• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.14 no.4
• /
• pp.15-45
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study is to find out the effect of science journal writings on the cognitive and affective features of the science gifted students. In this research, the tasks of on-line science journal writings were assigned for 6 months and the subjects in this study were 21 students of Chemistry Division of the Center for Science Gifted Education, Seoul National University. Consequently in science journals, science concepts are found in various aspects according to the writing formats, and psychological and behavioral characteristics of the science-gifted are revealed in positive or negative aspects. In cognitive prospect, science journal writing equips students with better understanding about science concepts and scientific research. In affective prospect, science journal writing help students improve observation and attitude toward science as wren as writing skills. Accordingly, science journal writing has positive effect on cognitive and affective characteristics of the science-gifted. In conclusion, acknowledged by most of science-gifted students as both beneficial and appropriate in their education program, science journal writing should be emphasized in education for science-gifted students.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.357-369
• /
• 1998

Science-related affective domain is considered as a very important domain for achieving students' scientific literacy. Most science educational objectives include some objectives about affective domain such as scientific attitudes, values, curiosity, interests and concerns about nature and science. In this research, the evaluation framework and items of science-related affective domain were developed. The evaluation framework consists of three main categories such as cognition, interest and scientific attitudes and 16 subcategories. The validity of the evaluation framework is tested by ten science educators. Forty-eight items are selected among item pool by considering item response analysis and item-test correlation coefficient. The Cronbach ${\alpha}$ of the tests is 0.83(cognition and interest) and 0.86(scientific attitudes). The results of the test are as follows. First, boys got higher scores than girls. Second, elementary students got higher scores than secondary students. Finally. students in urban areas showed higher scores than those in rural areas.

• Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• v.65 no.6
• /
• pp.468-483
• /
• 2021

The purpose of this research was to analyze the impact of Collaborative Problem solving for Character competency (CoProC) applied science classes on the character competence and scientific affective characteristics of vocational high school students. To achieve this, two junior classes of chemical industry majors in a vocational high school, were selected as the experimental group with 43 participants, and character competence test, scientific affective characteristic test, group discussion voice recordings, reflection activity sheets were analyzed. Based on the results of the study, the experimental group showed a statistically significant differences in value for the total character competence test score compared to the control group, and it had statistically significant differences in the nine lower character competence factors. Based on the results of the scientific affective characteristic test result, the experimental group was higher in total score to a statistically significant degree compared to the control group, and showed a statistically significant difference in seven of the lower factors, excluding consistency in interest. Therefore, science classes with CoProC applied were effective in cultivating the character competence and enhancing the scientific affective characteristics of vocational high school students.

• Journal of Science Education
• /
• v.42 no.2
• /
• pp.165-181
• /
• 2018

This study compares and analyzes the characteristics and effects of various educational contextual variables according to students' achievement level and gender groups based on the results of PISA 2015 science domain. PISA 2015 included additional variables about teaching-learning and affective characteristics in the field of science, because science was the main domain of PISA 2015. The results of the mediation analysis using a multiple group structural equation model showed that the environment and strategy for the teaching and learning had a positive effect on the affective characteristics, and also positively affected science achievement through the mediator of the affective characteristics. Particularly, the environment and strategy for the teaching and learning was the most effective in improving the affective characteristics for the low achievement group. It was found that the difference of the mediated effect between achievement level groups was statistically significant, but that between male and female students was not. Therefore, the appropriate the environment and strategy for the teaching and learning will need to be emphasized consistently to improve students' cognitive and affective achievement. The implications and suggestions of these results were discussed.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.279-302
• /
• 2009

This paper was to examine the effects of university-based science gifted education program on scientifically gifted students' science problem finding ability and cognitive-affective factors. For this study, 69 scientifically gifted students with previous Silted education experiences at the university-based science gifted education centers and 91 scientifically gifted students without any previous gifted education experiences were compared. Both groups of students were currently enrolled at a specialized science high school. To compare both groups, scientific problem finding ability, science anxiety, science related attitude, self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, test anxiety, cognitive strategies, and self-regulation were measured. The results indicate that there was no significant difference on scientific problem finding ability between these two groups. The comparison between the past and now in the aspects of variables observed in the study showed that both groups of students were decreased in the science anxiety and self-efficacy. But the test anxiety was significantly increased compared to the past in both groups. Implications of the study were discussed in depth.

• Journal of Science Education
• /
• v.33 no.2
• /
• pp.220-236
• /
• 2009

This study aimed to analyze the disadvantaged gifted students' affective characteristics and needs. The subjects of this study were 93 disadvantaged gifted elementary and middle school students in Daegu and Kyongsang-Bukdo Providence. The survey questionnaires including learning motivation, beliefs on intelligence, beliefs on academic achievement, interpersonal relationship, family variables, affective characteristics related to science and self-esteems were used to investigate their affective characteristics and needs. The results indicated that the disadvantaged gifted students showed the different characteristics on their intelligence, academic achievement, and family variables compared to those of general gifted students. They showed that they needed the financial and affective supports including transportation and continuous attention to disadvantaged gifted students.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.6 no.4
• /
• pp.361-372
• /
• 2004

This study is designed to investigate intellectual, emotional, and creative characteristics of mathematically gifted students. In this paper, we analyze their proof examples, responses to questionnaire on mathematical aptitude and social coping, and scores for Torrance creativity test(figure) in comparison with scientific gifted and general students.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.24 no.6
• /
• pp.1272-1282
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of science journal writing on science-related affects of scientifically gifted students at middle school level. Twenty one gifted students attending a university science gifted program wrote science journals for two months in a web-supported environment. The data sources include student journals, questionnaire and exit interviews. The results indicate that science journal writing has influenced the students positively in the affective domain, and in particular, cognitions of science, interests in science and scientific attitudes.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.49-73
• /
• 2004

본 연구는 과학영재학교 학생들의 지적, 정의적 특성을 분석하고, 다양한 특성에 따른 학생들의 교과 선택 경향, 학업성취도, 개별연구과제 선택 경향, 진로선택 및 학교 적응 정도를 파악하는데 그 목적이 있다. 본 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해 영재아들의 지적 ${\cdot}$ 정의적 특성 및 학교적응을 살펴보았다. 이에 따른 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 영재학생의 경우 출신 지역에 따라 영재교육을 받았는지의 여부에 차이가 났다. 즉, 영재교육을 받은 학생 중 대다수가 수도권과 영남 지역의 학생들이었다. 둘째, 학생들이 지적인 학습 능력에는 만족도가 높으나 대인관계 능력과 관련하여서는 상대적으로 만족도가 낮았다. 그리고 영재학교의 학생들은 일반학교 학생들과 성격 유형상 차이점을 보이고 있다. 즉, 영재학교 학생들은 일반학교 학생들에 비해 상대적으로 내향적이고 미래 지향적 혹은 개념적이며, 감정보다는 논리적 과정을 우선시한다. 셋째, PT 과목 통과에 있어서 생물과 정보 영역을 제외하고는 영재교육원에서의 교육과 PT 통과와는 상관이 없는 것으로 보고되었다. 넷째, 과학영재학교 학생들은 R&E 주제를 선택하는데 있어서 물리 과목에 가장 높은 선호도를 보였다. 그리고 이러한 선호도에는 남녀 간의 차이가 있었다. 또한 영재교육의 여부와 큰 상관이 없었다.

• 한국과학교육학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2008.08a
• /
• pp.105.2-105.2
• /
• 2008