• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.52 no.2
• /
• pp.127-144
• /
• 2021

The purpose of this study is to redefine the competencies of teacher librarians and to derive implications for training and re-educating teacher librarians by analyzing the priorities of competencies. A questionnaire survey targeting teacher librarians based on analytic hierarchy process has been conducted. The results indicate that in terms of the upper-level areas of competencies, it was found that they prioritized teacher librarians' competencies in the following order: information specialists, teachers, administrators, and cooperative leaders. Analysis of the lower levels of competency indicates that the priorities of the required competencies are listed in the following order: collection development, management and preservation, teaching and learning, media production, information service, library cooperative instruction, library assisted instruction, content curation. Therefore, being able to provide information resources by developing a collection of books to support the educational process in school libraries was found to be a critical competency. It seems necessary to cultivate the capacity to manage online and offline collections and produce and provide various teaching media and services by utilizing school library resources. It seems to give implications for the education of teacher librarians.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2007.05a
• /
• pp.976-980
• /
• 2007

본 논문에서는 비점원오염 관리를 위한 지역선정을 위하여 계층분석적 의사결정기법에 의한 접근 방법을 제시하였다. 주어진 유역 내에서의 비점원오염의 중요기여 인자간의 관계를 반영한 것이 본 연구의 특징이다. 주요인자로는 경사도, 유달거리, 유효강우비, 불투수면적비, 토양유실량이다. 각 인자의 가중치는 계층분석적 의사결정기법(AHP)으로 구하였으며 각 인자의 가중값과 속성 값의 단순 부가가중 합으로 표현되는 비점원오염 영향지수를 정의하였다. 높은 영향지수를 가지는 지역을 비점원오염 관리지역으로 제안하였으며, 시험유역으로 발안HP#6유역을 선정하여 적용해보았다. 관리지역 결과를 비교하기 위하여 AGNPS 모의를 통한 비점원오염 부하량간의 분석을 시도하였다. 비교 및 분석을 위해 Moran's I를 이용하였으며, T-N은 $0.38{\sim}0.45$, T-P는 $0.15{\sim}0.22$의 범위를 보였다. 이는 두 접근 방법이 상이함에도 공간적으로 유사한 경향을 보인다는 것을 말한다. 본 연구에서 제시하는 방법은 비점원오염 관리지역 선정에 있어서 적용가능 함을 의미한다.

• Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment
• /
• v.8 no.4
• /
• pp.36-44
• /
• 2003

The lack of water resources is becoming a serious issue throughout the world. The water shortage in Korea is expected to increase dramatically through 2020. The amount of water shortage could amount to 1.8 and 2.6 billion cubic meters in 2011 and 2020, respectively. Groundwater can be a solution to this matter in some places. Especially, underground dams are known to be advantageous over conventional dams, evert if they have some drawbacks such as their limited location for development and small sizes. The analytic hierarchy process(AHP) is an analytical tool, supported by simple mathematics, which enables one to explicitly rank tangible and intangible factors against each other for the purpose of resolving conflicts or setting priorities. In order to check the applicability of AHP to the evaluation of underground dam sites, lour candidate locations were chosen. They have suffered from problems like water-supply shortage and delayed dam construction. The analysis results are compared with those of the previous study using a conventional method. It is believed that the developed method can provide central or local government with a basis for reasonable decision-making regarding underground dam development.

• Journal of the military operations research society of Korea
• /
• v.36 no.3
• /
• pp.15-27
• /
• 2010

Dual-use technology, upon its effective development, can be a highly efficient technology that may be utilized for both achieving industry competitiveness and building National Security. Although research needs for such development methodology and call for corresponding efforts have long been proposed, actual outputs have not reached its desired level. Hence, this paper aims to provide more concrete and quantitative process in technology planning used to activate development of dual-use technology, considering dual usability and transferability of such technologies. In such effort, we propose use of patent analysis and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for determining priorities for spin-off defense technology. First, the necessity of R&D and potential spin-off are measured based on patent information. Second, the necessity of R&D results from a quantitative analysis and the potentials spin-off are derived from analysis of patent citations. Then, AHP is used to calculate the importance of evaluating factors, and to assess alternative scores. Finally, we present the result of spin-off priority. A case study on the Korea defense technology is presented to illustrate the proposed method. We expect this study to make contribution in vision making of the military R&D spending.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety
• /
• v.28 no.5
• /
• pp.692-699
• /
• 2022

The fishing village new-deal 300 project covers 300 fishing villages and ports for integrated development including reforming backward facilities and utilizing regionally indigenous resources for specialized programs. An analysis was conducted to decide selection factors in the fishing village new-deal 300 project through the expert interview based on AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process). The results of high-class appraisal items showed that the weights were ranked in the order of the development conditions and basic plan, project effects, project plan, and project execution and management. The project effect obtained 15.57 point in the AHP analysis, whereas the guideline stipulated the point as 6 point for the project effect item, The derived weights for each appraisal item in this study will hereafter be referred in determining the assessment points for the fishing village and port development projects.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.35 no.3
• /
• pp.557-565
• /
• 2015

Sea level rise due to global warming causes seawater intrusion into aquifers in coastal areas. Seawater intrusion vulnerability index was developed using PSR (Pressure, State, Response) model and analysis hierarchy process (AHP). Coastal regions in Korea, Gangwon-do Sokcho-si, Incheon-si Ganghwa-gun, Chungcheongnam-do Taean-gun, Jeollanam-do Yeosu-si, Jindo-gun were chosen and 14 indicators were selected by considering the humanities, economic, social, environmental aspects. Re-scaling method was used for the standardization of indices and questionnaire survey was performed to calculate weight values for each index. The results showed that Yeosu-si was selected as the most vulnerable region to seawater intrusion. The seawater intrusion index developed in this research can be used to analyze the vulnerable regions to seawater intrusion and to establish a policy to minimize the seawater intrusion problems in coastal regions.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.9 no.4
• /
• pp.254-264
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study was to develop a performance measurement factor of Balanced Scorecard(BSC) for health-care organization. We did also the research to evaluate the validity and reliability of these indicators. Fifty six health-care organizations are participated in a survey questionnaires. This questionnaires consists of 53-questions, which are the performance evaluation indicators designed by researcher, which are based on the Norton and Kaplan's BSC-Framework. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was carried out and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied to analyze the weight and significances of each factor. Factor analysis of the BSC resulted in 11 major measurement factors (Eigenvalue >1.0). The AHP analysis showed the list of the hospital BSC measurement factors and its KPI(Key Performance Indicator) weighted by its significance priorities. The recommendable degree of reliability and validity of these BSC factors suggests that these factors are adequate for performance measurements of the health-care organizations in Korea.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.8 no.3
• /
• pp.19-37
• /
• 2010

One of the core issues in the realization of e-government is the effective implementation of a website. The current trend of e-government is developing individual web sites and portals, covering such fields as education, tax, economics, real estate, travel, and health. Evaluating e-government web sites is essential for improving web sites. These principles can be included in usability in a broader concept. Website usability has attracted considerable research on website evaluation and has been regarded as one of the most important criteria for measuring and evaluating websites. Usable e-government web sites make citizens willing to search for helpful information or solve their civil applications. The objective of this paper is to suggest an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method for evaluating e-government web sites. The proposed AHP method has two special characteristics compared to general AHP approaches. First, all citizens who are e-government users can evaluate both the usability criteria and the web sites, but the weighting mechanism differs between criteria and web sites. Secondly, a pairwise comparison is time-consuming and not cost effective with many criteria. Therefore for evaluating a website with respect to a sub-criterion, we develop checklist items as measure scales with a seven-point rating. This method is efficient as it enable us to avoid the pairwise comparison mechanism between sub-criteria. A new computation procedure for the AHP is developed that combines and synthesizes priorities of portals in the case that two decision maker groups are involved.

• Journal of the Society of Disaster Information
• /
• v.15 no.4
• /
• pp.540-547
• /
• 2019

Purpose: This paper is for the improvement of the fire gate performance that occurs between the construction company and the residents. A survey was conducted on experts in the construction to prepare the causes and measures for the suit. Method: The application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) resulted in the following conclusions. Results: TIn the 2nd tier, 28percent of the "strengthening standards for installation of fire prevention zones" included in the "institutional strengthening of stnadards" of the 1st tier had higher importance. In the 3rd tier, "strengthening the installation standards by floor area" and "strengthening the standard of fire-resistant structures" showed high importance. Conclusion: The results suggest that detailed legal criteria for detailed installation criteria with varying site conditions are needed.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.39 no.4
• /
• pp.51-69
• /
• 2008

This study tired to develop the web credibility evaluation model by calculating weighted values and sensitivities of indicators which presented on preceding researches using Analytic Hierarchy Process. "Expert Choice 2000" was used as the tool for analysing AHP. 25 experts are answered for this questionnaire who are selected by judgement sampling method, one of the non-probability sampling method. Also, sensitivity analyses was performed to graphically see how the alternatives change with respect to the importance of the indicators or sub-indicators. The main results are summarized as followings; i) importance analysis in first level factors: trust-worthiness(0,606), expertness(0.222), safety(0.173), ii) importance analysis in second level factors: trustfulness (0.519), reputation(0.087), usefulness (0.102), timeliness(0,093), competency(0.027), security(0.115), reliability(0,058). iii) some of the importance analysis in third level factors: the site provides comprehensive information that is attributed to a specific source(0.252), the site has articles that list citations and references(0.153), the site contains user opinions and reviews(0.072), etc. iv) sensitivity analyses showed that the importance of the indicators or sub-indicators are slightly changed with respect to the alternatives change.