management workplace and suggested ways to improve the system. In the study, the cloud record management system has the following problems: first, it has not been accompanied by the change in the legislative system. Second, it has not been utilizing the benefits of cloud technology. Third, it has not been considering the changes after the system construction. Given this, the study suggested three improvement plans to solve these problems: first, in relation to the reformed legislative system, the study proposed the diversification of records management units (file-item structure) and the restriction on access to records. Second, the study suggested a system redesign by improving the current work process based on paper documents. Third, to solve records management issues, the study presented the establishment of the governance body and the proactive countermeasure of the National Archives of Korea.

A Study on a Democratic Records Management System in Korea (자율과 분권, 연대를 기반으로 한 국가기록관리 체제 구상)

  • Kwak, Kun-Hong
    • The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
    • /
    • no.22
    • /
    • pp.3-35
    • /
    • 2009
  • We have innovated the records management since 2004. So, We innovated the electronic records management, transparency, and accountability. From these results, we could mark a turning point to plant the democratic values in the government It is very surprising, but it is fact that there are the estrangement between the high level institutionalization and low level records cultural soil. But after starting new government, things have been going backward. We have experienced the hyper-politicized problem, shrinking governance problem, regressive personnel policies in the National Archives of Korea. 'New Innovation Model' has resulted the shrinking democratic values, and the growing the bureaucratism. At this point of change, it will be meaningful to review the future of records management. First, we should make the more archives to realize the self-control decentralization model. It means that all local governments has the duty to build the archives, and to operate it with a principle of autonomy. Second, We should start the culture movement to build the more archives, the small archives in private sector. Archives are necessary in the NGO, Universities, firms, art, media, etc. And the small archives are necessary in the various communities, which enhance the rights of minority. All these will spread the democratic values in our society. Third, right democracy system should be operated for the political neutrality, independency. This problem is not prohibited within the national archives innovation model. So, we should transfer the powers of government to local government, and we should re-innovate the National Archives Committee will have the role to make the important records management policies. In short, Unless going to forward with the more democratic values, it would go backward 'records management without democracy'.

Record management system and Registry System in the Gabo Reform (갑오개혁기 기록관리제도와 등기실체제(Registry System))

  • Lee, Seung-Hwi
    • The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
    • /
    • no.17
    • /
    • pp.85-114
    • /
    • 2008
  • One of the features of record management during the Gabo Reform is that the documents office controled producing and distribution of records. The records completed the operations were sent the record office and classified and arranged. previous researches understood this record management system during Gabo Reform were introduced from Japan. This article clarifies that new record management system settled through Meiji Restoration were introduced from German(Prussian) registry system at the time. However, German registry system managed current records and this system was based on modern record management system which open the records to the public with archives. Japan accepted only registry system, current record management system of German, and didn't established archives at Meiji regime. It is same with Joseon Dynasty during the Gabo Reform regime. Therefore, the record related regulation at the Gabo Reform regime could not be judged to be a modern system. The regulations on records at Gabo Reform regime had no terms about people's right or open the records to the public which decides modern record regulations. The meaning of record system during Gabo Reform regime is that the value of records and name of organizations coincides with record life cycle. The documents office managed current records and record office classified and filed closed records. Concept of "current record=document=documents office, non-current record=record= record office" didn't succeed to today. The term 'record' is used as current record or non-current record without difference.

A Study of Record Management system and organization in Asia - India, Singapore, Vietnam - (아시아의 기록관리 제도 및 체계에 대한 연구 - 인도, 싱가폴, 베트남을 중심으로 -)

  • Moon, Ju-Young;Kim, Na-Reum
    • Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
    • /
    • v.4 no.1
    • /
    • pp.149-176
    • /
    • 2004
  • We treated Asia's records management and system based on India, Singapore and Vietnam. We research the main content and characteristics of the law of records management of each country. We research them from the viewpoint of organization and specialists-training system and records management system. Finally we compare each country and talk about current events and points. We can find out good chances of mutual association through understanding each country. It will be helpful to settle a suitable records management system for our country.

The character of the archives and records management 'reform' from the third quarter of 2004 in korea (한국 국가기록 관리 체제 '혁신'의 성격 - 기록관리법 개정안 분석을 중심으로 -)

  • Kwak, Kun-Hong
    • The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
    • /
    • no.13
    • /
    • pp.3-40
    • /
    • 2006
  • The archives and records management 'reform' has spreaded out through the third quarter of 2004. There are many evidences such as the change of the Office of the President's management on the record production, 'the reforming road map for the final draft on the archives and records management.' This method spreads into the Cabinets. So it is improved these rosy conditions was upgraded by the laws and regulations. We also hope that the conditions of the records management to be a higher level than before. However the actual conditions of the records management are not good comparing with the law and regulations. I think this unbalance is a serious problem. The reason of the 'failed history' during past time was caused not by the laws itself but by the indifference and negligence on the laws. The academic field and NGO have continuously required some essential suggestions on that problem; political neutrality and independent of the National Archives, the employment of specialists and the improvement of their skills etc. But these requirements have not accepted yet. This revised records management law also has not applied to the road map wholly. Even though the outward growth during that time is remarkable, we need to learn some instructions by way of the 'failed history'. Therefore our urgent task is to narrow the gap between the new system and the actual conditions based on long and short term projects.